Should the President be able to be re-elected in consecutive terms?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 96.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 4.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .
Kaiser Chris, you forgot to link Chapter 40 in you threadmarks. Other than that, good story (especially since I'm from Texas) and waiting for more.

Hope you win a Turtledove; you deserve it...

BTW, if you need any help with maps, PM B_Munro or go to the alternate electoral maps thread...
And to think. If only the man hadn't been so greedy his legacy would be oh so different. A founding father of modern Italy (he really wouldn't be all that much, but hey, they'll be people arguing for that, and technically even right now, in this TL, he "helped" found modern Italy via thousands of deaths and a war that he lost). A man who willingly gave up his crown to see his country restored to its proper glory. But now, he's merely a heretic and traitor. A man betrayed by his own allies and killed in his own palace, by the war he started. And to think, in doing this he gave the French a new reputation, more land, and an ally in Italy. I guess, the man though as greedy as he was, ended up being a Francophile with the way he "helped" them out.

Anyways, thanks Chris. It was a suitable ending to this Heresy. Now to see how the rest of the 19th century turns out due to this Sardinian Heresy.

If only is right, and I am sure on this worlds AH.com there are probably a few dozen threads where he has a small personality tweak and ends up as one of the good men in Italian history rather than a tyrant who got thousands killed and ruined his legacy. Oh well, history seems to need fools like him too.


Wait, the United Kingdom and Britannia. I'm assuming this isn't a typo, so I have to guess we're going to see some kind of split in the British Empire in the future, and one that presumably lasts awhile given they are both denying killing the former king of Sardinia. Interesting if this is so.

Anywho, the last trio of updates were great. I'm just disappointed I can't get a full length history book on this world's Italian unification. Keep up the good work.

Magni Imitator: In a way Charles Albert will forever be a lesson in Church teachings in the future on the sin of Greed. How absolute power corrupts absolutely and why all people should strive to be humble and gracious in their life. While it is true that Charles could've avoided all of this by simply helping to create Italy and getting some sort of compromise to retain his power, he was too prideful and didn't want for his kingdom to lose its power or anyone else to sit on the throne of Italy besides a Savoy. I guess you could say that in many ways Charles was a TTL example of Tywin Lannnister, though way less smart. To be honest though I'm not really a huge fan of the OTL Savoys. Under their rule Italy was in a false state of power as the country was always in a state of political unrest and never bothered to industrialized or upgrade its army, always going on idiotic ventures for the sake of rebuilding the glory of Rome. It gets worse when Victor Emmanuel actually supported Mussolini's conquests just so he could add a few titles to his name. In the end Charles was as much of a Francophile as he was OTL since France will get so many benefits from this compared to their original actions.

Pieman97405: The great thing about alternate history is that the life and legacy of an important historical figure can change so rapidly due to the butterflies and small decisions that shape the course of history. My favorite example of this is TL-191 where Lincoln ends up being vilified as the worst President in U.S history, while becoming the founder of the Socialist Party. I'm sure in the future there will be some alternate history scenarios where Charles is a good king and actually cooperates in the Unification. I could imagine someone from our TTL site writing a TL called "The Chronicles of Charles Albert the Great" or some other thing like that. It is true though that for every great man or woman in history, there will always be two fools who will bring about destruction.

I was wondering whether or not you would notice it. I ineternally debated whether or not I should spill a hint about the future rise of Britannia, but since I drop future hints left and right I figured why not. Britannia and the United Kingdom are two completely seperate entities with Britannia coming after the U.K. "Hint, hint" a certain dictator I've been quoting for a regular basis is responsible for this. While they have both denied any historical British involvement in the assassination, I never said they did it at the same time. Anyone guess who the assailant is?

The Italian Unification has been one of my favorite story arcs and I do like everyone's positive reactions. While I do wish I could spend more time on it, and I could even do a seperate TL dedicated to Papal Italy, the thing is that this timeline is called Lone Star Republic. And while it is Texas-centric, I do try and make it a world history timeline and make sure everyone's actions get recorded with the appropriate amount of care. Maybe after I'm done with Lone Star Republic in the future, I can dedicate a seperate TL called "Chronicles of the Lone Star Republic", which goes into further detail on various subjects that would have a greater amount of story to work with, or weren't covered enough.

