King Theodore's Corsica

All very true. Still, my feeling is that there may be a little extra wrinkle ITTL, because Theodore is not really your average Catholic king - he is, as his secretary put it, "as Catholic as the Grand Turk." Seizing Church property is unlikely to be the only thing that puts him at odds with Rome. Historically, following the WoAS Genoa decided to let Jews back in to boost the economy (they had previously been expelled); plenty of restrictions were put on them, but Benedict nevertheless went through the roof because the ban did not restrict them to ghettos or require them to wear distinguishing badges. Theodore's Jewish policy, as far as I can tell, was to put no restrictions on them whatsoever, which I'm certain will go over in Rome like a lead balloon. When you add this to the Church property confiscation - not to mention the Freemasonry, the alchemy, the alliance with the Barbary states, and the fact that he was formerly pursued by the Inquisition - it makes for a rather unique situation. And while Theodore knows how to make compromises for the sake of expediency and put on a show of religiosity, if there's one thing he never compromised on it was religious tolerance, which was the closest thing to a dogmatic belief he seems to have had. Not for no reason was it the only condition he initially requested in order to accept the crown.

I suspect that in different circumstances which allowed him to express his "real" beliefs openly, he would have been a Deist.
 
Fight Another Day
Fight Another Day

5CV5Cz9.png

The highlands of the Agriate, with the Bay of San Fiorenzo and Cap Corse in the distance

Rumors of the defeat of Brigadier Jean-Baptiste François, Marquis de Villemur at San Pellegrino had come to the ears of Lieutenant-General Louis de Frétat, Marquis de Boissieux within days, but Boissieux initially dismissed them as contradictory and implausible. There were claims that the army had been all but wiped out and that their commander had been captured, no doubt owing to confusion between the captured Colonel Armand de Bourbon, Comte de Malauze and Villemur himself. The loss was indeed not as staggering as the rumors had claimed, but Boissieux was nevertheless stunned by the actual scale of the defeat when Villemur's report finally reached him on the 17th.

Operationally speaking, the Boissieux’s plan was thoroughly ruined. He had intended for the Corsicans to be oppressed from all sides, threatened by advances from north, west, and south and unable to offer a coherent defense. The advance from the north, however, had been slowed to a crawl by bad terrain, poor logistics, and the resistance of the Corsicans, who forced Brigadier Anne de Montmorency-Luxembourg, Comte de Montmorency et Ligny to pay for every inch of progress. With Villemur driven back from San Pellegrino, the advance from the south had been stopped cold as well.

Yet Boissieux soon got over his shock, and his course of action remained largely unchanged. By the time Villemur's report arrived, the general's deadline had recently expired and he had already ordered Jean-Charles de Gaultier de Girenton, Marquis de Chateauneuf le Rouge, Seigneur de Rousset, to make final preparations for marching on the Nebbio. Strategically, Boissieux still believed his plan sound—to cut off the rebels from all succor and supply by ejecting them from the coastal regions. Such a strategy had already proved effective once before, as the imperial intervention of 1732 had followed a very similar trajectory: the Austrian forces had initially struggled against the Corsicans, but with the application of superior numbers they had been able to capture the coastal districts and compel the rebels to come to terms without having to actually invade the interior. All that had changed after San Pellegrino was that this strategy would have to be accomplished by one great advance from the west with Rousset's force, and given the poor Corsican performance against that force in the Balagna there was good reason to think it would still be a success.

While the morale of the Corsican troops was undoubtedly buoyed by their unambiguous defeat of a French army in the field, the Corsican prospects of holding the Nebbio remained grim. San Pellegrino had been fought against a diminished, disease-weakened force of no more than 1,500 men with no artillery and a trivially small detachment of cavalry, by a rebel force with at least a 5:3 numerical advantage and the benefit of favorable terrain. In contrast, the Balagnese corps of Rousset was twice as large, possessed two hussar squadrons and a battery of field artillery, and would be much better supported by the Franco-Genoese naval forces. The Agriate, through which that force would have to pass, was congenial territory for guerrillas but was unlikely to mask a whole battalion as the Castagniccian woods had at San Pellegrino. Past those maquis-covered hills, the French would descend into the Nebbio's landscape of farmland, orchards, and gently-rolling hills.

It was not just the physical geography of the Nebbio which posed a problem for the royalists. Its inhabitants, nearly as much as the people of Bastia, were largely uncooperative and frequently outright hostile to the rebels. Being on the northern coast and quite close to the Genoese capital of Bastia, the Nebbio had generally prospered under Genoese rule and its economy was tied closely to that of the colonial metropole. The rebellion had brought only hardship to most, and tensions were exacerbated further by Theodore's extractions of "contributions" from its people (justified on the basis that, since they were mostly filogenovesi anyway, there was no harm in alienating them further) and the harsh rule of Colonel Giovan Natali, the royalist governor of the Nebbio. Natali was a native of the province, but this was a two-edged sword; he knew the territory, but he also used his power to pursue old scores and personal grudges against various people and rival clans in the name of punishing "traitors to the nation." On the 16th of June, not long after Theodore had returned to the Nebbio with his victorious forces, Natali's enemies struck back; unknown assailants ambushed him and his bodyguards near Patrimonio and left him dying on the road, riddled with bullets. That the assassins were never caught despite this brazen attack in rebel-held territory is further testament to just how disgruntled and uncooperative the locals had become. Although Natali's death ended his abuses, it hardly helped matters in the district, which seemed to be spiraling out of control at the very moment when it was in greatest danger of invasion. The rebels themselves were now concerned about the prospect of rebellion.

There was, Costa informs us, a lively debate in the war council upon Theodore's return. A number of Theodore's commanders, inspired by the recent success, urged that all forces be gathered for a defense of the Nebbio from Rousset's army. Colonel Antonio Colonna, Costa's nephew, was one of them, as was Brigadier Giuliani di Muro, who though still recovering from being wounded at San Antonino probably wanted to make another attempt at recovering his honor. Count Gio-Giacomo Ambrosi di Castinetta, governor of Bastia, also voiced his support; his was a powerful position, and he was sure to lose it if the Nebbio fell, as Bastia would then become indefensible. Adjutant-General Edward Sarsfield, Viscount Kilmallock, was not bullish on their prospects but believed that it was a necessary fight, for he thought the loss of such a prize—including the Genoese capital itself—would be too deleterious to morale.

