Ignore

Hmmm. I believe the women's movement had the intellectual roots to catch fire near the end of the Enlightenment. The biggest obstacles standing in womens' way in the late 18th, early 19th centuries are religion and lack of possible independent jobs for women.

During the time period women were seen as the tender, comforting sex, as more emotional, and unsuited to anything requiring hard decisions or harshness. In keeping with religious beliefs, the ideal traits of women were gentleness, modesty, and being of maximum aid to her husband at home. It's important to keep these things in mind to understand of the mindset of men towards women in the era; they didn't deny women property rights out of maliciousness or sheer belief in women as inferior beings, they did it because the man was seen universally as the head of the household, and the woman as his helpmeet, as the Bible instructs.

In fact, I'll never be able to find it again, but I was skimming through an old book on government from the 1830s on Google Books, and the author, in discussing voting rights, actually mentions the possibility of giving women the vote (In the 1830s!), but then dismisses the idea as useless, arguing that women voting would either simply double the votes of a household, or else cause strife within the household between husband and wife. He concludes that the only real beneficiaries of giving women the vote would be young unmarried women, and the author "would not wish to encourage prolonging that condition." It's interesting that the justification in that book for not giving women civil rights doesn't rest on arguing that women are mentally inferior, but that it would disrupt the rigid household roles of society. The unyielding belief in these household roles among both men and women is a massive thing.

And that I think is the main thing that would prevent an earlier women's movement. In a time period where most money is still earned by manual labor, men are inevitably the sole or primary breadwinners of a household, and add that to the religious component, which states that a woman should be meek, modest, and a helper to her partner, as God commands, and you have a pretty unbreakable barrier. I think the best opportunity for women to gain more legal rights would be at a time when unquestioning religious belief is at its zenith. In other words, Revolutionary Europe. The longer it takes for reactionary elements to re-establish control, the larger the window would be for women to press for more rights during the time period.

edit: And now that I've gone and written up a long response, you've gone and deleted the question.
 
That's an interesting question, but in the timeframe as outlined, I don't believe the Turks could have mounted a force or the resources required to cross the Atlantic and wage war with the Mayans in the first place.
 
Top