Unkown: Thanks for the notice with the threadmark.

I'm flattered that you would see my TL as Turtledove material. Since this is my first ever TL it would be a huge honor to even be nominated for an award. While I don't know how many people read the story, I think a fair number have seen it and I could stand a decent chance at winning. Here's hoping that Lone Star Republic makes an appearance in the coming weeks. To be honest though, I will probably face stiff competition as there are plenty of other threads on the forum with the same quality as mine. For now I'll just continue the story and see where it takes me from there.

I'll see what I can do for maps. Right now it's not too much of an issue as the TL will remain somewhat stationary in terms of time. Also getting a new electoral map will be difficult with the massive territorial and state changes the United States will go through in the coming decades. The next Map done by me will be one focused on Italy in the next update.


Chapter 55 will come out either today or tomorrow, that chapter will be about the treaty and the final unification of Italy. After that is the Texan Culture post and then one or two posts on the Crimean War. Overall there won't be constant daily updates this week as I'll try and make a return to Gihren's Glory. Happy New Year everyone and here's to a great 2017!
 
Chapter 55 Italian Unification
Chapter 55 Italian Unification

"Blessed are the children of Italy. For today we become one. Deus Vult!"- Pope Pius IX 1853
"And Britain thought it would be a good idea for me to join her in Crimea. I think I'll stick with my Italian gains thank you very much. Now about that expedition to Indochina."- Emperor Napoleon III 1855
"With France to the west, Italy to the South, and Russia to the east, it is not simple enough for us to ally with Britain. We need to forge new relationships abroad in order to protect the Fatherland. I hear Japan is looking for some guidance."- Foreign Minister Otto von Bismarck 1861

When the Christmas Conference began it soon amounted to a meeting that was less about dealing directly with Sardinia, but rather mostly deciding who gets what from the nation, Italy or France. While it is true that Napoleon had just gained himself a very good ally in Pius, the French Emperor wanted more than just a promise of friendship to compensate for the French lives lost. Alliances always come and go as Napoleon said, but land stays forever, at least for a few decades that is. France's open demands when they went to the conference were the gaining of Savoy, Nice, and Sardinia. While Savoy and Nice were somewhat understandable with the fairly large French population and Frankish history there, Sardinia was unquestionable to the Italians as it had been apart of Pisa for centuries and thus belonged to Italy, while France had never once held direct control of it. Napoleon pointed out that Sardinia had a fairly large Corsican population, since the House of Bonaparte originated from Corsica then it was his sacred duty to protect their rights. Napoleon then went on about "protecting" the rights of other unique ethnicities, especially the Sardinians, and that how in actuality Spain had more of a legitimate claim than the Italians did. The Italian committee shot back that Sardinia had been settled by the Byzantines and it had been given to Pisa by the Pope, therefore giving Pius the right to decide. The French were headstrong on this matter the entire time as they would not allow such a precious geopolitical location in the Mediterranean to go away. Pius had been contemplating the matter and to him there were few options to defy the French, Pius could not excommunicate Napoleon like he did with Charles Albert as that could lead to a possible schism in the Church, and France had proven that it could occupy Rome in the past and control the Papacy. If a new war were to be continued with France, then the Italians would surely lose as they did not have the superior training or technology like the French. So Pius relented to a possible compromise that gave into the French demands, though Italy and by extension the Papal States would get its own due. Beyond that the rest of the terms were merely those by the Confederation which set about to limiting Sardinian influence and power in Italy. These are the following terms:
  1. Sardinia-Piedmont is to pay $1,875,000 reparations to all the Italian states and will take full responsibility for the war. Distribution of the reparations is to be divided based off participation and need for recovery.
  2. Lombardy and South Tyrol in its entirety will be transferred directly to the sovereignty of the Papal States.
  3. The Counties of Nice, Savoy, and the island of Sardinia are to hold referendums on February 14th on whether or not they will stay as members of the Confederation, or become part of the Second French Empire. The option to stay in the Confederation will allow the first to to stay as part of the new Principality of Savoy, but the latter will become independent and if in a monarchy, shall not allow a member of the House of Savoy on the throne.
  4. The Kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont is to become the Principality of Savoy. Any old claims outside of those of the Savoy Dynasty are null and void.
  5. The Italian referendum would be pushed forward to March 17th in order to prevent further issues of Unification in the future.
After the signing of the Treaty of Turin on January 3rd, Pius also made sure to lift the excommunication of the remaining members of the House of Savoy so that peace would move forward. Pius also used his role as Pope further by stating that while fighting for the side of Sardinia was unjust and highly heretical, all soldiers who had been in the opposing army were now forgiven in the light of Christ and the souls of the dead could enter heaven, something that severely overjoyed the religious in Sardinia-Piedmont. The new Prince Victor Emmanuel while not at all in favor of these terms, and mostly ignored during the conference, relented so that his family could preserve its legacy and right to Savoy. There were already talks of establishing a Republic in the new Principality and doing anything to further inflame the people was not something that Victor could afford to do. Napoleon found these terms to be acceptable as he already had received private word from Pius that a unified Italy was more than willing to enter into a future alliance. And while the referendums may not have been able to become rigged like the French ones, Napoleon had high hopes that he would succeed. A month had passed and the results of Savoy's referendums came. Shockingly to the Italian Nationalist movement, all three of the regions had voted to become part of France. Nice and Savoy had been an overwhelming majority with a 83% and 77% respective favor in yes. The Sardinian vote was very close with a 53% vote in favor of annexation. Historians have found that the reason for being so was due to the feelings of animosity of the Sardinians towards Italy, while French agents promised overwhelming autonomy to the ethnic Sardinians if they became apart of France. So unfortunately, Italy had to part with these territories and watch them turnover to France. The issue of Italian irredentionism would not die though despite positive future relations, and the issue would continue well into the 20th century. On the brightside, when the time came for the Italian referendum, all over Italy the results had shown in favor of Unification with an overwhelming 91% vote in favor across the peninsula. It was time for Italy to become a nation.

