Hello, as you may know next year is the 100th anniversary of Jutland, the most important naval battle of the European theater in WW1 for afterward Tirpitz demanded that the Kaiser re-institute U-boat warfare.
Now whatever the Commander's faults (Except Hipper, Hipper is best admiral) at Jutland, ensured the High Seas Fleet got a bloody nose and ensured England would rule the waves on the top half.
Now the difficult part.
He had probably earned the despisal of a good chunk of the nation for not doing Trafalgar 2 he kept the fleet intact, essentially unharmed, and stronger than ever a year later (Plus the ships lost weren't going to be missed, save the destroyers). Plus he didnt go for Trafalgar 2 allowing the Navy not to suffer any unnecessary losses.
For his work and hard service he got canned, essential exile to New Zealand until 1924 by the PM Lloyd George and his cronies on a Friday so no newspaper would report it until Monday, including his 'faithful' fellow Admiral Beatty who replaced him. Then wrote nasty versions of the 'truth' at Jutland.
At the end of his career Beatty won an Earldom in 1919 despite nearly losing all his battlecruisers and the five Super-dreadnaughts.
Jellicoe win his Earldom in 1925 after returning home and having to deal with the wave of bio writers who hated his guts for 'abandoning' Beatty.
Now lets imagine a world where the Admiral who kept his forces together and was beloved by the fleet got rewarded for his actions (criticism on the U-boats is heavy though). While Beatty has slower going.
Is there any way this is possible.