List of Alternate Presidents and PMs II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brundlefly - TAGD Deutschland
THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY

It's like OTL, but worse!

Don't know enough BritPol to know how horrified I should be, but this is what I imagine the U.S. equivalent to be (with apologies to @Ulysses Orbis, who had a similar concept but went Full-On Dystopia instead of OTL But Kind Of Shit).

If so, here's TAGD: Russian Edition


And here's the German edition.

For those unfamiliar with German politics: the FDP candidates range from former Nazis organised in the "Naumann circle" (who planned a nationalist restoration in the early 1950s) to hardcore monetarists of today. The Greens retain both their eco-fascist right-wing and "Fundi" hard left-wing. The PDS/Left is more old-school Leninist, including candidates with dubious anti-Zionist leanings.


1949-1963: Hans Globke (CDU/CSU)
1949 def. Karl Kleikamp (SPD), Friedrich Middelhauve (FDP)
1953 def. Erwin Schoettle (SPD), Werner Naumann (FDP)
1957 def. Erwin Schoettle (SPD), Werner Naumann (FDP)
1961 def. Herbert Hupka (SPD), Werner Best (FDP)


1963-1966: Franz-Josef Strauß (CDU/CSU)
1965 def. Herbert Hupka (SPD), Werner Best (FDP)

1966-1969: Theodor Oberländer (CDU/CSU)

1969-1974: Herbert Hupka (SPD)
def. Theodor Oberländer (CDU/CSU), Siegfried Zoglmann (FDP)
1972 def. Waldemar Kraft (CDU/CSU), Siegfried Zoglmann (FDP)


1974-1982: Wolfgang Abendroth (SPD)
1976 def. Alfred Dregger (CDU/CSU), Erich Mende (FDP)
1980 def. Franz Handlos (CDU/CSU) , Erich Mende (FDP)


1982-1998: Alfred Dregger (CDU/CSU)
1983 def. Erhard Eppler (SPD), Erich Mende (FDP), Herbert Gruhl (Greens)
1987 def. Peter von Oertzen (SPD), Herbert Gruhl (Greens), Jürgen W. Möllemann (FDP)
1990 def. Ottmar Schreiner (SPD), Manfred Brunner (FDP), Hans Modrow (PDS), Herbert Gruhl (Greens)
1994 def. Ulrich Maurer (SPD), Rainer Zitelmann (FDP), Jutta Ditfurth (Greens), Hans Modrow (PDS)


1998-2005: Oskar Lafontaine (SPD)
def. Alfred Dregger (CDU/CSU), Hans-Christian Ströbele (Greens), Konrad Adam (FDP), Hans Modrow (PDS)
2002 def. Günther Beckstein (CDU/CSU), Hans-Christian Ströbele (Greens), Hans-Olaf Henkel (FDP), Inge Höger (PDS)


2005- : Erika Steinbach (CDU/CSU)
def. Oskar Lafontaine (SPD), Hans-Christian Ströbele (Greens), Hans-Olaf Henkel (FDP), Norman Paech (PDS)
2009 def. Andrea Nahles (SPD), Hans-Olaf Henkel (FDP), Ottmar Schreiner (The Left), Jürgen Reents (Greens)
2013 def. Thilo Sarrazin (SPD), Hans Modrow (The Left), Antje Niewisch-Lennartz / Jürgen Reents (Greens), Frank Scheffler (FDP)
 
Have I started a thing :0

I do think the subsequent versions may be slightly more dystopic than my original, but I could easily be wrong.
 
Oppo - Pres. David Milliband of the United States
2017-2019: Donald J. Trump/Mike Pence (Republican) [1]
2016: Hillary Rodham Clinton/Tim Kaine (Democratic)
2019: Mike Pence/Vacant (Republican) [2]
2019-2029:
Mike Pence/Tom Cotton (Republican) [3]
2020:
Elizabeth Warren/John Bel Edwards (Democratic) [4]
2024:
Chris Kennedy/Adam Schiff (Democratic) [5]
2029-Present: David Milliband/Beto O'Rouke (Democratic) [6]
2028:
Ivanka Trump/John Thune (Republican) [7]


[1] Trump's administration would be remembered for being unable to get things done. The Republican health care plan passed, but it was disliked by most Republicans, and almost all of the general public. One piece of bipartisan legislation that succeeded would be the Equal Opportunity to Govern Amendment (allowing anyone who has lived in the U.S. for fourteen years to become president). Overall, Trump's presidency has been seen below average in historical ratings of presidents, but not as bad as many thought.