Captain-General Simone Fabiani, the most senior general and vice-president of the war council, was adamantly opposed to a grand confrontation for the Nebbio. If any lesson had been learned in the Balagna, he argued, it was that the French could not easily be opposed in the open field, and the forces which the royalists now possessed were even fewer than those he had commanded in the Balagna. Furthermore, he pointed out, the royal army had been fortunate to maintain its best troops in its retreat from the Balagna, and they might not be as lucky if subjected to another defeat. Speaking in his support was Colonel Felice Giuseppe, the hero of San Antonino (who may have done so for no other reason than his contempt for Muro), as well as Theodore's cousins Johann Friedrich Caspar von Neuhoff zu Rauschenburg and Matthias von Drost, whose positions rather depended on the king remaining alive and in power, not beaten or dead on the field. Rauschenburg had also experienced the worst of a field battle with the French firsthand and was not eager to repeat the experience.

Theodore remained regally aloof from the initial discussion, but retained the final word, and in the end sided with Fabiani. Costa says that it was simply a matter of trusting Fabiani's judgment. Theodore, however, may have also felt that he had special knowledge which his councilors lacked. Unlike his subjects, Theodore knew France (or at least thought he did). He had, after all, been raised to manhood in the French royal court, and alone of all his advisers and generals had served in the French army. His instinct was that the war for his crown would ultimately be won not on any Corsican battlefield, but in the halls of Versailles.

While it can be argued that Theodore consistently overestimated his own skill at foreign policy and frequently attempted the outlandish or impractical with little success—"a visionary and a madman," as Lord Carteret would describe him a few years later—his approach in this case was not without merit. The French would never run out of regiments, but King Louis XV and his minister Cardinal André-Hercule de Fleury could run out of will to continue the fight. So far the cost to the French had only been in blood, a commodity which Versailles spent rather freely, as the financial burden of the intervention had been borne solely by the Genoese. The French, however, had already sent the maximum force authorized and paid for by treaty; to ramp up their presence further would require either paying for it themselves or compelling the Republic to pony up more money, and neither was terribly palatable. Cardinal Fleury had assured the king that the Corsican expedition would be no drain on the finances of state, and the Genoese already considered the existing price to be extortionate, to say nothing of new expenses. Exasperated by Boissieux's conduct, dismayed with French setbacks, and increasingly gripped by paranoia that the French would take the island for themselves, the Genoese senators were not in a cooperative mood, and their public finances were in a shambles already. It surely did not help that Ambassador Jacques de Campredon, the old French hand in Corsica who knew better than anyone how to work the Genoese Senate, had recently been sacked.

Theodore presumably did not know the specifics of this fraying relationship—nor the details of the treaty of intervention, which was notionally a secret pact— but he was correct to assume that his enemies' greatest weakness was political, not military. His interest lay less in economic problems than the balance of power, for he had correctly ascertained that British influence in the Mediterranean was what the French feared most. Early in his reign he had sought to allay those fears by any means possible (while nevertheless still appealing to London for assistance), but as hope of an understanding with the French faded over the course of the intervention, he began to place his hopes more and more in the idea that the British could be convinced to step in and make France back down for fear of sparking a greater war. Fleury's grand aim, after all, was to preserve peace with Britain, and presumably he would not hesitate to leave his Genoese allies hanging if the Corsican war seriously endangered that peace.

Although Theodore never explicitly articulated a grand strategy, his approach to the war by the summer of 1739 was essentially Fabian in nature (appropriately enough, given that his chief general was Fabiani) - to attrit, exhaust, and wear down the enemy, through interminable marches and constant ambushes in the rugged interior, with the ultimate objective of either convincing the French that the maximalist terms of Fontainebleau were not worth enforcing or convincing Britain that the nascent Kingdom of Corsica was strong and sturdy enough to merit a gesture of support which would compel the French to moderate their position. The danger, of course, was that a Fabian strategy can plausibly succeed only when time is on the side of the one employing it. Theodore seems to have been relying entirely on the assumption that the patience of the rebel Corsicans, oppressed and besieged on their own island by a powerful army, would last longer than that of the French king and his ministers. In the summer of 1739, that was not the safest of bets.

In accordance with this strategic vision, the priority of the nationals now became the evacuation of the Nebbio. Since the arrival of the "syndicate armada," most of the war materiel disembarked in the Nebbio which was not immediately distributed had remained in that province, predominantly at San Fiorenzo or Theodore's "northern capital" of Murato. If the Nebbio was to fall, however, it would all have to be removed—dozens of artillery pieces, thousands of small arms, more than a hundred thousand pounds of gunpowder, tens of thousands of pounds of shot, and so on—or else be lost to the French. In fact this had already begun under Fabiani's orders following the fall of the Balagna, when it was feared the French would launch an immediate follow-up attack, but Villemur's advance up the eastern coast had threatened to cut off the ongoing withdrawal. Fortunately, Villemur had been stopped less than a day's march from the Golo valley, the chief artery for the transport of Corsican heavy weapons into the interior by mule-back. After San Pellegrino, efforts were redoubled and given all available resources. Boissieux was undoubtedly correct that the rebellion, cut off from the sea, would eventually wither and die, but with the powder, weapons, and money Theodore still held in reserve he could potentially prolong his survival for months, perhaps even years.

A secondary logistical difficulty was what to do with the French prisoners. The Corsicans held nearly 500 French soldiers, enough to populate an entire French battalion, and feeding and guarding them proved to be no easy task. Some had been held at Bastia and San Fiorenzo, but if the northeast district was to be evacuated they could not remain there. Once more, Theodore send a message to Boissieux offering an exchange, not merely for Corsican militiamen but the eminent hostages at the Chateau d'If. His highest ranking captive, Colonel Armand de Bourbon, Comte de Malauze, seemed likely to be a good bargaining chip. In the meantime, as Theodore awaited a response, Malauze was reportedly well-treated by the man he referred to as the "King of the Rebels," who invited him to dinner regularly. Some of his officers were baffled as to his preference for the Frenchman's company, but Theodore, starved for news from the continent and interested in any political developments he might turn to his advantage, was eager to hear the latest gossip from Paris.

