I would expect the influx of refugees from the US durring the Civil War will serve to add further cultural development to the nation.
BTW, will Texas join the South or try to stay neutral?
"Culture of the Lone Star Republic 1836-1861
Western Union Party: Heavily Pro-American. Pro-French. decentralized government. Pro-Indian. More authority to commonwealths. Free trade. Agricultural. Pro-Slavery. Improve relations with Mexico. Isolationist outside of regional affairs. More Moderate. Demographics are American immigrants, French, Indians, California, Eastern Texas.
Republican Party: Nationalist. Strong central government. Protectionism. Industrialism. Strong military. Expansionism and support of settlers. Moderate Abolitionism. High investment in education. National infrastructure projects. Keep French Alliance but have moderate ties with America and establish alliance with Germany. Demographics are Tejanos, Germans, Chinese, Catholics, Western Texas, Arizona
I would expect the influx of refugees from the US durring the Civil War will serve to add further cultural development to the nation.
Expect to see a stronger concentration of Chinese immigrants in California than OTL.
After the Civil War, I'd expect a lot of Africans leaving the South for California.
Hmm... I guess what I'd like to see is (just brainstorming this here): arts (poetry, books, paintings, type of trends this follows like realism and romanticism or naturalism, stuff like that), architecture (building styles), holidays (national ones, state holidays, how they're celebrated), how patriotism for Texas may have become steeped into their day to day lives, if Texas has become a melting pot, Texan philosophies or rather a way of thinking that's characterized them like America's Social Darwinism during the Gilded Age, sports if they have any, fashion trends, Texan etiquette and customs, how they approach their culture, how the world perceives Texans, languages (like do people walking down a street greet a person in English or Spanish, somethings like that?), Texan gourmet, how Texans spend leisure time if they have it, is their like a theater culture/opera culture, how women are viewed, how foreigners are viewed, how they view themselves, how they view nature.
As I stated above, just a brainstorm, but yeah, those are some things I'd like to see. Obviously not all of them in one go, hell, not all of them period, though maybe.... Naah, don't won't to be too greedy and ask for all of that which would be rude. So yeah, if you get some of that cool. But if there's none of what I said in it, cool.
I think we should look at the anti-slavery movement in Texas before the ACW breaks out. BTW, will Texas join the South or try to stay neutral?
I would expect the influx of refugees from the US durring the Civil War will serve to add further cultural development to the nation.
Texas joining the South won't be so simple. From my perspective as an outsider and not working with all the info available, I'd have to say no to joining the South. Why? Well, here's why I think they won't join the South:
First off, they won't "join" the South due to a thing called nationalism, patriotic pride, and the fact that it's been ingrained in people's minds for years that Texas is a nation and a very well off one, at that. Kaiser Chris states:
Which means several things. Texas is still around in '61, meaning it made it passed the Civil War stage of Central, North America as I remember Chris stating repeatedly, the ACW for this TTL occurs in the '50s. The other meaning, if Texas has been an independent nation since '36 and the ACW begins in the '50s, there's been quite a bit of time for people to have been Texanized. Add in the many immigrants who are enjoying Texas' laws and life opposed to laws and life back home, whether in the US or in Europe or even Asia and Africa. This just gives more people willing to become Texan, that and they're allies with the French. People who dislike Slavery, something I find amusing considering this Texan Political group and it's goals in TTL:
Yeah... They make no sense to me. Want to be friends with ole Mexico, who hate Slavery and them. Then there's the entire issue of France. The nation to abolish, reestablish, then once more abolish Slavery if I remember right. I believe it was first abolished for them in 1794, brought back by the "Tiny Emperor" Napoleon in the year 1802, then abolished again in 1848? I'm probably wrong on that, unfortunately. But anyways, back to the issue at hand. Assuming what I've said is correct, then the Pro-Slavery group is Pro-French, which has it's French Immigrants probably leaning on them to get rid of slavery or is made up of French citizens who enjoyed having slaves and have now fled to Texas to keep that right. Even better is that California and Indians are apparently Pro-Slavery, although more by relation of the party then personal views.