[2] Eventually getting tired of the office, Trump resigned to be replaced by his Vice President, Mike Pence.

[3] Pence would be much more of a conventional Republican, alienating most of Trump's populist base (some would move on to be Gabbard Democrats). Pence was much easier to work with the Republican Congress, but as Democrats took over in the 2026 mid-terms, he fell to pressure. Despite being one of the most conservative members of the House, many saw Pence as a moderate, which has been a reason for his success.

[4] Pence would be renominated almost unopposed, with only Congressman Justin Amash running against him. Warren would also win by a large margin over New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Hawai'i Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. The election was a bigger victory for Pence than expected. While he would lose some of the Mid-West, he would make gains in traditionally red states.

[5] After Warren's loss, the moderate faction was expected to take the nomination. With the President's high popularity, New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, the expected front-runner, declined to run. While a few others ran, Illinois Governor Chris Kennedy would take up the mantle of the DLC. Kennedy was behind the entire campaign and Pence won by a 1996-esque margin.

[6] David Milliband has one of the most interesting stories of any president. Milliband was a Member of Parlament and a member of the Blair and Brown cabinets. He would run for the leadership of the Labour Party, losing to his younger brother Ed. He would then become the President of the IRC, moving to New York. He would gain American recognition for his opposition to Trump's travel ban and policies on refugees. After Andrew Cuomo retired, Milliband was encouraged by former Warren staffers to run for Governor. He would take the Democratic nomination and the governorship. Now, thanks to the Equal Opportunity to Govern Amendment, he was elected president. Time will tell how successful his administration is.

[7] The Republican nomination would be a battle between Vice President Cotton, businessman Donald Trump Jr., Senators Ben Sasse and Rand Paul, and businesswoman, model, and former presidential advisor Ivanka Trump. The two Trumps would be ahead (with Donald leading), and Cotton, Sasse, and Paul competed for second place. After the early primaries, the three would drop out, leaving it to just the Trumps. Ivanka would ultimately come on top in a close match. The Democrats would have Gabbard, Milliband, and (finally) Booker. Milliband was able to bridge the gap between the two factions of the party. The general election would be a dirty campaign, with Trump using the same nativist campaign strategies as her father. Conservative surrogates called Milliband a puppet of the United Kingdom, while liberals felt that Trump was a puppet of her father. After eleven years of Republican rule, the nation wanted new leadership. Despite polling showing the race to be a toss-up, Milliband would win by five points.
 
Maybe this guy can be a better dystopian leader? He believes in British Israelism

I think you may be mixing him up with Robert Bradford... who was certainly out there and can probably be argued as being the closest the National Front came to an actual MP.
 
I think you may be mixing him up with Robert Bradford... who was certainly out there and can probably be argued as being the closest the National Front came to an actual MP.

If you look further down the article you can see he does believe in British Israelism. Though Bradford is also pretty dystopian.
 
Gonzo - Trí dorcha gloine
Trí dorcha gloine

1932-1938: Eamon de Valera (Fianna Fail)
1932: W. T. Cosgrave (Cumann na nGaedheal), Thomas J. O'Connell (Labour), Michael Heffernan (Farmers')
1933: W. T. Cosgrave (Cumann na nGaedheal), Frank MacDermot (National Centre), William Norton (Labour)
1937 (Minority): Eoin O'Duffy (Fine Gael), William Norton (Labour)

1938-1943: Eoin O'Duffy (Fine Gael)
1938: Eamon de Valera (Fianna Fail), William Norton (Labour)
1943: Eamon de Valera (Fianna Fail), William Norton (Labour), Michael Donnellan (Clann na Talmhan)

1943-1953: Richard Mulcahy (Fine Gael)
1946: Eamon de Valera (Fianna Fail), Joseph Blowick (Clann na Talmhan), James Everett (National Labour)
1950 (Minority): Eamon de Valera (Fianna Fail), William Norton (Labour), Joseph Blowick (Clann na Talmhan), James Everett (National Labour)

1953-1961: Sean MacBride (Fianna Fail)
1953 (Confidence & Supply w/ Clann na Talmhan): Richard Mulcahy (Fine Gael), William Norton (Labour), Joseph Blowick (Clann na Talmhan), James Everett (National Labour)
1957: Richard Mulcahy (Fine Gael), William Norton (Labour), Joseph Blowick (Clann na Talmhan), Margaret Buckley (Sinn Fein)