upload_2017-1-2_22-44-22.png

Aftermath of the Treaty of Turin. French gains in Black, Papal Gains in White.

In the summer of 1853, the Italian Confederate Parliament was called together for one last session in order to discuss the issue of creating a constitution and the framework of Italy. This was a rather special occasion as the city of Rome soon became flooded with millions of Italians who wished to observe the process of the creation of their new country. Special speakers and delegates were also invited from across Italy and outside the nation, to take part in the process. Foreign signatories also took part in the observation with Hungarian President Lajos Kossuth being invited to give advice with his experience on the matter of nationalism. Overall the matter of creating a constitution was not so terrible of an issue as all of the Italian states had similar constitutions with differences mostly residing in division of power and voting rights. Rather, the main question on everyone's minds was who would be the leader of Italy and how would power be divided. Granted Pius was the obvious frontrunner and he could've easily obtained total control of Italy through the will of the people, but the high opposition of nobles and conservatives over the sovereignty of their states was brought up time and time again. Even many of the nationalists while wishing for a unified Italy, still had a deep connection and pride in their home state. Another fact was that the Italian states had contributed so much to the Confederation individually, and Rome would not have been saved from invasion were it not for the actions of King Ferdinand. Thankfully Pius was no Alexander VI as he had no desire to become an all powerful autocrat. He still had a duty to the Catholic Church first and that could not be done if he had to micromanage Italy at the same time. Coming before the parliament again, Pius stated that while he would gladly take the mantle of leadership, he had no desire to obstruct the rights and sovereignty of the monarchs, nor eliminate the unique regional culture of Italy solely for the sake of Unification. He proposed for Italy to be united into a Federal type of government where each state would retain a great deal of autonomy and their rulers would be able to control most of the affairs of their respective states. The central government in Rome would decide Italy's foreign affairs, military matters, economy, and transportation in order to protect Italy and promote its national welfare. Each state would elect a representative to the national legislative branch and anything that wasn't said in the Constitution or passed in Rome, would be decided by the states. This was able to calm the fears of the conservatives and the constitutional process was able to pick up great speed. With the final outcome decided on September 8th.

