Vitruvius said:
Good point. I'm not clear on exactly how that was resolved. Whether her brother lost Lorraine because the French deposed their father and installed their cousin Nicholas or because their father married their mother before getting an official Papal annulment of his first marriage. It should be noted that Nicholas was a Bishop and Cardinal in Pectore so his own marriage required Papal dispensation as well. So if the French wanted the match it shouldn't be too hard to arrange the necessary paperwork, so to speak, to make it all legit. But I hadn't thought of the Polish match until Gonzaga suggested it and I too really like the idea so maybe that's just the better bet.
Well, in my eyes, both matches have their advantages. If TTL Louis XIV were to wed the heiress of Lorraine, he would increase the size of his kingdom, which is good news to him since he rules more lands. As for the Polish match, it would be a good way of making an ally of Poland, a country that has a border with Austria (An ennemy of France).
All depends on what would appear better at the time.
Vitruvius said:
That didn't stop her sister Henrietta. And I thought that there were some Catholic suitors considered before they settled on William of Orange. But I could be wrong. I agree its not the most likely but its a possibility. If not its definitely worth considering who she marries if not William of Orange.
Well, the problem of Mary is that she is the eldest daughter of Charles I, meaning her bloodline comes after her two older brothers (Charles II and James II). Chances she would inherit the throne are low, but Parliament would probably secure that she is wedded to a Protestant in case the two sons were to die childless (or prove unworthy of their throne).
I'm not saying the match could be impossible. But I think it would pose a problem to the Stuarts. Plus, Cromwell and his Commonwealth weren't that far off, so the Stuarts would not want to risk their throne so early.
I do admit that having her not marry William II of Orange would be an interesting scenario, although I do not know who else she could marry. By this, I mean I don't know her other possible suitors, not that I think the marriage was inevitable.
Vitruvius said:
Well the issue with Louis XIV's grandchildren is that they are the children of a Dauphin which I believe was unprecedented at the time. Normally French Kings had not lived so long as to be alive during the youths of their grandchildren. The only example I could find was Francis II who was born during the reign of Francis I. But Francis I died when he was 3 years old so he quickly became Dauphin and so never had any other title.
I can see at least two other cases. One is that of Louis IX, who was born during the reign of his grandfather Philip II Augustus (Louis IX was 9 when his grandfather died). Then there is Philip IV who was 2 when his own grandfather (Louis IX) died. I also think Charles V of France was born during the reign of his granfather Philip VI, but I'll have to check.
However, it's true that in those three cases, the grandson of the French King was never granted an Apanage.
Vitruvius said:
So what do you title the son of a Dauphin? They decided on Burgundy, again unprecedented as Burgundy had only been bestowed as an appanage twice by French Kings. Each time it resulted in a long lasting dynasty. The first time it was granted to the third son of Robert II and the second time it was given to the fourth and youngest son of Jean II. Burgundy was thus considered to come after Berry (which seems to usually be given to the third son).
It only became powerful because of the wealth and lands its Dukes accrued. Which brings up another point. The last time it was given out as an appanage it didn't work out so well for the French Kings. So unsurprisingly after the death of Charles the Bold the French Kings never bestowed the title again until le Petit Dauphin. Partially because it was claimed, even up to the time we're considering here, by the Habsburgs. Thus giving out a significant and contested appanage to your third son when your brother has already proven that he's willing to defy the King and conspire with enemies of France may not be something Louis XIII is interested in doing.
By the time Louis XIV bestowed the title the power of the nobility had been greatly reduced and the Spanish Habsburgs defeated thus the appanage would be less significant. That's also why you see very ancient appanages like Toulousse, Vermandois and Vexin being revived for his legitimated children. Therefore Berry is most likely here and Burgundy is only a less likely 'possibility' for his younger brother Charles and even then I'm not sure about it.
Flawless reasonning. In this case, Berry is indeed most likely.
Another thing crossed my mind. When we talked about Philippe, we said he would get Anjou then Orléans like his OTL counterpart. OTL, when Philippe got the Duchy of Orléans, he gave back Anjou to the crown and Anjou was later awarded to the second grandson of Louis XIV. In this scenario, it's possible after TTL Philippe gets Orléans, Henri swaps Berry for Anjou. What do you think?
Vitruvius said:
Well if we assume Henri gets Berry and considering the issues surrounding Burgundy I'd tend towards Alençon. Henri II gave it to his fourth son and it had previously been used at times for third sons so it seems more likely. But its up to Louis XIII and so he could always get more creative and revive a title like Burgundy.
