Abdul, where did I state that Islamic society was inferior?
Let's not get insulting here. The printing press and associated literacy was key to the rise of Western Europe, and success of the printing press there and not elsewhere can not be presented as some kind of slur.
It also did not succeed in China, which first developed it, nor in India, where the idea(if not actual prototypes) must surely have passed through. It did not succeed in the Islamic nations(Ottomans were the preeminant Muslim society, not the only one). For that matter, it was more successful in the Protestant societies than the Catholic ones.
Is it that peculiarities of Protestant sects encouraged a higher degree of literacy and a major increase in the printing industry(as it were), which led to other developments?
Or does it simply imply hostility to all Muslims, Hindus, Chinese and Catholics?
Let's not get insulting here. The printing press and associated literacy was key to the rise of Western Europe, and success of the printing press there and not elsewhere can not be presented as some kind of slur.
It also did not succeed in China, which first developed it, nor in India, where the idea(if not actual prototypes) must surely have passed through. It did not succeed in the Islamic nations(Ottomans were the preeminant Muslim society, not the only one). For that matter, it was more successful in the Protestant societies than the Catholic ones.
Is it that peculiarities of Protestant sects encouraged a higher degree of literacy and a major increase in the printing industry(as it were), which led to other developments?
Or does it simply imply hostility to all Muslims, Hindus, Chinese and Catholics?