right on the edge of trolling!I had fun with it!
right on the edge of trolling!I had fun with it!
Seriously though.right on the edge of trolling!
As I said until Lend Lease all RN repair work in USN Yards was cash and carry, after that it went on the Lend Lease books. As to the transports, that was a Charter paid for under Lend Lease. IIRC the 72 hour limit was at the option of the ports nation. Also by 1941 the Rules of War and Hauge treaties had except in the case of POWs in Europe and the Med had been dumped. Starting withy Germany's actions against Poland, Denmark ,and Norway.Seriously though.
What explanation was given for the USS Wakefield, USS West Point and USS Mt. Vernon in carrying the 18th Division?
The USN Chain of Command was seriously concerned about the ramifications of transporting belligerents. Not the
escort so much.
Likewise with the HMS Indomitable being in a Norfolk Navy Yard drydock for upwards of ten (10) days in NOV 1941.
The Graf Spee was only afforded 72 hours under the Hague Convention (1907 or 1899).
The British have chartered commissioned US Warships for WS-12X . That it's legit and legal under Lend Lease is now proven. It would certainly simplify things, if the British just charter the entire US military. In for penny, in for a pound.As I said until Lend Lease all RN repair work in USN Yards was cash and carry, after that it went on the Lend Lease books. As to the transports, that was a Charter paid for under Lend Lease. IIRC the 72 hour limit was at the option of the ports nation. Also by 1941 the Rules of War and Hauge treaties had except in the case of POWs in Europe and the Med had been dumped. Starting withy Germany's actions against Poland, Denmark ,and Norway.
Yeah, I think the conspiracy theory is crap. But the US administration did objectively push Japan too far in the summer of 1941, almost certainly for the reason you stated. Misunderstanding how the Japanese regime would react to pressure. And possibly not realising how quickly the embargo would cripple their military operations?That is laughable!,
You have fallen into the often disproven conspiracy theory that FDR wanted to provoke a war with Japan. He was failed by his State Department on understanding how far Japan could be pushed. He never violated his oath of office. The work on foreign vessels in American ship yards was until Lend Lease (passed into Law by both Houses of Congress) was on a cash basis. That was no different then building warships for foreign countries. IMO, FDR never waxed poetically on Neutrality, He played a political game with it. Escorting vessels at sea is no different then today's " Freedom of the Seas" operations.
Reuben James was sunk on Oct 31, 1941, taking a torpedo intended for a merchant ship while escorting a convoy - and when I say escorting, I mean attacking a submerged U-boat with depth charges.Likewise with the HMS Indomitable being in a Norfolk Navy Yard drydock for upwards of ten (10) days in NOV 1941.
The Graf Spee was only afforded 72 hours under the Hague Convention (1907 or 1899).
OTL there were a handfull of Dutch fighter pilots transfered from the UK to the NEI. They had experience in the war over Holland and participated in the BoB. The KNIL pilots were , just as the Dutch pilots during the war over Holland, quite daring, close to reckless, but lacked the tactical training/education. In OTL the handfull of Dutch pilots tried to change this, maybe under tighter RAF instructors improve.the input from the vastly experienced British pilots who unlike their Dutch counterparts have actually flown in combat, will mean that the Dutch fighters will be now flying in finger four formations, not vic threes
Just before the War over Holland in May 1940 the Dutch Army leaders recognised , as one of the few European armies the danger and potential of airborn attacks and assault by paratropers and planned the defense according, this with mixed results. Despite the near destruction of the German paratroopers this airborn asaults where a major factor in the early defeat in 1940. The delivery of a few more M3 scoutcars with .50 guns or the infamous Marmon Herrington CTLS's might help to defend the airfields a bit better.British input will ensure that the Dutch airfields will have some basic infrastructure to enable them to withstand enemy attack. Just dispersing the fuel and ammunition dumps and providing basic blast protection and camouflage
The KNIL was in trasition from a light armed army on foot and horse, capable to do offroad action to a motorised road bound army with heavier arms. Not sure if this was a correct path. On the other hand most battles took place in area's with well established infrastructure, airfields, oil installations, cities and ports. They might chose TL to extend the Korps Marechaussee te voet (literally "marshal corps on foot") which were almost the inventors of jungle contra guerrilla in the Atjeh war. The latter ended formaly 40 years ago, however the situation remained tense in Atjeh and Sumatra. To such an extend that the KNIL was sometimes literly stabbed in the back during the Japanese Invasion of Sumatra.The Dutch ground forces, will have begun to switch from being a colonial police force, to an effective army, capable of operating in the jungle and away from their home bases
Hi Butchpfd, I've not been able to find out much about this event, and the subsequent damages to Boise, so thank you for this. Wiki has an excellent map, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sape_Strait and expand the map, and what looks like plenty of room on google maps, is in fact quite a treacherous passage.The Sape Straight, where the Boise struck a reef, was a navigation pathway frequently taken by shipping,, for hundreds of years. For whatever reason either the Dutch missed marking the reef, or the chart the Boise was given was faulty. In the DEI, Straits were just as important as harbor entrances. Just look at a map of Indonesia.
