True actually, Francis would certainly not take that well, I'll go change the bio then.I don't think Henry would get away with executing a foreign princess.
True actually, Francis would certainly not take that well, I'll go change the bio then.I don't think Henry would get away with executing a foreign princess.
Since Jane Grey was named after Queen Jane Seymour, she would probably be "Anne Grey" now, weird as that is!In a world where Jeanne of Navarre's younger brother lives to adulthood and Henry and Anne Boleyn have quadruplets (Yes, I decided to play along too, at least to the extent of plotting out a basic family tree...)
Henry VIII of England m 1533 Anne Boleyn
1) Princess Elizabeth (b. 1 August 1533) m. Frederick II of Denmark (b. 1 July 1534)
2) Edward, Prince of Wales (b. 1 August 1533) m. 1548 Jeanne of Navarre (b. 16 November 1528)
- Prince Henry of Wales (b.1550)
- Lady Anne of Wales (b.1552)
- Lady Margaret of Wales (1553-1554)
- Lady Joan of Wales (b.1555)
- Lord Edward of Wales (1556-1562)
-Lord George of Wales (b. 1558)
3) George, Duke of York and Pembroke (1 August 1533) m. Lady Jane Grey (b. 12. Oct 1537)
4) Lady Anne (b. 1 August 1533) m. James Hamilton, 3rd Earl of Arran (b. 1537)
Notes: May seem odd choices of marital partners, but I was trying to find French proxies for at least some of the children, given Anne's pro-French attitudes. And I thought a Scottish alliance made sense, but Mary Queen of Scots was probably too young for Edward or George, so Lady Anne to James Hamilton it was...
Do you know, I didn't even think of that. But yes. Anne or Elizabeth, perhaps...Since Jane Grey was named after Queen Jane Seymour, she would probably be "Anne Grey" now, weird as that is!
Isn't it weird how many ripple-effect things would change from just one choice? Like how if Anne Boleyn had had a son and lived, would Mary Queen of Scots exist? Since Marie de Guise was very reluctant to marry James V of Scotland and was dragging out negotiations for a while but accepted immediately when Henry "Wife Killer" Tudor started hankering after her.Do you know, I didn't even think of that. But yes. Anne or Elizabeth, perhaps...
That's fascinating! Who would James V have married if not Marie de Guise?Isn't it weird how many ripple-effect things would change from just one choice? Like how if Anne Boleyn had had a son and lived, would Mary Queen of Scots exist? Since Marie de Guise was very reluctant to marry James V of Scotland and was dragging out negotiations for a while but accepted immediately when Henry "Wife Killer" Tudor started hankering after her.
That's more murky, but I'll do my best! After Princess Madeline died, Francis I wanted to arrange another French bride for him. Marie de Guise was the top choice since she was from a very powerful, Catholic family and had proven her fertility with two sons, but Marie was understandably reluctant to live in Scotland (which, to her, was the boonies) and leave her son. She was hemming and hawing and trying to delay the match til James lost interest, but she realized James is an infinitely better match than Henry VIII (at least James is young and handsome and less likely to kill her) and decided to take the lesser of two evils.That's fascinating! Who would James V have married if not Marie de Guise?
Do not work like that. Fitzroy would never become King, being a bastard, Eleanor would NOT be divorced, specially not in that year and that way and if Henry had married her is likely who she would have a much better childbirth history than her auntAn alternate six for Henry:
King Henry VIII (1491-1547), reigned from 1509, M. Eleanor of Austria (1498-1536) [1] in 1512, Elizabeth Blount (1502-1536) [2] in 1530, Anne Boleyn (1507-1537) [3] in 1536, Margot of Alencon (1517-1543) [4] in 1538, Elizabeth Boleyn (1510-1545) [5] in 1543 and Katherine Manners (1528-1556) [6], had issue
With Eleanor of Austria:
1. Princess Elizabeth, later Queen Elizabeth I (1516-1556), reigned from 1553 never married
2. Princess Mary (1519-1555) M. Duarte, Duke Guimaraes (1515-1559), had no surviving issue
With Elizabeth Blount:
3. Henry Fitzroy, later Henry Tudor, Prince of Wales (1521-1543) M. Mary Howard (1519-1543), had no issue
4. Lady Margaret Fitzroy, later Princess Margaret (1522-1540)
5. Prince Arthur (1531-1536)
With Anne Boleyn:
6. King Henry IX "The Devote" (1537-1553), never married
With Margot of Alencon:
7. Princess Katherine, later Queen Katherine (1539-1608), reigned from 1556 M. Henry Percy, Duke of Northumberland (1532-1589), had issue
7 (A). Princess Margaret Percy (1559-1610) M. Holy Roman Emperor Matthias (1557-1619)
7 (B). King Henry X (1561-1621) M. Christina of Lorraine (1565-1637)
7 (C). Prince Francis, Duke of York (1564-1610) M. Penelope Blount (1563-1609)
With Elizabeth Boleyn:
N/A
With Katherine Mannes:
N/A
...
