Probably a combo of those factorsWhat would see Maria Anna sent to France here? The fact that Ohil doesn’t want to remarry and that the next best option is younger ir already tied to France?
Probably a combo of those factorsWhat would see Maria Anna sent to France here? The fact that Ohil doesn’t want to remarry and that the next best option is younger ir already tied to France?
I imagine that Eleanor elopes with Frederick (which is weird because I thought they only met during the interval between her two marriages) and so Charles offers Isabella in Portugal, which again is weird because she was married in Denmark well before Charles was offering a sister in Portugal.@isabella and others can correct me, but Karl V's sister never went to Castile/was never in her grandpa's custody so a Portuguese marriage is a bit unlikely. Would help if you explained a bit of background to why Eleonore ends up with Pfalz and Isabella in Lisbon instead (the dates you give for Isabel of Portugal would indicate that Karl V didn't dilly-dally about marrying her)
Austria and Hungary are given to Maximilian,
Yes, Eleanor and Frederick have a scandalous elopement and so Charles offers his sister to PortugalI imagine that Eleanor elopes with Frederick (which is weird because I thought they only met during the interval between her two marriages) and so Charles offers Isabella in Portugal, which again is weird because she was married in Denmark well before Charles was offering a sister in Portugal.
ITTL Ferdinand is childless so he has no choice (note I did not put any descendants of Ferdinand down)They are not Charles's to give and Hungary never belonged to Charles in the first place, why Ferdinand would agree to give up Hungary in favor of his nephew?
ITTL Ferdinand is childless so he has no choice (note I did not put any descendants of Ferdinand down)
...that is true. I'll edit out HungaryAs far as Austria is involved, sure thing, but Hungary was his wife's inheritance or "inheritance" and I doubt even pro-Habsburg nobles would be going to back son of Charles V with no connection to previous dynasty who is a Spaniard unable to help them.
IOTL's Mary I?Gender swapped children of Philip of Burgundy and Joanna of Castile.
1. Emperor Charles V (November 15 1498-Febuary 25 1558) m. Isabella of Portugal (October 24 1503-May 1 1539) [a] Isabella Jagiellon (January 18, 1519-September 15 1559) .
2. Archduchess Eleanor (February 24 1500-September 21 1558) m. King John III of Portugal (June 7 1502-June 11 1557)
3. Archduke Ferdinand (July 18 1501-January 19 1526) m. Anne of Bohemia and Hungary (July 23 1503-January 27 1547)
4. Archduchess Mary (March 10 1503-July 25 1564) m. King Louis II of Hungary and Bohemia (July i 1506-August 29 1526)
5. Emperor Philip (September 18 1505-October 18 1558) m. Anne of Bohemia and Hungary (July 23 1503-January 27 1547)
6. Archduke Maximilian (January 14 1507-Febuary 12 1578).
Drawing a blank on who would be a good wife for the last son.
This is what I’ve come up with so far.For a possible idea:
Oh an intriguing tree wiuld the double palatinate marriagebbe due to attempts by Charles elector palatinate to reconcile with his cousins?This is what I’ve come up with so far.
Charles II of England, Scotland & Ireland (29/5/1630–6/2/1685) m. 1648, Sophie Augusta of Holstein-Gottorp (5/12/1630–12/12/1680)
IOTL Sofie had 14 children so I added more as we know they are both are fertile.
