Jiyu Banzai! A Japanese Timeline

Well it’s not necessarily supposed to be the best system around. An important thing to remember about the new Japanese government is that there’s a handful of people who know democratic theory and a bunch of people who take their word for it . They’re doing what they think sounds good because they don’t have enough concrete experience to see a spanner in the works (for instance, Minagawa’s plan for the legislature sounds nice in theory, but would likely end up wasting significant amounts of time on referendums because the PM is either intentionally being a prick or has massively misread the mood in the country). The government is very much learning on the job (part of the reason for the four year gap before elections is so they can iron out problems before things get too entrenched), not to mention its ideological heart are literally people in their late 20s and 30s. Japan, and its new leaders, has a lot of growing to do.
I guess it's my background as a law student that makes me antsy about juries. OTL Japan only began experimenting with lay judges that accompany professionals in criminal cases, and from 2004. As a socialist, I do think the land management reform is okay. The referendum idea that was shot down actually sounds nice, but the threshhold of parliament votes would need to be upped. OTL Japan sees very few referendums, sadly.

I don't know how far will the timeline go, but a democratic Japan needs to be critical of Western countries, because in OTL, the thought that they were advanced in everything led to the acceptance of cruel colonialism as a normal thing, and after the unequal treatment following WW1, the "eye-opener" made all the WW2 atrocities possible.

I know the revolutionaries are not isolationists- they fought those in the war, but a realistic view of European/American countries would really help.
 
I don't know how far will the timeline go, but a democratic Japan needs to be critical of Western countries, because in OTL, the thought that they were advanced in everything led to the acceptance of cruel colonialism as a normal thing, and after the unequal treatment following WW1, the "eye-opener" made all the WW2 atrocities possible.
I don't know how far I plan on taking the timeline either (most likely somewhere in the second half of the 20th century), but Japan will have no problem being critical of the West. One of the benefits of having your leadership being people who genuinely believe they are on the right side of history without a lot of history in politics is that they can be very blunt about their opinions even if its counterproductive from a realpolitik position. In particular, Japan will gain a fair amount of enmity from abroad due to their willingness to call out things they don't like and support unpopular causes. It won't be Kaiser Wilhelm levels of foot in mouth, but Japan will make things harder on itself because of it.
I know the revolutionaries are not isolationists- they fought those in the war, but a realistic view of European/American countries would really help.
While they're not isolationists, Japan doesn't have much of a foreign policy right now. Domestic affairs will keep it from actively looking abroad and its relations will be ad hoc and heavily driven by personal preferences instead of by a coherent national policy.
 
Foreign Reaction to the New Japan

Foreign Reaction to the New Japan​


The foreign reaction to the Japanese Civil War was one of surprise, especially after the Bakufu’s unexpected surrender. As the new regime settled in, the powers that looked at the Pacific with interest made their moves to feel out this new force on the scene.

Korea:​
The Land of Morning Calm had thrown its lot in behind the Tohokai’s mad attempt to establish democracy in East Asia. Honestly, King Heonjong had expected the rebels to be defeated. He had hoped that their defeat would be so bloody and devastating that it would delay Japan for years before it could turn its attention on Korea. So when the Tohokai actually managed to overthrow the Japanese government, he was profoundly shocked. Thoughts about the American Revolution and its effects on France, a subject his new French friends had enlightened him about some years past, filled his head as Heonjong feared he had set his own kingdom on the path of rebellion. But he had already opened Pandora’s Box, he couldn’t simply undo it no matter how much he wanted to.
Heonjong’s first concern was that the Tohokai would not attempt to spread their democratic ideas to Korea. He dispatched an embassy to Osaka in February 1868 aboard the Korean Navy to request an audience with the new government. While the presence of ironclads outside of Osaka was quite the threatening stance, newly appointed Prime Minister Minagawa chose to overlook the blatant show of force and accepted the Korean diplomats. After being made aware of Heonjong’s fears and his request not to interfere in Korean internal politics, Minagawa told the diplomats that his government would not censor itself if it believed Korea was heading down a dangerous path, nor did it expect Korea to censor itself regarding Japan, but he did promise that Japan would not support any subversive groups or call for regime change. He also made a vague statement regarding Japan’s willingness to defend its shores against foreign attack, a reference to the Korean warships sitting in harbor. The Korean diplomats would have the good sense to avoid mentioning this last part to their king.
Heonjong’s response to Minagawa’s statement was extreme vexation. Although the Tohokai had relied on Korean naval support, humanitarian aid, and de facto subsidies to survive their civil war, they were now threatening to bite the hand that fed them. King Heonjong nearly decided that the new Japan was just as hostile as the last one when the diplomats gave him a letter directly from Minagawa.
It was an offer of alliance between Japan and Korea.
Heonjong was stunned by this. He had no clue whether it was a trick or not, and would spend several days convening with his advisors to try and determine the veracity of the offer and whether he should risk accepting it. In his mind, the fallout of the American Revolution weighed heavily and he didn’t want to end up at the business end of a guillotine. Finally, King Heonjong himself departed from Busan to Osaka to see Toshio Minagawa.
Heonjong arrived in Osaka on March 4th aboard a lightly armed vessel, a show of good faith after the last embassy had arrived armed to the teeth. Unlike the last Korean visit, this time the Japanese were aware of their coming, and PM Minagawa himself came out to greet King Heonjong. After rudimentary pleasantries, the two entered into negotiations about the proposed alliance between the two nations. After Minagawa agreed that as part of the alliance a Japanese force would be deployed along the Yalu, the front line in any war for Korea and turning the soldiers into de facto hostages, Heonjong accepted his offer. The Treaty of Alliance and Friendship between the Kingdom of Korea and Japan would be officially ratified by both nations’ governments on March 10th, 1868.

China:​
China’s reaction to the Tohokai victory was mild disappointment. They had sunk money into the Tokugawa Shogunate in the hopes of gaining a new ally in the region, but instead had gained a new neighbor built on Western ideals. While the new Japan had yet to show any signs of bowing to foreign pressure, its wartime alliance with Korea worried the Qing. They had not taken the growth of Korean strength very well, and the prospect of a Korean-Japanese alliance was not one they wished to see. When the word of said alliance reached Beijing in early April, it was rapidly becoming imperative to many in the Qing court that Korea be brought to heel before Japan was ready to support it in any significant fashion. Although Chinese armies would not be given the order to march, China began preparing itself for what it viewed as an inevitable conflict for control over the Korean peninsula.

