As we naval history nerds know, the Japanese aircraft carrier Soryu and the American aircraft carrier Wasp died horrible deaths during the Pacific War. However, what stands out is that both were caught with their pants down: Soryu getting jumped by Yorktown's dive bombers while refuelling and rearming her own dive bombers at Midway, not helped by the fact that IJN damage control was not great, and Wasp getting torpedoed by I-19 while conducting flight ops and having her gas lines filled with fuel - she died hard and her crew were very brave, but she still succumbed.
I have been considering scenarios in which both carriers don't die their respective deaths and get to fight in more carrier battles. So, assuming that neither ship is in so compromising a position - they know an attack is coming, have drained their fuel lines and are conducting evasive manoeuvres, protected by screen ships - how much damage can they take, while staying afloat and in a repairable state? It probably is not much, given how fragile these two carriers were, but I would be grateful for information and an analysis from anyone.
I'll divide this into categories:
(a) Just bomb damage
(b) Just torpedo damage
(c) A mixture of (a) and (b)
(d) Shell damage (for fun - why not?)
For further consideration:
(A) Each ship has their OTL 1942 crew on board and their RL damage-control experience.
(B) Each ship has a 1944 USN-level damage-control crew on board.
And, as a final question, would you rather have a Soryu or a Wasp if you had to build a fleet carrier on a budget?
EDIT: Originally this was just about the durability of both carriers but I've now expanded the subject to their general usefulness and how they could have been used if they didn't die their respective deaths, especially off Guadalcanal.
I have been considering scenarios in which both carriers don't die their respective deaths and get to fight in more carrier battles. So, assuming that neither ship is in so compromising a position - they know an attack is coming, have drained their fuel lines and are conducting evasive manoeuvres, protected by screen ships - how much damage can they take, while staying afloat and in a repairable state? It probably is not much, given how fragile these two carriers were, but I would be grateful for information and an analysis from anyone.
I'll divide this into categories:
(a) Just bomb damage
(b) Just torpedo damage
(c) A mixture of (a) and (b)
(d) Shell damage (for fun - why not?)
For further consideration:
(A) Each ship has their OTL 1942 crew on board and their RL damage-control experience.
(B) Each ship has a 1944 USN-level damage-control crew on board.
And, as a final question, would you rather have a Soryu or a Wasp if you had to build a fleet carrier on a budget?
EDIT: Originally this was just about the durability of both carriers but I've now expanded the subject to their general usefulness and how they could have been used if they didn't die their respective deaths, especially off Guadalcanal.
Last edited: