If they will not meet us on the open sea (a Trent TL)

Saphroneth

Banned
It was a fine day.

The RMS Trent, mail packet with the British Royal Mail service, steamed steadily east along the Bahama Channel - the relatively narrow deep-water route between Cuba and the Bahamas - and her bow splashed as it cut the waves, out of time with the steady sound of her paddles.

"It's quite warm for the season, isn't it?" asked one of the passengers. "I must say, I'd have thought the weather would be far worse - it is November, after all."

"You should have to ask someone from down this far south," replied the Trent's Captain, a man by the name of Moir. "But speaking for myself, this time of year is often one for storms or squalls - we seem to have a good passage so far."

He walked on, compensating for the swaying deck with unconscious ease, and stood at the bow for a long moment to look out at the horizon.

To the north, though the sky was clear but for a few fluffy clouds, he could feel a storm brewing. Not weather, but far worse - politics.

For months, now, the United States had been divided in twain. The Union called to arms to protect their unity, and the Confederacy mustered to win their freedom - and a small part of that distant war had come to his own Trent, in ten of the persons who had booked passage to England.

They were not ambassadors, because the Confederacy as yet was not recognized - was not considered a nation - and could not send ambassadors. But they rejoiced in the title of commissioner - one each for England and France - along with their secretaries, and in two cases their families.

Moir did not care overmuch for the outcome of the American War, for himself. But having met the men who the Confederacy had chosen to represent them, he found himself warming to them a little on a personal level.

Looking up at the sun, he adjudged the time to be a little short of noon. His cook was quite competent, so it would be a pleasant meal.

Then the lookout signalled down from the mast, and Moir learned that the American War had come to him in more ways than one.





"I don't like this," Moir said, watching as the vessel - a corvette or a frigate, though he recalled that the Americans called their corvettes "sloops" and did not make the distinction - lay acros their path, showing no colours. "Surely he sees the flag?"

"He must, Captain," agreed the Royal Naval officer onboard, Williams - a passenger himself, in charge of the mails. "At this distance we could see their ensign easily."

"Well, we shall soon find out what is up," Moir mused. "They must be waiting for us, or they would have made for their true destination. Do you think she is a Southern privateer?"

"If she is, then we will have no trouble with her," Williams pronounced surely. "But no Southern ship could be so large or powerful, not unless they have taken one of the ships captured at Norfolk and made her seaworthy."

He shook his head. "No, I think-"

Williams was interrupted by a puff of white smoke, and then the crash of a cannon-shot - and, ominously, the splash of a round shot impacting the water ahead of the Trent.

"By god, she has fired," Moir said. "Why would she fire a shot across our bows, without a blank shot first?"

"She is an American vessel," Williams pointed out, as the flag went up - and, just as he said, it was a stars-and-stripes, the Union's naval ensign.

"Sir?" called the man on the wheel. "Should we stop?"

Moir hesitated, thinking of the crew and the passengers and the diplomatic situation all at once. Before he came to a decision, however, the American ship fired another round.

This one was a shell, and burst not a hundred yards in front of the Trent's bow.

"Her guns are all out!" Williams warned. "She may mean to fire into us!"

"Heave to!" Moir ordered. "We'll see what this is about!"

He took up a speaking trumpet and walked to the side of his ship, waiting as she slewed sideways and lost way.

Then he hailed the American ship, asking for some sort of justification.







Some minutes later, an American lieutenant climbed aboard Trent from his cutter - one of two the American ship had sent over.

Two members of the crew escorted him to Moir, now up to a slow simmering boil of anger, and cleared his throat.

"Captain," he began. "I am instructed to demand from you a list of the passengers upon your ship."

"Lieutenant, you may not have it," Moir replied firmly. "This is an illegal action. What is your ship?"

"The San Jacinto," answered the American lieutenant. "My captain and I have been given positive assurances that there are men on board your vessel the Trent who are wanted by my government, and we will have them."

"You will not have any man, woman or child from this ship," Moir countered. "You have no right to take any person whatsoever from under the protection of the British flag."

