LBJ, Taft-Hartley, and the dramatic revision of Rule XXII

In early April, nineteen forty-seven, a group of twenty one gentlemen took their seats around a conference table in the US Senate office building. These men had gathered to hear from Richard Brevard Russell, their fellow Southron, their unelected leader. He had called the Southern Caucus to discuss strategy.

“Well, let me first address these rumours you fellows might have heard recently,” the Georgian began. “I know there’s been much whispering about my commitment to dealing with the union problem our country faces. Apparently some people say I have gone soft on the issue. This is not true.” Murmurs from around the table. Some individuals were beginning to interject, but the leader continued. “I believe in America’s free enterprise system, I hold it in as high esteem as I do our regional traditions and ways of life,” this drew nods from all, “And I will fight for both.”

“Currently we have in Senator Taft’s bill a solution to the thuggery and communism besetting so many of our workplaces. My voice will vote ‘aye’ for the motion to read it off the Senate calendar. But,”--here he took a pained breath--“That is all I will do. For I do not think it’s in the interest of our nation for this piece of legislation to be debated, or passed.”

The stunned silence that followed was quickly broken by John Sparkman of Alabama; “Now, before you fellas jump to any hasty conclusions, let's here out what Dick has to say.”

What followed would later be described as the ‘pitch of the century’ by the youngest man present.

“We face more perilous threats than what the CIO poses. Let me employ a crude partisan metaphor… We are looking down the barrel of political irrelevancy, and that barrel is held aloft by the very men who have written this otherwise sensible law. On the floor I will congratulate the senator from Ohio for his thoughtful solutions, but gentlemen, let’s not kid ourselves--our party is in opposition, we have lost our chairmanships, we are cursed with a weak, foolish man in the Whitehouse,” the leader drew breath after those words, and in doing so implied his disdain for Truman. “Defeating the liberals and radicals in our party can not be a task we abdicate to the Republicans. If they take credit for reversing the excesses of the New Deal they’ll not only take the presidency next year, they’ll win another half-dozen seats off our weakened damnyankees.”

The reactionaries in the caucus, men like Bilbo of Mississippi, had been straining, turning red, about to explode in anger. Now Russell was making them sit back in their chairs and listen.

The power of these men assembled to protect the Southern way of life, to prevent the intermingling of the races, would no more be protected by the GOP Old Guard than it would be by the irresponsible liberals of either party, explained Russell to an increasingly receptive audience. Yes, there had been much common ground between the sane factions of both parties these last few years. Roosevelt’s court packing scheme had cemented this alliance.

But make no mistake; not only were the Republicans culturally alien to the Southland, they could win national mandates in both congress and the executive without taking a single vote in the eleven states represented by the men around the table.

That reckless man Roosevelt might come back from the dead and run in next year’s election, but if he didn’t carry these states as a Democrat he wouldn’t even become Washington dogcatcher! (This last observation got some belly laughs.)

Yes, they had the filibuster to prevent any anti-lynching laws or such that a President Dewey or Taft might put forward. They’d done it before under Democrats, they’d do it again. But senate power was a dying resource if it could only be exercised to obstruct--it was pivotal that a Democratic president be elected in 1948, or that it was at least impossible for a Republican to be re-elected in ’52. Otherwise their chances of regaining the senate look dire. And no senate committees dominated by Southern leaders meant the Caucus, our glorious band of brothers dedicated to the Lost Cause, must eventually weaken. And die.

“Therefore I have made contact with senators Lucas, Magnusson and Pepper, and have given them my assurance that if they can organise a filibuster of this bill as soon as it comes to the floor of the chamber, then they need not worry about the men of the South voting to impose cloture.” The other party would not be given any such advantage. A derailed Taft-Hartley omnibus bill meant the GOP could not exploit the unpopularity of a Democratic-aligned union movement for their own electoral gain.

“Nobody present wants me to go back to these fellows and modify my offer?”

The youngest man in the room seized the moment.

“Senator Russell,” said Lyndon Johnson, “the great people of Texas only sent me to this place a scarce eighteen months ago, but in even the furthest, hottest corners of the Lone Star State, Dick Russell’s judgement is considered inviolate. I move that this meeting endorse that judgement.”

All were in agreement. For the Southern caucus of 1947, as one historian would later write, was, “for all the world like a large and highly individualistic family, whose members are nevertheless bound by one blood.”
 
Is the South going to enter the modern world as regards unions, or is this purely an electoral ploy to screw with the GOP and they're working on their own bill?



If you haven't read it, The UAW and the Heyday of American Liberalism by Kevin Boyle might interest you.
 

