I played again as the liberal ottoman empire and something got me dissapointed at the end
So, basically the kemalist route allows you to build a economy similar to latin america at the time, a strong national internal market with a export orientated trade policy, while the Liberal route of the sublime federation has you to open your economy and privatize everything, and after a while a event tells how poverty and wealth inequality is out of control, ouch
Yeah you can compete with Russia in size in that route. I was going for it since they are very conservative and not a trap route (looking at you soccon), but that economicql part made me change my mind if I like them or not.Yeah that was annoying because I was industrializing like mad and that 25% consumer goods hit really stung. I just went the liberal route over the fact I could keep both Egypt and most of Arabia as the Sublime. It also felt like the revolts in the Arab war were much smaller in that route because I didn't piss as many regions off.
Saw your posts on Reddit, definitely curious to see what your ideas for other countries are.My Ideas For an Austria Rework
Pre Ausgleich
View attachment 634321
And Post Ausgleich Civil War
View attachment 634322
Cursed Slovakia.My Ideas For an Austria Rework
Pre Ausgleich
View attachment 634321
And Post Ausgleich Civil War
View attachment 634322
Cursed Slovakia.
Yes, sufferYes, right in my feelings.
The non-Huey AUS paths are inarguably villainous, as are the Red authoritarians. Huey, the demsoc Reds, and the PSA are morally ambiguous to good, depending on the path the Reds and PSA take. New England are at best a lighter shade of asshole.There is a wave in the Reddit of people trying to claim that there are villains for the second American civil war.
I don't think so, every major side (Apart from MacArthur) is trying to improve the nation. The AUS and the CSA cannot be classified as villains on my opinion, just some of their routes like Moseley and Foster.
Yeah, but the discussions are basically people claiming that the CSA and the AUS are villain paths, since both reject liberal democracy for a syndicalist or a populist one.The non-Huey AUS paths are inarguably villainous, as are the Red authoritarians. Huey, the demsoc Reds, and the PSA are morally ambiguous to good, depending on the path the Reds and PSA take. New England are at best a lighter shade of asshole.
Mac Daddy and Huey's B-team (Pelley and Moseley) are scum.
Anybody who seriously thinks that Comrade Flynn is worse than Dugout Doug needs to re-play the game and pay attention to the events.Yeah, but the discussions are basically people claiming that the CSA and the AUS are villain paths, since both reject liberal democracy for a syndicalist or a populist one.
I would argue that Pelley deserves a category of his own (a complete monster)Mac Daddy and Huey's B-team (Pelley and Moseley) are scum.
Isn't most of the world made of villains by that logic? To consider only the liberal democracies to be the "good guys", seems rather close minded.Yeah, but the discussions are basically people claiming that the CSA and the AUS are villain paths, since both reject liberal democracy for a syndicalist or a populist one.