The Russian Empire:​
Russia’s reaction to the end of the Japanese Civil War was incredibly muted. While they would officially state that they wished for the continuation of good relations with Japan, in reality St. Petersburg cared very little for what happened on a group of islands that had until recently shut themselves off from the outside world. While some of this sentiment was lingering embarrassment over the failed 1818 expedition and an attempt to enact damnatio memoriae, a significant amount of it came from Europe, Central Asia, and China being seen as far more important. Prussia, now the North German Confederation, was making moves to completely upend the balance of power in Europe by uniting Germany, Central Asia was in the process of being conquered, and the newly-acquired territories in Amur had to be secured. Compared to this, Japan was but a mere sideshow. Its alliance with Korea drew some interest, but St. Petersburg itself would remain neutral on the whole matter.

The United Kingdom:​
The UK’s response to the Tohokai victory was one of vocal support. With the threat of Bakufu retaliation gone, Britain was more than happy to shower the new democracy with praise. In particular, it praised the use of an Englishman’s book to decide what type of government it should be. The flattery was laid on so thick that Queen Victoria herself would write a letter of congratulations to Toshio Minagawa.
Beneath all the flattery, however, was the ruthlessly pragmatic reasoning that underpinned the British Empire. Britain wished to bring this new Japan into its sphere of influence and turn it either into an ally or a chess piece in the Great Game with Russia. If giving the Japs a pat on the back for letting the peasants vote got them what they wanted, who cared if they resorted to flattery?
For their part, the Japanese would thank the British for their support and assured them that Japan was not about to shut them out. They did, however, make it clear that they had no intention of allowing European goods to flood into Japan and crash the economy. Such an occurrence had played a significant role in the radicalization of the peasantry, and a government born out of a revolt by said peasants for said peasants wasn’t going to allow history to repeat itself. The British were none too pleased about this, but the arrival of American diplomats helped convince them to back down.

France:​
The Second French Empire under Napoleon III had expanded its influence in the Far East tremendously through its deals with Korea, conquering Vietnam and Cambodia, and intervening in China. When Napoleon III heard about the new regime in the Far East, he immediately ordered his diplomats to see if they could extend his influence even further.
French diplomats arrived in Japan in early January from Korea. After sitting in on several sessions of the Osaka Convention, they proceeded to mingle and attempt to establish ties with what looked to be Japan’s new political class. Their efforts were an abject failure, as only a handful of delegates cared enough about foreign relations to entertain them. While France would be able to wrangle out a Treaty of Friendship later in the year, it was nothing more than pretty words. For the time being at least, French influence in Japan was essentially dead in the water.

The United States:​
The United States welcomed the rise of Japanese democracy with thunderous applause. Their very own freedom fighter Toshio Minagawa (Minagawa’s lengthy stay in the US had made many Americans see him as “their” man, a viewpoint that Minagawa was less than enthusiastic about) had managed to overthrow tyranny and establish a new free state. Coming on the heels of America’s own civil war and during the tumultuous times at the beginning of Reconstruction, it was a breath of fresh air for the American people.
Owing to Minagawa’s fondness for the United States, he made sure to push through a Treaty of Friendship with them and to begin the negotiation of trade deals with the United States. Although he would face accusations of favoritism from his own government, Minagawa insisted that positive relations with the United States would only do the nation good. In order to minimize criticism, Minagawa turned over negotiations with the Americans to a specifically prepared committee on August 19, 1868.
The committee, conveniently chaired mainly by Tohokai members, drafted a rather extensive trade agreement with the United States, with both nations giving the other favorable tariff rates and Japan agreeing to favor the United States for arms contracts for the next ten years. For the Tohokai, it was hoped that by drawing close to the United States, they could gain a powerful ally to keep the French and British off their backs.
Although neither side had expected it, Japanese cultural products would flood into the United States as a wave of Japanophilia swept the nation. It would become fashionable in the 1870s to have a part of your house set aside for a simplified version of the Japanese tea ceremony to be held while many rich men and women would show up to parties wearing an Americanized kimono and yukata. The Japanese reaction to this was one of confusion, but they merely shrugged and accepted the commercial advantages of catering to American demand.

The Kingdom of Hawaii:​
The Kingdom of Hawaii was the second nation in the entire world to recognize the Tohokai government, with Korea being the first. Due to the personal friendship between King Kamehameha IV and Minagawa, Hawaii had made sure to recognize his authority in mid 1866 in the aftermath of the Second Battle of Hamamatsu to raise rebel morale. It was a bold move that had brought on fierce condemnation from both the Bakufu and National Protection Army, and indeed from within the King’s own court, but it endeared Hawaii to the Tohokai.
The Tohokai victory in the civil war was met with celebrations by Kamehameha, who sent a ship laden with gifts, including some of Minagawa’s possessions he had left in Hawaii when he returned to Japan, to congratulate the new government. Kamehameha would personally visit Japan in late 1868 to once again extend congratulations and to establish friendly ties between Japan and Hawaii. When informed that his hopes of being the first foreign sovereign to visit Japan had been dashed by Korea’s King Heonjong, Kamehameha is reported to have said “One of these days I’m going to wake up and find that the Koreans have beaten me to my breakfast as well!” Apparently nobody had remembered the Ryukyu Kingdom’s own kings had visited Japan many times, often not at their own discretion.
After attending a session of the Interim Diet, Kamehameha bid farewell to Japan and returned home with a Treaty of Friendship and promises of future cooperation in the future.