Sachyriel

Banned
So, the Democrats from the South are annoyed that Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Natives and Arabians hooking up with White woman and bringing about a Communist take over of the USA?

'If McCarthy was a MKKKarthy?'

Do I have it kinda right or totally wrong?
 
Electric Monk said:
Is the South going to enter the modern world as regards unions, or is this purely an electoral ploy to screw with the GOP and they're working on their own bill?

If you haven't read it, The UAW and the Heyday of American Liberalism by Kevin Boyle might interest you

The Southrons aren't actually all that fussed about unions in this TL--I found a piece by Alexander Cockburn which noted that in OTL both Alabama senators actually voted in support of Truman's veto of Taft-Hartley, which I think earns an :eek: eek smily from most of us who thought we knew these knuckledraggers. Now try and imagine Richard Shelby voting in support of the recent Detroit bailout...
(I wrote seeking suggestions at the other thread.)




So, the Democrats from the South are annoyed that Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Natives and Arabians hooking up with White woman and bringing about a Communist take over of the USA?

'If McCarthy was a MKKKarthy?'

Do I have it kinda right or totally wrong?

C'mon, with the exception of McCarthy as a Klansman you're just repeating what every signatory of the Southern manifesto actually did believe;)
(Tailgunner Joe gets his inspiration a little earlier in this TL, though...)

It was all about the n____rs for these guys, and I'm just positing what would happen if labor policy was infuenced by the desire to protect the gentle (white) people's way of life.

Also, the POD is slightly earlier than 1947, LBJ in OTL wasn't elected to the senate until the following year.
 
So, the Democrats from the South are annoyed that Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Natives and Arabians hooking up with White woman and bringing about a Communist take over of the USA?

'If McCarthy was a MKKKarthy?'

Do I have it kinda right or totally wrong?

IOTL Southern Democrats backed Taft-Hartley because a) they don't like unions, and b) they especially didn't like communist run unions (that latter part existed mostly in their heads).

ITTL they choose to not back it in order to prevent the GOP from gaining a powerful talking point "we cleaned out the communists in the Democratic Unions when they wouldn't do so". Weakening the GOP ensures that Democrats remain or gain power as Democrats are forced to listen to the South (whether or not they agree) while the GOP can ignore the south full stop.
 
Last edited:

Sachyriel

Banned
C'mon, with the exception of McCarthy as a Klansman you're just repeating what every signatory of the Southern manifesto actually did believe;)
(Tailgunner Joe gets his inspiration a little earlier in this TL, though...)

It was all about the n____rs for these guys, and I'm just positing what would happen if labor policy was infuenced by the desire to protect the gentle (white) people's way of life.

Also, the POD is slightly earlier than 1947, LBJ in OTL wasn't elected to the senate until the following year.

I'm not a racist and I'm not a communist.

I was just making sure I had a grip on this part of the story, I wasn't so sure that it wasn't Harry Turtledove in disguise...

I do want to see Flora Hamburger in a new disguise... maybe something in leather?
 
I'm not a racist and I'm not a communist

No, I wasn't suggesting any thing like that.

I was just making sure I had a grip on this part of the story, I wasn't so sure that it wasn't Harry Turtledove in disguise...

I do want to see Flora Hamburger in a new disguise... maybe something in leather?

As for Turtledove's Southern victory series, honestly I never got beyond 'How Few Remain', and I've only heard mixed reviews of the rest.
 
The Southrons aren't actually all that fussed about unions in this TL--I found a piece by Alexander Cockburn which noted that in OTL both Alabama senators actually voted in support of Truman's veto of Taft-Hartley, which I think earns an :eek: eek smily from most of us who thought we knew these knuckledraggers. Now try and imagine Richard Shelby voting in support of the recent Detroit bailout...

Opinion was more divided than modern GOP senators, sure, but the South was and is a place where relatively few members of the South can and do run economic policy regardless of their citizen's preference or the opinions of Senators.

The South adopts statewide economic policy in order to take industry from the North on a non-level playing ground. They stole textiles (and then Asia stole them in turn) via a low-wage, low-tax, low-service plan and they're attempting to do the same thing today in regards to auto plants (by backing the Japanese).
 
IOTL Southern Democrats backed Taft-Hartley because a) they don't like unions, and b) they especially didn't like communist run unions (that latter part existed mostly in their heads).

ITTL they choose to not back it in order to prevent the GOP from gaining a powerful talking point "we cleaned out the communists in the Democratic Unions when they wouldn't do so". Weakening the GOP ensures that Democrats remain or gain power as Democrats are forced to listen to the South (whether or not they agree) while the GOP can ignore the south full stop

I've also had Russell driven by the desire to get back into the majority. After the '46 midterms Truman was a lame duck for every single day until the general election--nobody thought he'd win in '48.

