Not exactly the most neutral source, considering he spent his whole life trying to establish a homeland in Eretz Israel. However, if East Prussia was still under Stalin's thumb, then... yeah.David Ben-Gurion insisted that "the only way to get Jews to go [to East Prussia] would be with machine guns."
Germany would be the most likely place (I believe East Prussia was offered), but it's unlikely the Jews would go along with it. David Ben-Gurion insisted that "the only way to get Jews to go [to East Prussia] would be with machine guns."
Germany would be the most likely place (I believe East Prussia was offered), but it's unlikely the Jews would go along with it. David Ben-Gurion insisted that "the only way to get Jews to go [to East Prussia] would be with machine guns."
Not exactly the most neutral source, considering he spent his whole life trying to establish a homeland in Eretz Israel. However, if East Prussia was still under Stalin's thumb, then... yeah.
Israel's roots lay in WWI, not WWII. So a Jewish state in Europe would be redundant since there were already plans for such a thing in Palestine.
You'd be more likely to set them up somewhere in Africa. The Balfour Declaration had already supported the movement of the Jews to Israel.
Well of course, but the British policymakers of the era were dismissive to the Arabs at best. They were deemed too backwards to matter due to the racism of the time.But one could have used as a counter argument that there were already another group of people living in Palestine and they were still the majority. After all, the Germans were the ones with a historical debt to the Jews, not the Palestinians.
it might have been natural somehow to include the Vilnius area too. As far as I understand, Vilnius was added to the Lithuanian SSR after the war and there were few Lithuanians in the city at this time. As late as 1897, 40 % of the population were Jews (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilnius#Demographics) and Vilnius was known as the "Jerusalem of the north,
Another possibility could have been Silesia, including Kraków as the capital, although I believe there were traditionally more Jews in Vilnius. Of course, the hitch is that both these two areas came under Soviet control, so somewhere in West Germany might have been a better choice.
There's a few extra problems:
a) Where in Europe isn't going to have been trashed by WW2, that wasn't a neutral state?
b) Is it a state Jews want to live in? The Red Army aside, East Prussia is Germany. How many Holocaust survivors want to live in Germany, who weren't already German?
c) What happens to the people already living there? That was a question in Palestine as well but Europeans are Europeans & this is 1945. Double standards would apply
c) What happens to the people already living there? That was a question in Palestine as well but Europeans are Europeans & this is 1945. Double standards would apply
What about the non-Jewish majority of the city's population, and overwhelmingly non-Jewish population of the surrounding area? No way this would be natural unless it is assumed that Jews are more equal then others.
What about Cyprus? It's relatively isolated and I don't know if Ithaca a large enough population to cause a problem.
But one could have used as a counter argument that there were already another group of people living in Palestine and they were still the majority. After all, the Germans were the ones with a historical debt to the Jews, not the Palestinians.