Anyways, if Texas joins the ACW it stands quite a bit too loose, as well as gain. France likely won't support them, so there goes some allied aid as it'd drag them into a war in which Britain and Germany might consider helping out the US if only to ensure France didn't get to much power. To be honest, if played wrong or right, the American ACW here has perhaps an even bigger potential to spark WW1. Back to topic. So with France not aiding them, it'd just be them and the South which to be honest, ought to be somewhat weaker. Having just fought a war, the US likely had recruits from everywhere, and while the North makes back their population via waves of immigration, the South is more of relying on natural births. Add in the fact, the South has even less RR currently and even less modernization as well as industrialization. Though, they will have experienced officers, the North also has that too, having just had quite a bit of people as officers fighting in the Third Anglo-American War, or whatever you want to call it (American Conquest of the North, Expulsion of the Brits, War to Free the Quebecois, The Northern Campaign/War, War of 1845, Mr. Harrison's War, Third Time's A Charm, Twice in Three Tries, British Fail Against Americans... Again, Royaly Losing the War, Arrogance is thy Downfall, Deaths on your head Ms. Queen, Listening to Advisors kinda Helps out a lot, Lucky Sonofabitches those Americans, "Europe's more Important!" say the Brits for the first time ever, A New Leaf in Global Politics and Warfare alongside Geography, 1812's Revenge, etc...) So, essentially, though it'd give them another ally, they'd be fighting a more urbanized, industrialized, and modernized enemy with an even bigger army despite the South and Texas joining together. Also, joining the war would see Texas fighting the US Navally, leading to its merchant fleet being subject to "pirate" raids, and US retaliatory strikes. The South will have an even harder time financing itself leading to Texan having to play the main role in the alliance aside from fighting. Then the Texans will either have to invade via ship, or head north and attack across the Mississipi, or go East into the South before North and fighting there. Either way, it's going to be quite a journey. Plus, should Texas lose, the punishments aren't going to be kind. Perhaps losing Cali, maybe the US trying to effectively conquer ole Texas. Economic punishments for sure, restrictions to the military, and perhaps some trade agreements in Americans favor.
Now here's what I believe Texas will do: Proclaim "neutrality" and officially have that hold. Meanwhile, Confederates are getting arm shipments, uniform, medical supplies, food, ammo, etc... from the Texans, quite a bit of Pro-Slave Texans join Confederate Army, a couple Texan ships go missing and become Confederate ships, some US merchant ships end up going missing having been raided by Texas. Texas selling Confederate Cotton and maybe Confederate soldiers/diplomats using Texas ships to travel to Britain/France/Russia/a European Nation to ask for some aid and recognition (The Trent Affair, what's that? Last I check it was the Americans Assaulting the Austin that almost started a war between Texas and America. Obviously never happened, and won't happen in this TTL). Heck, maybe some Confederate soldiers get training in Texas.
Alright, now that's over, I want to state this:
I like this political party the most out of the two. Something which I'm sure most, if not everyone here does, after all, the other one is "Pro-Slavery". Also sure, this one has some support for slavery via "Moderate Abolitionism", which means it's not everyone is wanting it, but it's still one of the two political parties and effectively controls Texas Government, so having the goal of "Moderate Abolitionism" is quite a thing. Even more so, seeing how they're likely to get it done with Texas not having as many slaves it did by OTL, with those being replaced by these Germans, Tejanos, Chinese, Catholics, Arizona people, and Western Texas. So yeah, I think slaves in Texas are likely going to have it good soon even more so if Texas doesn't do segregation and is willing to educate the slaves via an organization similar to the Freedman's Bureau. Even better is their focus in Education, Infrastructure, and the strong military. All good things in my eyes. Even the "Strong Central Government" part is good to me. I'd say, this is the current best of two options when deliberating between the two based on 21st Century Morals and personal preferences.
Now, a question. Will Texas subscribe Social Darwinism and/or go through a Gilded Age?
Edit: Having forgotten about this.
