It kinda does imply that, in what way were the Mughals "far more sophisticated" as a society than the Aztecs? The Aztecs had an organized state with its own levels of bureaucracy and some of the largest cities in the world that by Spanish accounts were well-kept, none of this implies they were behind the old world in societal sophistication.
To quote the Dude:
well that's just, like, your opinion, man. I'm not downplaying the civilisational accomplishments of the Mesoamerican empires, thank you very much. But whatever. I'll bite.
First and foremost, the Mughal Empire's administrative system was an exceedingly well-oiled machinery, partially inherited from previous Muslim dynasties on the Indo-Gangetic plain, which allowed the empire to effectively expand its centralised governance over almost the entire length and breadth of the Indian subcontinent; supporting the growth of an economy which by the 1600s totalled between 20 and 25% of
the entire world's GDP. This behemoth of a polity with its millions upon millions of subjects belonging to a myriad of different cultures and religious creeds used a single common currency, was governed, taxed and administered by the emperor's appointed officials and governors. Then there's the advanced state of Mughal India's agriculture (at some points even more advanced than those of Europe, IIRC) and its pioneering development of manufactories, not to mention the fact that it kept a standing army.