Part #202: Middle-earth in the Middle Kingdom
Novamundine
The Siamese had been preparing for a long time and fought a war in Cambodia in 1853-1856 that resulted in the expulsion of the Belgian Ostend Company and the assertion of control over Cochinchina (southern Daiviet) as well as Annam (northern Daiviet).
Devakul proceeded to land troops on Hainan Island and took the capital Qiongshan. Ultimately this did not go any further as Devakul lacked the soldiers to do any more and the Chinese reacquired the island at the peace treaty
it was through battles on land, at great cost of human life, that the tide finally turned in favour of the Qing and left all the land between the rivers in their hands.
Does that mean that Siam now controls all of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia? Am I understanding this correctly?
I thought that Hainan was under French and Scandinavian occupation.
I know you hate people saying this, especially so soon after Alex's excellent American effort, but would it be possible to get a map of the two Chinas post-RWII? Not being familiar with Chinese Geography (great album title), it's hard to understand the full impact of what's just happened.
Maybe, unless Feng China did retain the part of Tonkin it has controlled since the First Sino-Siamese War (#152)
Just wish I'd thought of it earlier (previous instances of this: 'Meridian'; referring to Joshua Churchill as Bloody Blandford).OMG, OTL needs this word! It'd prevent so many arguments on the Internet.![]()
Thanks for pointing this out - the idea is that the Feng Chinese got it back after the Great American War with those two countries retreating from the East to some extent, but I only realise now you've said it that I've never actually written that in the text. I often forget just what has been put on the page and what is just in my head so please do point out apparent contradictions like this. (I will discuss it in a future update now, anachronic order FTW)I thought that Hainan was under French and Scandinavian occupation.
Yeah, I have an easily editable basemap from a while ago so I will do that fairly soon.That was, as certain among my friends say, lush. I know you hate people saying this, especially so soon after Alex's excellent American effort, but would it be possible to get a map of the two Chinas post-RWII? Not being familiar with Chinese Geography (great album title), it's hard to understand the full impact of what's just happened.
Good idea. I might even remember to write something about Navarre this timeSpeaking of areas I'd like to see, it'd be really cool to get an update on all of those tiny European states that haven't really featured so far (assuming there's anything to feature) - Iceland, Andorra, Ragusa, the Republic of Man, Malta and the like.
So if "Novamundine" refers to the New World, is there a niche for "Vetumundine" or something to reference the Old World?Just wish I'd thought of it earlier (previous instances of this: 'Meridian'; referring to Joshua Churchill as Bloody Blandford).
That was, as certain among my friends say, lush. I know you hate people saying this, especially so soon after Alex's excellent American effort, but would it be possible to get a map of the two Chinas post-RWII? Not being familiar with Chinese Geography (great album title), it's hard to understand the full impact of what's just happened.
Thanks for pointing this out - the idea is that the Feng Chinese got it back after the Great American War with those two countries retreating from the East to some extent, but I only realise now you've said it that I've never actually written that in the text. I often forget just what has been put on the page and what is just in my head so please do point out apparent contradictions like this. (I will discuss it in a future update now, anachronic order FTW)
Here's the requested map. Trouble is you have to go forward a bit to let all the dust of the wars settle, and that means there are some minor spoilers, but there you go.
(Meridian) Luzon got the wrong colour.
“2 x turkey dhansaks with rice, one with coriander dip and one without = 12R.4f.-m
1 x jiaozi vegetable sharing platter with side order of kimchi borsht = 4R.3f.2m
1 x garlic naan with cocoa dip = 2R.1f.-m
Delivery charge = 1R.-f.-m
Total 19R.8f.2m”
—From the Correspondence of Bes. David Batten-Hale (New Doradist Party--Croydon Urban)
What did not help was Beiqing reliance on Scandinavian military advisors in the 1840s and then, following Scandinavia’s defeat in the Unification War, Jianing fired them without first securing replacements. As the Scandinavians had been particularly heavily involved in the naval modernisation programme, it was in this field that the Beiqing had the most difficulty in the conflict (whereas on land the difference between the two powers’ weaponry and tactics was less noticeable).
It's not changed substantially since it was discussed back in (IIRC) Volume III. One Royal is ten Florins and one Florin is ten Farthings (but they are abbreviated m for mill).I love Dr. Lister's choice of quotes!Admittedly, the currency of the Kingdom of England puzzles me a little...
Loosely inspired by an earlier OTL incident where the Qing Chinese in the 18th century tried to modernise their artillery with Swedish advisors, but it didn't turn out too well I believe.Us screwing things up for the Chinese? Well, as you said, we are the Forrest Gump of history.
Loosely inspired by an earlier OTL incident where the Qing Chinese in the 18th century tried to modernise their artillery with Swedish advisors, but it didn't turn out too well I believe.
You've actually stumbled upon a point of Swedish 18th century history that I was entirely unaware of. Got any reference for where you learned this?
Warfare in the Eighteenth Century by Jeremy Black. Has a number of interesting factoids but not a lot of detail. (Another intriguing Chinese-related part was that apparently some Chinese writer wrote a Dies the Fire scenario where Chang'e stops gunpowder from working because it had destroyed the glory of warfare and turned it into slaughter, or something).
I would guess it's seen as taking away the personal aspect and making the enemy more faceless goons.Thanks. Will check it up and see if I could use it somehow!
The notion of that guns and projectile weapons takes away some of the glory of warfare is a trope I've never understood and never will understand. Like, in Star Wars when Obi-Wan describes the light sabre as an "elegant weapon for a more civilized age" always struck me as... Weird. I find the notion of shooting your foe far more elegant and subtle than actually cutting him up or dismembering him.
In my view, the most elegant warfare you could fight would be warfare as practiced on Eminiar VII in A Taste of Armageddon.
(Weird thing about Star Trek is that quite often I find myself going "The aliens actually do have a point, it's us humans who are doing the stupid thing.")