I think this a potential balkanization, not what the start up in 1936. but I am not entirely sure.
As I said once earlier in the thread, the possibility of a British-aligned state in India can make some sense: the Raj isn't just gonna disappear in the blink of an eye because of the British Revolution, especially with the Royal Family moving to Canada. There would likely still be staff in the Raj that would remain loyal to the crown in these conditions and they could form a form of remnant state. What might need to change would be the location and size of said remnant.As long as it doesn't have a British-aligned state somehow surviving to 1936, I'm fine with whatever they come up with.
It's definitely not the 1936 map.
Discarding the wearing of hats? The syndicalists really are evil.
Guess we now know what UoB citizens eat.
Discarding the wearing of hats? The syndicalists really are evil.
Does this mean Pakistan exists in 1936 or not?
People I just won the Civil war as the feds, should I restore theelectoral college?
Depends on what you believe the electoral results were and whether the EC vote matched the popular vote.
In-game the EC failed two times in a row to produce a clear winner, leading to presidents with dubious legitimation. This will be seen as one of the reasons for the CW...People I just won the Civil war as the feds, should I restore theelectoral college?
In-game the EC failed two times in a row to produce a clear winner, leading to presidents with dubious legitimation. This will be seen as one of the reasons for the CW...
But the pixels ingame don´t know they doomed to war .No, because anyone winning would still cause the civil war.
MacArthur is couping Huey and Reed,
And Huey and Reed are going to rebel against Landon, Floyd and Garner
And even if there was no MacArthur coup, Huey or Reed would still rebel.