What came out of the process was the birth of the Italian Federation, or as it would be known in the colonial era, the Holy Roman Empire. The Constitution was merely a continuation of the Roman Constitution as it provided the same basic rights for its people in similarity to the American one. The matter of the government would be divided into three departments. The executive office would be held by the Pope as Head of State, the role as head of state would be held by the Papacy no matter what national origin of the pontiff, and the Pope would nominate a Prime Minister in order to head the legislative branch, the Prime Minister would be approved by the Italian Parliament and would act to lead the cabinet and command the majority of Parliament in government, though the Pope would have executive veto on a law. The legislative branch would be filled with representatives that would be decided based on population of the states. In order to satisfy equality, Pius would give freedom to Lombardy and Venice within Italy, which would be divided into two seperate Republics. A Supreme Court would be created that would uphold the legality of the law within Italy, 1/3rd of the membership would derive from members of the Church in order to make sure that the morality of the laws would be intact and stay Christian. Universal Male suffrage was given to all Italian citizens. The monarchs of the individual member states would retain their powers within the borders of their states based on the individual constitution of each state, the highest honor going to Ferdinand who was made King In the Two Sicilies. Federal departments would be formed with the goal of overseeing implementation of Italian policies and cooperation between the States. Italian would be come the recognized national language of Italy while Latin would hold a position of honor as a de jure language for government documents and procedures.The economy would be a free market one that would implement the Christian Capitalist ideals spearheaded by Pius and would create a Federal Council of Corporations which would protect worker's rights and promote the greater welfare and prosperity of the Italian citizen in the national economy. Each state would have their own self-defense force that would at most make up a corps. A volunteer army would be established that would draw citizens from across the Federation to form the Holy Italian Military. In terms of religion Catholicism was the state religion of all of Italy and Rome would remain a Catholic City with no religious buildings of any other denomination or religious group. Freedom of Religion would be guaranteed though and greater rights were given across the nation with Jews now being able to become elected to office. Finally, the Vatican would maintain a seperate sphere of sovereignty under the Church as represented by the Holy See. When the Constitution was finally signed, all of Italy would rejoice as they had whethered through the trials of nationalism and had finally unified into one country. Special elections would be held by the end of the year in order to elect members to the new Italian Parliament, while Guiseppe Garibaldi was nominated as the first Prime Minister, a position he would retain for many years. For the first time since the downfall of Rome in 476 A.D, Italy was unified as one state, one which would be lead by the Italian people under the protection of the Catholic Church and God. Today the Italian Federation has remained as one of the world's great powers and is a shining beacon of progress in Europe and the greater Christian world. "Romae renascitur" Rome is reborn.

upload_2017-1-2_22-32-8.png
upload_2017-1-2_22-46-13.png

Flag of the Italian Federation (Right) Pope Pius IX announcing the Italian Federation inside the Roman Colosseum (Left)

A/N: A formal Map of the Italian Federation will be posted tomorrow. Vive Italia!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-2_22-36-27.png
    upload_2017-1-2_22-36-27.png
    147.9 KB · Views: 186
Last edited:
Will there be any changes in Italian culture and politics when compared to OTL?

I could see this having GLOBAL ripples throughout the world as their would be less reason to remove Catholicism from education.

Italian culture is going to change significantly as the Catholic Church is now going to be an important part of Italian society and religious devotion will be the same in Italy as it would be in Latin America. Another important change to note is that Italians are going to have major regional identities to modern day with the Federal system. I could be wrong about this since I'm not Italian, but I'm pretty sure that OTL Italians have a greater identity with the nation of Italy then being from Venice, Sardinia, Rome, etc. On the political side if Pius's successors are equally as liberal as him, then Italy will actually turn out to be one of the most liberal states in Europe. The Conservative side will be drawn into two camps; the minority who support the old ways and power of the nobles, and the majority who wish for power to be held by the Catholic Church. Socialism may show up in Italy, but due to the Church's teachings in money and the Federal Council of Corporations, they will be extremely less powerful. When it comes to political parties these are the ones I plan:
  1. National Liberals
  2. Catholic Democratic Party
  3. Conservative Party
  4. Italian Socialist Party
Sometime in the future I may do an update showing the political parties of all the major countries and their ideologies. The Italian political party makeup could also increase in the future. Lastly, with an earlier unification and a fairly strong central government, Italy will be more likely to industrialize earlier on and join the ranks of its neighbors as a great power. Leading to a larger and more stable empire, and Italy becoming important in the world economy.