Given what you told me earlier on Burgundy, I think the title wouldn't be given by Louis XIII. TTL Louis XIV might, but I think it would be a bit early with Louis XIII.
Alençon seems a good possibility indeed if Berry isn't there. Then, there is possibly the fact Alençon might be swapped for Berry later. It all comes with the reasonning I have that if Philippe swaps Anjou for Orléans, then Henri might swap Berry for Anjou and thus Charles could swap Alençon for Berry. It wouldn't seem impossible since Henri II's fourth son (you mentionned him) swapped Alençon for Anjou when his brother Henri III became King.
Vitruvius said:
While the naming and matching of all these extra children is interesting and kind of fun I'm still curious about the nature of France under this new Louis XIV. He will take power under very different circumstances than his OTL counterpart and with different people around him. So his reign is bound to be substantially different. So does anyone have any other thoughts on how that might play out? I still think its reasonable to posit that he will go easier on the nobility since they won't be immediately threatening him. Beyond that I'm not sure.
That's kind of hard question. TTL Louis XIV could be anything from a mighty king to a complete incompetent since he isn't the same as OTL Louis XIV. At least, that's what it says on paper since we created this Louis XIV from a child that was stillborn OTL.
Louis XIII would probably take a greater part in his son's education since TTL Louis XIV is born in 1619 and not 1638. It's highly possible Louis XIII and Richelieu play some sort of influence on his personna. On the other hand, Anne of Austria's role will be reduced in his education : since TTL Louis XIV will be 24 on the death of his father, Anne will have no Regency and will not undertake most of her son's education. She could still have some role as, earlier in the discussion, we talked about the possibility she would be more close to Louis XIII and the fact he might use her to moderate Richelieu's power.
This brings the question of Cardinal Mazarin. OTL, Mazarin was Richelieu's successor, so Mazarin might take the role Richelieu had with Louis XIII, but with TTL Louis XIV. I said earlier that Mazarin's position might not be as important, but he might stay as an important minister of France even if not on the scale of Richelieu.
If the Fronde doesn't happen, then there is no reason TTL Louis XIV would fear the nobility. If it does, the shock could be less important than it was to OTL Louis XIV (who was a child and was reigning only in name). TTL Louis XIV might still try to reduce the nobility's power like his OTL counterpart, but not on the same scale. We could thus have a less absolutist France, which might mean no Versailles Castle (which is a bit sad since it's a magnificient palace) or at least not immediately. If there is no Fronde, TTL Louis XIV might choose to stay at the Louvre, and thus to remain in Paris.
Regarding his marriage, all would depend on how TTL Louis XIV gets along with his wife, be it Anne Catherine Vasa of Poland, Anne of Lorraine or someone else. IOTL, his counterpart didn't get along well with Maria Theresa and as a result, he took many mistresses (most notably the Marquise de Montepsan, mother of most his illegitimate children, and the Marquise de Maintenon, who became his second wife). ITTL, if the marriage is happy, there might be no reason for him to take a mistress.
In regards to diplomacy, provided things go OTL, Louis XIV will have to confront two things. First are England & Scotland (not yet Britain) : if Charles II doesn't get children, he will be succeeded by James II who will probably get kicked out like OTL. If TTL Louis XIV adopts the same attitude as his OTL counterpart, he will support the Jacobites and England & France will once again be at each others' throat. That might also depends on who succeeds James II and how his relationship is with TTL Louis XIV : OTL, Louis XIV and William III of England hated each other.
Second is Spain. If things go OTL, Philip IV will be succeeded by his ill-fated son Charles II "the Bewitched". Charles II was mentally ill and phyiscally unable to have a child, so his succession will be an important question. TTL Louis XIV will likely support the candidacy of the children of his brother Henri (whom who said might get the Spanish marriage). This might be better for a possible Bourbon Spain as a Franco-Spanish Personnal Union will be less likely.
We can assume that TTL Louis XIV will try to expand France and get territories that should be French like his OTL countepart : Franche-Comté, Alsace and a number of Northern cities might be his primary target. Maybe even Wallonia, since it's a Catholic French-speaking area.
Regarding inner policies, the main question is going to be Religion. TTL Louis XIV might not suppress the Edit de Nantes which tolerated Religious Freedom. However, he might still seek to weaken the Protestant Party in fear it becomes "a state in the state". Louis XIII's reign was marked by a similar policy : if he played a greater role in his son's education, you might get a Louis XIV continuing his father's policies.
France might develop a better navy like it did OTL if TTL Louis XIV ends up with Colbert as one of his ministers (which is likely if we keep Mazarin). This might influence French colonial expansion later on.