Anyway, in the next instalment I'll explain how Johnson gets to the Southern caucus earlier than OTL, and how he influences Russell's thinking.
(I'm influenced strongly by LBJ's leading biographers' arguments about Johnson being obsessed with integrating the South into the modern US economy. Here it's spead up a tad.)


Opinion was more divided than modern GOP senators, sure, but the South was and is a place where relatively few members of the South can and do run economic policy regardless of their citizen's preference or the opinions of Senators.

The South adopts statewide economic policy in order to take industry from the North on a non-level playing ground. They stole textiles (and then Asia stole them in turn) via a low-wage, low-tax, low-service plan and they're attempting to do the same thing today in regards to auto plants (by backing the Japanese).

Yes, this is the old low tariff/high tariff devide. You'll be pleased (or dismayed) to learn Bretton Woods gets a shoutout next--as well as lots of sexy political extremism!
 
Last edited:
The Briefest Ascent, 1945 to 1947


The Senate Office Building, April ‘47


After the extraordinary caucus meeting Russell received Senator Byrd in his office for a private function.

The senior gentleman from Virginia wanted to confirm what he believed had just happened. He even waived the normal pleasantries of leaving a calling card and waiting in the antechamber--he wanted a face to face meeting, he wanted an explanation for what had transpired. He wanted it promptly.

“Why, Senator, what a pleasant surprise,” Russell was behind his desk just a few minutes when Byrd strode into the room. “Bourbon? You’ll note I am partaking of some Earl Grey,” in fact he’d just returned to his seat with china cup in hand, “A treat I’ve just taken up. You, on the other hand, as my guest, deserve something a little stronger.” At this Byrd nodded.

“Thank you, but no thank you, Senator. Please don’t stop your ritual on my account, however.”
Byrd sat bolt upright across from a slender man whom he’d never seen drink tea. If not for the import of the occasion he might’ve accepted his hosts offer, and watched as the Georgian walked over to a side table and poured an inch of Tennessean whiskey for an esteemed colleague for only perhaps the third, or maybe the fourth, time in Dick Russell’s nearly fifteen years in the senate. Harry Byrd accepted that his colleague was most reserved.

“I declare I support your leadership of tonight’s caucus,” said the Virginian, “And I appreciate the underlining reason for your strategy--the one rationale you didn’t raise with us. Make the liberal damnyankees accept the legitimacy of the filibuster on this, and they then have no right, absolutely no damned right, to question our use of unlimited debate in future campaigns defending Southern ways of life.” Byrd gave a tight-lipped smile as the other man’s face awkwardly registered the words ‘the one rationale you didn’t raise’. This confirmed what he’d thought since the evening’s gathering.

Russell was now straining to remember exactly what he’d said before. “Really, Senator, I’m certain I made clear that that’d be the quid pro quo we expect of the Northerners. Quite certain.”

“Now, Dick,” the normally proper man leant forward as he spoke with unusual familiarity, “If you’re going to accept coaching from Lyndon Baines Johnson before you give one of the most important conclaves in your entire political life, you might as darn well memorise everything he’s told you to say. Everything.” At this Russell was almost ready to blush.

“Although I admire that you realise he has a better mind for this than even the one you possess, Senator. I know I can drive back to Richmond tomorrow and tell my people that there’s a new youngster in DC who’ll stop fools like Harry Truman from raising the niggers up. Now and forever.”


Washington and Texas, 1945


Johnson was enjoying tall-tales and liquid relaxation in the Speaker’s private office under the US House dais. He was, naturally, on guard and more alert than any of Rayburn’s other favourite representatives who’d convened for the “Board of Education,” the name given to the congressional giant’s regular drinking sessions. Today, July 19, was so far just part of the grind. That didn’t stop the thirty-seven year old from staying on his toes, however.

“Mr Sam, I tell you that the SOB was so drunk he couldn’t stand. And he was still only halfway though the hearing--drunkest damn county coroner you ever did see. Me and the Johnson City undertaker had to manhandle him up to the podium and tie, actually tie, the gavel into his hand, I tell you boys…” LBJ was interrupted from telling the rest of his Texan ‘bull’ by a staffer rushing in on the Board.
“Old Pappy O’Daniel has gone mad and quit!” The revelry stopped dead.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The junior senator from Texas was a difficult man, and few had thought otherwise since at least about the time, in nineteen forty-one, when he’d stolen the special election that had put him in the nation’s capital. But now he’d exceeded even his own reputation for being an ornery bastard.