1961-1967: Noel Browne (Fianna Fail)
1962 (Confidence & Supply w/ Clann na Talmhan): Oliver J. Flanagan (Fine Gael), Brendan Corish (Labour), Joseph Blowick (Clann na Talmhan)
1967-1975: Oliver J. Flanagan (Fine Gael)
1967: Noel Browne (Fianna Fail), Brendan Corish (Labour)
1971: Noel Browne (Fianna Fail), Brendan Corish (Labour)

1975-1977: Kevin Boland (Fianna Fail)
1975: Oliver J. Flanagan (Fine Gael), Brendan Corish (Labour)
1977-1979: James Kelly (Fianna Fail)
1979-1986: Conor Cruise O'Brien (National Coalition)
1979: James Kelly (Fianna Fail), Stephen Coughlan (Social Credit)
1984: James Kelly (Fianna Fail), Stephen Coughlan (Social Credit), Tomas Mac Giolla (Sinn Fein)

1986-1989: Alice Glenn (National Coalition)
1989-1991: Brian Lenihan, Snr. (Fianna Fail)
1989: Alice Glenn (Fine Gael), Jim Kemmy (Labour), Roibeárd Ó Seachnasaigh (Sinn Fein), Stan Gebler Davies (Democratic Unionist)
1991-1999: P. J. Mara (Fianna Fail)
1993: Jim Kemmy (Labour), Garret Fitzgerald (Fine Gael), Alice Glenn (Catholic Democrats - The Nationals), Roibeárd Ó Seachnasaigh (Sinn Fein), Stan Gebler Davies (Democratic Unionist)
1997: Dana Rosemary Scallon (National Democrats), Michael Noonan (Fine Gael), Mary Robinson (Labour), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein)

1999-2002: Padraig Flynn (Fianna Fail)
2002-2006: Dana Rosemary Scallon (National Democrats)
2002 (Minority): Padraig Flynn (Fianna Fail), Michael Noonan (Fine Gael), Pat Rabbitte (Labour), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein)
2006-2012: Mary Coughlan (Daonlathaithe Críostaí)
2006: Dana Rosemary Scallon (National Democrats), Pat Rabbitte (Labour), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein)
2010: Niamh Ui Bhriain (National Democrats), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein), Pat Rabbitte (Labour)

2012-????: Danny Healy-Rae (Daonlathaithe Críostaí)
2015-2015: Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein)
2015 (Feb) (Minority; Support from Socialist Party): Niamh Ui Bhriain (National Democrats), Danny Healy-Rae (Daonlathaithe Críostaí), Joan Burton (Labour), Paul Gogarty (Green), Joe Higgins (Socialist)
2015-2016: Brian Crowley (Daonlathaithe Críostaí)
2015 (Sep) (Minority): Niamh Ui Bhriain (National Democrats), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein), Joan Burton (Labour), Paul Gogarty (Green), Joe Higgins (Socialist)
2016-2017: Niamh Ui Bhriain (National Democrats)
2016 (Minority; support from Daonlathaithe Críostaí rebels): Danny Healy-Rae (Daonlathaithe Críostaí), Gerry Adams (Sinn Fein), Joan Burton (Labour), Paul Gogarty (Green), Joe Higgins (Socialist)
2017-????: Lucinda Creighton (Daonlathaithe Críostaí)
2017 (Minority): Niamh Ui Bhriain (National Democrats), Mary Lou McDonald (Sinn Fein), Joan Burton (Labour), Paul Gogarty (Green), Joe Higgins (Socialist)
 
Last edited:
I feel like you're diverging a bit from the original premise, which (AFAICT) was to have essentially the same political situation as OTL but replace all party leaders with significantly worse people.
 
I feel like you're diverging a bit from the original premise, which (AFAICT) was to have essentially the same political situation as OTL but replace all party leaders with significantly worse people.
I would agree with you there - though notably "Through a Glass Darkly" whilst shittier than OTL over all does have hope spots - Noel Skelton would likely have been really rather good as PM, Anthony Nutting would have been poor due to inability to execute policy not policy itself (similarly to Heath) and Duff Cooper would have been far better domestically than Eden to my mind at least (though this would be backed up by a far more aggressive hostile policy if a more measured one, perhaps). Mason onwards is more conventionally "like OTL but worse" however, but again Collins and Drling are bad but hardly dystopic. It's OTL but worse, but also to an extent just "OTL but different".

If I'd wanted it really bad Powell would have been the Thatcher analogue.
 