"My instructions are to arrest Mr. Mason and Mr. Slidell and their secretaries, and send them prisoners on board the United States war vessel nearby," the lieutenant said simply. "I will have them, and I will have their baggage and dispatches."

There was a muttering from the passengers, which soon escalated into shouts and threats. The American lieutenant made no answer at first, but his men - nearly twenty seamen, armed with cutlass and pistol, and two ensigns with them - came aboard, forming a knot around their officer.

"I have no quarrel with your ship, captain," the lieutenant said. "But my government, and my captain, and I - we will have Mr. Mason, and Mr. Slidell, and their secretaries Mr. Eustice and Mr. McFarland."

The muttering rose again, but before it could break out into another round of threats one of the passengers stepped forwards.

"I am Mr. Mason," said the gentleman. "What do you want of us?"

The lieutenant looked mildly relieved. "You four, to be taken as prisoners upon the San Jacinto, and your baggage confiscated."

"We will not go with you, not unless we are forced," the diplomat stated.

His fellow addressed Captain Moir directly. "We claim the protection of the British Flag, as passengers upon your ship."

"That is your answer, lieutenant," Moir said.

"Then I must take charge of the ship," the lieutenant stated positively. "It must be searched for dispatches as well."

At that, Commander Williams stepped up from the back of the crowd, full of indignation. "In this ship I am the representative of Her Majesty's Government, and I call upon the officers of the ship and the passengers generally to mark my words when, in the name of that Government, and in distinct language, I denounce this as an illegal act - an act in violation of international law - an act, indeed, of wanton piracy, which, had we the means of defence, you would not dare to attempt."

"But you do not have the means of defence," replied the lieutenant, then signalled to his ship. Almost at once three more cutters launched themselves across the gap, each one full of sailors, and within a few minutes nearly a hundred armed American sailors were aboard - accompanied by thirty marines, complete with their officers.

"If you will not accompany me to my vessel, then I must take the ship by force," the lieutenant said, voice still calm but in a glassy way - that of a man who knew the situation could in moments explode into violence.

"We will not come willingly," Mason said. "But if the alternative is for a fight, we must surrender to duress."

Moir sighed slightly, trying to disguise his relief as the four Confederates were taken into American custody, only for the lieutenant to continue. "Sergeant!"

"Sir," one of the marines said, coming to attention.

"Search the ship."

"You may not," Williams denied. "You may take the baggage of the commissioners, for they are travelling with you, but you may not search this ship - that would be an act of piracy against the British flag."

"Captain Moir!" Slidell called. "I hope you will understand that I expect redress from the British government for this outrage while under the protection of the British flag! I understand that you had little choice of yourself, but I trust you will represent the case properly!"

As the boat with the prisoners in stroked towards San Jacinto, the lieutenant paused.

"My orders are also to take you, captain, and your papers, on board the San Jacinto, and to take the Trent into company with my vessel."

Moir's eyes narrowed.

"You will find me on my quarter deck; if you want me, you will have to come there for me," he said, and turned to walk away without another word.







About an hour later, the Trent was under way once more - lighter by four Confederate envoys, their baggage, and considerable provisions, the latter having been requisitioned by the captain of the San Jacinto to allow him to feed his prisoners.

Moir stared at his plate, still half-full of his lunch.

"What an awful day," he said, shaking his head. "What a fine mess."

"Fine mess indeed," the Royal Navy commander agreed. "But not as fine as it could have been, captain. Firstly, your ship may make all speed for England to report this disaster, instead of being captured by those pirates; secondly, she is unmarred and undamaged, where she could have been fired upon and riddled or sunk; thirdly, no man or woman was killed today, though it was undoubtedly a risk; fourthly, the wives and children of our passengers are safe, though they might not have been; and, lastly, I took the liberty of securing the emissaries' mail as being under our protection, for we could not provide protection to their persons."

Moir looked up, startled. "When on Earth did you do that?"

"I confess, captain, it was what I was doing whilst you were talking with the lieutenant, at first," Williams explained. "Mr. Slidell's daughter showed me where the mails were kept, and I took them to my quarters in haste before joining you on deck."