“This treaty is too much! This treaty will rob America of her sovereignty! I… I have no choice. No choice at all…
“We thought that with the onset of a new administration the dead hand of socialism would be lifted from the leadership of our great nation. But I have information that sinister forces, moneyed forces, forces that want to suck America dry, have imposed this treaty on us. We must avoid foreign entanglements that dishonour what our boys fight and die for this very day!”

But W. Lee O’Daniel was forced to give this rant away from the senate floor, as the voting was over. Bretton Woods was now practically the law of the land. In a rare act of censorship both senate party leaders had informed the Texan he’d not be given leave to speak on this Bill until after the president had signed it, not even as private members business. And his response, something nobody could have predicted, was now playing out under the Capitol rotunda…

“Gentlemen, it pains me to do this. I woke up this morning not even imagining what I think now. But this tyranny must be fought! So I have this evening tended my resignation as a United States Senator--not because I wish to leave the fight, but because I seek to continue it!
“I will go home to my great state of Texas, and I will fight for re-election to this august body on the one issue that matters, rallying true patriots to throw off the shackles of this infamous treaty…”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Upon hearing the news of O’Donnell’s ‘campaign launch’, Rayburn immediately took his protégé aside.
“Lyndon, you have to run. Not only to save the country from this madman, but to fix the wrong done to you back in ‘41. You’ll be finished if you don’t face down this challenge.”

LBJ was suddenly pensive. He was mentally going over the angles of fighting another special election. He needed to win this, he needed it more badly than he had four years before when he and his boys had been outfought, outspent, and what’s more, out cheated. Then Governor O’Daniel had bested him by the slimmest of margins. But things had changed.

“Mr Sam, I feel overwhelmed,” Johnson almost whimpered. He’d adopted this tone a couple of times before with the older man, but now it was at it’s rawest. “If Coke jumps in… It’ll be a hell of a fight. I can’t lose a battle like that, then I’ll really be finished…”


And he was right. In the next couple of days the news out of Texas, as well as in the national press, was all about how the popular Governor Coke Stevenson had this race in the bag if he decided to run. Every one had decided that O’Daniel was a lost cause, a crank who had decided on political self-immolation, either because he was foolish enough to think this was his best chance to see off his obvious competitor for the Democratic primary in ‘48, or because he was mad enough to think there was a genuine anti-administration insurgency on the rise in Texas*.

But Stevenson would not declare. He indicated it wasn’t the right time, that he wanted to be a better chief executive to his people than the man he’d served as lieutenant governor under, and that that included not leaving office midterm.

Yet he wouldn’t say he wasn’t running, either.

LBJ should have used these early days to rebuild his reputation as the man who’d finished a close second in ‘41. He should have used this time to arrange for his business patrons, the Brown brothers, George and Herman, to lockup support from the oil industry. He should have been organising the county bosses who’d been for him last time. Yet Congressman Johnson was not immediately doing these things, for he was convinced that O’Daniel went into this race with enough votes (“The sumbitch has twenty percent now, on election day he’ll still have almost fifteen”) to throw this election to Stevenson. And not enough votes could be made to appear out of nowhere to overcome the Pappy factor. Johnson just did not believe he could win this surprise fight. For his career to grow, to progress, he thought his only choice was to reach a secret agreement with Stevenson: If you run I won’t, so if you run I want you to keep in mind my support for you and reciprocate by not blocking me from seeking the governors mansion next year.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


George and Herman Brown were concerned. They had been over the moon when the prevaricating Stevenson had finally declared he would not be a candidate in the election; their boy Lyndon had raced from his house in Austin to the secretary of state’s office with a contingent of reporters to cover his filing. He might have lost nearly a fortnight of electioneering, but the Brown’s saw the field as easy to overcome, at least in terms of cash and oilman endorsements. That field was Johnson, O’Daniel, Representative Martin Dies, a couple of timeservers from the Democratic state government, and the inevitable token Republican businessman. It looked all too easy for their team.

