Maggie Tudor, actually - but James V would be heir to the throne.
Earlier Stuart dynasty in England... hmm...
Maggie Tudor, actually - but James V would be heir to the throne.
I'd also be interested in Friedrich III of Germany, or Isabel I of Brazil, liberator of the slaves, or HREmperor Konradin (the last Staufer heir), or queen Jane of England.
Earlier Stuart dynasty in England... hmm...![]()
no insanely high amount of inbreeding?And no Hapsburgs!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
no insanely high amount of inbreeding?
Oh god, not an alternate monarch but just a bit more genetic luck for this chap
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain
Only for as long as Maggie doesnt marry, and as reugning Queen she probably will.
But if it's after James V was born, that won't matter. He'll still be King of both England and Scotland - Maggie is the blood-ling, after all.
how much luck could he have? his mom was his father niece!Oh god, not an alternate monarch but just a bit more genetic luck for this chap
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain
how much luck could he have? his mom was his father niece!
oh dear. man I would hate be a part of that familyAnd he was related to Juana the Mad of Castile in fourteen different ways! If you look at this tree, there's actually only four people on there not related to her...![]()
I take it Eustace isn't a likely option? What kind of connotations does the name have in England?
YesEustace was the son of King Stephen of England, he died in 1153 at the age of 23.
Yes, I read the earlier post, and wikipedia gives a bad impression of him, that's why I assumed it's not a likely option.