Indeed the very reason that the two capital ships were there was to be seen. They were to be seen and disappear, repeatedly, so as to make clear to the Japanese that they would face opposition if they got frisky. Hence they were to be seen at various places: Darwin, Borneo, major ports in Indonesia, etc. The idea was to make them seem like a powerful force that could appear and exert itself at any point in the region.The latest post from our author raises some interesting points, one why are the British allowing the Japanese to run spy flights over Singapore, and
<<SNIP SNIP>>
However the British might be in a transition phase, where the old idea of establishing a deterrent and thus letting the Japanese know about the improvements to the defence capabilities of the colony is desirable. As apposed to the present situation where the deployment of naval units is a secret, and thus information to be withheld from the Japanese.
I had to look up damage reports to USS Boise to find it. Even there it, was barely a footnote to later battle damage,Hi Butchpfd, I've not been able to find out much about this event, and the subsequent damages to Boise, so thank you for this. Wiki has an excellent map, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sape_Strait and expand the map, and what looks like plenty of room on google maps, is in fact quite a treacherous passage.
Hi Butchpfd, I've not been able to find out much about this event, and the subsequent damages to Boise, so thank you for this. Wiki has an excellent map, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sape_Strait and expand the map, and what looks like plenty of room on google maps, is in fact quite a treacherous passage.
Seriously though.
What explanation was given for the USS Wakefield, USS West Point and USS Mt. Vernon in carrying the 18th Division?
The USN Chain of Command was seriously concerned about the ramifications of transporting belligerents. Not the
escort so much.
Likewise with the HMS Indomitable being in a Norfolk Navy Yard drydock for upwards of ten (10) days in NOV 1941.
The Graf Spee was only afforded 72 hours under the Hague Convention (1907 or 1899).
From The One Ship Fleet: USS Boise 1938-45 by Phillip Parkerson:I found the list of official USN damage reports, and there is none for the Boise's grounding. Apparently it was not classed as combat damage. The only reference I can find is in Adm Hart's war diary, that the Boise had struck a reef, and suffered an @ 20 foot gash on her lower hull, forward. It does not mention how wide or deep the damage was.
IMO, that would put the damage well forward of the superstructure. Since several sources state that Boise offloaded most off it's 6" ammunition for Marblehead, and 5" for Houston, it imo appears the flooding did not reach her magazines.
Hi Friendly Ghost, yes that's pretty much what I concluded as to what happened. The interesting thing here is the suggestion, that if the USN said she needed to remain in theatre, I think she could have been capable of doing that after a patch up! Just how long she was actually under repair in Bombay would be interesting to know, and whether a quicker turnaround might have happened in a safe Singapore Naval Base is something I wonder about.From The One Ship Fleet: USS Boise 1938-45 by Phillip Parkerson:
on 21 January 1942, she struck an unchartered reef off the island of Timor, ripping a huge gash in the hull. Thus, the cruiser had to put into Colombo, British Ceylon (modern-day Sri Lanka) for repairs. [...] where it remained for 11 days (9–18 February) awaiting a berth for repairs. When no room for her was found in Colombo, Boise departed on 18 February for Bombay (Mumbai), British India, where she went into dry dock.When temporary repairs were completed, Boise got underway from Bombay on 4 April 1942 and made for Mare Island Navy Yard at San Francisco, California, where she underwent an overhaul and refitting for war.So it seems that the damage, although enough to stop her proceeding with the mission she was on at the time, was not bad enough to stop her sailing long distances. There might be more in the Boise's own war diaries, but I don't have access to those.