The first troubles they encountered were with the most ultraconservative members of the business community. “Sure, Pappy has done us a disservice by bringing about a totally unnecessary election in a time of war, but I’m hearing from fellows who think this is the right time to draw a line in the sand and shout ‘enough!’” Who were these fellows? the brothers would ask. Well there are the people at the Dallas Morning News, and the Hunt family, for example. They were saying it might be a good thing if O’Daniel put in a good showing, and alerted America to the dangers of the international financiers who stood to benefit from the IMF/World Bank plans. Was that such a bad thing? Wasn’t that just plain, good old fashioned patriotism? Anyway, people are saying Dies is too much of a loser, barely above the minor candidates… And people remember when your Johnson fellow was an enthusiastic New Dealer in his earlier races. Perhaps a special election like this, one not competing for newspaper column space with other races, can serve as a kind of referendum in support of Americanism

LBJ had delegated to his aide Horace Busby responsibility for monitoring the rival campaigns. It was only one of many tasks Busby was supposed to accomplish each day until the poll. But Busby was finding out some disturbing things. His memos were adopting a nervous tone.
“Boss, we thought that Pappy’s campaign didn’t have anyone on the ground, what with all his county machine allies from his earlier races now being against him. But I’m finding some interesting stuff. He’s got a lot of amateurs volunteering for him. Across the state volunteers who’d been for the Regulars are with him 100%.
“But that’s not all. The Republican’s appear to have deserted their candidate for O’Daniel.
“This guy has hit a nerve with his opposition to foreign aide, and internationalism in general. As for the aggressive advertising that Dies’ is running, ‘O’Daniel is wasting the peoples’ time and money while our boys are dying in the Pacific’; I’m getting strong anecdotal evidence that folks just don’t like that. It may be driving the most conservative people who don’t like us away from Dies and towards Pappy.”
At the end of August Busby asked LBJ if he could leave Texas and travel to Washington, and then onto New York. He said it was pivotal to find out how much cash might be flowing to O’Daniel from out of state, and those two cities were the places to start looking.

“Fuck, Horace, you’re not pussying out on me are you?!” LBJ was livid.

“Boss, ask John [Connally], ask Mr Brown or his brother. They’ll tell you this could be intelligence we desperately need to know.” Johnson did just that. Half an hour later he instructed Busby to withdraw money from the campaign safe, and to buy return airline tickets for back East.







*And yet that may not have been such a crazy idea. In the lead up to the general election the previous year, O’Daniel had supported a hard Right faction within his state’s Democratic Party who were against another term for FDR--the ‘Texas Regulars’. They’d had some success in the early round of the Texas convention season, but had quickly lost control of the state presidential nominating machine, and had bolted to form their own minor party, eventually standing an unpledged slate of electoral college delegates in November. They’d won little more than 10% of the Texas vote. Just as people inside the Lone Star State thought the only logical hope for Pappy’s success was for him to rely on his old popular, if waning, appeal to low-information voters, national observers decided that he was obviously attempting to revive the militantly anti-New Deal faction of his party. HL Mencken added a third consideration; “His fellow Texans view him as crazy and doomed, while the Washington press corps see him as principled and doomed. I take the attitude that the distinguished gentleman is both mentally unsound, as well as being sincerely committed to his own peculiar anti-worldly ideals. Political mortality is just not a consideration for Mr O’Daniel.”
 
I've come to the conclusion that if Taft-Hartley isn't passed in 1947, then it's never passed in it's original form.

Rather, it's either brought in with a grandfather clause during the fifties under a GOP president (to expire sometime in the sixties), or the Wagner Act is amended to allow the individual states to decide whether or not to outlaw closed shops, wildcat & secondary strikes etc. It would be a legalistic mess, but politically it makes sense, as the resilient GOP legislation of '47 was only ever possible because of postwar social dislocation, not to mention incredible uncertainty over which would be the dominant party and what form continuing liberalism would take.

I think thirty years of political struggle over what to do with Wagner then takes place, after which comes a question mark...

Indeed the Eightieth United States Congress was pretty much the only Republican opportunity to pass major anti-New Deal legislation, buoyed by the post-war environment. (They did kill a couple of Truman's crazier ideas IIRC, but they passed Taft-Hartley and they killed healthcare too.)

I agree on closed shops, with no right-to-work laws the union shop is going to become an issue with Republicans. Not one they'll win on, to be sure, but one they can make a great deal of hay from.
 
Yeah it doesn't get a lot of replies (welcome to any timeline that does modern economics and, sigh, doesn't bring up the issue of Hong Kong not being handed to the ChiComs…*I mean, yeah, I dunno of what you speak) but hey—update!

Please :).
 
Can't do an update for this TL quite yet--working on an Australian TL.

Also, I'd planned on writing 'LBJ, Taft...' in a traditional short-story prose manner, without recourse to faux non-fiction or journalism; but I found it really hard to do it that way while also making sure to impart enough information to keep the narrative 'lively'. What I achieved here is three thousand words and very little progress, at least compared to the standards of AH.com.

I think the next installment will be told as a TV interview script circa 1980 (I've already decided against linear storytelling for this thing--I started in '47 and went backwards. I can skip forward several decades before returning to the 'do nothing' congress.)
 
Top