News from the rest of Corsica was less than encouraging. It was reported that the Franco-Genoese force at Ajaccio had captured Cinarca and that the western province of Vico, previously the domain of the indifferenti, was on the cusp of defecting to the French; the brigade of Maréchal de Camp Louis-François Crozat, Marquis du Châtel seems to have been substantially outperforming its envisioned role of merely acting as a force-in-being in Ajaccio to keep Lieutenant-General Luca d'Ornano occupied. There were rumors that d'Ornano himself, Theodore's foremost commander in the Dila, was in negotiations with du Châtel or Boissieux. That was a danger not only because of the psychological impact of such a high-profile defection, but because it would expose the interior to attacks from both the north and south.

On June 22nd, Rousset's brigade entered the Agriate. A comparatively rich agricultural region, the province was nevertheless almost deserted; most farming had been carried out by the Genoese and done seasonally, with few permanent residents, and since 1730 this seasonal exploitation had been infrequent. The dense maquis was then interspersed with weed-filled fields, overgrown olive groves, and pasture turning slowly into wild land, and dotted with pagliaghji, the drystone dwellings for farmers and livestock characteristic of the region. Using the mountains and the maquis as their refuge, Colonel Giuseppe's militiamen of Caccia and Canale harassed the French columns, but their effectiveness was limited. Rousset had chosen to take the coastal route, which was longer but kept him further from the mountains and secured at least one flank against the raiders. By the 26th, the French had reached the Torre di Mortella at the mouth of the Bay of San Fiorenzo. Although formerly occupied by the rebels, the Corsicans did not have much faith in the ability of a single six-pounder gun to hold back Rousset's whole corps, and the French found the tower abandoned. On the next day, the first French battalions marched into San Fiorenzo. The rebels had stripped most everything of worth from the town and burned their little fleet, including the Genoese galley which they had captured during the siege of the town. Its charred timbers were still smouldering on the beach when Rousset's men raised the Genoese flag upon the citadel.

While the rebels would not contest the plain, they retained the mountainous fringes of the Nebbio. The French were now in the same strategic position that the ill-fated Genoese Colonel Marchelli had been in 1736, and Marchelli's attempts to break through the mountains to Bastia had ended in disaster. The royalists were more numerous, better armed, and better prepared than they had been in 1736, but the French army was not the Genoese army, and Rousset was not Marchelli.


Situation in Corsica around the end of June 1739
Green: Royalist controlled
Red: Genoese controlled
Blue: French or joint Franco-Genoese occupation
White: Unknown, neutral, or uninhabited
 
Last edited:
If the royalists lose Bastia and San Pellegrino both, how do they communicate with the rest of Europe (much less get resupplied)?

Well they don't. But they've just recieved a massive ammount of supplies, so resupply isn't going to be a problem for a while and geting messages out secretly should still be doable because supply ships are going to still be going to genoan/french cities.
 
If the royalists lose Bastia and San Pellegrino both, how do they communicate with the rest of Europe (much less get resupplied)?

Presumably in the same way they got supplied IOTL, since they never had Bastia - through small boats landing on the (largely uninhabited) eastern coast. That, after all, was how Theodore landed.

Franco-Genoese control of the sea makes this difficult, because without a secure port such ships are vulnerable to being attacked while unloading, but it's not impossible. The usual tactic was to pull into a shallow lagoon or estuary where patrol ships could not follow, although admittedly the Genoese do have small armed craft of their own. To truly cut off the rebels, the French need to control the entire eastern coastline, or at least patrol it heavily enough that nobody will want to risk the trip.

IOTL, the Corsicans did find other ways. For some time there was a disgruntled Corso-Genoese captain in the Ajaccio garrison who smuggled out oil to rebel-aligned merchants right under the nose of the Genoese commandant. Still, without a port of their own, the flow of supplies will certainly be attenuated.
 
Very ominous ending there Carp. The Dila seems to be in danger of falling and the French seem poised for an attack on the Corsican interior.

I have got to say, Theodore is in a difficult spot, but I fully support his decision to stay and fight a guerrilla war from the inland. The Corsicans have proven themselves to be capable fighters that are able to match the French in a few situations, the terrain definitely benefits them further inland, and numbers are in their favor for the most part. Hopefully they have enough supplies to last another year and a half, because they will not be getting much more anytime soon.
 
Borgo
Borgo

z1tO1Kt.png

The village of Borgo (Corsican: "U Borgu"), looking northeast. The body of water is the Lagoon of Biguglia, the largest of the Corsican lagoons. The Tyrrhenian Sea is separated from the lagoon by the narrow spit of land in the background.

With the plain of the Nebbio in hand, the French soon snuffed out the remainder of Corsican resistance in the northeast. The French easily won a skirmish at Oletta, and while the Corsicans put up marginally more resistance at Rutali and Murato the outcome of the French campaign there was not seriously in doubt. Some rebel arms caches were reported as seized, indicating that the Corsican evacuation of materiel from the northeast had not been completed, but it is difficult to know the proportion of the losses. Chancellor Sebastiano Costa reported the loss of several artillery pieces, which were presently of no use to the rebels but had nevertheless been bought dearly and could not be easily replaced. Royalist fighters on Cap Corse, who had thus far been able to hold back the brigade of Anne de Montmorency-Luxembourg, Comte de Montmorency et Ligny, found their position untenable with the fall of the Nebbio and retreated by way of Bastia to avoid the possibility of being cut off.