He smiled at the private joke, then his smile faded.

"This is bad business," he added. "The war in America is already a large one, with great armies, for all that barely a battle has been fought... now our own country may be drawn in."

Moir stood, and nodded. "I fear you may be right," he said softly.

He turned to look out the window. "We cannot proceed to Britain," he said. "Not after such an incident. I will have us make for St. Thomas, and put in there."

"A fine idea, captain," Williams approved. "The Plata leaves from there shortly, does it not?"

Moir nodded silently.

"I cannot conceive of any man put in charge of a great warship being so hot-headed," he said. "Not unless his instructions were positive that he should act that way, if circumstances allowed."

It was still a fine day, but he didn't really appreciate it any more.






(As far as possible this is reconstructed from the account in the Times and on Wikipedia, including all the direct quotes I could get in. It was hard to write without making the Americans look insanely arrogant, because the course of events as described has them continuing to suggest things after being informed that they're acts of literal piracy...)
 
Last edited:

Saphroneth

Banned
So, are you are restarting this from the beggining?
For now I'm seeing how well I can do text of an OTL event.

There's definitely some errors I need to correct, and some events which need to be planned out and plotted out (for starters I need to make sure I get the US West Coast right!) but what functionally amounts to a redo is in the cards, yes.
 

Saphroneth

Banned
Here's the two quotes I literally copy-pasted:



"In this ship I am the representative of Her Majesty's Government, and I call upon the officers of the ship and the passengers generally to mark my words when, in the name of that Government, and in distinct language, I denounce this as an illegal act - an act in violation of international law - an act, indeed, of wanton piracy, which, had we the means of defence, you would not dare to attempt."

"You will find me on my quarter deck; if you want me, you will have to come there for me,"


Both from the Times.
 
Perhaps the British could request as part of the final settlement that Wilkes be sent back to Antarctica.

When he was in command of the United States Exploring Expedition, his command presence was so striking that every other commissioned officer on the expedition resigned before it was finished, went home, and wrote letters and articles blackening Wilkes for his conduct. And did I mention that he employed the punishment of "flogging through the fleet"?
 

Saphroneth

Banned
Perhaps the British could request as part of the final settlement that Wilkes be sent back to Antarctica.
I do need to work out what would happen to the San Jacinto, I actually missed her in the first iteration of the TL because the Sloops list had her as a Frigate and the Frigates list had her as a Sloop.
 

Saphroneth

Banned
This was good, though damn if you'd made the whole thing up I would think the American Lieutenant was over the top.
Yeah, the demands were all real. He really did demand the men, their luggage, to search the ship and to take the captain over to his own ship.

The warning shot was also real - they went straight to firing a shot across the bows, escalated to firing a shell, and had their guns run out and pointed at the Trent.

It's easy to see why it was such an outrage, as all this got reported in the Times.

Heck, I even left something out because it was too hard to squeeze in, which is that the American lieutenant (his name was Donald Fairfax, and he ended up as an Admiral) tried to persuade the families of the commissioners to come with them as well - though he had to admit that they'd be separated upon arrival in New York.

To be perfectly fair to Fairfax, he was operating totally under orders and had no discretion (and the Times did make that clear). His orders stated:

On boarding her you will demand the papers of the steamer, her clearance from Havana, with the list of passengers and crew.

Should Mr. Mason, Mr. Slidell, Mr. Eustice [sic] and Mr. McFarland be on board make them prisoners and send them on board this ship and take possession of her [the Trent] as a prize. … They must be brought on board.

All trunks, cases, packages and bags belonging to them you will take possession of and send on board this ship; any dispatches found on the persons of the prisoners, or in possession of those on board the steamer, will be taken possession of, examined, and retained if necessary.

Of course, all this was totally illegal and the Americans technically didn't even have the right to come on board - the US having repeatedly refused the mutual right of search or even visitation.
 

Saphroneth

Banned
Okay, so, the news of the war.