The Kingdom of Ryukyu:​
The Kingdom of Ryukyu held a unique place in Japan. It was an independent state that was, until before the civil war, beholden to a vassal of a foreign power. It was simultaneously a Chinese tributary state and a subject of the Satsuma Domain. It was simultaneously free, yet not.
Confusion over Ryukyu’s new status erupted on the island as soon as word reached them of the formation of the National Protection Army in Japan. While they had followed the Japanese Civil War intently, before then it was considered something that would not likely fundamentally reshape their status. With the formation of the National Protection Army, however, it meant that Satsuma was in open rebellion against the Bakufu as part of an Imperial restoration attempt. No matter who won, the Satsuma’s control over Ryukyu was likely to be abolished.
The Tohokai victory, when it came, was then seen as a blessing and a curse. It meant the dissolution of their overlord, but it had created a state that might give the peasants… ideas. In order to ascertain their status, a delegation from Ryukyu would arrive in Osaka in late 1868.
The delegation first met with PM Minagawa, who had insisted upon overseeing the matter personally. During their initial meeting, the Ryukyuans delivered a point blank question that got to the heart of matters: Do you consider us your vassals? Minagawa’s response came in the form of two questions that were just as clear cut: Do you want to be? Would you like to be part of our new Japan? The delegates had no answer, and would leave the room soon after.
The Ryukyuans had set off a firestorm in the Interim Diet soon after they arrived. Despite being granted far greater powers than he would have had four years down the line, Minagawa’s aggressive control over foreign policy had begun to rub the Diet the wrong way. Eager to put him in his place, the Diet demanded control over the situation. Realizing that this wasn’t a fight worth taking, Minagawa acquiesced to their wishes.
But now the matter was in the Diet’s court, and they didn’t have a plan. Many of them hadn’t the faintest clue about the relationship between Ryukyu and Satsuma, let alone whether or not Ryukyu should be part of Japan. This lack of preparation would become a warning to the Diet that they couldn’t just take on tasks simply because they could and felt slighted and served to humble them as they were forced to ask Minagawa to intervene.
Unfortunately for them, Minagawa was also ill versed in matters of Ryukyu. He had a basic understanding of the situation, but nuances he lacked. Like many in the Diet, he had no idea about how Ryukyu should be approached. They weren’t culturally similar enough to the Japanese to be deemed a wayward province simply being unified, yet their status as vassals of a Japanese warlord surely meant that his government, as the Imperially recognized successor to the Bakufu, had some claim to it, right? Yet even if it did, was it morally right to forcibly annex Ryukyu (by this point, any thought of allowing the Ryukyuans to continue existing as vassals had left his mind) into Japan?
The matter was also complicated by another type of politics: geopolitics. The navy wished to see Ryukyu annexed so they could use it as a base to extend their power projection ability while the army viewed it as a good springboard for operations against Taiwan or the Philippines, should either become necessary. Although Minagawa did not wish to act like the imperialists who had threatened his country, there was a very real argument to be made that refusing to do so could place Japan at even more risk than simply going ahead with the action. After all, if Ryukyu wasn’t in Japanese hands, wouldn’t someone else simply snap it up?
Eventually Minagawa came to a decision: kick it back to the Diet. He submitted a plan to the Diet in which Japan would formally swear to protect the independence of Ryukyu, de jure recognizing it as an independent and sovereign kingdom, but that it would also allow for the people and government of Ryukyu to join Japan should they ever wish to. The Diet, eager to get this confusing matter over with, rapidly agreed and ratified the Statute on the Status of the Kingdom of Ryukyu. The Ryukyuans would leave Osaka very confused and with a copy of the recently passed legislation that had, at least for the time being, secured their kingdom’s independence.
Within a month, the Ryukyuans were back in Osaka. King Sho Tai had sent them back to feel out just how serious the Japanese were about their new situation. After the Interim Diet once again confirmed the Statute and Ryukyu’s independence, the Ryukyuans began discussing renewing economic ties with Japan. Centuries of Satsuma exploitation had tied their economy to Japan’s, and they were afraid that the already poor islands would become even poorer without trade with Japan. After several days of negotiations, the Japanese signed an economic treaty with Ryukyu in which Ryukyu renounced its tributary status with China and would be allowed to trade with Japan as if it was part of the nation. Pre-empting Chinese anger, Japan dispatched a frigate to protect the islands and show their determination to defend them. Although Japan’s actual ability to protect Ryukyu against China was unknown, its willingness to continue protecting the Kingdom convinced Ryukyu to put its faith in its new alliance with Japan.
 
Well. If China attacks at a time when Western vultures are circling, I wonder if Japan will try and carve out a sphere of influence in China, but be forced out by its supposed new allies.

How will the revolutionaries treat the Ainu ? In today's Japan, some view them as clearly non-Japanese, but there are also beliefs that the Jomon people Ainu descended from definitely had strong influence on the making of Japanese as an ethnicity.
 
@Roland Traveler Liked reading this new chapter of yours. It's good to see that this Japan has friends/allies in the form of the Kingdom of Korea, the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the USA and to a lesser extent the British Empire and France. It's also good to see that the Ryukyu Kingdom is on its way to becoming a part of this new Japan. Also, I would like to know the reactions of the Spanish, especially the Spanish colonial authorities in Manila in the Spanish-controlled Philippines are reacting to the new Japan, as well as the reactions of the Dutch, who (prior to the rise of the Tohokai) were the only foreigners to have actual contact with Japan during the previous Tokugawa Shogunate aka Bakufu on the island of Dejima, and how the new Japan could/might affect their colony in the Dutch East Indies aka Indonesia. Also, how will a Tohokai-led Japan affect the Portuguese, especially their nearby colony of Macau?

- Also, with the deal that was struck between Korea and Japan to have Japanese troops stationed at the Yalu River - will these lead to your ATL version of the First Sino-Japanese War with Tohokai Japan acquiring Taiwan and confirming the Ryukyus as an integral part of Japan and no longer a tributary state of China at war's end and with the Kingdom of Korea becoming free of China and gaining territory in Manchuria, especially the Liaodong Peninsula and/or areas that have a Korean ethic minority presence such as in Yanbian?

- Also, will we see the respective current domestic situation in each of the Japanese Hone Islands such as in Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu as well Ezo aka Hokkaido, Karafuto (i.e. Sakhalin Island), the Nemuro Sub-Provinces aka the Kuriles/Kuril Islands as well the Ryukyus (including Okinawa) and the Ogasawara Islands aka the Bonin Islands?;

- Also how will Tohokai Japan and the Kingdom of Korea resolved the issue of Tsushima Island and the Dokdo Islands aka the Liancourt Rocks?

- Lastly, will the relationship between Tohokai Japan and the USA change when the former becomes critical of the latter's annexation of Hawaii as well what the USA was doing during the Philippine Insurrection after Spanish-American War?

Please let me know. Thank you.
 