Bastia, like San Fiorenzo, was doomed. The French forces under Maréchal de Camp Jean-Charles de Gaultier de Girenton, Seigneur de Rousset encountered significant resistance at the Col de Teghime and Bocca di San Stefano, the two main passes between the Nebbio and Orto (the pieve of Bastia), but local militiamen and the Bastia garrison under Count Gio-Giacomo Ambrosi di Castinetta count not hope to hold forever against thousands of regulars under Rousset and Montmorency. On July 7th, Castinetta abandoned the city, but only after destroying or disabling most of the remaining artillery (primarily Genoese bastion guns). The Corsicans abandoned the Genoese prisoners held captive in the citadel, some of whom had been there since 1736. Their numbers had considerably thinned since then, in large part due to typhus. A French apothecary traveling with Rousset's corps recorded in his journal that the survivors were in an atrocious state—filthy, malnourished, and sharing cells with corpses. There were, however, no French prisoners among them. Theodore had marched them inland, hoping that he might still find some value in them, and had seen to their well-being. He had little influence, however, over the seething antipathy of the Corsicans towards their "occupiers," and the rebels treated Genovesi who fell into their hands as worse than dogs.

The Genoese made much of "their" recapture of the colonial capital, and sympathetic newspapers on the continent were soon crowing that the rebellion was collapsing.[1] Commissioner-General Giovanni-Battista de Mari soon relocated to his rightful place at the governor's palace, but was furious to find Montmorency already in residence and French grenadiers guarding the citadel gates. Montmorency had no pretensions at Mari's overthrow—he was merely using the island's most comfortable building as a temporary command post, and handed it over once Mari had arrived—but he resented the unceremonious ejection of his soldiers from the citadel as if his regiment had not just fought alongside the Genoese for the past several weeks. He was soon joined at Bastia by Lieutenant-General Louis de Frétat, Marquis de Boissieux, who sensibly desired to be nearer the main theater of war. Montmorency's complaints were old hat to Boissieux, who had been dealing with such petty displays of distrust by Mari for more than a year.

Maintaining territory once seized had posed some problems in the Balagna, requiring the dispersion of Genoese and French forces to various strategic villages, but the northeast was a generally "loyalist" province and demanded little in the way of internal security. Nevertheless, infiltration from the outside was still possible, and a pause was necessary to establish posts, reorganize the troops, and move the French command as well as supplies, munitions, and artillery to Bastia. Boissieux wanted to move on quickly to complete the "encirclement" of the rebellious interior, but he was personally hobbled by a spell of illness, and friction between himself and Mari was not going away. After insulting Montmorency at Bastia, Mari turned himself wholly to the cause of retribution. Despite the general loyalty of the province, there were still royalist sympathizers, and Genoese troops busied themselves with hunting down alleged traitors and destroying their homes and properties. In some cases the targets of these raids were not really royalists, but merely those who had acquiesced to Genoese rule; the French apothecary who noted the abominable state of the Bastian prisons also briefly related the sad story of a man who had his cattle seized by the rebels and was then hanged by the Genoese for supplying the rebels with meat. Boissieux had previously had some small success in restraining Mari's zeal, but Mari's return to his palace in Bastia seems to have boosted his confidence, and Boissieux's illness probably played a role as well.

Conquering the eastern shore had originally been the job of Brigadier Jean-Baptiste François, Marquis de Villemur, but his defeat at San Pellegrino ended this ambition. Since that time, he had retreated to Cervioni, but was forced to abandon that position too because of the relentless attacks of the Castagniccian militia under Lieutenant-General Count Andrea Ceccaldi. The Corsicans recaptured the town on June 20th, while Villemur withdrew to the environs of Aleria, held by a Genoese garrison. From there he was able to evacuate the wounded and sick and resupply his brigade thanks to the Genoese navy, and Ceccaldi dared not attack him in the coastal plain. Although secure and resupplied, Villemur's force was too weak to attempt another march northwards, which placed the responsibility for the conquest of the eastern coastal pieves—from north to south, Mariana, Casinca, Tavagna, Moriano, Campoloro, and Verde—on the shoulders of Boissieux's commanders in the northeast, Rousset and Montmorency.

On the 14th of July, a week after the fall of Bastia, the French made their first foray south. The target was the village of Borgo in the pieve of Mariana. Although only a small hamlet, Borgo occupied a key strategic position. Perched upon a hill at the edge of the mountains, Borgo overlooked the coastal route between Bastia and Vescovato. It was also only two miles from the valley of the Golo, which was and remains the principal route of transport between the northeast and the deep interior of the island. It was further rumored that the rebels had a cache of arms there. Boissieux dispatched the Nivernais regiment under Colonel Charles de Béziade, Marquis d’Avaray, to take the village, search it for arms, and hold it as an advance post. The village was not strongly garrisoned and fell with little resistance, although the rumors of an arms cache do not seem to have contained much truth.

Theodore's reign now seemed to be in serious crisis. The swift loss of Bastia and the Nebbio badly rattled the royalist leadership, and the rats were starting to jump ship. The defection of Marquis Saviero Matra was already well-known, and there were persistent rumors that Lieutenant-General Marquis Luca d'Ornano was discussing his own terms of armistice or surrender with the French in the south. D'Ornano, after all, had been a prominent member of Campredon's "pro-French" party immediately prior to Theodore's arrival. Lieutenant-Colonel Sir John Powers, one of Theodore's most prominent foreign officers and a participant in the Battle of San Pellegrino, had decided to quit the cause after the fall of the Nebbio and had taken a ship out of Bastia shortly before its capitulation.

Given this situation, a defense of Borgo seemed even more crucial if only to make a show of resistance, but it was not forthcoming. Theodore and his captains knew just as well as the French the value of the village as a point from which to launch an invasion of the interior. Although Boissieux was attempting to avoid such an eventuality, the Corsicans had no way to know this, and it was expected that the French would next move inland from Borgo and into the rebellion's heartland. Despairing of holding Borgo itself, Theodore retreated towards Morosaglia, and recalled Ceccaldi and his men from Cervioni to prepare for a defense of the pieve of Casaconi.

The pessimism of Theodore and his cabinet, however, was not shared by the Castigniccians. The loss of the fertile north had been a bitter blow to the king and had discouraged many of his elite supporters, but the most recent wartime experiences of the Castagniccian peasantry had not been defeats and withdrawals but San Pellegrino, Alesani, and the recent recapture of Cervioni. Their motivating emotion was not fear, but anger; local priests, relates Costa, harangued the people on the outrages committed by the French in Alesani. The men of the Castagniccia had played only a limited role in the war in the Balagna and the Nebbio, but Borgo was their own doorstep.

