Been interested in admiral Zenker proposed 1928 design for a true battle cruiser.
General specifics are 17500t displacement (empty or standard according to different sources) eight 12'' in four twins and nine 5,9'' in three triples, with high speed (34knots) and protection on similar scale to the Deutschlands.
In short, something between the original invincibles and Fishers "follies".
Would a KM option for say, eight BC of this general type, as opposed to the twins and the Bismarcks and the GZs, or simply a KM option for pure BC rather than Fast BB be useful or Ben worst than OTL options?
I find it interesting that the KM considered such a reversing of the HSF earlier option for building decently armoured BC and considered such a pure BC design, and would like to know if someone had details on the operational logic behind such a concept.
General specifics are 17500t displacement (empty or standard according to different sources) eight 12'' in four twins and nine 5,9'' in three triples, with high speed (34knots) and protection on similar scale to the Deutschlands.
In short, something between the original invincibles and Fishers "follies".
Would a KM option for say, eight BC of this general type, as opposed to the twins and the Bismarcks and the GZs, or simply a KM option for pure BC rather than Fast BB be useful or Ben worst than OTL options?
I find it interesting that the KM considered such a reversing of the HSF earlier option for building decently armoured BC and considered such a pure BC design, and would like to know if someone had details on the operational logic behind such a concept.