Well. If China attacks at a time when Western vultures are circling, I wonder if Japan will try and carve out a sphere of influence in China, but be forced out by its supposed new allies.
A Chinese attack on Korea would be a disaster. It's not just the poorer state of their armies, although that is being improved, it's the nature of the border. It's mountainous and covered almost entirely by rivers, any attack against a force even somewhat decently equipped would be a disaster waiting to happen. Doesn't mean China won't try in the event of a war, however.
How will the revolutionaries treat the Ainu ? In today's Japan, some view them as clearly non-Japanese, but there are also beliefs that the Jomon people Ainu descended from definitely had strong influence on the making of Japanese as an ethnicity.
The Ainu are going to be an interesting topic to cover. I'll go into detail on them in the next update (which will be a mixture of the creation of a new Japanese culture and how things are playing out in the leadup to the elections), but it will be quite contentious. Recognizing the Ainu as a separate people yet not granting them an independent state would by highly hypocritical in the aftermath of recognizing Ryukyu, and there are people in Japan who see Hokkaido as an integral part of Japan and a sight for future colonization.
@Roland Traveler Liked reading this new chapter of yours. It's good to see that this Japan has friends/allies in the form of the Kingdom of Korea, the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the USA and to a lesser extent the British Empire and France. It's also good to see that the Ryukyu Kingdom is on its way to becoming a part of this new Japan. Also, I would like to know the reactions of the Spanish, especially the Spanish colonial authorities in Manila in the Spanish-controlled Philippines are reacting to the new Japan, as well as the reactions of the Dutch, who (prior to the rise of the Tohokai) were the only foreigners to have actual contact with Japan during the previous Tokugawa Shogunate aka Bakufu on the island of Dejima, and how the new Japan could/might affect their colony in the Dutch East Indies aka Indonesia. Also, how will a Tohokai-led Japan affect the Portuguese, especially their nearby colony of Macau?
Spain is mainly wary about another democratic state rising near its empire. The last one had quite a bit of influence on its territories in the Americas, if you'll recall, and they don't want the Philippines to get any ideas. Aside from that, they hope for trade and not war.
As for the Dutch, the civil war was the death knell of their influence in Japan. This isn't necessarily due to hostility toward them, but mainly due to the fact that the majority of the Tohokai members spent their time abroad elsewhere and believe other nations would make better friends for Japan. They are trying to establish a working relationship, but without a patron or the extenuating circumstances that Ryukyu had, the Japanese aren't in a hurry to establish diplomatic and economic ties.
Portugal is a virtual non-entity to the Japanese, at least diplomatically. While obviously their influence on the Christian community is quite large due to having essentially founded it, aside from some missionaries popping up here and there, Portugal has more important things to worry about than Japan.
- Also, with the deal that was struck between Korea and Japan to have Japanese troops stationed at the Yalu River - will these lead to your ATL version of the First Sino-Japanese War with Tohokai Japan acquiring Taiwan and confirming the Ryukyus as an integral part of Japan and no longer a tributary state of China at war's end and with the Kingdom of Korea becoming free of China and gaining territory in Manchuria, especially the Liaodong Peninsula and/or areas that have a Korean ethic minority presence such as in Yanbian?
There is no guarantee that Japan will be able or willing to take Taiwan in the aftermath of a war with China, but future tensions between Korea and China will involve Japan due to said troops. The Japanese recognize this (mainly, some miss the obvious statement behind placing troops on a country's border), and are willing to go to war with China if the need arises.
- Also, will we see the respective current domestic situation in each of the Japanese Hone Islands such as in Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu as well Ezo aka Hokkaido, Karafuto (i.e. Sakhalin Island), the Nemuro Sub-Provinces aka the Kuriles/Kuril Islands as well the Ryukyus (including Okinawa) and the Ogasawara Islands aka the Bonin Islands?;
I don't think I'll go too in depth about the parts of Japan, but I will try to have an overview to provide reasoning behind who they vote for in the Diet. As for territorial expansion, Japan has a lot on its plate right now. It doesn't really have the resources or political will to go out and make claims.
- Also how will Tohokai Japan and the Kingdom of Korea resolved the issue of Tsushima Island and the Dokdo Islands aka the Liancourt Rocks?
Tsushima will be recognized as Japanese simply due to practicality, but the Liancourt Rocks will likely be run by a condominium. Nobody lives there and the matter isn't important enough to jeopardize relations over. Since neither country wants to withdraw its claims (in both cases to avoid looking weak at home) but neither side particularly care enough to make a big deal over it, a condominium serves as a way for both sides to be happy.
- Lastly, will the relationship between Tohokai Japan and the USA change when the former becomes critical of the latter's annexation of Hawaii as well what the USA was doing during the Philippine Insurrection after Spanish-American War?
Both of those occasions are around thirty years' off at this time, there's no guarantee they will happen. Hawaii will be a source of tension between Japan and the United States in the future, however.
 
@Roland Traveler Thanks for you reply to a number of my questions Roland Traveler.

Also, will there be a more formal/formalized as well as a far-reaching/encompassing ATL version of the Gentlemen's Agreement of 1097 to 1908 between Tohokai Japan and the USA in regards to Japanese immigration that is favorable to both countries and allow for large scale Japanese immigration to the USA, specifically to Hawaii, the Philippines, and other US colonial possessions in the Pacific, as well as to Alaska (especially when Japan has control of all of Sakhalin Island aka Karafuto and the Kuril Islands/Kuriles aka Nemuro Sub-Provinces) and the US West Coast states such as California, Oregon, and Washington?

Please let me know. Thanks again.
 
@Roland Traveler Thanks for you reply to a number of my questions Roland Traveler.

Also, will there be a more formal/formalized as well as a far-reaching/encompassing ATL version of the Gentlemen's Agreement of 1097 to 1908 between Tohokai Japan and the USA in regards to Japanese immigration that is favorable to both countries and allow for large scale Japanese immigration to the USA, specifically to Hawaii, the Philippines, and other US colonial possessions in the Pacific, as well as to Alaska (especially when Japan has control of all of Sakhalin Island aka Karafuto and the Kuril Islands/Kuriles aka Nemuro Sub-Provinces) and the US West Coast states such as California, Oregon, and Washington?

Please let me know. Thanks again.
There will be no Gentlemen's Agreement. Japan has neither the legal means nor the ideological underpinnings to make such a deal binding even if, say, the PM promised the President to limit immigration. Japan will try to keep people from leaving, however it will be through high quality of life and economic stability instead of bureaucratic shenanigans.
 