The Battle of Borgo began on the afternoon of July 15th as a minor skirmish between a group of irregulars from Bignorno and d'Avaray's battalion. Who exactly instigated the skirmish is unclear, but Costa insists it was not according to any order from the war council or any royalist general. Quite without the input of the rebel command, the battle rapidly escalated. Armed men had begun congregating in many villages of the northern Castagniccia, hearing rumors of an immanent French attack, but as news of fighting near Borgo spread these men began marching down the Golo. By the morning of the 16th, Borgo was surrounded by at least a thousand Corsicans. The French held against their assault—although outnumbered more than two to one, they were well dug in on the hilltop, and the Corsican attack was poorly coordinated given that they had no command above the company level. Still, d'Avaray was alarmed by their numbers, and prior to his encirclement he dispatched a messenger to Boissieux requesting immediate reinforcement.

By this time Theodore and his generals realized that battle had been joined without their knowledge or consent. The king was not pleased, as he had hoped to avoid a pitched engagement, and seemed incapable of decisive action. His English secretary, Denis Richard, wrote that the king seemed to have lost his good spirits since the fall of Bastia and was increasingly melancholic and anxious. Captain-General Marquis Simone Fabiani, however, wanted to seize the opportunity. He had been the chief proponent of a strategy of avoidance in the Nebbio, but now argued that, with fighting already underway, battle could not be declined. But for Fabiani, Theodore's paralysis might have left the irregulars at Borgo twisting in the wind, and although Costa tells us that Fabiani "convinced" Theodore to allow him command it may be more likely that Fabiani simply acted in his capacity as Captain-General and marched his forces to Borgo without the king's license.

Fabiani arrived in the environs of Borgo late on the 16th with several hundred of Theodore's regular forces in addition to a larger body of militia from Rostino, Orezza, and elsewhere. Skirmishing continued under darkness, but a new assault could not be made until dawn. When it came, this attack too was beaten back. After several hours of fighting, a French relief force was sighted approaching the village from the north. Despite his illness, Boissieux had come personally, along with three infantry battalions and the miquelets. Fabiani ordered another assault on the village in an attempt to preempt Boissieux's arrival, but this too was repulsed, albeit with heavy French casualties. Undoubtedly part of the problem was that while Fabiani was ostensibly in supreme command, many of the Corsicans were irregulars who had arrived before Fabiani and were not functionally under his control.

The Corsicans were not successful in preventing Boissieux from relieving d'Avaray's regiment, but Boissieux did not hold the position for long. D'Avaray's regiment had taken serious casualties and was critically low on ammunition, and the colonel reported to Boissieux that there were certainly upwards of 3,000 Corsicans in the vicinity, a number which was certainly exaggerated. Although Fabiani had broken off his assault upon Boissieux's arrival, fierce skirmishing continued all around the French perimeter, and irregular forces which had been pushed aside by Boissieux's advance now picked their way back north in an attempt to surround the French. Under continual fire, in danger of being surrounded, and convinced by d'Avaray that the enemy was at least half again as numerous as his own force (including the exhausted Nivernais regiment), Boissieux elected to withdraw from the position. The Corsicans pursued the French for the remainder of the day, harassing their columns with fire from the trees. The fighting continued all the way to Furiani, where the Corsican attack finally broke off on account of nightfall and the arrival of more French forces under Rousset.[A]

Corsican casualties in the Battle of Borgo, while not precisely known, were significant, and their "liberation" of the town did not last long. Ten days later, the French re-occupied the village, this time with a larger force supported by artillery and cavalry, and the Corsicans were not strong enough either to defend it or immediately retake it from the bulk of Rousset's division. Nevertheless, the engagement on the 15th-17th was considered to be a moral victory by the Corsicans. The Castagniccians had demonstrated that the loss of the north had not put out the fires of rebellion, and that the rebel movement remained capable of threatening Boissieux's army - or at least detachments of it. The engagement also seemed to return some backbone to Theodore, who was gratified by the fact that many of his "subjects" remained loyal and willing to fight for the cause which he had by now wagered his whole life upon. Fabiani, too, benefited substantially from the battle; although his actual importance is still debated, given that he did not start the battle and even after his arrival most of the Corsican participants in the battle were probably outside his control, his presence and initiative in joining the fight helped lift the cloud that had been hanging over his reputation since "his" loss of the Balagna.

Boissieux still pushed ever closer to his goal, the encirclement of the interior, but the episode reflected poorly upon him. Although the French claimed to have caused more casualties than they suffered - which, given the repeated failed assaults on the village, may well be true - they nevertheless suffered reported losses of 82 killed and 175 wounded, casualties amounting to half a battalion. Unlike at San Pellegrino, Boissieux had been personally in command at Borgo, and could not foist off the "defeat" on one of his subordinates. The increasingly exasperated French ministry, which had easily rebuffed prior Genoese complaints about the lieutenant-general, began more seriously considering his replacement.


Footnotes
[1] In fairness to the Genoese, there were two Ligurian battalions with Montmorency which must have been among the first to enter the city. Still, it is impossible to consider the recapture of Bastia as a Genoese accomplishment.

Timeline Notes

[A] This battle bears a close similarity to the actual Battle of Borgo in 1738 (not to be confused with the second and better-known Battle of Borgo in 1768, fought by Paoli's republic). As ITTL, IOTL Boissieux dispatched a battalion to Borgo which came under repeated attack from a large irregular rebel force, marched to relieve the isolated battalion, and found resistance so fierce that he chose to withdraw back to Bastia under continual harassment. That was, historically, Boissieux's last battle; he died of an indeterminate illness (although one source I've read, without much evidence, claims dysentery) not long thereafter. I think the "repeat" of the historical Battle of Borgo is justified here because the French and Corsicans find themselves in a similar strategic situation ITTL in the summer of 1739 as they did IOTL in late 1738, in which the French/Genoese control the north but not the eastern coast. Borgo is a really obvious strategically important position; there's a reason it was the site of a key battle in both 1738 and 1768 (both of which were major Corsican victories, and arguably the greatest battlefield successes of the rebels aside from the more mythologized Battle of Calenzana). Given Boissieux's rather easy victories in the north and the near-absence of Corsican resistance in the northeast, it seems sensible to me that he would act somewhat "historically" and assume a battalion could hold an important post which was less than a day's march from Bastia.
 
