Look to the West -- Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thande

Donor
This map really shows which areas are over and underrepresented - it'll be a great help at the next election, when some new seats will have to be given out.

Hopefully, you'll allow me 'working out' the ENA elections to become a regular thing?
By all means.

Well since Thande hasn't given much population figures its hard to tell what deserves and what doesn't deserve its representation.
TBH I remember when Jared used to give detailed population figures for the Decades of Darkness USA and he seemed to spend half his time arguing with people about what they should be and retconning them, so I honestly just don't want to open that can of worms.
 
TBH I remember when Jared used to give detailed population figures for the Decades of Darkness USA and he seemed to spend half his time arguing with people about what they should be and retconning them, so I honestly just don't want to open that can of worms.

Just go for a general 'about the same, a bit less, much more' relative to OTL and that should be close enough. It's not as if we're trying to divide up the Electoral College after all.
 

Thande

Donor
It's not as if we're trying to divide up the Electoral College after all.

That's true--at this point at least, the ENA still has the attitude that representation need not have anything to do with population (unlike the KGB following the ascent of the Populists).
 
It seems like you can avoid some shenanigans by just giving a rough population distribution/density map or chart ("This is an urban center, that's a bunch of barely-occupied nominal claims") without hard numbers. This would still be some work for you, Thande, and I can understand if you don't want to do it, but the information would be interesting and hopefully free of bickering. :)
 
It seems like you can avoid some shenanigans by just giving a rough population distribution/density map or chart ("This is an urban center, that's a bunch of barely-occupied nominal claims") without hard numbers.
I second this request, Thande, if you've got time for this without pushing back the next main post.
 
The trouble is, one of the great charms of this timeline is how Thande hops all over the globe, giving us interesting updates on how things are going in places like New Zealand and Persia. Frankly I'm pretty bored and disenchanted with the ENA, it's everywhere else I'm interested in! So I'd be asking for rough indications of the population trends of the whole damn world.:eek: Surely such a map is just as much needed in the UPSA as the ENA, anyway? How about parliamentary France? Germany? Zand Persia?

Clearly it's a lot. I do hope Thande is at least keeping some rough estimate of regional population trends in his head, because obviously the relative sizes of the various nations has a bearing on which developments are realistic.
 
I'm reading the entire TL on my e-reader I got for Christmas. Loving it so far. The fact that this thing is over 1300 pages long (and counting) and I plan to get through the whole thing speaks volumes of how much I'm enjoying it. Just past the Jacobin wars now.

I'm having a hard time finding the maps and other attachments in the old thread though and as of today I get an error whenever I try to access it. If it wouldn't be too much trouble for you Mr. Thande, and if you still have them on your computer would it be at all possible to upload a zip file of all the maps made thus far for those of us who are a bit behind? Thanks.


My apologies for reposting and deleting this post a lot. I was in hybrid mode and very, very confused.
 
I tend to go with unicameral by default in TTL because I think the use of bicameral assemblies by republics in OTL was largely inspired by the USA's, and that example doesn't exist in TTL.

Ah? So it's not inspired by the English parliament, with House of Commons/House of Lords? (Which admittedly is a different kind of bicameral parliament.)
 
I've been making a lot of maps of this type for the current OTL American election, so I'm thinking of doing a few for LTTW as well. This one just shows the distribution of MCPs by province.

I hadn't realised that Nova Scotia has so many seats, but then I thought of Louisburgh(sic)...
 
That's interesting as far as Brazil's future goes. Countries with high populations but low natural resources tend to be sources of immigration to more developing countries...

Well Rio Grande took all of Brazil's coal and the land it uses for lumbering and tobacco.

It lost a fair bit of its oil in the north and it access to the Amazon's Brazil(well I guess not any more) nuts and rubber.

It seems to have retained most of it farmland though, and a lot of its mining resources.
 
Thande, I’ve been reading your timeline for some time after the start of Volume II, and I’ve got to say your timeline is one of the best I’ve read, IF not the best.