InfernoMole - Сквозь стекло мрачно
I would agree with you there - though notably "Through a Glass Darkly" whilst shittier than OTL over all does have hope spots - Noel Skelton would likely have been really rather good as PM, Anthony Nutting would have been poor due to inability to execute policy not policy itself (similarly to Heath) and Duff Cooper would have been far better domestically than Eden to my mind at least (though this would be backed up by a far more aggressive hostile policy if a more measured one, perhaps). Mason onwards is more conventionally "like OTL but worse" however, but again Collins and Drling are bad but hardly dystopic. It's OTL but worse, but also to an extent just "OTL but different".

If I'd wanted it really bad Powell would have been the Thatcher analogue.

Ah.

If so...

Сквозь стекло мрачно

1991-1996: Boris Yeltsin (Independent)
1991: def. Nikolai Ryzhkov (KPSS), Vladimir Zhirinovsky (LDPR)
1996-2000: Viktor Chernomyrdin (Our Home - Russia)
1996: def. Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Vladimir Zhirinovsky (LDPR)
2000-2004: Sergey Shoygu (Unity)
2000: def. Viktor Chernomyrdin (Our Home - Russia), Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Irina Khakamada (Union of Rightist Forces), Grigory Yavlinsky (Yabloko), Vladimir Zhirinovsky (Zhirinovsky Bloc)
2004: def. Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Sergei Kiriyenko (Union of Rightist Forces), Grigory Yavlinsky (Yabloko)
2008-2012: Boris Gryzlov (Unity)
2008: def. Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Boris Nemtsov (Union of Rightist Forces), Grigory Yavlinsky (Yabloko)
2012-2016: Dmitry Medvedev (Unity)
2012: def. Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Sergei Kiriyenko (Union of Rightist Forces)
2016-present: Maria Zakharova (Unity)
2016: def. Gennadiy Zyuganov (KPRF), Alexei Navalny (A New Russia), Sergei Kiriyenko (Union of Rightist Forces)
 
Mumby - British Macronisme
British Macronisme

1997-2007: Tony Blair (Labour)
1997 GE (Labour majority) def. John Major (Conservative), Paddy Ashdown (Liberal Democrat), David Trimble (UUP)
2001 PME 1st round def. William Hague (Conservative), Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat)
2001 PME 2nd round def. William Hague (Conservative)
2001 LE (Labour majority) def. William Hague (Conservative), Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat)
2005 PME 1st round def. Michael Howard (Conservative), Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat), Roger Knapman (UKIP)
2005 PME 2nd round def. Michael Howard (Conservative)
2005 LE (Labour majority) def. Michael Howard (Conservative), Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat), Ian Paisley (DUP)

2007-2009: Gordon Brown (Labour)
2009-2014: David Cameron (Conservative)
2009 PME 1st round def. Gordon Brown (Labour), Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat), Nigel Farage (UKIP)
2009 PME 2nd round def. Gordon Brown (Labour)
2009 LE (Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition) def. Harriet Harman (Labour), Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat), Peter Robinson (DUP)
2013 PME 1st round def. Ed Miliband (Labour), Nigel Farage (UKIP), Vince Cable (Liberal Democrat), Natalie Bennett (Green)
2013 PME 2nd round def. Ed Miliband (Labour)
2013 LE (Conservative-UKIP Coalition) def. Harriet Harman (Labour), Nigel Farage (UKIP), Vince Cable (Liberal Democrat), Peter Robinson (DUP)

2014-2017: Boris Johnson (Conservative)
2015 LE (Labour minority) def. Boris Johnson (Conservative), Vince Cable (Liberal Democrat), Paul Nuttall (UKIP)
2017-: David Miliband (Democratic Modernist)
2017 PME 1st round def. Anne Marie Waters (UKIP), Aaron Bastani (Britannia Unchained), Philip Hammond (Conservative), Tom Watson (Labour)
2017 PME 2nd round def. Anne Marie Waters (Patriotic Alliance)
2017 LE (Democratic Modernist-Liberal Democrat Alliance) def. Philip Hammond (Conservative), Tom Watson (Labour), Richard Burgon (Britannia Unchained), Anne Marie Waters (Patriotic Alliance)

The introduction of Direct Prime Ministerial Elections, on a runoff system modelled after France, was controversial to say the least. It combined both American presidentialism and European imitation, things which people found distinctly unsavoury in the new Prime Minister. Blair's own popularity lent strength to Labour in 2001 as he ensured the timetable for legislative elections came immediately after the prime ministerial election. In 2005 however, the quagmire of Iraq meant Blair only narrowly achieved victory in the 2nd round, and while he received a third majority in Parliament afterwards it was on a risible share of the vote. Blair stood down in 2007, well aware that his own unpopularity put the party in danger.