Firstly, the news of the war warning (that is, that the ultimatum is rejected) reaches Bermuda pretty much as soon as Immortalite does. I've been corrected on the weather at the time, so the war warning reaches Bermuda around the 9th or 10th of January with the frigate in dire need of recoaling - fortunately she can do so.

The war declaration itself can take place any time later than the 8th of January, which is when the ultimatum rejection reaches Britain. If the British were feeling really sneaky (would they be? Good question...) they could send the news on the Europa which left on the 11th of January, and only then make the official declaration of war to Adams (the US ambassador to Britain).
This would mean the news would reach the Union on the City of Washington (left 15th January, arrived in the Union on the 31st) by which time a lot of preparations by everyone will be ready.

Absent that, however, the news would roughly speaking move at mail packet speeds. It would reach Milne roughly on the 20th, and Halifax on the 21st (where it would be, if sneaky mode is on, communicated down the sleigh route instead of sent by the customary telegraph routes and as such would reach Canada on the 25th; otherwise it would arrive on the 21st or 22nd).


The news would go via the Greyhound to Rum Key and the Bulldog to Dunlop's squadron at Vera Cruz, thus alerting Dunlop on or about the 27th (seven days total time elapsed) and he sails on the 28th (having been ready to go as per his orders). At the same time, the Union is also trying to pass the information but they don't have a mail ship ready to go and so their own ship leaves on the 22nd or 23rd at the earliest (n.b. this is very generous indeed, they may simply not have had a ship this fast available) - so the news reaches Port Royal about the 24th or 25th, and the Gulf Blockading Squadron HQ roughly on the 29th or 30th - so they don't get caught totally by surprise, but they don't get time to fully concentrate either.


The British way of alerting the Pacific squadron, going by the regular mail schedule (which they would likely abrogate if needed) would reach Colon on the 6th of February. A Union mail steamer to Aspinwall would arrive a day or two later, so functionally the two are informed at the same time.
Here's the positions, via Cerebropetrologist:



San Francisco
USS St Mary's (22), USS Active (4), USRC William L. Marcy (6), USRC Shubrick (3), USRC Joe Lane (3)

Mazatlan, Mexico
HMS Termagant (24), HMS Mutine (17) [?]

Acapulco, Mexico
USS Narragansett (5), USS Saranac (9)

Panama/Tobaga:
USS Cyane (18), USS Lancaster (26)*; HMS Tartar (18)

Callao, Peru:
USS Wyoming (6); HMS Bacchante (51), HMS Clio (21)

Valparaiso (Chile)
HMS Cameleon (17)



* - the Lancaster had a cracked crankshaft and could not make steam, only sail

Here's the kicker, though - the Union didn't have a mail route down the Pacific coast, so that news won't travel in an organized way for them. This combines with the Lancaster being unable to make steam (and the Cyane being a sail sloop) to suggest the Tartar will make it out, and then a series of running battles as the two sides try to get themselves alerted and race for San Francisco.


Incidentally, and amazingly, all US consular communications at this time actually went through London to take advantage of mail and telegraphic links - the US at war with Britain has pretty much cut itself off from the world, and needs to re-establish a new set of channels in a hurry before they can organize things like blockade running...
 
Last edited:
Here's the kicker, though - the Union didn't have a mail route down the Pacific coast
Yes, they did- the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. It had four ships (Golden Gate, Sonora, Golden Age, St Louis) which took turns to make the trip from San Francisco to Panama and back. The voyages which are relevant to this time period are:
St Louis- left San Francisco 21 January 1862, arrived Panama 4 February 1862; left Panama 11 February 1862; arrives San Francisco 26 February 1862.
Golden Gate- left San Francisco 1 February 1862
Sonora- left San Francisco 11 February 1862
Golden Age- left San Francisco 21 February 1862
St Louis- left San Francisco 1 March 1862

The big problem is getting the news to San Francisco. As of the Trent, the telegraph isn't working, and the Pony Express has been dismantled because the telegraph was supposed to replace it. Let's recap the evidence we've seen already:

'We have the same old story to tell to-day about the non-communication by telegraph which has bothered us for several days past' (Marysville Daily Appeal, 31 December 1861)
'Early last evening, while the wires of the Overland Telegraph were working, we were promised dispatches from the East. But the reception of private dispatches was continued until a late hour, and then we were informed that news could not be received. The heavy gale probably deranged the wires. At this particular juncture there is great anxiety to hear from the seat of war, as the culmination of the contest is believed to have arrived. The telegraphic wires between this city and San Francisco were not in working order last evening. By the Overland Mail we have details of Eastern news to the 18th ult.' (Sacramento Daily Union, 9 January 1862)
'Swain, the telegraph operator, sends word that on the San Francisco line he finds a large number of the poles down between this city and the San Joaquin, the ground being so thoroughly saturated that they were easily blown over. Ladd, who went out on the Sacramento line, has not been heard from yet. It may be days before we get a dispatch from Sacramento and San Francisco.--Stockton Republican, Jan. 16th' (Sacramento Daily Union 18 January 1862)
'Messrs. Street and Ladd, of the overland telegraph company, have been taking a voyage along the wire to ascertain their condition. They were unable to report favorably on any immediate prospect of resumption on the line. At a point near Mokelumne City the party sailed over the submerged wires' (Marysville Daily Appeal, 28 January 1862)

From 'Up and Down California in 1860-1864; The Journal of William H. Brewer: Book 3, Chapter 1, THE RAINY SEASON':
'San Francisco; Friday, January 31:... All the roads in the middle of the state are impassable, so all mails are cut off. We have had no “Overland” for some weeks, so I can report no new arrivals. The telegraph also does not work clear through, but news has been coming for the last two days. In the Sacramento Valley for some distance the tops of the poles are under water!'
'San Francisco; February 9:... The telegraph is now in working order, and we had news this morning—up to 5 P.M. last night from St. Louis—surely quick work.'
I think the news would get there a little quicker than 9 February - by boat, if necessary - but not dramatically quicker.

As for notifying the ships along the coast, there are two ways of doing it:
1) Mail steamer from San Francisco (i.e. the Sonora leaving early)
2) Mail steamer from Panama (i.e. the St Louis, receiving the news from the Atlantic and Pacific Steamship Company's steamer North Star, due to leave New York on 1 February and arrive in Aspinwall on 10 February)
San Francisco to Panama took about 14 days, and Panama to San Francisco a little longer (15-16).

Here's the positions, via Cerebropetrologist:
Don't take them as gospel: this is one of those areas where a few days makes a big difference. For instance, the positioning of Bacchante and Clio at Callao is based on early January. However, they were due to sail to Panama in late January. If they got there by 6 February, the whole balance of power in the Pacific changes.

If the British were feeling really sneaky (would they be? Good question...) they could send the news on the Europa which left on the 11th of January, and only then make the official declaration of war to Adams (the US ambassador to Britain).
I don't think it's necessarily sneaky, as there's a weekend intervening. The City of Washington leaves New York on 28 December 1861 and arrives in Queenstown on Thursday 9 January 1862. If the Cabinet meets on Friday 10 January 1862, it's feasible that they might be able to send a Queen's Messenger in time to board the Europa (departing from Liverpool on Saturday 11 January), but also be unable to arrange a meeting with Charles Adams until Monday 13th.

It does, however, depend on whether the right Cabinet members are still in London in early January (as well as where Adams was). I don't think any of the key personnel were absent, but it's something I'll probably have to confirm.

Incidentally, and amazingly, all US consular communications at this time actually went through London to take advantage of mail and telegraphic links - the US at war with Britain has pretty much cut itself off from the world, and needs to re-establish a new set of channels in a hurry before they can organize things like blockade running...
Probably in Northern Germany, as the only other mail ships to America sail from Bremen and Hamburg. However, you're looking at a reduction in service from several times per week to approximately fortnightly.
 