Last edited:
I've been a bit busy the last few weeks and ended up taking a longer break than anticipated, but we're back now.

As the last line of that chapter indicated, I'm toying with the idea of replacing Boissieux. IOTL, he actually requested his own replacement after his defeat at Borgo; he was both demoralized and very ill (terminally so, as it turned out) and realized he was not the man for the job. He may make the same decision ITTL, although I haven't decided if his present illness is likewise terminal or if he's just having the usual "I'm a 76 year old man with pre-modern health care on a notoriously unhealthy Mediterranean island" health issues.

I'm not sure, however, who would replace him. Maillebois was his replacement historically, but that decision was made around the beginning of 1739 IOTL; we're more than halfway through that year ITTL. There's no reason that Maillebois couldn't still get it, but my impression is that France had a rather long list of Lieutenant-Generals on the payroll and as far as I know there was no specific reason that Maillebois was chosen. I don't have a list of Lieutenant-Generals of France in 1739, but some can be intuited from who was made Marshal of France in subsequent years. In fact no fewer than seven men got their batons in 1741 alone, the most prominent of which were Maillebois and Belle-Isle. (Another possible candidate is Maurice de Saxe, who got his baton in 1743, but I'm not sure Theodore's kingdom would survive that even with God's own luck.)

As an unrelated aside, it struck me recently just how small Corsica is. One would think, from the slow progress of the campaign, that there is a lot of ground to cover, but logistical difficulties in Corsica are owed entirely to the rough terrain, not the land area. If Corsica were a country in Europe today, it would be among the smallest; at 8,680 sq km/3,350 sq mi, the island is marginally smaller than Kosovo (10,908 sq km). Only the true mini-states, starting with Luxembourg, would rank after it. For my fellow Americans, if Corsica was a US state it would rank 49th out of 51 in land area, just behind Connecticut (!) and ahead of only Delaware and Rhode Island.
 
Hurray for an update! Things still looking grim for the Royalists and King Theodore doesn't look like he is at his best, yet the rebels proved that they still have a sting, so let's hope this morale boost can help them survive for some months before ousting Theodore.

Maybe the French will get overconfident and try to seize the central area? Might they find a "Dien Bien Phu" there?

For the meantime, chestnut bread is actuamlly quite good... well, better than starving at least!

As to size: you are right, I always think pf Corsica as comparable with Sardinia if somewhat smaller, but it's surface is actually little more than a third of the Italian island (about 24.100 km2).
 
One of these days the Corsicans are going to have to deal with the fact that one of their most populated provinces hates them almost as much as they hate Genoa.
 
Is the Syndicate still operating? Are we likely to see more help from them if so?


Still praying for a beautiful Union Jack to be seen off the shores of Corsica...
 
Hurray for an update, and a great one as well!

That's a lot of ground to just give up in a short span of time. Hopefully Theodore can hold out for another year and a half because at this rate it looks pretty bad.
 
For some reason, I did not get notification of updates to this for a bit, but am getting them again now.

The proceedings have been interesting. An inexorable French advance along the northern coast, but a defeat and near-collapse of the eastern advance. What might really swing things Theodore's way would be rebel forces actively trying to suddenly take the comparatively undermanned French and Genoese holdings in the Dila, but getting there through the island is as I understand more time-consuming than going around via boat.

To what ranks could a commission be bought? As late as the Napoleonic wars, Britain still sold the position of colonel. In the 18th century, still-feudal-in-many-ways France should be at least as bad. Could an untested bufoon with good connections potentially gain command in an entire threatre of war such as this one?
 
One of these days the Corsicans are going to have to deal with the fact that one of their most populated provinces hates them almost as much as they hate Genoa.

Such is the way with colonialism. There is (almost) always a sub-population which derives social and/or economic benefits from their relationship with the colonizers, and for that reason supports the status quo against the uncertainty of violent revolution. The northeast is the closest part of Corsica to Genoa, not only geographically but economically, administratively, and culturally (aside from a few Genoese-dominated and Ligurian-speaking enclaves elsewhere, specifically Calvi and Bonifacio).

Bastia owed its very existence to its role as the Genoese capital of the island. The city suffered during its rebel occupation, not just from Castinetta’s iron fist but from the loss of Genoese trade, government salaries, and the attendant demands of an administrative center. The Nebbio was a key breadbasket of Genoa, while Capo Corso was one of the few parts of Corsica which was still partly feudalized, with actual “fiefs” owned by Corso-Genoese noble families mixed in with the pieves.

The Balagna is in a similar position in terms of trade - the economic life of the province depended on agricultural exports to Genoa - but there is more of a “local identity” in the Balagna, demonstrated by the existence of native noble families like that of Fabiani. The northeast, in contrast, is dominated by actual Genoese or Corso-Genoese families and functionaries. The result is that loyalties in the Balagna are more mixed, with considerable royalist and republican factions, while the royalist faction in the northeast is fairly anemic.

It’s not that there are irreconcilable differences between the northeast and the interior, but rather that from the perspective of most northeast Corsicans the revolution offers them little except poverty and death. Once Corsica has its independence, however, I suspect the situation will be similar to America's experience with the Loyalists - some who identify strongly with the mother country or fear retribution will leave for good, but most will stay, and the animosity will fade. Those northern districts are also some of the most populous and productive areas on the island, and ultimately can't simply be pushed aside as dens of traitors. Corsica can't succeed without them.

Is the Syndicate still operating? Are we likely to see more help from them if so?