The founding of the Italian Federation will have huge global ripples later on. The most important being is the later effects that will make the Western World a more conservative place than OTL. That's not to mean that liberalism is dead in any way or form. But the aftermath of the Great War and an alternate rise to fascism and prevention of the Second World War and Holocaust, will cause Europe to generally be more conservative, religious, aristocratic, and capitalist than OTL. Leading to a general more conservative outlook in the rest of the world through its colonies. Catholicism in general gains a lot more power and as a result Catholic parties, voters, politicians, will have a greater result on politics along with the increased spread teachings of the Catholic Church, this being possible with higher membership and devotion. I'm not going to reveal the full changes of the rest of the religions. But here's some sneak info; Protestantism is more or less the same, Orthodoxy gains a lot more power than their current status, Hinduism stays strong in India, Buddhism spreads in the 20th century through revival movements in Asia, Islam will have less radicalism overall but the Shia/Sunni divide will be greater, and Judaism is in the tens of millions due to no holocaust and early liberal tolerance of Jews in the West.
 
The founding of the Italian Federation will have huge global ripples later on. The most important being is the later effects that will make the Western World a more conservative place than OTL. That's not to mean that liberalism is dead in any way or form. But the aftermath of the Great War and an alternate rise to fascism and prevention of the Second World War and Holocaust, will cause Europe to generally be more conservative, religious, aristocratic, and capitalist than OTL. Leading to a general more conservative outlook in the rest of the world through its colonies. Catholicism in general gains a lot more power and as a result Catholic parties, voters, politicians, will have a greater result on politics along with the increased spread teachings of the Catholic Church, this being possible with higher membership and devotion. I'm not going to reveal the full changes of the rest of the religions. But here's some sneak info; Protestantism is more or less the same, Orthodoxy gains a lot more power than their current status, Hinduism stays strong in India, Buddhism spreads in the 20th century through revival movements in Asia, Islam will have less radicalism overall but the Shia/Sunni divide will be greater, and Judaism is in the tens of millions due to no holocaust and early liberal tolerance of Jews in the West.

Makes me excited to see this equivalent to fascism that I expect to exclude the warmongering aspect that was scene in OTL, probably thanks in no part to more influence from the Christian faiths of both East and West. Although a much more powerful Eastern Christianity probably means that the Russian Empire succeeded in it's long desired 'Third Rome' ambitions, since such a feet would definitely have major implications for other Eastern sects like a revival in the Oriental Orthodox churches of Southern India and Iraq.

Although a saner islam will be a huge boon to stability in the Middle East
 
Here is the map of the Italian Federation I promised yesterday. I will be working with other members to try and create a high quality post-1846 Europe map.
upload_2017-1-4_0-36-52.png
 
I was wondering whether or not you would notice it. I ineternally debated whether or not I should spill a hint about the future rise of Britannia, but since I drop future hints left and right I figured why not. Britannia and the United Kingdom are two completely seperate entities with Britannia coming after the U.K. "Hint, hint" a certain dictator I've been quoting for a regular basis is responsible for this. While they have both denied any historical British involvement in the assassination, I never said they did it at the same time. Anyone guess who the assailant is?
Given that real history books allude to the future all the time it would seem odd if you weren't giving us the occasional hint. That out of the way I never thought about our favorite British dictator changing the name (I guess I just filed him under "when this comes it'll be great"), but it does make sense given his views on the monarchy. No guesses on who killed the King for me, I'm not familiar enough with 19th century blond Englishmen, and haven't had enough coffee to make a stab at it.

The most important being is the later effects that will make the Western World a more conservative place than OTL. That's not to mean that liberalism is dead in any way or form. But the aftermath of the Great War and an alternate rise to fascism and prevention of the Second World War and Holocaust

Prevention of the Second World War you say, I'm intrigued. I'm not sure what you have planned (smaller wars to expunge Fascism, a cold war, that vile form of government lasting until now in timeline), but it is going to have drastic knock on effects going down the road.

Anywho, an Italian federation that'll always have the Pope as its head of state, and will be called the Holy Roman Empire. It is a bit of a strange beast, but one that was well worth reading about. A good final(?) update on Italian unification.
 