Brown was not well suited to Britain's newly presidential system. The rigid 'prime ministerial elections every four years' bound him, and after the global financial system nearly collapsed, his popularity was in shreds. While he survived into the second round of the prime ministerial election, he was defeated by a wide margin and it was only thanks to the Harman Honeymoon and the afterglow of the Cleggasm that prevented the Tories from obtaining a majority. To maintain the coalition, which many expected to collapse quickly, the Fixed Terms Parliament Act was introduced, setting the length of a Parliament to four years, de facto ensuring that legislative elections would occur shortly after prime ministerial elections, as had become the norm.

Four years of austerity withered Conservative popularity, but did much more harm to the Lib Dems and especially to Nick Clegg. It also saw Eurosceptic rebellion on the Tory backbenches and saw Nigel Farage rise to national prominence. When the country went to the polls in 2013, many expected a Labour victory. As it was, Ed Miliband only narrowly came ahead of the surging Farage. The Lib Dems suffered as rumours Clegg wished to endorse Cameron's prime ministerial candidacy led to a rebellion and his deposition. Cable led the party into the electoral gauntlet, but his leadership honeymoon is believed to have saved the party from total annihilation. While Cameron survived his second prime ministerial election, at the ensuing legislative election, UKIP took the momentum from an astonishing prime ministerial campaign and went on to win more seats than the Lib Dems who only just remained in double figures. Another hung parliament and another Tory led Coalition, conditional on a referendum of leaving the European Union in 2014.

Cameron's failure to negotiate a convincing deal he could go to the country with, led to the victory of the Leave campaign and his resignation. While some believed this meant Farage would become Prime Minister, it led to a Tory leadership election and the man who had upset Cameron's best laid plans gained the office he so coveted. While Farage resigned due to health problems and UKIP steadily imploded, and Labour elected a leftist and elderly maverick, Johnson saw his rising poll numbers and decided to call a snap legislative election in 2015. The result was astonishing. Johnson flailed on the campaign trail, while Michael Meacher went from strength to strength.
The Tories lost their majority while Labour became the largest party in Parliament. This was an unprecedented situation. The introduction of direct prime ministerial election called into question whether Johnson could continue. Meacher called a vote of no confidence in Johnson, but the Lib Dems and UKIP rallied to Johnson to prevent Meacher from taking office. Meacher's death later that year and the beginning of internecine conflict between Labour's left and right allowed Johnson to continue as Prime Minister but as a lame duck incapable to passing much of his agenda.

The country became increasingly polarised, until the scheduled Prime Ministerial election came around in 2017. By this time, Britain had left the European Union, but on a distinctly soft basis, as Labour and Tory moderates worked together to prevent a Hard Brexit. It was clear Johnson's position was no longer tenable and stepped aside for a 'safe pair of hands'. Meanwhile, Labour's backstabber in chief aimed to reclaim the office of Prime Minister. But matters quickly spiralled out of control as UKIP re-emerged from the electoral quagmire under a 'neo-fascist' populist, calling for a much harder break with Europe. The left of Labour, dissatisfied the leadership election after Meacher's death, rallied around Aaron Bastani and his Britannia Unchained campaign. And then David Miliband came back from across the sea, having earned some laurels in the Clinton Administration. He stood on a 'Democratic Modernist' platform, to much rolling of eyes. But he steadily rose in the polls and earned the endorsement of the Lib Dems under Jo Swinson. While on the campaign trail he defeated Zach Goldsmith in his own by-election. In the 1st round, the traditional parties were quickly eliminated to shock from all sides. It would be a run off between Miliband and Waters, a choice between moderation and neo-fascism. In the 2nd round, Waters rebranded UKIP as the Patriotic Alliance and there were fears that enough Eurosceptic Tory voters and dissatisfied working class Labour voters could get her into Number 10. As it was she was defeated by a wide margin, and in the ensuing legislative election, the Democratic Modernist-Liberal Democrat Alliance won a huge majority. The country wonders what comes next...
 