- Charles, Prince of Wales, later, Charles III of England, Scotland & Ireland (1/12/1650-4/3/1718) m. 1666, Princess Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, later, Queen Consort Elizabeth of England, Scotland & Ireland (27/5/1652–8/12/1722)
- Princess Mary, later, Princess Royal, later, Duchess of Orléans (15/10/1651-) m. 1570, Philippe I, Duke of Orléans (21/9/1640–9/6/1701)
- Princess Elizabeth, later, Princess consort of Orange (11/8/1652- m. 1670, William III, Prince of Orange (4/11/1650-8/3/1702)
- Prince Robert, Duke of Cambridge & Ross, later additionally, Duke of Newcastle-on-Tyne (24/9/1653-9/12/1715) m. 1669, Lady Elizabeth Cavendish, Heiress of Newcastle-on-Tyne, later, Duchess. Of Newcastle-on-Tyne (22/2/1654–11/9/1734)
- Miscarriage (15/4/1654)
- Princess Anne, later, Electress Consort of Palatine (25/2/1655- 17/5/1709) m. 1671, Charles II, Elector Palatine (31/3/1651–26/5/1685)
- Prince James, Duke of Gloucester & Glasgow (19/5/1656-) m. Marie Elisabeth of Hesse-Darmstadt (11/3/1656–16/8/1715)
- Princess Sophie, Queen of Sweden (14/2/1657-1733) m. Charles XI, King of Sweden (4/12/1657-15/4/1697)
- Stillborn son (27/2/1658)
- Princess Henrietta (12/1/1659-15/11/1674)
- Prince Frederick, Duke of Lancaster & Kendal (7/5/1660-18/10/1720) m.
- miscarriage (7/5/1661)
- Prince Henry, Duke of the Monmouth & Cleveland (4/2/1662-30/12/1718) m. 1681, Princess Anne of York (6/2/1665–1/8/1714)
- Prince William, Duke of Durham & Dunmore, later, Duke of Northumberland (11/5/1663-1726) m. 1681, Lady Elizabeth Percy, Dowager Countess of Ogle and Duchess of Northumberland (26/1/1667–24/11/1722)
- Princess Augusta (21/7/1664-17/8/1736) m. 1682, Charles Seymour, 6th Duke of Somerset (13/8/1662-2/12/1748)
- miscarriage (25/7/1665)
- Princess Charlotte, later, Princess of Conti, later, Queen of Poland & Grand Duchess of Lithuania (22/12/1666-17/1/1717) m. 1685, François Louis de Bourbon, le Grand Conti, later, Louis II, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (30/4/1664–22/2/1709)
Eleanor and Frederick meet before Charles‘ departure for Spain, so well before her marriage to Manuel… I think you are mixing Eleanor and Christine (of Denmark, whose romance with René of Chalon, who happened between her marriages , was likewise broken by Charles V)I imagine that Eleanor elopes with Frederick (which is weird because I thought they only met during the interval between her two marriages) and so Charles offers Isabella in Portugal, which again is weird because she was married in Denmark well before Charles was offering a sister in Portugal.
Why do Charles and Ferdinand switch wives? Why are none of Henry and Katherine's sons married? Why would Castile go to Ferdinand? Why is Elizabeth marrying Francis II, born 34 years after her? Also, if 6b is born and dead in the same year, how is he "John III"? Why is Mary marrying James VI, born 50 years after her?John III of Portugal m. Eleanor of Austria d.1523(a) Joanna of England(b)
1a. John of Portugal b. 1518 d. 1523
2a. Maria of Portugal b. 1520 m. Philip II of Castile b. 1523[1]
3a. Eleanor of Portugal b. 1523 m. ?
4b. Afonso VI b. 1528
5b. Catherine b. 1533 m. ?
6b. John III b. 1537 d. 1537
Henry VIII m. Catherine of Aragon(a)
1a. Elizabeth, Queen of France b. 1510 m. Francis II(a) Antoine, Duke of Vendome(b)
2a. Joanna, Queen of Portugal b. 1510 m. John III of Portugal
3a. Henry IX b. 1511
4a. Edward b. 1513
5a. Edmund b. 1514
6a. Mary b. 1516 m. James VI
7a. Catherine b. 1518 m. Emperor Maximilian II b. 1520[2]
1.Son of Ferdinand III of Castile(Archduke Ferdinand) and Isabella of Portugal
2. Son of Charles V and Anna of Bohemia-Hungary
Note John of Aragon, son of Germaine and Ferdinand II survives here.