The ending, with that map of South America, makes me remember one of your opening quotes, some guy saying a phrase very similar to a Bismark phrase, but for south America instead of the Balkans. I need to comment a lot about it, so here it goes:

OTL South America saw some wars, but for most of its independent history, it was a mostly peaceful place, with upheaval being civil wars and military coups rather than constant wars. Some countries split and stuff, but there weren’t the aberrations found in Europe, like immense ethnic groups of one country inside the other, etc. The immense cut-up of Portuguese South America is not going to produce pretty results, methinks.

For starters, Brazil and Portugal: I have a feeling there are two directions to be taken here. The first is that angry Brazilians take over and make a angry independent Brazil with serious revanchist aspirations. The second is that Brazil will stay united to Portugal in order to counter UPSA power. Also, revanchism, lots of revanchism. I’m feeling we’re not going to see the independence of Brazil, it was caused by some Portuguese wanting to turn Brazil into a ordinary colony, I doubt its going to happen under the Aveiro doctrine. Brazil is probably a United Kingdom with Portugal right now.

Portuguese Brazil has it pretty bad now, it’s virtually under siege. In the south, it has the UPSA, Cisplatina and Rio Grande. In the north, there’s Pernambuco (another UPSA puppet) and the Republic of the Guyanas. All of them took territory from it and all of them are either hostile foreigners or splinter countries puppeted by foreign powers. The Luso-Brazilians are going to panic when they perceive this.

It might even create a perception of menace, something like “Hispanic hordes are going to take over the lusitanic peoples again, we must react!” Both in America and Iberia. In this case, it might either end with a independent angry Brazil ready for revenge, or angry and paranoid United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and Algarves. The Brazilian stereotype of this TL is NOT going to be happy, easygoing people with a love of carnival and beaches, but rather a bunch of revanchist, militaristic jungle crazies.

Its kinda interesting to see that Hispano and Luso-America are kinda switched over in this TL. Hispano America is united in two countries and luso-america is now divided in four countries, three being UPSA puppets, one united with Portugal, and part of it is under occupation of a dutch colonial remant.

Now on to the UPSA: Did UPSA only take and retain Mato Grosso from Portuguese South America? Its not going to be too hard to swarm them with settlers, but I guess they’re going to retain a serious lusitanic culture over the years, and it might be a sticking point, especially for Brazilian/Lusitanic revanchists.
Also, Thande, what about the Guaicuru/Kadweu natives? Mato Grosso, in the borders between Mato Grosso and OTL Paraguay was their stomping grounds. They were horse-riding nomadic natives that gave both both the Spanish and the Portuguese constant trouble though the colonial times, commonly kidnapping people of rich brazilian families and asking for ransom in Assuncion. Even after they signed treaties with Brazilian and Paraguayan authorities, they never ceased being militaristic. During the Triple Alliance War, the Guaicurus resisted a Paraguayan attack and even counter-attacked them in their own territory. Perhaps a possible native state, as a buffer against Brazil?
Also, Pablo Sanchez. I can’t see how Societism is going to take over the UPSA. I’m feeling bad times are coming for the UPSA, and Societism will be way they will take to stabilize the country. UPSA has been on the rise for some time now, I’m getting a feeling they’re going to take a ugly fall any day now, and I get a feeling that the Luso-Brazilians and perhaps New Spain will be there to kick them while they’re down.

