Blair152
Banned
Hitler was never a good choice for Fuhrer of Germany. There are two reasons why I think this. Feel free to disagree. 1: Hitler never rose above the rank of
greiffeiter, (corporal), and 2: He wasn't the military genius he pretended to be. So who would have been a better choice? How about Germany's co-
commander of its army in the East during World War I? Erich Ludendorf.
Ludendorf was the only German general to defeat the Russians in the early
days of World War I. He defeated them in the Battle of Tannenberg. He also
almost defeated the Allies during the 1918 Michael Offensive. So how would
Germany under Erich Ludendorf differ from Germany under the Mad Corporal?
greiffeiter, (corporal), and 2: He wasn't the military genius he pretended to be. So who would have been a better choice? How about Germany's co-
commander of its army in the East during World War I? Erich Ludendorf.
Ludendorf was the only German general to defeat the Russians in the early
days of World War I. He defeated them in the Battle of Tannenberg. He also
almost defeated the Allies during the 1918 Michael Offensive. So how would
Germany under Erich Ludendorf differ from Germany under the Mad Corporal?