Saphroneth

Banned
Yes, they did- the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. It had four ships (Golden Gate, Sonora, Golden Age, St Louis) which took turns to make the trip from San Francisco to Panama and back. The voyages which are relevant to this time period are:
Thanks for the correction. It looks like the news is going to reach the Pacific it'll be via Colon at about the 5th, with the telegraph flooded out, and then San Francisco on the 9th via telegraph.

Don't take them as gospel: this is one of those areas where a few days makes a big difference. For instance, the positioning of Bacchante and Clio at Callao is based on early January. However, they were due to sail to Panama in late January. If they got there by 6 February, the whole balance of power in the Pacific changes.
Hm, they're both capable of 11 knots under steam and it's 1340 nm. At a speed of eight knots they'd take exactly a week, so it looks like they would indeed be there then.


I don't think it's necessarily sneaky, as there's a weekend intervening. The City of Washington leaves New York on 28 December 1861 and arrives in Queenstown on Thursday 9 January 1862. If the Cabinet meets on Friday 10 January 1862, it's feasible that they might be able to send a Queen's Messenger in time to board the Europa (departing from Liverpool on Saturday 11 January), but also be unable to arrange a meeting with Charles Adams until Monday 13th.
Right, that seems like a distinct possibility. They were apparently waiting for the news, so they'd presumably be assembled.
 
At a speed of eight knots they'd take exactly a week
I did some calculations for ships for which I had a decent starting and leaving dates: might be worth reducing the estimated speed a little.

Liffey = 41 days from Gibraltar to Halifax (22 Dec to 1 Feb) = 2,658 nautical miles= 3kts
Melpomene = 29 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (22 Dec to 20 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles= 4kts
Hero = 39 days from Spithead to Bermuda (8 Dec to 16 Jan) = 2,988 nautical miles = 3kts
Agamemnon = 30 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (24 Dec to 23 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles = 4kts
Aboukir = 25 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (30 Dec to 24 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles = 5kts
Edgar = 6 days from Spithead to Lisbon (1 Jan to 7 Jan) = 866 nautical miles = 6kts
Edgar = 23 days from Lisbon to Port Royal (30 Jan to 22 Feb) = 3,729 nautical miles = 7kts
Caesar = 20 days from Gibraltar to Spithead (29 Dec to 18 Jan) = 1,145 nautical miles = 2kts

Thanks for the correction. It looks like the news is going to reach the Pacific it'll be via Colon at about the 5th, with the telegraph flooded out, and then San Francisco on the 9th via telegraph.
In that case, when the news arrives in the Pacific the main British force will be at Panama, consisting of HMS Tartar (there already) and HMS Bacchante and HMS Clio (arriving 31 January). HMS Termagant is on the way to Panama from the north, arriving on 9 February. HMS Mutine is on the Mexican coast, either at Mazatlan or Acapulco. Thanks to the many permutations of its name, HMS Camelion is almost impossible to find information on: however, it's probably at either Valparaiso (with the storeship HMS Naiad) or Callao (with the storeship HMS Nereus).

As for the Union ships, you have:

USS Cyane at Panama
USS Saranac travelling to Panama from Acapulco (left 1 February, arrived 9 February)
USS Wyoming travelling between Callao and Panama (arrived 11 February)

USS Lancaster at Acapulco (arrived 28 January in 11 days from Panama, left for San Francisco 11 February 1862)
USS Narragansett at Acapulco (arrived 30 January)

USS St Mary's at San Francisco
USRC Shubrick at San Francisco
USCS Active at San Francisco