The syndicate still exists, but there’s not much they can do right now. Technically, the syndicate is an illegal enterprise, as the Dutch government has formally agreed to ban trade with Corsica. That doesn’t mean much in the Netherlands, because the government is not actually interested in enforcing that agreement, but it means that the syndicate’s ships won’t receive the diplomatic protection of the States General if they get caught violating the ban. If the French intercept a syndicate ship - which is much more likely now given the French dominance at sea and the loss of the rebel ports - the States General will have to disavow them, and they are likely to be treated as smugglers or pirates.

But the real issue is that there’s no reason to send more ships. The rebels are actually doing okay for arms right now; what they really need are good soldiers and a strong fleet, neither of which the syndicate can provide. Even if the rebels did need arms, they have no ability to pay for them after losing the Balagna and the Nebbio, and the syndicate is only interested in supporting the rebels if they can make a buck off it too.

So yes, the syndicate still exists, and yes, we will see more of them in the future, but at the present time the syndicate partners have neither the ability nor the inclination to intervene. They’ve done their part for the time being and made some money off it; now it's time to sit back and see if Theodore survives with the arsenal they sold him. If he makes it, they’ll be happy to give him more support in the future as a promising long-term investment. If he doesn’t make it, well, at least they made a modest profit off their earlier arms delivery.

Still praying for a beautiful Union Jack to be seen off the shores of Corsica...

The chances of Britain helping out under Walpole’s government are practically nonexistent. Walpole was a strong advocate for peace and non-intervention in continental affairs, and was dragged rather unwillingly into the War of Jenkins’ Ear (which, declared in October of 1739, has not yet begun ITTL). Certainly he had not the slightest interest in Corsica during the OTL first French intervention under Boissieux and Maillebois. Historically, Walpole’s resignation did not come until 1742, which is likely to be the same ITTL. Lord Carteret, his successor, was much more amenable to the Corsican cause, and IOTL he met with Theodore while the “king” was in London in 1742.

Genoa, however, did not actually join the WoAS as a belligerent until 1745. Their neutrality was somewhat in doubt before then - the Spanish used the port of Genoa to supply their armies in Italy, and early in the war a British flotilla violated Genoese sovereignty by sailing into the Bay of Ajaccio and blowing up a Spanish ship of the line right under the nose of the Genoese battery - but Britain was careful not to actually attack the Genoese and force them into the war, as they didn’t want to make things any harder for the Pragmatic Allies in Italy than they already were.

In other words, it’s unlikely that the Corsicans will have any British help before 1742, and probably no overt help (like, say, shore bombardment by the Royal Navy) before 1745. The British will eventually play an important role in the revolution, but they are not going to help Theodore fight the French occupation force.

(That said, not all British ships acted in strict accordance with British policy. Theodore’s brief return to the island in 1743 was on a British frigate, an action which was protested by the Genoese and disavowed by the British.)

To what ranks could a commission be bought? As late as the Napoleonic wars, Britain still sold the position of colonel. In the 18th century, still-feudal-in-many-ways France should be at least as bad. Could an untested bufoon with good connections potentially gain command in an entire threatre of war such as this one?

The French absolutely sold commissions, but one could not buy oneself straight into the general staff. As far as I know, a colonelcy was the highest position which was actually for sale, and higher ranks (brigadier, maréchal de camp, lieutenant-general, and ultimately Maréchal de France) were appointed. Certainly merit was a factor in promotions, but seniority, noble rank, personal connections, and one's position and popularity at court could also be determinative. Performance mattered, but the French officer corps was very far from being a pure meritocracy.

The French army of this time was notorious for its massive glut of officers, from lieutenants right on up to lieutenant-generals. In 1740, the ratio of enlisted men to officers in the Prussian army was 29 to 1; in the French army, it was 11 to 1. In 1758, the French army had 172 lieutenant-generals, an enormous number by European standards, and the cause of considerable waste since they all had generous government salaries, to say nothing of provisions, servants, and staff. In the same year, the French army in Germany had 900 colonels for 163 regiments and promoted 129 new brigadiers despite having only 30 brigades. In the case of lieutenant-generals, the sheer number of them relative to the available divisional commands meant that on a major campaign they were sometimes rotated in and out of field positions on a daily basis.

Undoubtedly there was a lot of dross in the lieutenant-general’s list, and many must have held the rank as a sort of military sinecure. The fact that they were on the list, however, didn’t mean they were in active service, because lieutenant-generals held that rank for life. The French army had its problems and the French government did not always choose its commanders wisely, but I don’t believe Fleury’s government was so incompetent that it would have picked a complete nonentity to replace Boissieux, particularly since they are eager to wrap up that campaign as quickly as possible. Boissieux himself was no military mastermind, but he had served with distinction and considerable bravery in Italy. In retrospect, he was too old for the job and too unsuited for the kind of warfare he faced in Corsica, but he was hardly a rank amateur picked out of a hat.
 
The chances of Britain helping out under Walpole’s government are practically nonexistent. Walpole was a strong advocate for peace and non-intervention in continental affairs, and was dragged rather unwillingly into the War of Jenkins’ Ear (which, declared in October of 1739, has not yet begun ITTL). Certainly he had not the slightest interest in Corsica during the OTL first French intervention under Boissieux and Maillebois. Historically, Walpole’s resignation did not come until 1742, which is likely to be the same ITTL. Lord Carteret, his successor, was much more amenable to the Corsican cause, and IOTL he met with Theodore while the “king” was in London in 1742.

Genoa, however, did not actually join the WoAS as a belligerent until 1745. Their neutrality was somewhat in doubt before then - the Spanish used the port of Genoa to supply their armies in Italy, and early in the war a British flotilla violated Genoese sovereignty by sailing into the Bay of Ajaccio and blowing up a Spanish ship of the line right under the nose of the Genoese battery - but Britain was careful not to actually attack the Genoese and force them into the war, as they didn’t want to make things any harder for the Pragmatic Allies in Italy than they already were.

In other words, it’s unlikely that the Corsicans will have any British help before 1742, and probably no overt help (like, say, shore bombardment by the Royal Navy) before 1745. The British will eventually play an important role in the revolution, but they are not going to help Theodore fight the French occupation force.