Now, for the strange Republic of the Guyanas:
Hohohoho oh boy, its going to be a strange place. A dutch trading and military elite taking over a mass of luso-native riverside peasants and some monocultural sugar farmers and cattle ranchers. Ever heard of Cabanágem, Thande? If the dutch screw up, its going to be Cabanagem x3, except this time there’s no Brazil to help the loyalists, only a further-away UPSA. Cabanagem has been often compared to the French Revolution, which is going to make waves if it happens in TTL.
I wonder what economic activities such state will live by? I’m guessing mining. fishery, rubber and extraction of amazonic products. We might see Açai and such. Serra Pelada is part of the sold territory they brought from UPSA, and I would hazard a guess they might find the gold if they look at the forest, though that depends on where it is, I will look a map. Gold Mines would seriously help government revenue.
Is the Carajás mineral province within Dutch Guyanian or Portuguese territory? I think it is, and it might be found if they look for it hard enough. I will look today for some maps of the area and then post about it on Thursday, because I’m internetless. Also, there is lots of untapped mining potential in Amazon even today, and the Dutch might find it.
Culturally, I wonder how that is going to go. The conquered peoples are catholic Luso-natives with a rural culture concentrated around rivers. The Dutch are protestant traders and soldiers with a urban culture from a temperate country. I think the key to control here is to perceive that Amazon’s roads are the rivers, and I think the Dutch are actually pretty prepared to perceive this.
Linguistically, I think we’re going to see a dutch-speaking upper class and a Portuguese speaking lower class. Did Pombal prohibit the General Language (Nheengatu) in this TL? If not, we might see a Dutch-speaking upper class, some western amazonic nheengatu speakers and the eastern part of the country will contain a Portuguese speaking lower class. I think the original upper-class (slave-holding rural colonels) will be the main link between the Dutch-speaking elite and the mass of Portuguese speaking peasants. Its very much akin to Dutch Pernambuco in OTL, and like it, if the Dutch fail to please the local escravocatas, its not going to end well for them.
Still, the Dutch might be able to tackle the challenge, but its going to be a weeeeird place, and it might end in blood, tears and burned houses. This would be a good place for Societism to take hold, but that remains to be seen.

I really don’t have much to comment on New Spain, except: How did they get the north of OTL’s Pará and most of OTL Amazonas? Is that gains during the Popular Wars or did they win against Portuguese Brazil before and I don’t remember due to lousy memory?

Also, the rest of the world: When are we going to see more Superia, India, Khazakistan and Yapan?

Well Rio Grande took all of Brazil's coal and the land it uses for lumbering and tobacco.

It lost a fair bit of its oil in the north and it access to the Amazon's Brazil(well I guess not any more) nuts and rubber.

It seems to have retained most of it farmland though, and a lot of its mining resources.

Actually, that coal in Rio Grande do Sul is actually rather crappy, and was never much useful.
That said, Brazil's only significant loss was rubber, at least now. Many resources in the North were only found after the government gained interest in the amazonic region from the fifties to beyond.
 
...
Also, Pablo Sanchez. I can’t see how Societism is going to take over the UPSA. I’m feeling bad times are coming for the UPSA, and Societism will be way they will take to stabilize the country. UPSA has been on the rise for some time now, I’m getting a feeling they’re going to take a ugly fall any day now, and I get a feeling that the Luso-Brazilians and perhaps New Spain will be there to kick them while they’re down. ...

I'm still not sure just what Societism is; one ironclad verity about it seems to be that it denounces the idea of nationality, asserting that all of humanity is one people.

Now in the context of OTL that sounds like a progressive, or at least liberal, principle. Way upthread, I speculated that perhaps, with the USPA being roughly analogous to the OTL USA, what we have here is something like the rather liberal idea I had as a much younger person of the USA as the representative of the archetypical 'Age of Reason' society--that with the 1776 Revolution and Constitution, we set ourselves on the path of a society ruled by the will of the people. Growing up in the 1970s I rather thought that all humanity, if only freed of invidious dominations, would naturally merge into an American sort of mentality.

So it's cultural imperialism, on a grandiose scale. But it conceives of itself as the transcendence of the petty irrationalities of history.

I was thinking that the reason Sanchez's notions gain traction in the USPA is precisely that they've bitten off way more than they can chew, in seizing control of so much of Brazil. And that the way "out" of this dilemma is to subscribe to the ideology that nationality is a petty illusion to be transcended.

Put that way, it is very ambiguous whether Societism has any of what we OTL would call "progressive" content, except this bit about all humanity being one. I certainly meant well when as a youth I figured the whole world wanted to be American, but people who are quite harsh can also find a lot of use in this idea too.

The way Thande has framed and foreshadowed Societism, it seems like a big boogeyman, the way "Communism" was framed as the very culmination of all human evil in my own upbringing. It has been very unclear to me just what life in a Societist, um, society, is like!

Like, I think Thande may have dropped a hint that the Societist sphere still upholds the idea of slavery all the way to the end of the 20th century, for instance. But maybe I just misread something?

