Japan stays neutral in WWII

It's true that the Swedes speak fantastic English, but they're not owned by an England that genuinely wants to turn Sweden into an integral part of England.

Japan was making significant progress towards destroying Han Chinese language in Taiwan by the time the war ended. The Japanese were brutal in their methods, and their methods were effective. Korean would probably have survived, but it would be much, much less prevalent, like Irish Gaelic, Scots Gaelic or Nynorsk Norwegian.
What do you mean by "Han Chinese language"? You are aware that "Han Chinese" is an ethnic group that speaks quite a large number of langauges, yes? If by "Han Chinese language" you mean Mandarin, then it's important to remember that virtually no one on Taiwan spoke that language before the KMT showed up postwar. Most Taiwanese spoke Taiwanese Hokkien (usually just called "Taiwanese" 臺灣), with a smaller number speaking Hakka, and of course small numbes speaking aboriginal languages.

It's true that Japanese was making huge in-roads during this time period. It was the language of education, it was the language you needed to get a good job or to speak to the government. It was the language of a wider culture, for reading not only Japanese newspapers, movies, and novels, but also for a growing body of Taiwanese lit that spoke to the colonial experience. Lastly, it was also very useful as a lingua franca, allowing the various language groups of Taiwan to speak to each other.

I know it's possible for languages to disappear and be replaced with their colonizer's language. There are examples of that around the world. But I wonder if it's really possible in Taiwan, at least during the time period we are talking about. During the Japanese colonial period, the government pushed Japanese hard--during the Militarist period, people were even strongly encouraged to speak Japanese within their own homes, and the Taiwanese-language newspapers disappeared. When the KMT arrived, they pushed Mandarin very hard, and Taiwanese was again strongly discouraged. And yet, Taiwanese is still around, still the first language of the vast majority of the people. I'm honestly not sure what either of those governments could have done to push harder. So I think Taiwanese will survive even if Taiwan turns into a normal Japanese prefecture or two, at least up until the present day. Maybe eventually it will turn into Welsh (for example), but just the 60 years since the war is I think too little time.
 
7th Amd Bde, 6 & 8 Australian ID. Say 11 and 17 Indian ID all when reformed. 18 Br ID ,previously mentioned. Plus later in the year 14, 19,20,34 Indian, 32 Amd (Indian) divs, 5th Tank Bde Indian possibly, all originally configured as motorised.
Late 42 early 43 possibly 23, 25, 28 and 36 ID Indian ( sorta 36 is all brit but on the Indian establishment.) Maybe 43 Amd Div (Indian).
2 Groups RAF (from India). 7 Fighter Sq RAAF (P40, Wirraway), 6 Sq Maritime recon ( Hudsons and Ansons mainly), 1xB25, 1x Boston, 2x Beaufighter Sq in Mid 42.
Nov 43 the RAAF is 15 fighter Sq (P40, spit, Boomerang). 7 sq Beaufort, 2sq Beaufighter, 1x A31 or 35, 4 sq Vengeance, 3 sq Catalina, 6sq Anson/Hudson, 3 sq C47 and a misc transport squadron but that includes training formations so say 10 FS, 7 attack, TBD, 2 Maritime recon and1-2 transport.
Up to late 42 Blue is ongoing so a lot of potential reinforcements would be tied up in Iraq/Iran.

Part of the issue is going to be different force structures in different theatres. A lot of the Indian ID were demotorised for Burma so there would be a trade off.
But as a rough comparison that would put 50% more troops available to 8th army at Alamein provided they could be properly equipped, shipped and supplied.
For me the likely outcome is the build up to Alamein happens faster.

Definitely 2BB and one CV 2 cru div and 2 desron, probably another crudiv and desron from the RAN with more later. Maybe another crudiv and desron from the DEI and some air force, say a composite group of 3 fighter, 2 light bomber if reequipped. Personally I would be dubious about ground forces but a BDE could be possible.

Thanks for this. I am thinking the real difference in this fall out later in 1943. Aside from the ground and air forces there is a huge difference in cargo shipping. No combat losses in the Pacific, and a lot less devoted to delivering material to the Asian/Pacific battlefields. Less demand for cargo ships in the east allows more material to be delivered to the battle fronts in the west.
 
It is even sure that United States enters to WW2 if Japan not attack to Pearl Harbor? If United States stays neutral too, WW2 might end to stalemante.

Even if they did stay neutral, it is unlikely it would go to a stalemate. Germany might be able to make a deal with exhausted British and Russian forces. But Hitler bit off way more than he could chew.

Still if they had more resources to go on the defensive in the East, Kursk had been handled properly (backhanded blow), the Soviets may start thinking they are taking the brunt of the situation and agree to a deal which they will betray the first chance they get. Hitler would have to be out of the picture, he wouldn't make the deal. By now his subordinates will be looking at him with less awe than before. He was the man who lost an army in Russia with his stand your ground strategy, not the man who conquered France.

A bloodless coup is unlikely with the Nazi's in power, so assassination of him and key Reich members would be the easiest route.
 
Top