Last edited:
Major Crimson - Fear Nothing But God
Something for a TL idea I've had and may or may not do. Focuses on a successful Rye House plot which leads to the deposition of James II a little early and - with more radical elements of the plot taking control. The resultant government is a republican one, considerably more democratic than that of the First Commonwealth and based largely on early radical ideas. A brief civil war occurs, not dissimilar to the OTL Glorious Revolution and led by the Duke of Monmouth among others, the Commonwealth rebels are able to route James and his supporters within a year. As per OTL, the Stuarts flee to Paris along with the Tories and others who fear the new government. The Duke of Monmouth, as a neutral power and military leader acts as the first caretaker "Lord Protector" before giving way to Robert West who focuses on land reform and establishing a stable political system before, in turn, handing over to Locke who establishes his own "Commonwealth". Democratic, with elections every two years, the leader of the new Commonmen Assembly (House of Commons) elects a new "High Speaker" every election who acts as executive and speaker for both the Commonmen Assembly and for the High Assmebly (House of Lords). The continued existence of the High Assembly and of titles in general is a point of major debate and a divider between the two sides of mainstream "Liberal" politics, Levellers and Commonwealthmen. This depicts the first 25 years or so of the Commonwealth's life and how its political system shapes up. There's lots of leader continuation as elections occur every two years but nevertheless, I learnt a bunch of new names looking into this.

Fear Nothing But God

Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England and Scotland

1683-1686 - Duke of Monmouth (Independent) [1]

1686-1688 - Robert West (Green Ribbon/Leveller) [2]

1688 - John Locke (Leveller) [3]


High Speaker of the Commonwealth of Albion and Ireland

1688-1703 - John Locke (Leveller) [3]

def. 1688 John Ayloffe (Green Ribbon), Thomas Belasyse (Old Protectors), Earl of Argyll (Kirk Party), John Owen (Godly)
def. 1690 Baille of Jerviswood (Diggers), Thomas Belasyse (Old Protectors), Earl of Argyll (Kirk Party), John Ayloffe (Green Ribbon), William Carstares (Godly)
def. 1692 Baille of Jerviswood (Diggers), John Lambert (Old Protectors), Aaron Smith (Green Ribbon),
Earl of Argyll (Kirk Party), Robert Ferguson (Godly)
def. 1694 John Trenchard/Richard Nelthorpe (Diggers/Green Ribbon), Charles Fleetwood (Old Protectors), Robert Ferguson (Godly)
def. 1696 John Trenchard (Commonwealthmen),
Charles Fleetwood (Old Protectors),
William Willams (New Protectors), John Paterson (Godly)
def. 1698 John Trenchard (Commonwealthmen), William Willams (Whig), Charles Fleetwood (Protector), John Paterson(Godly)
def. 1700 John Trenchard (Commonwealthmen), Robert Harley (Whig), Richard Cromwell (Protector) [6], John Graham(Godly)

def. 1702 Robert Harley (Whig), Walter Moyle (Commonwealthmen), John Graham (Godly), Richard Cromwell (Protector)


1703-1704 - Awnsham Churchill (Leveller) [4]


1704-1708 - David Leslie (Whig) [5]
def. 1704 Awnsham Churchill (Leveller), John Owen (Godly), Walter Moyle (Commonwealthmen), Richard Cromwell (Protector), Jon Straw (Diggers)
def. 1706 Richard Hampden (Diggers), Lord Oxford (Leveller), Angus North (Godly), Walter Moyle (Commonwealthmen), Richard Cromwell (Protector)


[1] When the members of the Green Ribbon Club, who had for some years been plotting the deposition of James II, learned that they had a traitor among them their plans were rapidly accelerated. Raising an army of volunteers they marched on Westminster in May 1683 and, with the coward King James fleeing the city for Paris, set up a new English and Scottish Commonwealth. The Duke of Monmouth commanded this army, having raised more than half of it himself and despite his own claims to the throne, was persuaded to support a republican government by the rest of the Club. When James returned in July with an army consisting of loyalists and French soldiers, Monmouth forged his volunteer forced into the second New Model Army and was appointed Lord Protector as well as Supreme General of the Commonwealth Forces. Monmouth routed the exiled King at the Battle of Christmas Day and James, captured, was forced to sign away his titles, acknowledge the new state and was eventually publicly shamed. As a few minor rebellions flared up Monmouth remained in place for a further two years in order to ensure stability but readily handed the reigns of power to civilian leaders once his time was up.

