Make Norse Christianization bloodier and drawn out?

Basically, I'm playing with this concept.

Scenario I have now: Killing Olaf Tryggvason (and his Hirdman Lief Ericson) after he has offended and alienated many of his subjects but before he can do serious damage to the Norse Pagan intelligensia (mass executions of Godi and Seideman for example). Basically have him make committed enemies for Christianity and then die before he can kill them.

Result I'm shooting for: Eventual Northern Crusade directed at Norway/Sweden creating the kind of cultural disruption we saw in the OTL Northern Crusades that were directed at the Balts. If on a scale of 1-10 the level of cultural disruption Christianization had is a 1-2 For the British Isles, 3-4 for OTL Scandinavia 6-7 for Saxony and 10 for old Prussia (where Prussian is extinct and the people mostly forgotten). I want to up the conversion in terms of violence to be in the 7-8 range with invasions from crusaders and burned halls and other stuff to keep the Ravens well fed.
 
Less unified (North) Germany, leaving less acute pressure for "convert or sword". Shifting back the troubles that OTL following the death of Otto II, a generation or two (the crown moving onto a toddler), and pair it with a more drawn out problem and the pressure could levirate for enough time, could be a way to go
 
Christianisation was an ongoing trend in Norway since a century, mostly because it was more established in Danemark at this point (and that Danish influence, especially political, was huge in Norway) and that because Christianity stressed a more unified kingship (especially with the model of fighting saint king that evolved in Scandinavia).

Generally, christian kings (or at least kings being distrustful of old ritual structures) searched as well a broader unification of Norway (it's telling that you don't have much division of Norway as Harald I did among his sons).

Even if Olaf dies only shortly after his accession to kingship, you'd still have a significant Christian inside and outside Norway to deal with.

As for Crusades : they are really unlikely to happen in this scenario as the concept wasn't formed yet, while being on the verge of being so by the late XIth and would likely not target Scandinavia.

So, in this initial scenario : you'd likely end with a division of Norway which doesn't imply a full-fledged pagan reaction (Eric Haakonsson may have tried this, but it didn't really shows), and on which the Christian king of Danemark would have the upper hand.
 
To summarize, it sounds as if preventing the conversion of Denmark by weakening the HRE in the 900s is key to delaying the Christianization long enough for the concept Crusades to become a thing.

Opens up a Denmark mini wank potentially. Do not know the HRE at the time very well but it seems very open to fracturing. Am I missing anything?
 
Top