VVD0D95
Banned
That was because there were no males of the house of Stuart left. Scotland followed semi Salic lawMary Queen of Scots was born as a girl and yet the throne went to her...Scotland accepted female succession
That was because there were no males of the house of Stuart left. Scotland followed semi Salic lawMary Queen of Scots was born as a girl and yet the throne went to her...Scotland accepted female succession
I can not see a match between the eldest daughter of the Queen of England and someone with John Sigismund Zapolya who was a Catholic without any crown or financial stability… Louise of Lorraine also was Catholic and sound pretty unlikely as wife of an English prince. Henry IV’s sister Catherine of Bourbon-Navarre (born 1559) sound as a far likelier match than herPOD Robert Dudley and Elizabeth I married before she became queen
Robert Dudley (b. 1532) m. 1551 Elizabeth I (b. 1533)
1. Anne (b. 1551) m. John Sigismund Zapolya (b. 1540)
2. Henry IX (b. 1553) m. Margaret of Valois (b. 1553)*
3. Robert (b. 1554) m. Louise of Lorraine (b. 1553) [a] Anna Vasa of Sweden (b. 1568)
4. Margaret (b. 1555) m. Henry IV of France/III of Navarre (b. 1553)
5. Elizabeth (b. 1557) never married
*IOTL she wed a Protestant king meaning it is possible for her to do the same here too.
John Sigismund Zapolya was flip-floppy in the matters of religion, and had he survived beyond 1572, he'd be King of Poland.I can not see a match between the eldest daughter of the Queen of England and someone with John Sigismund Zapolya who was a Catholic without any crown or financial stability…
John Sigismund Zapolya was like Anne of Cleves who flipped between religions often...I can not see a match between the eldest daughter of the Queen of England and someone with John Sigismund Zapolya who was a Catholic without any crown or financial stability… Louise of Lorraine also was Catholic and sound pretty unlikely as wife of an English prince. Henry IV’s sister Catherine of Bourbon-Navarre (born 1559) sound as a far likelier match than her
Wait, Renée wouldn’t exist in alt as Anne of Brittany has zero reason to marry Louis XII, and even if she does this marriage is a bit of a waste, more likely Charles X marries Catherine of Austria.1. Charles X (b. 1510) m. Renee of Brittany (b. 1510)
Catherine of Austria...is she not destined for Portugal?Wait, Renée wouldn’t exist in alt as Anne of Brittany has zero reason to marry Louis XII, and even if she does this marriage is a bit of a waste, more likely Charles X marries Catherine of Austria.
She’s only destined for Portugal of Eleanor or one of her younger sisters don’t marry into it. Getting Eleanor to marry there should be easy enough, just have them get the dispensation sooner (this is why her marriage to John III never happened and why she married Manuel instead).Catherine of Austria...is she not destined for Portugal?
Although yeah I forgot Renee likely won't exist if Anne and Louis don't wed...
Wasn't she married to Manuel because Charles didn't want to marry Isabella?She’s only destined for Portugal of Eleanor or one of her younger sisters don’t marry into it. Getting Eleanor to marry there should be easy enough, just have them get the dispensation sooner (this is why her marriage to John III never happened and why she married Manuel instead).
True, plus here Louis of Orleans will stay married to Jeanne until her death…Wait, Renée wouldn’t exist in alt as Anne of Brittany has zero reason to marry Louis XII, and even if she does this marriage is a bit of a waste, more likely Charles X marries Catherine of Austria.
Yes, the reason was that one but here will not be a problem as Charles V will be already married to Mary Tudor at the death of Ferdinand II of AragonTWasn't she married to Manuel because Charles didn't want to marry Isabella?
Why Laurette, though?Henry II m. Laurette of Flanders
1a. Geoffrey I of England b. 1153
2a. Henry b. 1155
3a. Matilda b. 1156
4a. Richard b. 1157
5a. Thierry b. 1158
6a. Adelaide b. 1162
7a. Joanna b. 1165
8a. John b. 1166
Gertrude is barren, Margaret is too young.Why Laurette, though?
Or better Laurette is the only one among the daughters of Thierry to not be Henry II‘s first cousinGertrude is barren, Margaret is too young.
And why exactly would this law be accepted...After the death of the senile George III (81), and the subsequent rule of George IV (67) and William IV (71), Parliament implements an amendment to the Act of Settlement that the monarch only yields the divine right to rule until 60.
Victoria, b. 1819, r. 1837 to 1879, d. 1901, m. Albert of Saxe Coburg Gotha
Edward VII, b. 1841, r. 1879 to 1901, d. 1910, m. Alexandra of Greece and DenmarkGeorge V, b. 1865, r. 1901 to 1925, d. 1937, m. Mary of TeckEdward VIII, b. 1894, r. 1925 to 1954, d. 1972, m. Wallis Simpson, Duchess of WindsorGeorge, Duke of York, b. 1895, d. 1952, m. Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, Duchess of YorkElizabeth II, b. 1926, r. 1954 to 1986, m. Henry, Duke of CarnarvonGeorge VI, b. 1956, r. 1986 to 2016, m. Lady Amanda KnatchbullHenry IX, b. 1991, r. 2016 to Date, not yet married
WHy would they pass such an Act? What purpose does it serve?After the death of the senile George III (81), and the subsequent rule of George IV (67) and William IV (71), Parliament implements an amendment to the Act of Settlement that the monarch only yields the divine right to rule until 60.
Victoria, b. 1819, r. 1837 to 1879, d. 1901, m. Albert of Saxe Coburg Gotha
Edward VII, b. 1841, r. 1879 to 1901, d. 1910, m. Alexandra of Greece and DenmarkGeorge V, b. 1865, r. 1901 to 1925, d. 1937, m. Mary of TeckEdward VIII, b. 1894, r. 1925 to 1954, d. 1972, m. Wallis Simpson, Duchess of WindsorGeorge, Duke of York, b. 1895, d. 1952, m. Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, Duchess of YorkElizabeth II, b. 1926, r. 1954 to 1986, m. Henry, Duke of CarnarvonGeorge VI, b. 1956, r. 1986 to 2016, m. Lady Amanda KnatchbullHenry IX, b. 1991, r. 2016 to Date, not yet married