I don't know whether it was an invasion or simply a plan to launch counter strikes I know there was someone in the Reagan administration who advocated launching some sort of counter attack on the Russian pacific coast.Are you sure it was an invasion? Seems odd to invade somewhere which is almost cut-off from the rest of the world, when you could just bomb the naval facilities.
Can you tell me the name of the plan?Invading Kamchatka is a bad strategic move:
-Kamchatka is very cold
-Kamchatka is very rugged and mountainous
-There's absolutely nothing in Kamchatka (not even a lot of minerals) and the previous point would make it hard to break out of (also, you'd have to go even further north and through some of the tundra and taiga, which is almost impossible to do in the summer and is very very cold in the winter)
You'd be better off invading at Vladivostok or the mouth of the Amur, and since Reagan's advisors weren't idiots, I'd assume that an attack on the Russian Pacific coast would be directed there.
And not enough vodkaOne big
naval base, 20 active volcanoes, and too many bears...
And not enough vodka
And maybe not enough WOMEN!
Without those the men may not be enthusiastic for the mission.![]()
when comrade has bears.. who of needing womans .. also so cold that maybe hard to tell differenceAnd maybe not enough WOMEN!
Without those the men may not be enthusiastic for the mission.![]()