Establishing the New Japan

Establishing the New Japan​


The completion of the Osaka Convention had turned the Tohokai from a rebel group to a proper government, but it had not turned Japan into a proper democracy. For over 2,000 years Japan had been ruled by an autocracy, the population couldn’t simply be expected to embrace the new system with no regrets. It would likely take a full generation for the new status quo to fully solidify, but they could at the very least convince the people that their government had their best interests in heart.
The government’s fear about the population was perhaps premature. By war’s end, they had managed to gain quite a bit of goodwill among the populace through land reforms and smashing the system that had been smothering them. On Kyushu, the population was even more grateful for having been saved from the growing insanity of the National Protection Army. While this goodwill wasn’t infinite and would eventually fade away, the initial foundation of the New Japan was incredibly firm.
Nonetheless, the government had no desire to test this. Alongside efforts to revitalize the economy, a national curriculum for schools was established that emphasized democratic ideals, the failure of the previous system, and the power of people when they coordinated. The curriculum would also include basic mathematics, literacy, and history. It was hoped that by the time a child had completed their compulsory 13 years of education, they would have a solid grasp of all the skills needed to survive in the modern world while also being supportive of the new regime. For the adults, programs to increase literacy were rolled out nationwide that would serve the same purpose. While they would be less intrusive than those for children simply due to having less time, they would also attempt to teach political theory.
Outside of education, propaganda campaigns were enacted to help rally support for various causes. These campaigns were mainly aimed at increasing political awareness and the need to vote in the upcoming elections, an event that would come to weigh heavily on the national consciousness. After the provinces of the new Japan were decided in 1870, mainly based on the provinces of the Edo era, numerous politicians would pop up and campaign for their future careers. The political lines would soon become drawn across Japan as people found their preferred candidates and supported them.
The largest of the political factions were naturally the Tohokai. While the Kansai region was supportive of them, their most fervent supporters were in Kyushu. The scars on Kyushu were mainly mental and economic, with fighting being limited. Farming would actually see a decrease in productivity as the NPA’s regulations during 1868 were removed and the farmers returned to their normal practices. Although poverty still remained endemic across the island, government efforts to improve the situation brought hope to them, as did the appearance of Japan’s first smokestacks in Nagasaki in 1871.
On Shikoku, the island’s wartime performance made it very proud of its local identity. The island would slowly become dominated by movements supporting self-governance. The effectiveness of the Local Corps and Awa’s ability to supply its own liberation without the intervention of the RJA would help grow a feeling that the common people could take care of themselves. When collectivist anarchism spread to Asia in the 1870s and 80s, Shikoku would become fertile ground for its ideas to sprout.
Honshu’s political status was mainly divided along the northeast and southwest. Chugoku and Kansai were both solid supporters of the Tohokai, but the support of different factions within the Tohokai kept the regions from forming a solid bloc. The socialist wing of the party, small as it was, would become highly popular in Kansai as industrialization advanced and news of worker’s abuse came in from across the world.
In Chugoku, socialist thought would not become as popular as in Kansai outside of the cities. In the countryside, a much more conservative sentiment reigned. Although they had embraced democracy, the people were not willing to jump at ideas that were both exceptionally new and foreign. Instead, they supported the right wing of the Tohokai, which advocated protectionist policies and heavily investing in agriculture. While there wasn’t anywhere near the same divide present in France between rural and urban Japanese, the difference in political orientation was clear as day to any who opened their eyes.
In Kanto, the old regime held its greatest amount of popularity. During the civil war, Kanto had been almost entirely untouched and had been the site of the limited reforms undertaken by the Bakufu. Yoshinobu’s reduction of taxes in the region for the families of those who would join his army in particular did much to improve his standing. Thus it would be Kanto that would become the heart of the Restoration movement. The Restorationists wished to return to a system resembling the old Shogunate, believing it had only been thanks to the corruption of the daimyo and a reluctance to change that the old system had become unsalvageable. In practical terms, they supported the creation of a new constitution with a powerful presidency that held final authority over the military like in the United States. It was no secret that in 1869 and 1870 that the Restorationists viewed Napoleon III as a role model for their own political future.
In Tohoku, the support for any political party was quite limited and it mainly supported those who were perceived to advance their interests. The Tohokai would make significant inroads into the region, however, due to the party’s unified support for the expansion of infrastructure in the region. Support for the establishment of new mines in the region to exploit its iron deposits would see further voters peeled away to the Tohokai. With no significant opposition, Tohoku would become tentatively dominated by the Tohokai.

Outside of regional politics, a national debate was going on in Osaka. The debate had three main parts: where to place the capital, what to do about the Edo-era class system, and what to do about the Ainu. While Osaka had much support due to it being the heart of the Revolution, Edo was seen as a way to extend an olive branch to remaining Bakufu supporters while Kyoto had significant cultural significance. After several days of deliberation, the Interim Diet declared that Kyoto would once again become the political capital of Japan upon the conclusion of the 1872 elections. Additionally, they officially decided that Japan would move away from the Chinese calendar to the Gregorian calendar. This decision was based mainly in foreign politics, as it showed Japan was shifting from a Sinocentric system to a Eurocentric one. For the Dragon, it was one more mark that did little damage but wounded its pride.
The Edo-era class system was a much more contentious topic. While the Tohokai viewed it as a backward system designed to keep the people down, the majority of the people had grown up in said system, and a majority of people hadn’t seen the same problems that the class system had afflicted upon the samurai and merchants. While the Tohokai could count on the support of the merchants among the Diet, they would still have to face resistance to begin working to completely dismantle the old class system.
The main source of controversy was the Tohokai’s push to recognize the burakumin as equals and to help raise them to the same standards as the rest of the Japanese. While many would recognize the inherent hypocrisy of claiming to be a democracy while upholding a blatant class system, arguments in its favor ranged from “it’s tradition” to Buddhist-inspired “they did something in a past life to deserve this”. Eventually, however, the Tohokai were able to convince enough Diet members to push through an act that would declare all Japanese citizens equal under the law, formally denounce the Edo-era class system, and establish an agency to help now-former burakumin establish new lives and integrate into their communities. This last clause was added as a form of one upmanship against the United States, who’s own Freedmen’s Bureau was facing significant troubles in their own attempts to reconstruct in the aftermath of a civil war. Upon the passage of the act, PM Minagawa would say in front of the Diet “Where the United States has failed its negro citizens, we shall not fail our own burakumin.”
The United States would take that as a challenge.

The Ainu question was one that would take a full month to resolve. One thing that almost everybody in the Interim Diet could agree upon was that Ezo was Japanese territory and was vital to its security. Under no circumstances were the Ainu to be given an independent state.
This did not mean that they were inherently hostile to the Ainu, however. The Japanese population of Ezo had interacted with them for centuries, and by the 1870s the two had developed into a peaceful relationship dominated by trade. Japanese settlement of northern Ezo was even forbidden by the island’s former lords to protect this trade. As a result, the Ainu were willing to concede to Japanese domination without much of a fight. The last one had not ended well for the Ainu, after all. As much as they may have wanted to fight, the depredations of the last century had left them far too weakened to do so.
Once again, the Tohokai were sympathetic to their plight. Their commitment to anti-imperialism extended to equality between ethnic groups as the only way to ensure fair treatment of all. But they were not willing to sunder Japan for it. After a month of debating, including several rather fierce shouting matches, the Diet had drafted a Tohoku-inspired treaty for the Ainu to sign. In it, the Ainu had two choices: either they would integrate themselves into Japan as an equal part of society or they would be forcibly assimilated.
The Ainu people had little hope of resistance and sullenly accepted their annexation into Japan. Although they would lose what little remained of their independence, at least the protection of their culture and rights were enshrined by law. On the Japanese end, the areas inhabited by the Ainu were established as new provinces in which the local governor would be drawn from the Ainu population. Additionally, land in these provinces not distributed to villages would be placed directly under the control of the provincial government instead of the national one. In a move that would become somewhat infamous among both the Maori and the Ainu, the Act for the Integration of the Ainu would officially be declared by the Diet to be “the foremost example of magnaminty and proper governance toward a native people since the Treaty of Waitangi.”
Apparently nobody had told them what had happened to the Maori after the Treaty of Waitangi.