I'm going to mention my thoughts on it, so here they are:
Most of the Americans fleeing are going to be several things. Slaves, people who disagree with the Confederacy but can't make it to the Union, or Slaveholders who don't want to get screwed by the Union when they win. That means several things. If it's slaves, then I can't do much but postulate, considering we haven't heard anything like OTL's Fugitive Slave Laws having been passed by TTL's Texas or America, which means quite a bit. Without them, the South will be pissed and Texas alongside the North will get African-Americans much faster. They'll be free, but somewhat uneducated, which will mean a lot. Now the abolitionists that can't get out of the South but can get to Texas are going to be somewhat happy and somewhat disappointed. Texas still has slavery, but nothing so far shows that the divisional lines due to that are really bad and that Texas isn't freeing some slaves. Of course, there's nothing to suggest otherwise. Though, the Crockett Years and rise of the Western Union doesn't really say that they are tolerable towards escaped slaves, so... yeah. Then there's the Slaveholders fleeing. More hatred for blacks right there might just create a White Supremacist group. Maybe, we'll see Texas taking a hardline approach on anything like Terrorism due to them. I've no idea. In the end, perhaps they'll all provoke a rise of Nativism as they annoy the different ethnicities within the Texan Nation and take away some jobs from other Texans, however, I can't see that as most of the Texans are still Immigrants themselves.... With some of the population having been born there. Mainly the Tejanos, Native Americans, and descendants of the original American settlers, plus whatever kids have been born here since their parents came over. But yeah, they'll racial and ethnic tensions in Texas for a while.
Those two could really shake up the political discourse of whatever country you dropped them in if they are anything like they were in OTL. Of course there is no guarantee they will be.Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater might make appearances.
Good. No matter the timeline southern slavers need a reality check.they'll be in for a shock as most of their "cousins" don't hold the same values on slavery and southern culture as they do.
Austin's official policy is going to be one of neutrality, but Texas will be involved with both sides one way or the other. Unnoffically aid will be transferred to the Confederacy from Texas in the war, at the same time the government is going to be supporting the Union as the legit government, and the reason they can't stop this is due to the nation's priorities of winning the war against Mexico. The President in charge during the war, will have a wait it out policy where Texas will ally with the Confederacy if they win, and continue strengthening ties with the Union if they win. The outcome of the Civil War will affect Texas's immediate policies in the rest of the 60's and 70's.
Lastly the ACW beings in 1861 like OTL with Lincoln as President, though the makeup of the Confederacy and the process of succession and beginning stages of the war, will be far more different.
I'd also like to address several concerns you have with the Western Union Party. First, Crockett and the Western Union do NOT want to become buddies with Mexico, they just want relations normalized so both countries can live in peace and trade across the border (the Mexican War is going to reveal that it's not going to work).
The Republicans are basically like "Fuck Mexico, we're more powerful and they tried to oppress us", wanting to keep a close eye on them.
The Western Union's policy comes from Houston's OTL actions where he tried to make multiple attempts at a permanent peace with the Mexican government, while Lamar never gave a damn.
I'd also like to clarify what I meant by "Pro-Slavery". By Pro-Slavery, they are not like the Southern Democrats who want the institution to live forever as part of their bullshit heritage. The Western Union Party just wants to keep the status quo with slavery being legal across Texas. This is not a universal party platform, but something that represents them due to most of the party members being American immigrants from the South, who'd like to keep their slaves.
hat's important to remember, is that the Western Union does not have a political platform saying they will support slavery to the end of time. They are open to compromise on the subject and are not zealots like the Deep South. As for the rest of the party; California couldn't care less since slavery hardly exists in its borders, Indians don't care since it doesn't affect them, French are the ones in the party who are against it, but don't make a big fuss since it's not a fundamental part of Texas's society or economy.
They'll be staying to modern day along with the Western Union. Throughout Texas history they'll be the dominant party in politics due to their large support base and nationalistic policies. There will be plenty of political eras where the opposition rules, as shown with the incoming Crockett administration.
The Third Party that will show up later is also going to immensely affect things as they are the complete opposite on the political spectrum than Republicans.
Overall the Western Union is going to improve their policies over time and the slavery issue will get solved more smoothly.
When the Republicans have "Moderate Abolitionism", that doesn't mean it's a part of their party platform as many politicians, including Lamar, own slaves. What's important to remember is that the Republicans do not draw support from the plantation society, and their support groups all have high levels of anti-slavery feelings. Making them the first to propose abolition in the future.
Texas is going to lean more towards the Gilded age as the latter half of the 19th Century will be focused on economic growth and the strengthening of Texas's position in the world.
Blacks will not be a prominent minority group in Texas for a long time. This is due to the fact that Texas will only have around 200,000 slaves in Texas during abolition, and as immigrants continue to arrive from across the globe and Texas's NIR rises, Blacks will continue to grow, but they will have nowhere near the same impact as African-Americans on society due to the black population becoming a smaller minority in percentage over time. As the years go by, Black immigration will increase from the U.S as Texas's economy continues to grow and industrialize. The late 20th century will see an explosion in Afro-Texan culture, as immigrants arrive from Africa and the U.S in waves due to a process similar to the Sun Belt migration.
