In my second year, Chem major, but last semester was bad enough that I'll be doing somthing else in the fall, as inworking to pay back the student loan.
This semester went better, but my GPA is still really low courtesy of my poor marks in the fall, so I'll be doing something else come September.
Now, now, chaps. While it seemed possible that this all could be resolved at first, it's clearly gone too far now, and further conversation is feeding. So Ignore Lists, eh?
.Does no one here drink coffee (good italian coffee)
What's with all this tea business. My whole family is addicted to it, and apparently so are all of you.
I REMAIN DEFIANT.
dj:
That's how I feel about coffee.
, a brother in arms..Because the Japanese had been dealing with the destruction of Military targets since December 8th, 1941....they expected it, and the destruction of a military targert would not have phased them.
I've heard good things about darjeeling, are they true?
Well it must have done something even if it was just divert troops to AA defences, although I agree it was not effective in breaking morale, which was the hope.
I don't know, but I've often wondered if the "a lathe in every home" story was actually true or it was just a rationalisation for indiscriminate attacks.
In theory they were used on military targets (the aiming points were factories) obviously collateral damage was huge.
IIRC there were voices calling for a demonstration in Tokyo Bay including Edward Teller who was no peace-nick, and a lot of the other scientists on the project.There doesn't seem much question that there were those who wanted to see the effect on buildings IIRC. The moral question is somewhat unresolvable IMO, it did stop the war and probably overall casualties were lower because of that (I know it might have come to an end anyway, but that isn't definite).
That's a good one.
Nothing here has hurt that theory in the least.
You are correct. In many circles I am known as the Father of A-Bomb Revisionism. This thread is going into my files as further evidence that the atom bomb is a hoax. I felt that if I asked the question in this forum format people would be more relaxed and speak freely and I would discover if there had been a backup plan for Little Boy. Obviously the atom bomb denial question is so upsetting to the hoaxsters that they spread operatives throughout the internet to scorn people exposing that or, as we have seen here, insinuating that for a hypothetical model. So, it's been fun and I am that much closer to proving conclusively that we were lied to massively about atom bombs and war.
Hundreds of B-29 carrying M-69 aimable cluster firebomblets exactly like they did to Tokyo 6 months earlier. No shockwave, charred trees left standing and streets clear of debris. The aerial photos do not lie. Atom bomb hoaxsters lie.Just think about Enola gay for a moment. That was the single B-29 the history books say dropped the so-called Little Boy atom bomb on Hiroshima. According to the story the bomber was 30,000 feet above Hiroshima when they dropped the physics package. Still with me? Now, the reports go on to say that the crew of Enola Gay felt two violent shock waves when the bomb went off. That means the blast wave was so powerful it travelled through 28,000 feet of atmospher to rock the huge B-29 TWICE. Imagine the shockwave for those 2000 feet directly below such a violent blast. You might imagine steets covered with strewn debris, tree uprooted and thrown acros town and a big crater on the center of the city. Instead, we find no evidence of a shockwave. Trees charred and still standing with their fragile burnt extremities intact, streets clear, underground piping still functional etc.Also, think about the mushroom cloud seen so often to depict the explosion at Hiroshima and realize that mushroom clouds do not grow out of airborne radial explosions. When did you ever see a fireworks display sprouting a mushroom cloud. Mushroom clouds need to be seeded from the ground and must have a stable upper air mass to cool down into the mushroom configuration. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both bombed with conventional explosives. For Hiroshima my calculations show 164 B-29 using 1000 tons of M-69 firebomblets. They dropped 2700 tns of the same ordinance on Tokyo March 9-10, 1945.
You are frustrated because you can't defend the set of lies we have been taught in the history books. You would like everyone to be as pragmatic as you when discussing these matters
