Long term consequences of different 1066

WI William had died at Hastings and his army defeated.

England would be different. A large part of the "England's" "Nobility" seem to have been his folk.

Northern England would not have suffered harrying/

So does this change long term events:

England conquering Scotland, Wales and being involved in Ireland.


Does it change the relationship with the Churche


Does it speed up or postpone the industrial revolution?
 
greatenglishpeoplegreatenglandgreatscandinavia.jpg
 
What does that mean? Google translate's not working. And why does it say England (Englund) and have a British (Scottish and English). In a scenario where Scotland was part of England they ain't gonna get on the flag.
 
What does that mean? Google translate's not working. And why does it say England (Englund) and have a British (Scottish and English). In a scenario where Scotland was part of England they ain't gonna get on the flag.

It is a slightly "modernised" version of old english. It means:

"GREAT ENGLISH PEOPLE!
GREAT ENGLAND!
GREAT SCANDINAVIA!"

It wasn't so long ago that English football fans mostly waved the union jack at football games, so the use of an altered union flag to represent England isn't so far fetched. What's more Scotland has been conquered by a scandinavian England and their flag has been skewed to fit. The final insult.
 
Last edited:
It is a slightly "modernised" version of old english. It means:

"GREAT ENGLISH PEOPLE!
GREAT ENGLAND!
GREAT SCANDINAVIA!"

It wasn't so long ago that English football fans mostly waved the union jack at football games, so the use of an altered union flag to represent England isn't so far fetched. What's more Scotland has been conquered by a scandinavian England and their flag has been skewed to fit. The final insult.
Considering that it wasn't for a couple of centuries that St George became the English patron Saint I doubt he'd be the patron saint in an Anglo-Scandinavian Kingdom.
 
Top