[1] Divorced in 1530 after failing to give Henry a son, Henry marries long time lover Elizabeth Blount. Elizabeth I doesn't marry due to taking a vow of celibacy and so all hopes on her line lies on her sister who does not have any issue.
[2] A mistress of Henry VIII since 1519, has two children by the time of their marriage who are legitimised. Henry VIII still splits with the Church. Blount dies of a flu. Margaret dies in a horse riding accident and Fitzroy dies of the sweat.
[3]. Still does her magic, they have one son named Henry, she dies in childbirth like Jane Seymour in otl.
[4] An alt daughter of Marguerite of Angouleme and the Duke of Alencon, Margot converts but falls out of favour and is imprisoned and later dies under suspicious circumstances. Katherine gets the Mary treatment but becomes this scenario's equivalent to Elizabeth I, but with issue. Katherine I is Protestant, but has Catholic sympathies and wants peace with the Catholics in Europe, hence the marriages.
[5] Alt daughter of Tom Boleyn and Elizabeth Howard, Henry VIII marries her due to her resemblance to Anne but Elizabeth cheats on him and so is beheaded.
[6] An OTL noblewoman, she survives.
What happens to Catherine of Aragon? She dies with Arthur.
I suppose, I might remake that tree. I should’ve mentioned more detail such as a hard pregnancy leading to Eleanor not being able to bare more children etc. Also since it’s Henry VIII’s church I imagine he would legitimise Henry and Margaret Fitzroy.Do not work like that. Fitzroy would never become King, being a bastard, Eleanor would NOT be divorced, specially not in that year and that way and if Henry had married her is likely who she would have a much better childbirth history than her aunt
He would not as he had not done it in OTL. Also split from the church will not happen here as Eleanor is unlikely to put up the fight of Catherine and more likely to be replaced by another royal bride, likely from her own family. And Anne Boleyn would be long married at this point...I suppose, I might remake that tree. I should’ve mentioned more detail such as a hard pregnancy leading to Eleanor not being able to bare more children etc. Also since it’s Henry VIII’s church I imagine he would legitimise Henry and Margaret Fitzroy.
Yes, but would Charles let Henry divorce Eleanor? There are now good candidates now that Maria of Viseu, has been butterflied. As for Anne Boleyn true. I will probably remake this treeHe would not as he had not done it in OTL. Also split from the church will not happen here as Eleanor is unlikely to put up the fight of Catherine and more likely to be replaced by another royal bride, likely from her own family. And Anne Boleyn would be long married at this point...
If Eleanor is willing (and she would be likely tormented by her inability to give an heir to Henry) Karl has NO right to intervene. Also is likely who ATL Charles V will have daughters of the right age as he will have married Mary Tudor the Elder (and maybe remarried to Isabella of Portugal, if Mary died in the second half of 1520s). In alternative Charles would still have Dorothea and Christine of Denmark to offer (or would try to use Isabella of Poland as proxy)Yes, but would Charles let Henry divorce Eleanor? There are now good candidates now that Maria of Viseu, has been butterflied. As for Anne Boleyn true. I will probably remake this tree
I see, a Princess Christine of England would’ve been cool.If Eleanor is willing (and she would be likely tormented by her inability to give an heir to Henry) Karl has NO right to intervene. Also is likely who ATL Charles V will have daughters of the right age as he will have married Mary Tudor the Elder (and maybe remarried to Isabella of Portugal, if Mary died in the second half of 1520s). In alternative Charles would still have Dorothea and Christine of Denmark to offer (or would try to use Isabella of Poland as proxy
(or would try to use Isabella of Poland as proxy)
That would be awesome!Tudor Poland-Lithuania would be interesting to see.
That would be awesome!