It was a diaper.Was that Zardof, or something like that?
PS I'm always in favor of red lingerie.![]()
It was a diaper.Was that Zardof, or something like that?
PS I'm always in favor of red lingerie.![]()
No, it’s a masculine jock strap!It was a diaper.![]()
And to think Sean left the Bond movies because he was afraid of being typecast
I've never seen that movie. The poster makes it sound like it's trying to do the same things as 1984 and 2001, only with more profundity. Did the promo-writer just pick those two titles as his points of comparison because they're both years and hence provide a nifty "rhyme"?
Off the top of my head, I can't really imagine how a film could be similar to both 1984 and 2001. Those stories are both pretty different from one another, not even really in the same ballpark, except that they both qualify as science-fiction.
It is worth watching, after all, John Boorman is many things as a Director, but lack of vision isn't one of themI've never seen that movie.
The director was basically perpetually on drugs throughout production.
It was the '70s, after all.
And if you really remember the '70's, you did it wrong
Nah, Weed and LSD didn't make you forget.Kind of like the 60s?
![]()