Couple of maps of Europe in 1232AD, at the accession of Emperor Isaac II, showing national and religious divisions...
Look I don't mean to be rude, but have you even read the section on the Mongol invasion? I am perfectly aware that the Mongols cannot be defeated in a land battlem which is why I had them defeated AT SEA, where the Romans have the advantage. Secondly, you talk about a "Mongol invasion of Europe" which has not taken place, the only Mongols in Europe so far have been the desperate survivors of the Battle of Abydos fleeing north through the Balkans. Thirdly, there is no way in hell I am letting the Romans get to China, I may be fairly new to the forum, but I do believe that is a rather large "wank".
Nevertheless, the Mongols are not finished with the Empire yet, and your detailed comments have been useful for me to help write the next section. So thank you for your views.
Basileus Giorgios I must start by saying how much I enjoy this timeline and congratulate you on your efforts. I do have some questions over the plausibility of your last post though.
While the direct election of a magistrate is not unbelievable, the notion that women will be able to vote needs to be explained in more depth. Just how such a fundamental change in society’s norms and social practice and thinking has taken place needs to be expanded. Also the term of the magistrate being so long needs explanation.
Presumably the idea that a civilian magistrate could be elected can be drawn from ancient tradition and sold to the more conservative elements as a reestablishment of traditional Roman practice. Yet a term of three years seems unlikely since all the magistracies of ancient Rome were of one year’s duration. No emperor, even a reform minded one, would want too much power concentrated into the hands of a popular figure so three years seems too long.
My main stumbling bloc in accepting this scenario is the role of women in the electorate. Byzantium was traditionally a conservative and misogynist society. This sudden liberation of women, even if only encompassing aristocrats, appears too much too soon. The long struggle of women to achieve the franchise in modern times is eloquent testimony to the unlikely event of an Eastern Emperor giving them the vote on a whim.
Another problem is just what the mechanics of the election will be. An individual secret ballot type of arrangement seems impossible at this time in this society. Will there be a series of Assemblies modelled on the ancient curia system with the winner being the one who gathers the most regions or a sort of super Assembly held in the capital of the theme? Will the Assemblies vote in tribes or in centuries? How will the enrolment in the Assemblies be conducted and what will be the basis of enrolment? Will it be by residence, place of birth, occupation or some other method? How will the wishes of the Army be heard? The legions cannot be disbanded so the soldiers can travel somewhere and vote nor can the legionaries be effectively disenfranchised, as this would be a recipe for revolt.
I look forward to your opinions and your solutions.
This is the best TL I've seen on here yet.
I've got a question.
Could I maybe write some fiction for this TL, giving you full credit for it's creation of course, when it's a little further on?
That would be fantastic! Yes yes please do
Could you please personnal message it to me first though?
Thanks
Thanks for your thoughts! I will try to answer them one at a time.
The enfranchisement of some women is due to the strong and genuine love Isaac II felt for his wife Theodora, as the two of them ruled the empire together (much like Justinian and Theodora in OTL). Therefore Isaac has seen first hand that women are just as capable as men at running great empires. Also, many of the dreams that prompted him to make moves towards democracy featured the Virgin Mary, and if God could choose a woman to do important things, why shouldn't the Emperor do the same?
The three year term is my own invention, not wanting to have it at four years as in modern terms. See how the situation develops in the Demokratia for now, remember, the Emperor still retains near absolute power in the state, and if elected magistrates start getting too big for their boots, he can always cut down the amount of time in a term.
Elections take place in the capital of the Theme yes, on March 1st, meaning in practise not all enfranchised citizens can vote. The votes of a legion are taken slightly earlier, so they can be relaid to the centre of the theme. Citizens write the name of their chosen candidate on a piece of pottery, before throwing it into a deep well. The votes are then counted by monks and nuns, who are not enfranchised and therefore unlikely to be able to be bribed etc. By the end of the month, the candidates are summoned to the palace of the local Bishop, who informs them who is the winner of the election.
I hope this answers some of your questions!
Couple of maps of Europe in 1232AD, at the accession of Emperor Isaac II, showing national and religious divisions...