Invading Tejas in 1799-1800

Ok for one of my many TL I writing or planning calls for the invasion of Tejas(Texas) in 1799-1800 from the Louisiana Territory. Besides San Antonio, what other cities or towns would one have to hold to be able to get Tejas in the peace treaty that comes in mid to late 1800. I'm looking to break off what the Republic of Texas claimed as Texas OTL for this TL.
333px-Wpdms_republic_of_texas.svg.png
 
You'd have to whack the Comanche

IIRC San Antonio was generally known as Bexar at the time (from its full name San Antonio de Bexar)

There's something out by Galveston, it might just be a small fishing port or something

Other than that you have the usual Spanish mix of missions and forts

Was there something at Austin before they built Austin, which was why they built Austin there?

Oh, and the Alamo!

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
Ah, I'm ahead of the game in Galveston by 15-20 years!

from Wiki:-

Named after Bernardo de Gálvez y Madrid, Count of Gálvez, Galveston's first European settlements on the island were constructed around 1816. The Port of Galveston was established in 1825 by the Congress of Mexico following its successful independence from Spain. The city served as the main port for the Texas Navy during the Texas Revolution and later served as the capital of the Republic of Texas.

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
?? Are you skipping Louisiana all together? How about the city of New Orleans? Spain owned all of this during that time period. Plus Spain was an ally of France and Napoleon during that time period. Are we risking war with them then? Or is this an independent thing like Walker in Central America?
 
You'd probably have to carry the war across the border too, and occupy what is now Matamoros but what was then Villa del Refugio

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
OK I looked up Austin and it said this:-

When settlers first arrived from Europe, the area was inhabited by the Tonkawa tribe, and the Comanches and Lipan Apaches were known to travel through the area as well.[21] Spanish explorers, including the Espinosa-Olivares-Aguirre expedition, traveled through the area for centuries, though few permanent settlements were created for some time.[22] In 1730, three missions from East Texas were combined and reestablished as one mission on the south side of the Colorado River, in what is now Zilker Park, in Austin. The mission was in this area for only about seven months, and then was moved to San Antonio de Béxar and split into three missions.[23] In the mid-18th century, the San Xavier missions were located along the Colorado River, in what is now western Milam County, to facilitate exploration.[24]
Early in the 19th century, Spanish forts were established in what are now Bastrop and San Marcos

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
?? Are you skipping Louisiana all together? How about the city of New Orleans? Spain owned all of this during that time period. Plus Spain was an ally of France and Napoleon during that time period. Are we risking war with them then? Or is this an independent thing like Walker in Central America?
Nope, Louisiana has been sold and is apart of America ITL. East and West Florida I'm not that worry about because they should fall in short order in this war. But I want to get Texas into the US also in this war.

Yes the US military is far better than its OTL counterpart with a size between 16 to 18 regiments, though that's not set in stone. The Navy is small for a nation the size of the US, it has a few ship of line, number of heavy frigates, and smaller scout ships.

Basically this is the XYZ affair and Quasi-War on a much larger scale than OTL.
 
In the 1790s, Spanish Tejas contained less than 4,000 people (as the Spanish understood the term, so not including 'wild' Indians) - including 1,000 garrisoned troops, and all the converted Indians, whose loyalties were flexible at the best of times (Some Apaches once 'converted' just to get the Presidio San Luis de las Amarillas built in Comanche territory, to see what happened. You can imagine what happened). Although a bit earlier than the period of your interest, the reports of the Marqués de Rubí are a good period source. He rolled up in Spanish Tejas as part of a general inspection set up due to the waning French threat in the area. What he saw was a scattered bunch of wretched settlements under constant Apache and Comanche threat, and which couldn't hold the land nor even protect themselves. Spanish Tejas was not real, it didn't exist. He advised Tejas be entirely abandoned, except for Presidio La Bahía and San Antonio de Béxar, with the removal of all East Tejans to San Antonio, with the establishment of a line of forts which pretty closely mirrors the modern US/Mexico border. "The country," he said, "should be given back to Nature and the Indians." In 1772, by royal order, it was. The only other settlement was Nacogdoches, which was resettled by its Spanish inhabitants against orders, and which was in 1779 declared the first town in Tejas.

By the 1790s, the Spanish still didn't understand you can't make treaties with Indians. For one thing, there was no real cohesive government body. Dudes hung out with powerful leaders; if the leaders did something they didn't like, such as make a treaty, they'd just wander off. And then kill more Spaniards. 1792 was a particularly bad year, and in 1793, with the outbreak of what we call the Napoleonic Wars, Spain lost almost all interest in Tejas and its 4,000 people. Around 1800, you're looking at the only towns of note being San Antonio, Presidio La Bahía (Goliad), and Nacogdoches, having about 2,000, 1,500, and 500 souls respectively.

Persons of interest:

Philip Nolan was an Irishman who mapped much of Texas and engaged in a shitload of illegal horse trading in the 1790s. He saw what Rubí did - weakness. He teamed up with the hilariously duplicitous American General James Wilkinson, who thought it would be a good idea to break off Tejas from Spain. This was in between his plans to break off Louisiana from France and the Old Southwest from America. In 1800, Nolan and some 20 dudes entered Tejas well-armed, either to gather some new horses or to launch an invasion, depending on who you ask. The Spanish were jumpy about him and claimed he had a plan to crown himself as el Rey de Tejas, and he was shot and killed in a skirmish with Spanish soldiers. Wilkinson turned his plans to split off Tejas, or Mexico, or Louisiana, or Tejas and Mexico and Louisiana, towards another sympathetic ear, that of Vice-President Aaron Burr, who (then out of office) in 1805 went southwest to raise support, arms, and men. Ultimately Wilkinson, aka Agent 13 of the Spanish Crown, dropped the dime on Burr. The running assumption is he suckered Burr in with the idea to go after Mexico and/or Tejas, then told others it was a plan to go after Louisiana, to paint Burr a traitor, for whatever reason. Weird times, interesting guys.
 

katchen

Banned
The Spanish had a trading post at Nagcodoches in Northeast Tejas. That was about it for the Spanish. The French may have had something I 'm not aware of on the Red River or the Sabine.
 
Top