Anyway, the anti-Societists seem like a lot of nutcases to me, so I'm left very confused.

Conceivably, Sanchez and Societism are very good things.

Since I'm rather fond of the USPA in this timeline, I hope so.

But I doubt it...:(
 

Thande

Donor
Sentinela do Norte said:
Its kinda interesting to see that Hispano and Luso-America are kinda switched over in this TL. Hispano America is united in two countries and luso-america is now divided in four countries, three being UPSA puppets, one united with Portugal, and part of it is under occupation of a dutch colonial remant.
This was largely deliberate on my part. I like to go for some allohistorical ironies in the TL (like, for example, the ENA is known for its multi-party politics, whereas the USA in OTL is known for its two-party politics) but I try not to make them too forced. Also thanks for the rest of your points, I always like getting more ideas from people who are from the areas I'm writing about.
 

Thande

Donor
I wonder how much Societism will differ from Thande's original "Socialism".

Although the basic core principle was there waaaay back when I was planning this TL in 2006, Societism has moved on considerably from that early conception. Back then I had also not conceived the idea that its opponents would gradually come under a single ideological banner (of Diversitarianism) either: the analogy is that few people were all 'yay, capitalism!' as a distinct ideology in OTL before there was communism for it to react against--nations were capitalist, but just because that's the way things were, not because It Is The Right Thing To Do And Everyone Who Says Differently Is An Anti-American Socialist Who Should Be Shot, etc.
 
I'm still not sure just what Societism is; one ironclad verity about it seems to be that it denounces the idea of nationality, asserting that all of humanity is one people.

Now in the context of OTL that sounds like a progressive, or at least liberal, principle. Way upthread, I speculated that perhaps, with the USPA being roughly analogous to the OTL USA, what we have here is something like the rather liberal idea I had as a much younger person of the USA as the representative of the archetypical 'Age of Reason' society--that with the 1776 Revolution and Constitution, we set ourselves on the path of a society ruled by the will of the people. Growing up in the 1970s I rather thought that all humanity, if only freed of invidious dominations, would naturally merge into an American sort of mentality.

So it's cultural imperialism, on a grandiose scale. But it conceives of itself as the transcendence of the petty irrationalities of history.

I was thinking that the reason Sanchez's notions gain traction in the USPA is precisely that they've bitten off way more than they can chew, in seizing control of so much of Brazil. And that the way "out" of this dilemma is to subscribe to the ideology that nationality is a petty illusion to be transcended.

Put that way, it is very ambiguous whether Societism has any of what we OTL would call "progressive" content, except this bit about all humanity being one. I certainly meant well when as a youth I figured the whole world wanted to be American, but people who are quite harsh can also find a lot of use in this idea too.

The way Thande has framed and foreshadowed Societism, it seems like a big boogeyman, the way "Communism" was framed as the very culmination of all human evil in my own upbringing. It has been very unclear to me just what life in a Societist, um, society, is like!

Like, I think Thande may have dropped a hint that the Societist sphere still upholds the idea of slavery all the way to the end of the 20th century, for instance. But maybe I just misread something?

Anyway, the anti-Societists seem like a lot of nutcases to me, so I'm left very confused.

Conceivably, Sanchez and Societism are very good things.

Since I'm rather fond of the USPA in this timeline, I hope so.

But I doubt it...:(

Ins't Societism a Aristocratic Internationalism? Essentially, it doesn't matter what nation or ethnicity you are from, but rather, what class you belong to.


This was largely deliberate on my part. I like to go for some allohistorical ironies in the TL (like, for example, the ENA is known for its multi-party politics, whereas the USA in OTL is known for its two-party politics) but I try not to make them too forced. Also thanks for the rest of your points, I always like getting more ideas from people who are from the areas I'm writing about.

Heh, in this TL, I would be a subject of the Guianian Republic, assuming it still exists by then.
A good idea to develop Dutch Guyana would be getting some kind of mineral map of Pará and ask yourself "Can any of these resources be discovered by the current time of this TL? Will they find them?"
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top