(That said, not all British ships acted in strict accordance with British policy. Theodore’s brief return to the island in 1743 was on a British frigate, an action which was protested by the Genoese and disavowed by the British.)
I'd think it shouldn't be too hard for Walpole's successor TTL to decide pretty quickly that the Corsicans can be super useful in tying up French forces; I wouldn't object to seeing the scales pushed ever so slightly further down by making it so that Britain isn't as concerned about fighting Genoa as well (though I'm not sure what to suggest on that front).
 
I'd think it shouldn't be too hard for Walpole's successor TTL to decide pretty quickly that the Corsicans can be super useful in tying up French forces; I wouldn't object to seeing the scales pushed ever so slightly further down by making it so that Britain isn't as concerned about fighting Genoa as well (though I'm not sure what to suggest on that front).

The question is whether there will still be French forces in Corsica to "tie up" by the time the British are actually engaged in the war. IOTL, France drew down its forces starting in 1740, reaching six battalions (~3,000 men) by early 1741, 1,400 men by the summer, and completing their withdrawal in early September, just a few weeks after the French army crossed the Rhine into Germany. True, by that time IOTL Corsica was pacified, but even if the rebels had still been active in the interior the French might still have withdrawn. Corsica was a sideshow, of no importance in the broader WoAS in which far more was at stake than some poor little Genoese island.

Furthermore, in one of those strange technicalities of 18th century diplomacy, France and Britain were not actually at war until early 1744. Although the French and British armies had fought one another at Dettingen in 1743, the French were ostensibly acting as auxiliaries of Bavaria (their officers in Germany apparently wore Bavarian cockades) and were not actually at war with the British soldiers they were shooting at. War was not declared until shortly after the Battle of Toulon in 1744, which is why King George's War, the colonial American theater of the WoAS, did not begin until that year. Assuming the broader war goes more or less as OTL, the British are unlikely to attack French forces on Genoa until 1744 because they're not actually at war with either France or Genoa, which isn't very different from waiting until Genoa's entry into the war in the following year.

Undoubtedly the Corsicans have a difficult road ahead of them, one which won't involve Britain sailing to their rescue anytime soon. Not to worry, though - there may be a few non-OTL developments in their favor in the near future.
 
@Carp So with the Genoese being defeated earlier, and with the years of French occupation, would the republic have recovered in any way demographically and militarily with the respite, or would the financial burden of the French soldiers keep Genoa at the low it was just prior to the intervention? Even the slightest change would help, especially as Theodore's forces too must have degraded as they are pushed to the highlands, and with some very generous luck a rare bright officer or an especially dumb Corsican could snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.
 
Last edited:
@Carp So with the Genoese being defeated earlier, and with the years of French occupation, would the republic have recovered in any way demographically and militarily with the respite, or would the financial burden of the French soldiers keep Genoa at the low it was just prior to the intervention? Even the slightest change would help, especially as Theodore's forces too must have degraded as they are pushed to the highlands, and with some very generous luck a rare bright officer or an especially dumb Corsican could snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

Supporting the French expeditionary force was indeed expensive, which is why IBTL the Genoese did not accept the French offer of "help" for many months after it was initially proposed, and even stooped so low as to attempt new negotiations with the rebels as an alternative to paying the French. They are no better off ITTL, and in a sense worse, because by this time IOTL Maillebois was mopping up the last of the holdouts in the interior and the vast majority of the island had been pacified and was thus available for Genoese revenue collection.

It's difficult to see the Genoese accomplishing a military recovery under their present circumstances. The problem isn't really demographic - with about 400-500 thousand citizens, the Republic has a clear demographic advantage over the 120,000 or so Corsicans. Indeed, during the War of Austrian Succession the Republic maintained an army of around 10,000 men, considerably more than the 5-7 thousand range the army seems to have hovered around during the years of rebellion. The problem is really willingness to serve, since like most European countries of the day Genoa recruits its soldiers, it doesn't conscript them. The Ligurian peasants were willing enough to fight when the Republic itself was under threat, which is why a 10k army could be raised for the WoAS, but they did not want to serve in Corsica (and, as mentioned, sometimes specifically demanded exemptions from duty in Corsica when enlisting). Meanwhile, the Genoese upper classes sneered on the military vocation as low-class and inferior to mercantile or political pursuits. The most "warlike" of the Republic's citizens were the Corsicans themselves, who were now obviously unavailable, and the Republic simply could not afford to hire large numbers of high-quality foreign troops. They had a handful of presumably decent German/Swiss companies (although some, like the German "palace guard," may have been more ceremonial than useful), and a bunch of "Ligurian" companies whose ranks were bolstered by deserters and continental castoffs who had no better prospects than to be in the Genoese army.

Genoa's economic problems, by the way, are a lot deeper than the Corsican debacle. The country's chief manufacturing industries in the 17th century - mostly soap, silk, and paper - were badly undercut by northern competition, and the Republic had responded by moving industry into the countryside to take advantage of lower labor costs. This sort of worked - some competitiveness was regained - but the goods produced were shoddy (Genoese silk at this time was widely known as extremely cheap but very low-quality), the removal of industry from Genoa proper caused urban poverty to skyrocket, and the shifting of rural labor from farming into manufacturing caused agriculture to collapse and famine to become much more common. The population of the Republic hardly changed over the entire 18th century because there was a continual emigration of Genoese citizens, particularly skilled artisans, to other countries. The other great source of the Republic's wealth, banking, had declined sharply along with the decline of their major client, the Spanish Empire.

All this led to the Corsican rebellion, because the Republic's economic woes were exactly why Genoa was exploiting the Corsicans so heavily in the years running up to the outbreak of rebellion. The rebellion certainly made things worse, and the WoAS was a disaster, for Genoa ended up being occupied by their enemies and forced to pay the Austrians for the costs of their own occupation to the tune of millions of Genoese crowns (which they did not actually have). The war bankrupted the state, and contributed both to the loosening of the Republic's laws against Jews ("please come back, we're desperate") and ultimately the sale of Corsica to France in the 1760s. There was apparently a Genoese economic recovery of sorts in the 1780s, but by that time the Republic had only a few decades left until its Napoleonic abolition.
 
Top