What political parties does Texas have at the moment, and what parties will it have by 2017?

Given that real history books allude to the future all the time it would seem odd if you weren't giving us the occasional hint. That out of the way I never thought about our favorite British dictator changing the name (I guess I just filed him under "when this comes it'll be great"), but it does make sense given his views on the monarchy. No guesses on who killed the King for me, I'm not familiar enough with 19th century blond Englishmen, and haven't had enough coffee to make a stab at it.



Prevention of the Second World War you say, I'm intrigued. I'm not sure what you have planned (smaller wars to expunge Fascism, a cold war, that vile form of government lasting until now in timeline), but it is going to have drastic knock on effects going down the road.

Anywho, an Italian federation that'll always have the Pope as its head of state, and will be called the Holy Roman Empire. It is a bit of a strange beast, but one that was well worth reading about. A good final(?) update on Italian unification.

terranova210486: The current Political Parties in Texas are the Republican Party and the Western Union Party. Here is a rundown of their two ideologies:

Republican Party: Nationalist. Strong central government. Protectionism. Industrialism. Strong military. Expansionism and support of settlers. Moderate Abolitionism. High investment in education. National infrastructure projects. Keep French Alliance but have moderate ties with America and establish alliance with Germany. Demographics are Tejanos, Germans, Chinese, Catholics, Western Texas, Arizona.

Western Union Party: Heavily Pro-American. Pro-French. decentralized government. Pro-Indian. More authority to commonwealths. Free trade. Agricultural. Pro-Slavery. Improve relations with Mexico. Isolationist outside of regional affairs. More Moderate. Demographics are American immigrants, French, Indians, California, Eastern Texas.

There will be a third party that will enter Texas politics, but they won't enter until the turn of the century.

pieman97405: When I say prevention of the Second World War I don't mean that the rest of the century is going to be a peaceful one, rather the largest wars will be regional conflicts instead of one united world war. Cold Wars, Colonialism, regional wars, and smarter fascism are a heavy part of the mid-20th century. The main thing that is going to be a difference is the future of Asia. Japan and China's role and status after the Great War is going to heavily affect whether or not a Great Pacific War will take the place of WWII.

At least the Holy Roman Empire will actually be Holy, Roman, and an Empire this time. I decided to go the route of the Italian Federation because I found the continued usage of Savoy-led Italy to be too boring of a trend in multiple 19th century timelines. While I want to have the story flow as smoothly as possible, I'm looking to make Lone Star Republic one of big alternate changes. That's why the 1846 Revolutions are so successful TTL. When we reach 2017 Lone Star Republic is going to be a vastly different world than OTL.
 
Well that was a binge reading that lasted two days, two cups of coffee and a piece of fruit cake that may or may not have been made with alcohol. But I'll tell you what, you just found a new follower...

I feel like there is a bit of Kaiserreich in your timeline, a German Empire and an Italian Federation? Holy cow...
 
Well that was a binge reading that lasted two days, two cups of coffee and a piece of fruit cake that may or may not have been made with alcohol. But I'll tell you what, you just found a new follower...

I feel like there is a bit of Kaiserreich in your timeline, a German Empire and an Italian Federation? Holy cow...

I'm deeply humbled by your praise, thanks for following Lone Star Republic. It's a good thing that you came on right know because by the middle of next month we'll probably be starting the infamous Mexican War I've been hinting at so much. Am curious about how alcoholic fruit cake tastes.

The reason why you feel there's Kaiserreich is because parts of this timeline is based on Kaiserreich. The mod is one of my favorite alternate history scenarios but I'm sad because I can't play it with my Mac. The Italian Federation is entirely inspired by Kaiserreich as that was one of my favorite nations in the scenario along with the American Union State and Imperial France. I was planning to do an actual post-WWI German Victory that was based on a realistic Kaiserreich, but so many people have done that scenario that I decided to do this instead. An early German Empire was in my plan no matter what as I always loved the second Reich, one of the greatest nations in Europe and only to be shafted by its horrible allies and Wilhelm's stupidity. I will say though that while Germany may be based on Kaiserreich, not all of it is going to be like the scenario. I do find Germany to be a bit OP and some of the nations a bit unlikely, such as the AOG and the Ottoman Empire still existing. Post-Great War will be vastly different than anything you would expect though. I already hinted at fascist Britain, what comes along with that may shock you.

