Thanks for the explanation.![]()
Sounds good to me too. One must wonder what may happen if Auraria becomes home to a significant immigrant population.......
Thanks for the explanation.![]()
Sounds good to me too. One must wonder what may happen if Auraria becomes home to a significant immigrant population.......![]()
But is it likely to?
After all, Australia as a whole has never been the most benevolent of habitats, and intercontinental immigration has largely, historically, come from Europe. Most people living there probably wouldn't be particularly interested in going to Aururia, what with it not being the almost monolithically British place it was IOTL. The UK probably won't exactly be depositing the same amount of prisoners either, so whence would one get said immigrants at all?
Sounds good to me too. One must wonder what may happen if Auraria becomes home to a significant immigrant population.......![]()
This seems like one of the areas where Jared will have to decide what the net demographic effect of Aururian plagues + Aururian crops will be...
Developments such as
1) someone from Europe colonizes parts or all of Aururia. After all it's called "Lands of Red and Gold," isn't it?I hope not, though we've already seen the entering wedges of European hegemony in places.
My impression of these Aururians is, they are tough customers. Not just brawlers or brave fighters; they are shrewd. It must be hell in a lawsuit when your opponent's lawyer is an Aururian... I think they'll resist, and they'll be hard to swallow, and they'll turn colonial domination around to make it as much their deal as their nominal conquerors. But still, it might happen, if not to the whole continent in one hegemonic swallow, than to parts.
So, in that case, there's some immigrants right there. Some will come in fancying themselves the new bosses; others as servants of these lordly types.
2) in the case where parts of Aururia remain nominally or even clearly independent, in several centuries, parts of Aururia might get to be important in their own right, important enough to be courted as alliance partners on the stages of global politics. Some of those alliances will be with parties that lose battles; the upshot would be, exiles on the losing side of some foreign faction fight who have been defeated and needed to flee will be looking for new homes, and from time to time their Aururian allies will freely or grudgingly offer such a refuge.
So no, not the overwhelming legions of colonists from some hegemonic country that displaced and diluted the native population down to practically nothing of OTL. But there will probably be some sort of resident foreign population; if some major Aururian state is on the losing side of something as big as say the OTL 1848 revolts, a lot of refugees from that set of mostly aborted or soon coopted rebellions wound up in the USA OTL. For them to go all the way to Aururia, when Aururia isn't "opened" to settlement the way the mid-19th century US was, I think it has to be more than a distant spot on the globe; some positive iink would have to draw these refugees.
Have the Plirite made any converts in these areas? Also, what do Christian.Muslim and Buddhist faithful think of the Plirite religion?And the rate of technological progress, and the effects of Aururian interaction with Asia - the Nangu are already trading actively with Java and Japan, and technologically they are capable of reaching any port in East Asia as far as Port Arthur / Lüshunkou, although they wouldn't be anywhere near as good at naval warfare - and various other things.
Have the Plirite made any converts in these areas?
Also, what do Christian.Muslim and Buddhist faithful think of the Plirite religion?
Do I sense some foreshadowing here?Buddhists, on the other hand, have had all sorts of conversations with Plirite priests...
Or just a suggestion we're a chatty group.Do I sense some foreshadowing here?
Do I sense some foreshadowing here?
Or just a suggestion we're a chatty group.![]()
You are a Plirite?![]()
I wonder how much Baffin would associate pyramids with Egypt. There wasn't a lot of talk about the Pyramids--none I can recall--in the Bible, and that would be a European of this period's main association with Egypt. To be sure there are always travelers, and Egypt is both right next to Palestine and itself an associated "Holy Land" to Christian pilgrims.
But meanwhile, there are the Mesoamericans to think of too. I imagine the Aururian pyramid more resembles an Aztec or Mayan step-pyramid than an Egyptian smooth one, and lurid tales by the Conquistadors might stick in the contemporary European mind more than traveler's tales about Egypt.
To be sure, if Baffin is thinking "Egyptian pyramid!" and then sees the skulls, he'll switch over to "Aztec pyramid" and it will give him mental whiplash!So it's funnier if he's thinking Egyptian at first.
But I just don't know how much Egypt was a factor in European consciousness in the Early Modern period, before Napoleon's expedition there, whereas the American versions will be more recently on their minds, especially for world explorer types like Baffin.