The racial and ethnic divisions in Texas post Civil War will be shown later. America's future actions on slavery during the Douglas years and Abolitionists opinion on Texas's status will be explained later.
When the Southern exodus does begin though, they'll be in for a shock as most of their "cousins" don't hold the same values on slavery and southern culture as they do.
To show Texas's main reaction to slavery, I'm going to promise everyone right now that there will be an abolition arc in the future.
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. Update will come sometime tomorrow.
P.S I just love your alternate names for the Oregon War. I cracked up reading each one of them and I can see a Wikipedia page using these, or these being actual alternate names when teaching history.
As I thought. It's the only good course of action. Of course, I'd suggest that Texas aid the Union as well, otherwise some feelings might arise from the Northern Populace after learning the Texans helped out their rebellious brothers. Then there's the entire Southern dislike for Texas as they didn't truly help out the Confederates, of course, it'll likely be more of how they felt about the British and French not really helping them in OTL.
Crap. So it's OTL time, but different things. Now I'm really hoping we don't go over OTL's 600k deaths for this war.
Makes more sense then what I was thinking. Guess I was overreacting?
I guess they've found modernization a little early? No... Fine. Anyways, it makes quite a bit of sense.
Oh. Okay, I see what you meant by Pro-Mexico, essentially. It's a way of ensuring their citizens won't have to worry about War with Mexico yet again. A secure southern border. No more worries about trade routes being attacked, more money from trade, a way to decrease the army size as you don't necessarily have to worry about them doing something stupid.
Okay, I definitely overreacted about that bit. And the way you've explained it makes sense.
Yet another confirmation I went overrboard on the slavery situation, however, it did confirm the fact that the French within the party are anti-slavery like I thought, obviously not all of them, but enough for it to matter.
Alright. Sounds good for Texas.
Communists/Socialists early? Just joking, but now to be serious, will this Third Party end up having the regulated fate of any Third Party within the Central, North American Geographical area? Meaning, will they end up like most US Third Parties which just so happens to be, dissolving having been relatively ineffective during the years they were active only to have the other two parties later pick up part of their policies and make some of the changes they want years after the Third Party dissolved?
Of course.
Yep. Just like I thought.
By this do we mean the Texan thought process? The way the Gilded Age modernized and industrialized America, now doing that for Texas? The waves of immigration and rise of nativism? Socialism's rise, Social Darwinism's smothering grasp having taken ahold of the wealthy and some working class? Edited In: Wait... You answered that in the text I quoted and I didn't even recognize that, did I...?
Well maybe no Jim Crow laws? No Polls Tax, no Grandfather Clause, no Segregation? Something similar to the 13th Admendment is passed easier?
Of course, and may I say I'm looking forward to it.
Well, it'll be interesting. Confederates are in for some problems. Last I checked, if they uphold traditional Southern Values of the time, anybody non-white is below them. Que pissing off the Tejanos and the Natives, which happen to be major powers in Texas as far as I know.
We'll hold you to it. I promise.
You're welcome. Can't wait to read it.
Thanks. Now for my second performance with the American Civil War... once we see why it kicked off and what happened during it in this TTL.
I will answer about the third party. The afformentioned third party I talked about, will make an appearance in the 1890's and will stay to present day, unlike other American political parties. As a hint though, this new party is one that has existed in OTL, but has been defunct for a very long time.
Working on Chapter 56 right now. Will post in a few hours.
Sorry for the delay. After much time spent on this post, I give to you the culture of an independent Texas. Man, that was quite an amount of work. Next chapter shall focus solely on the Crimean War. After that is a return to the Crockett Years in Texas.
how dare you make a post of Texas culture and in the music section not mention Texas-reddirt country music!!!!!
Damn that sucks. I hate getting kickedSo a few of you my have already seen it, but for those (like me most of the time) who don't look for such things Chris has been kicked. Why am I bothering to post this, well, he asked me to, and he also asked me to tell you that the next update should be out next Monday.
So a few of you my have already seen it, but for those (like me most of the time) who don't look for such things Chris has been kicked. Why am I bothering to post this, well, he asked me to, and he also asked me to tell you that the next update should be out next Monday.