Not to attack the USSR in 1943 thinking but the B29/B32 was the follow on, NextGen, to the B17/B24. It was the next step, much like you had the natural progression in fighters from the P36/P35 to the P40, then to the P47 and P51. Longer range, more bomb load, more defensive armament, new electronics (including Radar bombing capability). Remember the 29/32 was from the 1939 need to have a plane that would be better able to attack someone. The NextGen after the 29/32 was the 36/35 for heavies.Were the US Bomber Barons anticipating that the B-29's might be needed for a 1946+ go at the Soviets? At least till the B-36 was ready for prime time?
AlanJWhite. I'm not sure what your driving at. Are you saying that the AAF should have gone with a clean paper design in 43 or heavily modify the B29 to make it a lower level night bomber.
By heavily modify I mean delete the turrets and not bother with pressurization systems.
Daylight Strategic Bombing was a failure in Europe and against Japan. The shift to nighttime incendiary bombing was made because conventional high level bombing was not effective,The reason they changed doctrine was the simple fact that going low at night with incendiaries increased the damage inflicted upon the cities in Japan, even more so than conventional high level bombing.
Well that is sort of yes and no. By 1945 Bomber Command was regularly striking within 600 yards of the aim point, that is sufficient to hammer an area target like a steel works, large factory, ship yard or a marshalling yard. Certainly the accuracy in 1942 was so poor BC were lucky to hit the right country but that improved massively over the years until by the end of the war it was a terrifying weapon of destruction.Daylight Strategic Bombing was a failure in Europe and against Japan. The shift to nighttime incendiary bombing was made because conventional high level bombing was not effective,
I was speaking specifically to bombing of Japan. Hap Arnold was unhappy enough that he relieved Hansell and sent in LeMay to make the 20th Air Force more productive. That to me is a signal that at least in Arnold's mind the high level bombing was not achieving its objectives.Well that is sort of yes and no. By 1945 Bomber Command was regularly striking within 600 yards of the aim point, that is sufficient to hammer an area target like a steel works, large factory, ship yard or a marshalling yard. Certainly the accuracy in 1942 was so poor BC were lucky to hit the right country but that improved massively over the years until by the end of the war it was a terrifying weapon of destruction.
It also served to force the Germans to divert massive resources to defending against strategic bombers from FLAK guns, night fighters, radars and control rooms, huge concrete FLAK towers and all the manpower to operate it. All of that was part of a death of a thousand cuts dragging resources away from the front lines shortening the war.
Without the 8th Airforce daylight campaign and the events leading up to Big Week the Luftwaffe would have been much stronger in the immediate run up to the invasion with dire consequences.
The claim that Strategic bombing was a failure is almost revisionist.
Sometimes based on the comments posted you would think that the UK could not have won WW2 with the equipment provided... posters don't like our small arms our rations, our tanks nothing is as good what the USA provided its troops.some times based on the comments posted you would think that the US could not have won WW2 with the equipment provided... posters don't like our small arms nor our C-rations, our tanks nothing is as good what England provided it' s troops
A couple of things on Japan; Hansell found himself on the wrong end of the battle of the high altitude precision VS low level incendiary bombing lobbies, made even worse by the apparent inefficiencies of the early raids under his command partly due to the existence of strong jet streams (unknown at the time) that affected bombing accuracy when the B-29s were operating at the altitude they were designed for since there were no adjustments made to the bombsights or bombing methods to account for these.I was speaking specifically to bombing of Japan. Hap Arnold was unhappy enough that he relieved Hansell and sent in LeMay to make the 20th Air Force more productive. That to me is a signal that at least in Arnold's mind the high level bombing was not achieving its objectives.
I agree that bombing became more accurate as the war progressed. I tend to discount 1945 bombing of Germany as the invasions from both sides were well under way.
Fat fingersWhat's with the temporary jump with the threadmarks?
First it goes normally 2384, 2385, 2386 and then jumps to 3487, 3488, 3489, 3490 before jumping back down to 2391 and then goes on as it normally would.
4 Brigades would be a short division. They would likely be attached to another force like the Poles, Free French or Canadians for logistical reasons if nothing else.Considering their state of preparation and armament, could the Belgians be considered ready for inclusion in this OVERLORD - when the time comes? Or, given the relative small size of the force, would it be too much of an administrative hassle for them to be front line material?