As the years marched on and the elections of 1872 approached, the Interim Diet had one last challenge before them. Reconstruction, the establishment of a national education service, the expansion of the bureaucracy (although many bureaucrats from the old regime were maintained due to necessity, the many new tasks the government had taken upon itself meant that the Japanese bureaucracy would be over twice as large in 1874 as it had been in 1865), expansion of the navy, infrastructure projects, and the funding of a Japanese force in Hamgyong, Korea meant that the budget was stretched in a thousand different directions. Although inflation was currently being fought off due to the demand for the Kin growing at roughly the same rate as the supply for it, this was only a temporary state of affairs, and the government was staring down a potential bankruptcy if it didn’t get its act together.
Taking on debt was not an option, as the world’s creditors in London had little faith in the new regime’s ability to repay its debts. Already this limited source of credit had been heavily eaten into as Japan struggled to fund its first four years of existence. With the depletion of Japan’s silver and gold mines, its specie was especially low, and what remained from the Bakufu era was being jealously hoarded in case the country needed to switch away from fiat. There were limited calls to return to a currency backed by rice, but its supporters were often driven out of the room by a mixture of jeers and mockery.
With the budget threatening to smother the new Japan before it had truly begun, the Interim Diet got over its reluctance to enact taxation (which had arisen from a mixture of fear of reprisal and feeling they did not have the moral authority to do so as an unelected body) and met in August 1871 to establish a tax code.
The Japanese tax code reflected the values of the new Japan. Heavy socialist influence meant that it was progressive and was felt especially hard by the merchants of Japan, who had been accruing ever greater wealth over the Edo period. Although there was significant resistance against the tax code from the merchants and more conservative members of the Diet, they were soon drowned out by a host of Diet members who remembered what inequality felt like and refused to experience it again. The old Ministry of Finance (Okurasho) was brought back into existence after its de facto dissolution alongside the Bakufu and was tasked with once again bringing in the tax. Taxation would begin in 1872, but until then Japan would have to make due with tariffs, borrowing, and printing money.

As February 1st, 1872 approached ever faster, all of Japan braced itself for the election results. Although the winners were all but declared even before the voting started, most Japanese were apprehensive that the entire system would be able to hold together and that some dissident would do something that would throw the entire thing off. Perhaps the most widespread fear was that a new civil war would break out as the losers rejected the outcome. As the polls closed on the 1st, the entire nation held its breath.
 
Last edited:
@Roland Traveler Liked reading this new chapter. Looking forward to reading the results of the first democratic election ever in this ATL Japan, and hopefully that will be a relatively peaceful one and which will pave the way for peaceful democratic elections in this Japan. Also:

- No Tokyo as the capital of Japan in this ATL? Why? Will there ever be a Tokyo established in this ATL Japan?

- Also, with Tohokai Japan indirectly and inadvertantly challenging the USA to do right for its African-American minority - will this result in a much longer lasting, more prevalent, and more successful Reconstruction in this ATL USA? If so, will Southerners from the former Confederacy blame/curse Tohokai Japan for this?

- Lastly, since the Russian Empire sold Russian Alaska aka Alyeska to the USA during the post-American Civil War era - will the Russian Empire also entice Tohokai Japan to buy the rest of Sakhalin Island aka Karafuto as well as all of the Kuriles/Kuril Islands aka the Nemuro Sub-Provinces?

Please let me know. Thanks again. :)
 
@Roland Traveler Liked reading this new chapter. Looking forward to reading the results of the first democratic election ever in this ATL Japan, and hopefully that will be a relatively peaceful one and which will pave the way for peaceful democratic elections in this Japan. Also:

- No Tokyo as the capital of Japan in this ATL? Why? Will there ever be a Tokyo established in this ATL Japan?
Two main reasons: first, it’s the capital of the Togukawa. It just feels wrong to the people in charge to move back there when Kyoto is so much closer. Second, Kyoto is a fairly non-political choice. It has no associations with the Tokugawa aside from the Emperor living there and is technically the capital of Japan. I did consider having them construct a brand new capital, but at this juncture there’s no money and Kyoto’s got much more prestige.
- Also, with Tohokai Japan indirectly and inadvertantly challenging the USA to do right for its African-American minority - will this result in a much longer lasting, more prevalent, and more successful Reconstruction in this ATL USA? If so, will Southerners from the former Confederacy blame/curse Tohokai Japan for this?
It will result in a more successful Reconstruction, but it will still be a failure overall. A Japanese PM, no matter how famous he may be, isn’t going to completely change the American mindset with one quote.
As for Southernors, there will be mixed feelings. On the one hand, the quote acknowledges that they were winning. On the other hand, it will result in a harsher Reconstruction (even if only temporarily). Opinion will likely be hostile with the occasional “at least they got the Feds abandoning the blacks right”. Blacks will appreciate the callout, however.
- Lastly, since the Russian Empire sold Russian Alaska aka Alyeska to the USA during the post-American Civil War era - will the Russian Empire also entice Tohokai Japan to buy the rest of Sakhalin Island aka Karafuto as well as all of the Kuriles/Kuril Islands aka the Nemuro Sub-Provinces?

Please let me know. Thanks again. :)
Japan does maintain their claims to the region due to annexing the Ainu, but there is no appetite to go after the regions right now. By the time Japan is in a position to pursue said claims, Russia may have no interest in selling the lands.
 
I think Japan as a democracy by early 1900s is more than a bit implausible. It has been a monarchy for thousands of years, you don't stop that sort of inertia in 20 or 30 years.
 