[2] Robert West is an oft forgotten leader in early Commonwealth politics, sandwiched awkwardly between the military hero Monmouth and the Father of the Nation that followed him, he is none the less greatly respected by historians and generally ranked very favourably. West ensured the passing of the Commonwealth Constitution Bill through Parliament which entitled the new government to make "emergency and essential" reforms to the new government, passing early land reform to take all crown estates and some lordly holdings into common ownership, he was able to narrowly avoid war with France but his greatest achievement is likely holding together the various factions of the rebels in the early years. Consisting of everything from hardline, anti-catholic Protestants to Leveller radicals to Presbyterian dissident ministers, the coalition was broad. Nevertheless, West was able to satisfy the demands of all factions whilst himself holding the loyalty of the two "Green" parties, the Levellers and the more radical, doctrinarian Green Ribbon. The office wore on West's health however and, satisfied that the Magnificent Revolution was safe, handed over to his friend and ally John Locke.

[3] Locke is uniquely revered within the relatively cynical Albionic nation. The true father of the commonwealth, Locke penned the vast majority of the Commonwealth's new constitution act and whilst deliberately preserving the "unwritten constitution" his Commonwealth Constitution Act of 1688 remains the most significant piece of constitutional legislation ever passed in the Commonwealth. Ever dramatic, Locke christened the new Commonwealth as "Albion", calling for a mythical name for his ambitious project. He created the new Chambers of Assembly consisting of the non-partisan High Assembly and partisan Commonman Assembly which represented the interests of both Lords and the Church and the People, respectively. Locke's newly established position of High Speaker (appointed by members of both Chambers of Assembly) made him Head of State as well as Speaker in both Houses. The franchise was extended to all those who were literate and held any amount of land, which was most adult men following his land and educational policies. Locke's ideas of liberalism slowly began to merge with the egalitarian and interventionist thoughts of the Levellers and a policy of Westite-Lockean Economics (OTL Georgism mixed with Locke's ideas of ownership via working the land) was instituted, with all land held by the government on behalf of the people but often loaned "indefinitely" to peasant farmers. If you could work it, you could own it. Locke also established the basis of Albion's Enlightened Childe program of state-funded and mandated Sunday school education. This, along with the governmental support of printing press expansion, rapidly made Albion the most literate country in Europe and possibly the world. War with France, avoided under West, proved inevitable as Britain was dragged into the Ten Years War. Their victory in North America, winning them Louisiana, Ohio and Arcadia whilst selling Rupert's Land to the French, was compounded by a Dutch-German route of French forces in Europe. The resultant Anglo-Dutch alliance or "Sisterhood of Republics" would be expanded over the coming decades and even centuries and remains the world's oldest alliance. The Commonwealth's victory abroad and success at home ensured Locke was an unbeatable High Speaker, only the splitting of radical Levellers off into the "Digger" faction (who were dismayed at Locke's moderation in the face of the High Assembly) and the resultant Commonwealthmen Party allowed for a genuine opposition to emerge. Locke's debates with close friend but political rival John Trenchard are famous and would set the stage for a series of tense political rivalries between the Speaker and Leader of the Opposition in the coming centuries. Toward the end of Locke's tenure, he focused on more controversial aspects of his beliefs and attempted to further the rights and political engagement of women as well as further emancipation of minority religions, affording Catholics some of the rights that they were stripped of following the revolution. This led to a general decline in Leveller popularity though Locke remained a national hero. Eventually, the strains of office became too much and Locke died of a heart attack in May 1703, almost exactly 20 years after the deposition of King James. Whilst the Levellers would struggle in the years following his death, Locke had established a party and movement that consistently remains Albion's "natural ruling party". The Commonwealth was born from his mind and he remains its greatest hero, it is not unusual even today for boys to be given the first name "Locke".

[4] Churchill was a student and admirer of Locke and historians generally believe him to be competent in his own right. His ideas for more radical electoral reform, however, worried some parts of the electorate and this fear, combined with a general feeling of exhaustion with Leveller victories in the past eight elections led to a relatively new, moderate opposition taking over.

[5] David Leslie was Albion's first Whig High Speaker. Whilst Trenchard's Commonwealthmen had formed the main opposition under Locke, Trenchard himself stepped back from frontline politics in 1700 and under Walter Moyle the Commonwealthmen succumbed to infighting and disunity. This allowed the moderate and centrist Whigs, a splinter of the hard-right Old Protectors (made up almost entirely of old supporters of the Cromwellian Protectorate and in favour of reestablishing said old order) who adopted the old tenants of Whiggism and moderate liberalism, to take the High Speaker's chair. Leslie was a moderate in all things, largely in favour of the political and economic status quo he lowered taxes and allowed for greater accumulation of land under the most successful farmers. He was also a proponent of free trade, signing treaties with the Dutch, Portuguese and even the French that brought boons to the Albionic economy. Thanks to the reforms started by Locke, it was under Leslie's Speakership that the first industrial revolution slowly began to take shape and minor potteries popped up across the nation. The economy boomed and this, combined with Leslie's non-interventionist stance abroad led to an explosion of banks and corporations within the Commonwealth. Despite this, however, Leslie was forced into cooperation with the Godly Party and even some moderate Protectors in his second term as the resurgent Diggers and still-powerful Levellers turned his majority in the Assembly into a minority. With cooperation between the Levellers and Diggers mounting in the face of the 1708 election, it seems that Leslie's Whig might be pushed back to the opposition benches sooner rather than later...

