Okay what? Is that a Crusader State based around Mount Sinai? Or are you talking about a Loyalist French Remnant that survives in Quebec? Either way Im on board.
If they were renaming it after a colony, wouldn't Canada make more sense?1763
In return for British territory in India taken by France in the 7 yrs War, Britain trades the territory of Aden.
1765
French rename the Territory Montreal, after the lost Montreal in NAmerica.
1790's
Britain occupies French Aden/Montreal. but like the French Caribbean leaves the French Governor/Government in Charge.
1815
Congress of Vienna, returns control of Montreal to France.
1890
To promote stability in France, Napoleon IV appointed Viceroy of Montreal.
1898
Fadosa War.
British occupy Montreal, Napolean IV declares Independence, with Himself as the King.
1901
Treat of Lisbon, formalizes French recognizing of Kingdom of Montreal.
Considering Aden is situated in the crater of an extinct volcano, I would think that Royal Mountain makes sense for a name.If they were renaming it after a colony, wouldn't Canada make more sense?
I was referring to the reason given.Considering Aden is situated in the crater of an extinct volcano, I would think that Royal Mountain makes sense for a name.
I was referring to the reason given.
"New Canada" would be pretty lame for a colony in the Middle East. At least Montreal makes sense, given that the whole mountain deal is still going on.
1765
French rename the Territory Montreal, after the lost Montreal in NAmerica.
I renamed it Montreal in order to comply with the OP.
Remember folks tthat montreal=mount royal. It doesnt have to have anything to do with canada.