What is situation is buddhism? Will we see Buddhist modernism?
I honestly haven't given Buddhism much thought since Neo-Confucianism had pretty much superseded it as the dominant philosophy in Japan by the 1800s. If I ever go into depth into the Himalayan states and their neighbors or if I have Buddhism experience a significant revival somewhere, I'll make sure to touch on the changes it's experienced in this timeline.
I think Japan as a democracy by early 1900s is more than a bit implausible. It has been a monarchy for thousands of years, you don't stop that sort of inertia in 20 or 30 years.
I will be the first to admit this is very much a soft AH timeline that concentrates more on the story I want to tell than strict plausibility, although one I've tried to make it feel realistic. I have honestly put in far more research into this than I was expecting when I started out simply because I want to accurately portray the subjects I'm talking about.
That aside, however, I do believe that there are a few extenuating circumstances that are allowing for the rise of Japanese democracy. The first is its competitors, the Shogunate and the daimyo that would have made up the forces behind the Meiji Restoration, have been utterly smashed by the civil war, and even then there are already people who are yearning to return to the good old days. While admittedly the Civil War was a bit contrived (although peasant revolts were becoming more and more common toward the end of the Shogunate, they were never as threatening as the Kansai Revolt was) and the Tohokai had an immense run of good luck (poor Shogunate decision-making meaning the revolt wasn't crushed immediately, being able to outwit their opponents on the battlefield, the group's cohesiveness being able to hold together, the fact that this group of virtual nobodies from Japan were able to learn the skills of governance while abroad), I would argue it's nothing unprecedented in our timeline. It's simply a matter of the right person at the right time taking history in an unexpected direction. They're simply another in a group that OTL includes Jean d'Arc, several high ranking members of the KMT, Joseph Stalin, Napoleon, Andrew Jackson, and Benito Mussolini. People from humble backgrounds can profoundly reshape the world if given the chance.
Second is that the new government took over from a government that was absolutely hated, meaning people are willing to give the new government a bit more slack than normal. A similar effect can be seen in the actual Meiji Restoration, where initial good faith efforts helped significantly reduce the amount of peasant unrest in the early 1870s before it spiked again.
Third is that the Tohokai are essentially the Vanguard Party of Leninist ideology. This was actually a bit of an accident, but they form an educated core of revolutionaries who have lead the peasantry to victory over their oppressors. This meant the rebellion had a centralized source of power that lacked significant infighting. Compare with the Shogunate which fractured over the initial failures and was only briefly able to take the initiative.
Fourth is the fact that these ideas sound good. You want to know why there's a solidly leftist bent to this Japanese government? It's because it sounds appealing (and a bit of personal bias). To the person on the ground, somebody telling you that the new government will let you control your own land, make sure you don't get too poor, and make sure those rich assholes aren't stomping on you sounds pretty good. The Tohokai have essentially sold a dream, and now it's their chance to fulfill it.

Of course, as you say, Japan has been an autocracy for millennia and can't simply be turned into a democracy at the flip of a switch. Even in-story the government is aware of this, which is why they are working so hard to gain the people's trust and to impress upon them what they view as democratic ideals. At least the Tohokai members are absolutely terrified of a counter-revolution a la France, and their fear has spread throughout the government. Besides, the first elections haven't even been finished yet, there is no reason to assume that Japan's transition to democracy has been smooth or without issue. Once the honeymoon period is over, problems will arise just like in any new regime that will determine if it holds together and how it adapts to the new times.
 
The vanguard party...hmmm. What are the odds that Japan becomes the first Communist country in this timeline, instead of Soviet Russia? It always seemed to me that the Japanese mentality was an excellent fit for Communism and socialism.
 
The vanguard party...hmmm. What are the odds that Japan becomes the first Communist country in this timeline, instead of Soviet Russia? It always seemed to me that the Japanese mentality was an excellent fit for Communism and socialism.
I don’t think that would really take hold unless an outside force acts upon the country or the government just really screws the pooch in governing. That said, Japan might maneuver their economy to a more state capitalist or lite-socialism system as the effects of rapid industrialization and the Gilded Age rear their heads in the West. There would be little appetite amongst the Japanese to trade feudal lords for corporate lords when the result is the same for the common man.

EDIT: I should add that while disparity and inequality is unavoidable, it just wouldn’t be as bad as elsewhere. Perhaps Charles Dickens and Upton Sinclair get somewhat inspired by the Japanese way of going about things if it’s not as bad by comparison when they write their works. That in turn could drive Japan to an even more progressive direction regarding human rights and economic equality.
 
Last edited:
Effects of the Japanese Civil War Abroad

Effects of the Japanese Civil War Abroad​


The overthrow of the Bakufu gave hope to countless would-be revolutionaries and rebels across the globe. If the highly autocratic Japan could be replaced by a new one based on democracy and the people’s wellbeing, then any people could do so. While it would not provoke any outright rebellions, there was a noticeable uptick in dissent and common sense pamphlets across the empires of Europe. These would quickly quiet down, with the emboldened dissidents realizing their time had not come by 1870.
This was not true of all movements, however. With the creation of a Japanese state that quite heavily and quite blatantly borrowed from Socialist thought, leftists from across the world had a brand new state that they could view as a role model. For revolutionaries, it wasn’t just the first step, it was the first seven toward the inevitable overthrow of the capitalist system and would soon be followed up by the true revolution. To reformists, it was proof that true societal change toward the socialist utopia could be made inside the democratic process.
Japan would become known as a haven for leftist and other revolutionary thought throughout the world. In particular, Sapporo in Ezo would become home to numerous freedom fighters from across Asia and Africa, determined to either overthrow the old regimes or the new Western imperial ones that ruled their countries. Nagasaki in the far south would become the home of leftist thought in Asia, with Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels themselves paying the city a visit in late 1880.
To the Japanese, this was quite the embarrassment as their nation’s reputation became intertwined with “that place where all the malcontents flee to.” Although they would rarely take action against individuals, even if they were fugitives, Japan would take more subtle measures to discourage such activities through propaganda and more strenuously checking whether people had a legitimate reason to be in the country. On rare occasions, they would turn over particularly notorious individuals to their home governments.