It’s also a way to keep claimants within the family. Plus with heirs, spares and more double marriages aren’t seen as a waste, especially marrying a spare to his cousin Anne. ITTL Charles is able to marry Mary of York to Dauphin of France as planned otl.Oh an intriguing tree wiuld the double palatinate marriagebbe due to attempts by Charles elector palatinate to reconcile with his cousins?
All Duchies can be separated:re duchy of Lancaster can it be separated from the crown?
Intetesting. And true re the duchies tho I was under the impression that Lancaster had been given special status to stick with the sovereign since the reign of Henry IVIt’s also a way to keep claimants within the family. Plus with heirs, spares and more double marriages aren’t seen as a waste, especially marrying a spare to his cousin Anne. ITTL Charles is able to marry Mary of York to Dauphin of France as planned otl.
With legitimate children, I doubt Charles finds the need to have the excessive amount of illegitimate children but the ones he dies have won’t be bestowed dukedoms, instead minor Earldoms to keep them comfortable without over reaching like IOTL.
All Duchies can be separated:
The are inherited by the eldest son upon death of holder and handed out at the monarchs pleasure.
For example when Edward VIII abdicated his brother the duke of York became king and the title was merged with the crown. It wouldn’t be recreated until the Queen bestowed it upon her second son Andrew, when he dies without male heir, the title become extinct and the monarch has the power to create it again.
The duchy of Edinburgh which has been created three times and in it’s current form has gone to the eldest son of the previous holder (Philip to Charles). It has been speculated that it will have a fourth creation to be bestowed onto Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex after Charles, Prince of Wales, becomes king and the title reverts to the crown.
Although Henry IV made the declaration that the Duchy of Lancaster became an inheritance held separately from the other possessions of the Crown, and should descend to male heirs and was confirmed iby Edward IV when he incorporated the inheritance and the palatinate responsibilities under the title of the Duchy of Lancaster, stipulating that it be held separate from other inheritances by him and his heirs, but would however be inherited with the Crown. This hasn’t be dictated by a parliamentary act yet, just customary tradition.Intetesting. And true re the duchies tho I was under the impression that Lancaster had been given special status to stick with the sovereign since the reign of Henry IV
Ahhh this is true, would be intriguing to see if he’d be willing to allow that to happen. Given the money concerns that led to the civil war and all thatAlthough Henry IV made the declaration that the Duchy of Lancaster became an inheritance held separately from the other possessions of the Crown, and should descend to male heirs and was confirmed iby Edward IV when he incorporated the inheritance and the palatinate responsibilities under the title of the Duchy of Lancaster, stipulating that it be held separate from other inheritances by him and his heirs, but would however be inherited with the Crown. This hasn’t be dictated by a parliamentary act yet, just customary tradition.
As the newly restored king, Charles II may wish to have the Duchy handed out, allowing others to benefit especially a son further down the inheritance and influence line of power.
No way who Eleanor married John here. She will marry Sigismund I of Poland as second wife if her other proposed matches do not work (still Ferdinand of Austria inheriting Castile if the son of Germaine lived is out of question)John III of Portugal m. Eleanor of Austria d.1523(a) Joanna of England(b)
1a. John of Portugal b. 1518 d. 1523
2a. Maria of Portugal b. 1520 m. Philip II of Castile b. 1523[1]
3a. Eleanor of Portugal b. 1523 m. ?
4b. Afonso VI b. 1528
5b. Catherine b. 1533 m. ?
6b. John III b. 1537 d. 1537
Henry VIII m. Catherine of Aragon(a)
1a. Elizabeth, Queen of France b. 1510 m. Francis II(a) Antoine, Duke of Vendome(b)
2a. Joanna, Queen of Portugal b. 1510 m. John III of Portugal
3a. Henry IX b. 1511
4a. Edward b. 1513
5a. Edmund b. 1514
6a. Mary b. 1516 m. James VI
7a. Catherine b. 1518 m. Emperor Maximilian II b. 1520[2]
1.Son of Ferdinand III of Castile(Archduke Ferdinand) and Isabella of Portugal
2. Son of Charles V and Anna of Bohemia-Hungary
Note John of Aragon, son of Germaine and Ferdinand II survives here.