John Edwards Victorious In the 2004 Democratic Primaries

I’m an Edwards fan, so please indulge me for a few moments here.

Part I: Iowa

For months and months it had been foreseen that the battle in the Hawkeye State would come down to a match between the overnight Internet sensation Howard Dean of Vermont and Organized Labor’s favorite, Dick Gephardt. Polls had consistently shown the two in a neck and neck race for first. The interesting main battle was seen for that of third place, with the mantra that there were only three tickets out of Iowa, and one of the Johns would soon have to write the political version of a ‘Dear John’ speech for his campaign.

However with only a week to go, the dynamic of the race started to shift. The media’s incessant attacks on Howard Dean’s ‘electability’ had started to take their toll, and Gephardt’s Union supporters began looking elsewhere, sensing that even if the Gepper won Iowa, he wasn’t strong anywhere else. As in OTL, the spotlight begins to shine on the two senators named John, who had largely been left on the side of a very cold Iowa road for dead. Both begin to climb in the polls. However, Edwards (as in OTL) steals the show at a debate sponsored by the Des Moines Register on January 4th, earning him lots of 2nd looks from people who are suddenly reminded of the good ol’ days of progress and prosperity under Bill Clinton. On January 9th, Senator Tom Harkin, sensing that the media’s attacks on Dean have done too much damage, endorses Edwards for President(in OTL he endorses Dean). On Sunday, January 11th the DSM Register endorses Edwards, saying “His Time Is Nowâ€. Polls show Edwards skyrocketing to the top on the backs of the twin endorsements, with John Kerry, who had been endorsed by Christie Vilsack (and by association Governor Vilsack) close behind. Gephardt refrains from attacking Dean as much because he realizes that he’ll probably be looked at as a VP candidate by all three, who are bunched up in the DSM Register poll days before the election. However, buoyed by ‘the Deal’ made with Kucinich and his supporters, Edwards begins to look like the comeback kid. On election night the results look like this (OTL numbers in parenthesis):

Edwards 31 (33)
Kerry 30 (38)
Dean 24 (18)
Gephardt 15 (11)
Kucinich 1 (1)

The campaigns quickly move on to another freezing state, New Hampshire, with Edwards and Kerry both claiming the big ‘mo’. Unlike in OTL, Gephardt decides to try and work a miracle out of the Feb.3 states, where he’ll almost certainly win his home state(and the biggest prize, Missouri).

Tomorrow: NH through VA/TN
Day After: Super Tuesday
Day After That: Southern Tuesday and Afterwards
 
If Edwards had won, I'd be more comfy voting Libertarian this fall, as the most plausible outcome of a really strong Libertarian move would be a Democratic Presidency. I respect Edwards b/c he was born poor/lower-class and worked his behind off to become wealthy. The American Dream and all that.

I really don't like John Kerry. The Vietnam Vets Against the War business (opposing the war is one thing, but deliberately slandering fellow vets and then asking for their votes takes chutzpah), his attempt to use McCain-Feingold to squish an NRA bid to buy a TV station, his flip-flopping on everything, and his sheer ludicrousness (he denied owning an SUV, but when it's revealed he does own one, he says it's really his family's) all grate on my nerves.

Go Badnarik!
 
Yes, I was a big Edwards fan during the campaign. He has a great shot at VP right now.

Fascinating recent ATL.
 
My own take on what would happen: A Edwards victory would probably energize the Democratic Party considerably, given his speaking ability and public image as a relatively youthful and energetic candidate. Because of his background, he could easily engage in more Class Warfare type attacks on the GOP and the President (more so than currently anyway). An Edwards’s victory would drive the Dems further to the left economically, with more mention of protectionist type policies than currently. Gephardt would probably be a likely VP in this scenario, although Edwards might go the alternative route and try to nominate someone more moderate to balance out the ticket.

Side note: I don't like Edwards. Edwards is a slick ex-malpractice lawyer, which given my dad's background as a Radiologist (who incidentally also worked his way up) already pisses me off. And he's cultivated this vaguely socialistic man-of-the-people image, one of the things I despise about modern Politics in general. And I don't like Kerry for the reasons Matt listed (plus I think he's a slave to the Unions).

Summary: I'm glad I don't live in this ATL..
 
Last edited:

Valamyr

Banned
I like Edwards and wish he had gotten the nomination.

I'm hoping he gets the VP spot. I was this feeling Kerry will rather find a way to pull Hillary Clinton out of his hat though.

I think the democrats were wary of putting a socialist in power though. Since Reagan, "neo-democrats" seems to be the norm, as if the only two acceptables poles in america now were center-right and pretty-darn-far-right.

I think the traditional left is bound to come back sooner or later; perhaps itll be mark the end of the bipartisan system. I hope to see that in my lifetime. A bi-partisan system is very hard to keep democratic. We're seeing some of the symptoms now i think.
 
POTUS,

Sometimes I don't like Edwards much either. I read an article discussing him as VP and someone wrote "do we really want a personal injury lawyer a heartbeat away from the Presidency?"

Kerry tries to be a "man of the people" which has turned into a joke. The GOP has a web-site called "Kerry-o-Poly" involving buying and selling Kerry's seven-odd homes.
 
Ironic, isn't it.....in the 19th century, Andrew Jackson was idolized as a man of the people.....now we merely wish for at least a decent leader. Is our democracy maturing? :D

The lawyer argument doesn't really sway me. I remember a Georgia State House campaign when a Democrat was demonized for simply being a lawyer! I guess since I'm considering going to law school one day I look at the issue a little differently. :)

As for the ATL itself, I could see an Edwards/Gephardt campaign, squaring off against Bush. I think that Edwards' youth and vitality might win the day, if he can get Americans to believe that it is time for a change.
 
Coriolanus,

I'm not dissing lawyers here (my Dad is one), but personal-injury lawyers as a group tend to have a very bad image ("ambulance-chasers"). My Dad criticized Edwards b/c he'd supposedly interfere with tort reform and efforts to end "frivolous lawsuits."
 
Matt Quinn said:
Coriolanus,

I'm not dissing lawyers here (my Dad is one), but personal-injury lawyers as a group tend to have a very bad image ("ambulance-chasers"). My Dad criticized Edwards b/c he'd supposedly interfere with tort reform and efforts to end "frivolous lawsuits."

Ah...I see your point perfectly.
 
Of course, how much against tort reform IS Edwards?

I've read some "man-of-the-people" rhetoric of his, and he tells of a story of one of his first big wins against "the rich" (or whomever), and I think he supported the Patient's Bill of Rights (not a bad thing on principle, but I've heard it has some goodies for trial lawyers in it), but surely there's something more.
 
Top