Alongside being a symbol of possibility, the Japanese Revolution inspired revolutionary thinkers. Louis Auguste Blanqui, an infamous French socialist who revolted at nearly every opportunity, wrote on the Revolution in 1868, stating “it is clear that the revolution must be steered by those who are knowledgeable. In Japan, the Tohokai soon learned that peasant unrest was insufficient to overthrow the ancien regime, and that their guidance was necessary. It was only through the intervention of the Tohokai as the vanguard of revolution that the overthrow of the Shogunate was affected.” Mikhail Bakunin, one of the founders of anarchism, would disagree with Blanqui, instead emphasizing the actions of the Local Corps on Shikoku, the response to the Call for National Mobilization, and the important role partisans played in the initial crossing over to Kyushu. “While the Tohokai may have turned the sparks of revolution into a flame, it was only through the actions of the people themselves that the fires were kept from being doused, and in the process transformed them into a great blaze that incinerated the old structure.”
As the International Workingmen’s Association met in Basel, Switzerland in September 1869, they were surprised at the arrival of a Japanese delegation of eight men. After being addressed in perfect English, if with an American accent, the surprised members of the International formally welcomed them to the congress. The visitors from the Far East gathered significant attention, and were faced with a veritable bombardment of questions about the status of socialism in their homeland. After awkwardly answering the questions as best as possible (although many of the Japanese delegates were fluent in English, they tended to lack knowledge of the more advanced vocabulary on display and were completely helpless against the French they all too often experienced), the Japanese settled in for their first experience with European leftist solidarity.
Instead of solidarity, the Japanese were met with factionalism. Remaining quiet during the discussion of private property, giving non-committal answers when directly questioned, the Japanese would vote with the majority by voting “No” on the matter. The Proudhonists, having hoped to find a new ally in the Japanese, were crushed by their complete rejection of Proudhonist ideology.
With the defeat of the Proudhonists, the growing schism in the International between Marx and Bakunin was put on public display at the Congress. Attacks by Marxists (Marx himself did not attend Basel) on Bakunin horrified the Japanese, who viewed them as absolutely unbecoming to both Marx’s status as a gentleman (even if the samurai class was now officially abhorred in Japan, the pseudofictional Bushido code still held sway in how gentlemen were supposed to act) and as a fellow socialist. If this was the way his followers acted, how bad was the man himself? Partly out of agreement, partly out of growing hostility to Marxism, the Japanese would place themselves behind Bakunin.
This unexpected show of support would cause Bakunin to meet privately with the Japanese. He would later write on it that “it was a most peculiar meeting. While my hosts were most gracious, it was clear to me that many among them were unused to the suits they wore and that their skills in both French and Russian were at most atrophied and at worst non-existent. Nonetheless, we managed to have a fruitful, if awkward, meeting in which they pledged their support to me in future clashes with the Marxists… It was the meeting I most enjoyed at the Congress.” No Japanese accounts from the Basel Congress have been unearthed, but Japanese socialist thought would be decisively pro-Bakunin for the next decade.
As the Japanese stopped in Paris on their trip home, Louis Blanqui would meet them at their hotel. Only one of the eight had any idea who the man was, but once they learned of his identity they eagerly entertained him. They discussed the Japanese Revolution with him deep into the night and reinforced his belief in the necessity to provide a strong leadership for the working classes to follow. Additionally, it impressed upon him the necessity to create a national network rather than relying on a singular group. “The Japanese Revolution was almost smothered in its crib”, he wrote in his journal, “it would be a disaster if a revolution in France met the same fate.”


Across the Pacific in the United States, the initial reaction to the Japanese Revolution was one of celebration, but not much else. While Americans viewed the victory of a national celebrity in support of a worthy cause as exciting, there was nothing about it that would make them significantly reexamine the world around them. Nonetheless, the Japanese were elevated in the minds of Americans into the ranks of “civilized” people. While they may not have been white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, they were recognized as a step above their neighbors (even though Korea had modernized before Japan, they would be called an “Oriental Despotism” and were considered inferior to both Japan and the US) and most definitely above the negro. The Japanese would appreciate this favoritism, but, like many things involving American fascination with Japan, they would do so in a hands-off manner.
This would change in 1869 when word of Prime Minister Toshio Minagawa’s statement regarding the Japanese plans to uplift the burakumin and the shot it carried arrived in the United States. To many in the north, it was a ringing indictment of the failures of Reconstruction. A mere four years after the end of the Civil War, the old order was starting to sink its claws back into the South! It was with great relief to those who took the words of Minagawa to heart when Ulysses S Grant was elected to the Presidency.
Unlike former President Andrew Johnson, Grant was willing to devote Federal authority to supporting blacks in the South. Reconstruction entered a new phase as legislation was passed to protect black Americans and many were allowed to either enter politics or the bureaucracy. With the passage of the Enforcement Acts and the creation of the Justice Department, the Federal government moved aggressively to secure the South. Under the 1872 Fourth Enforcement Act, the Freedmen’s Bureau was granted the task of establishing black and Unionist self-defense groups in the Southern states, as well as providing loans at a 0% interest rate to 100,000 freedmen and their families across the South. That same year, Congress elected to extend the Bureau’s charter for another four years, as well as extending the amount of credit available to freedmen.
After 1872, however, the fervor for Reconstruction began to die down. The stinging words of Minagawa had receded into memory and weariness at having to occupy the South had eroded Northern support for the effort. In 1874, the Amnesty Act restored voting rights to the majority of Confederates. This coupled with growing terrorist actions by white Southerners helped shift the balance of power back in their favor. Although Congress would pass a civil rights act in 1875 to try and remedy this, it was effectively up to blacks and pro-Reconstruction whites to resist the resurging tide of white supremacy in the South.

An unexpected result of the American fascination with Japan would affect the lives of Chinese immigrants living in the Western US. Due to the average American not having much experience with Asia outside of stories and being thoroughly racist, it comes as no surprise that the Chinese and Japanese were often mixed up in their minds. Taking advantage of this, many Chinese immigrants would instead claim Japanese heritage to limit discrimination against themselves. The similarities between the writing systems convinced many Americans that these immigrants were indeed Japanese, and soon Chinese goods, thought to be Japanese, found their way into American homes. Although those who were found out were often lynched by whites furious at being tricked, many would be able to successfully pass themselves off as Japanese.
 
Last edited:
So in light of the US fascination with with Japan and Chinese immigrants passing themselves off as Japanese, would this lead to a way to circumvent the immigration quotas when they go into effect? I can imagine some shady dealers setting up a system where a ship could leave China for Japan, fake some documents if necessary for the immigrants, then sail for the US and say everyone is from Japan.
 
Last edited:
So in light of the US fascination with with Japan and Chinese immigrants passing themselves off as Japanese, would this lead to a way to circumvent the immigration quotas when they go into effect? I can imagine some shady dealers setting up a system where a ship could leave China for Japan, fake some documents if necessary for the immigrants, then sail for the US and say everyone is from Japan.
Not necessarily on a large scale, but I do imagine such a thing will occur. Exploiting desperate people for money is a lucrative business, after all.
 
Top