[6] The return of the younger Cromwell to Commonwealth politics was unexpected but he seemed to have matured in exile and, riding on the coattails of his father, kept the Protectors a united and powerful force in the face of moderate opposition. Some fear that he will make a mad dash for power but for now Richard Cromwell is content to wait, building a true conservative opposition and setting up the conditions neccessary for a return to autocracy...

Party Breakdown:

Levellers -
A coalition of both traditional, proto-socialist Levellers as per OTL and Lockean ideas of property and liberty. Vaguely social democratic or Libertarian Socialist, they are major believers in the division of powers and social liberties. They are also surprisingly feministic for the 17th/18th centuries, espousing a legal equality for women in stark contrast to all other parties, they favour women's suffrage in the long term but first call for "political education of the fairer sex" and indeed are in favour of - albeit low - economic and educational limits on just who can vote. Have implemented the world's first public education system with government funded Sunday Schooling. Locke who led the party and country for more than a decade is considered to be the most important of the country's founding fathers and the Levellers largely formed in his image. Because of this, they are often considered the natural ruling party of the Commonwealth.

Green Ribbon - More extreme levellers, slightly more authoritarian and in favour of more dramatic reform including the abolition of any and all titles as well as the abolition of the High Assembly. Led by more extreme members of the initial Rye House Plot.

Diggers - Similarly to Green Ribbon, to the left of the Levellers but more comparable to Anarcho-Communists than their more authoritarian brethren in the GR. Want to give more power to devolved county governments and to establish a primacy for agricultural workers in the Commonwealth. Almost entirely agricultural in their support they also act as a farmer's interest party. Merge with Green Ribbon to form the Commonwealthmen but then break away again once that party drifts towards more moderate and populist ideas. Their second incarnation is possibly even more radical than the first and calls for universal male suffrage regardless of wealth or education, the expansion of government aid programs and a policy of religion equality, which distinguishes them from the other parties, all Protestant, Puritan or Presbytarian.

Commonwealthmen - A coalition of the above two parties, the Commonwealthmen from the first early opposition to the Levellers. In favour of the more decentralised government, the abolition of the High Assembly, devolution to the regions and higher taxes than their Leveller brethren. Want to increase the frequency of elections from bi-annual to annual. Agricultural in their base they start to drift towards something similar to Jacksonian Democracy as the 1700s roll around, become increasingly militant and populist and favour imperial expansion. The Diggers break away again, more radical and popular than ever.

Old Protector/Protector - Authoritarian and conservative, led by the leaders of the old Commonwealth and supporters of Cromwell, the Protectors are the most conservative grouping within the Assembly. They call for the re-establishment of the Lord Protector and the reimposition of dictatorial, Puritan government.

New Protector/Whig - A splinter of moderate Protectors formed what we would consider a classical liberal party, in favour of more lax taxes on land and less firm policing of fairness as well as a more isolationist foreign policy than the relatively interventionist Levellers, Commonwealthmen and Protectors. They believe in the political status quo and the continued existence of the High Assembly, turning to the "ancestral and educational abilities of the country's Lords which are so essential in the steering of the ship of state. Following defections from left and right and a strong election performance in 1704 they are able to briefly win power following Locke's death in 1703.

Kirk Party - Little more than a political vehicle for the Earl of Argyll, the Kirk Party broadly represented Scottish interests within the Commonwealth but rapidly faded into obscurity.

Godly Party - The Presbytarian ministers so essential in the original revolution now form a large voting block in both chambers of the Assembly. Ensuring the dominance and privileges of the Protestant faith are maintained, all of their Lords and Commonmen are Priests or Ministers and they further conservative social values and paternalistic ideas.




This took waaaaaaaaaaay longer than it was meant to but I may pop back to add in more backstory and annotations but feel free to ask questions.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top