Hi there! I just finished reading Gordon Rhea's book on the Battle of the Wilderness. i read where Longstreet got wounded by his own side and was continuing to read how many southerns after the war stated that had longstreet not been wounded, then would have acheived a major victory againt grant and had driven him back across the rappahannock. while i think that their statement is a bit far fetched, i did start to think how the rest of the war would have been shaped had longstreet not had been wounded, so any thoughts?