In this timeline, Jerry Brown secured the Democratic nomination in 1992, but lost to George H.W. Bush in the General Election. Clinton secures the Democratic Party nomination in 1996, defeats Bob Dole in the General Election that year, and defeats George W. Bush in 2000. How would his presidency be different if it spanned into the mid-2000s like this? Would Hillary serve simultaneously as New York Senator and First Lady after 2000? On the flip side, no Monica Lewinsky. In 2004, the election most likely comes down to Gore Vs. McCain like my previous thread suggested.
1) I can't see Bush 41 won reelection over Brown. What would be the PoD? Perot don't drop of race and Republicans won in in a broke 3-way-race? This could be, I think.
2) With a Bush reelection in 1992 we probably had Dan Quayle as the "crown prince" in '96. I can see Liddy with more chances to be the GOP nomination, than Bob in this scenario.
3) A better response on Middle East, and, probably, no 9/11. Hillary Clinton would continue being a key person on Clinton's presidency, but I'm not right if she had desire to enter on politics. If yes and OTL stays on some points, she could have tried to be Governor of New York in 2006 or 2010.
4) I'm not right if Gore would be veep of Clinton in '96. Evan Bayh, John Kerry or Ann Richards would have more chances, probably. I bet personally, in Bayh, and he'd good chances to be elect in '04.