I feel for Monterroso. He’s a bungler that is destroying his country, sure, but he was in an unenviable position from the beginning. The UPSA was ridiculously overextended when war broke out.

I doubt that attempting radical social change during the war is going to help the effort though.

Meanwhile Belgium is trying to go for even more neutral neutrality in all of this, which is amusing.
 
Excellent stuff @Thande.

Given how sympathetic Monterroso is and how the Americans have behaved, I think I'm firmly on the Meridian side, even in spite of knowing how hopeless it is for them by authorial prophecy.
 
While I've been focusing on my novel (see sig) I didn't want to leave LTTW hanging for too long, so I've just cranked out this update.

Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaay!

I have since decided that for publication I'm going to split this volume, so it will be Volume V: To Dream Again for the first 25 chapters (the lead-up to the prose beginning) and then the prose Pandoric War stuff will be Volume VI. Not sure what to call Volume VI, maybe just subtitle it "The Pandoric War"? I'll see if I can come up with a better title.

Leap Into The Dark
 
Part #243: Choices

That glorious defence by ordinary citizens had failed in the short term, but it had created an image of defiance that had caught the imagination of what had then been a sleepy backwater of the vast, inefficiently-run Viceroyalty of Rio de la Plata. [1]
[1] There is quite a lot incorrect here, in particular Monterroso treating a formally British force as ‘the Americans’, but it reflects the version of history presented in the Meridian foundation myth.

Wait, I thought the Viceroyalty of Río de La Plata never existed ITTL, and the Plate had been part of Peru until its independence. Why would Meridian revisionists report that the Spanish gave them more colonial autonomy than they did?
evidently an unreconstructed Areian-supremacist
Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.
Leap Into The Dark
Ooh, neat. It nicely foreshadows the metaphor naming the next war we've been informed of, too.
 
Wait, I thought the Viceroyalty of Río de La Plata never existed ITTL, and the Plate had been part of Peru until its independence. Why would Meridian revisionists report that the Spanish gave them more colonial autonomy than they did?.

I took it as just an accidental mistake myself, since the sentence makes even more sense putting in Peru.
 
Excellent work as always, and the Belgian pot continues to bubble. Will the disinherited Earl of Grey and his better half be making an appearance in the gambit pileup of conspiracies soon I wonder?
 
I have since decided that for publication I'm going to split this volume, so it will be Volume V: To Dream Again for the first 25 chapters (the lead-up to the prose beginning) and then the prose Pandoric War stuff will be Volume VI. Not sure what to call Volume VI, maybe just subtitle it "The Pandoric War"? I'll see if I can come up with a better title.

The Box Opens? And All the Evils Pour Out? Only Hope Left?

Given that the Pandoric War comes from Pandora's box, I think that this volume should be box-themed
 
For a time only.

Maybe the Societists will not rule over all of the Meridian colonial empire, and maybe some of its states will go independent. I don’t think it can keep Maharashtra, for instance, as it is surrounded by non-revolutionary powers, far away from the UPSA metropole, and naturally the princes won’t like being part of a homogenized state.
 

xsampa

Banned
The reference to Areians shows that Diversitarianism will celebrate and incorporate ideologies that would be considered fringe and bizarre IOTL, and give them a voice. One wonders if this won’t lead to cases where attempts at ideological takeover happen in Diversitarian democracies.
 
The reference to Areians shows that Diversitarianism will celebrate and incorporate ideologies that would be considered fringe and bizarre IOTL, and give them a voice. One wonders if this won’t lead to cases where attempts at ideological takeover happen in Diversitarian democracies.

You're probably right. "Free speech in the name of diversity" could be a major thing. We already know that Diversitarians encourage "alternative viewpoints" even if they think those same viewpoints as wrong.
 
Top