The Texas culture update will come on Friday or Saturday. After that is a Crimean War post that may become a two parter. Next week will be dedicated to Crockett's and Douglas's term. Also in the future I may do a story post dedicated to the alternate Confederate War, it's the one thing I wished I dedicated more time to since a continued Peru-Bolivia is such a big divergence. Thanks for reading and stick around for more. Long live the Republic!
 
The reason why you feel there's Kaiserreich is because parts of this timeline is based on Kaiserreich. The mod is one of my favorite alternate history scenarios but I'm sad because I can't play it with my Mac. The Italian Federation is entirely inspired by Kaiserreich as that was one of my favorite nations in the scenario along with the American Union State and Imperial France. I was planning to do an actual post-WWI German Victory that was based on a realistic Kaiserreich, but so many people have done that scenario that I decided to do this instead. An early German Empire was in my plan no matter what as I always loved the second Reich, one of the greatest nations in Europe and only to be shafted by its horrible allies and Wilhelm's stupidity. I will say though that while Germany may be based on Kaiserreich, not all of it is going to be like the scenario. I do find Germany to be a bit OP and some of the nations a bit unlikely, such as the AOG and the Ottoman Empire still existing. Post-Great War will be vastly different than anything you would expect though. I already hinted at fascist Britain, what comes along with that may shock you.

With the latest update, it seems like you are setting up the nations of Continental Europe to be more evenly matched with Germany than OTL. Although I am curious how the Scramble for Africa will go in this timeline
 
Hello everyone, quick update here. I'm going to release the latest chapter of Gihren's Glory tonight, so Lone Star Republic will be the next post with tomorrow being the latest. Before I finish writing it however, I want to know what you guys would want in the Texas culture chapter. The chapter is going to be called "Culture of the Lone Star Republic 1836-1861", and will feature several different aspects of Texas society and culture at the time. I would like for you guys to submit to me categories of Texas life that I could possibly write about in detail in the chapter. I already have a set of predetermined categories for the post in an example of a Wikipedia page, but I want to read your requests so that way all of your answers about Texas can be answered. Remember that the window is less than 24 hours so it would be good to respond soon. Thanks for reading and stay tuned for more.
 
Hmm... I guess what I'd like to see is (just brainstorming this here): arts (poetry, books, paintings, type of trends this follows like realism and romanticism or naturalism, stuff like that), architecture (building styles), holidays (national ones, state holidays, how they're celebrated), how patriotism for Texas may have become steeped into their day to day lives, if Texas has become a melting pot, Texan philosophies or rather a way of thinking that's characterized them like America's Social Darwinism during the Gilded Age, sports if they have any, fashion trends, Texan etiquette and customs, how they approach their culture, how the world perceives Texans, languages (like do people walking down a street greet a person in English or Spanish, somethings like that?), Texan gourmet, how Texans spend leisure time if they have it, is their like a theater culture/opera culture, how women are viewed, how foreigners are viewed, how they view themselves, how they view nature.

As I stated above, just a brainstorm, but yeah, those are some things I'd like to see. Obviously not all of them in one go, hell, not all of them period, though maybe.... Naah, don't won't to be too greedy and ask for all of that which would be rude. So yeah, if you get some of that cool. But if there's none of what I said in it, cool.
 
Hello everyone, quick update here. I'm going to release the latest chapter of Gihren's Glory tonight, so Lone Star Republic will be the next post with tomorrow being the latest. Before I finish writing it however, I want to know what you guys would want in the Texas culture chapter. The chapter is going to be called "Culture of the Lone Star Republic 1836-1861", and will feature several different aspects of Texas society and culture at the time. I would like for you guys to submit to me categories of Texas life that I could possibly write about in detail in the chapter. I already have a set of predetermined categories for the post in an example of a Wikipedia page, but I want to read your requests so that way all of your answers about Texas can be answered. Remember that the window is less than 24 hours so it would be good to respond soon. Thanks for reading and stay tuned for more.
I think we should look at the anti-slavery movement in Texas before the ACW breaks out. BTW, will Texas join the South or try to stay neutral?
 
Top