USS Fredonia (storeship) at Callao

My observations:
1) Cyane is outnumbered 3-1 by heavier ships with steam propulsion. The only way she makes it out is if the British are sporting and, because the news of the declaration of war has only just arrived, allow her to go to sea unmolested.
2) Similarly, the only way that a Union mailship is leaving Panama is if the British permit it to, or the captain is exceptionally talented in getting out to sea.
3) Saranac probably meets Tartar and Clio heading up the coast around the 8th of February. Captain Ritchie had allegedly arrested all his officers at Acapulco, and five senior officers including the captain himself (plus paymaster and three lieutenants) were later replaced. If it fights- and it may not do if the officers are under arrest- I don't think it wins.
4) Wyoming arrives at Panama around 11 February. It meets Bacchante, which Maitland intended to keep there, and probably loses.
5) The Sonora doesn't stop at Mazatlan, so it may well escape capture by Mutine (assuming Mutine hasn't left). It probably arrives at Acapulco around 17 February 1862, so is likely to meet the Lancaster between Acapulco and San Francisco.
6) The Lancaster may choose to bring the Narragansett up and engage the Mutine at Mazatlan, or it may warn Narragansett but run for San Francisco. It took until 7 March 1862 to reach San Francisco historically, so running seems a tad optimistic. It really depends on how quixotic Bell might have been.
7) Termagant, Tartar and Clio, with or without Mutine, are probably sufficient to blockade San Francisco but not to capture it. Even in the best case scenario for the Union, USS St Mary's, USS Lancaster and USS Narragansett are probably insufficient to defeat the British blockading force. This strikes me as a stalemate until one or the other side manages to get reinforcements.
8) There will probably be one or two fights between the crews of USS Fredonia or HMS Nereus in the streets of Callao.
 

Saphroneth

Banned
I did some calculations for ships for which I had a decent starting and leaving dates: might be worth reducing the estimated speed a little.

Liffey = 41 days from Gibraltar to Halifax (22 Dec to 1 Feb) = 2,658 nautical miles= 3kts
Melpomene = 29 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (22 Dec to 20 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles= 4kts
Hero = 39 days from Spithead to Bermuda (8 Dec to 16 Jan) = 2,988 nautical miles = 3kts
Agamemnon = 30 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (24 Dec to 23 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles = 4kts
Aboukir = 25 days from Gibraltar to Bermuda (30 Dec to 24 Jan) = 2,920 nautical miles = 5kts
Edgar = 6 days from Spithead to Lisbon (1 Jan to 7 Jan) = 866 nautical miles = 6kts
Edgar = 23 days from Lisbon to Port Royal (30 Jan to 22 Feb) = 3,729 nautical miles = 7kts
Caesar = 20 days from Gibraltar to Spithead (29 Dec to 18 Jan) = 1,145 nautical miles = 2kts
Interesting data - it suggests everyone will be moving a lot slower than I'd allowed for, though that might change with clearance to use more in the way of steam power (such as for Milne's ships, which are trying to catch their enemy before they can disperse). On the Pacific coast they'd have to conserve coal more, however.
What actually catches my eye is the high speed of the Edgar, which seems to have moved a lot faster than most others tabulated here.


8) There will probably be one or two fights between the crews of USS Fredonia or HMS Nereus in the streets of Callao.
That sounds like a fun one!

6) The Lancaster may choose to bring the Narragansett up and engage the Mutine at Mazatlan, or it may warn Narragansett but run for San Francisco. It took until 7 March 1862 to reach San Francisco historically, so running seems a tad optimistic. It really depends on how quixotic Bell might have been.
I know OTL he had a plan for turning an old sail liner hulk into a steam ironclad with enough money and iron, but that was (A) a plan from April and (B) never taken up. He might well bet on making it to San Francisco (as he doesn't know the British dispositions) but end up engaged along the coast.

7) Termagant, Tartar and Clio, with or without Mutine, are probably sufficient to blockade San Francisco but not to capture it. Even in the best case scenario for the Union, USS St Mary's, USS Lancaster and USS Narragansett are probably insufficient to defeat the British blockading force. This strikes me as a stalemate until one or the other side manages to get reinforcements.
I wonder if the Calypso will be that reinforcement, or whether they'd add another ship or two... alternatively, the reinforcements necessary to take San Francisco might be a detachment from the Indian station, as the forts are quite vulnerable from the rear.
 
(As far as possible this is reconstructed from the account in the Times and on Wikipedia, including all the direct quotes I could get in. It was hard to write without making the Americans look insanely arrogant, because the course of events as described has them continuing to suggest things after being informed that they're acts of literal piracy...)
There's some pretty good information in the US navy reports of the events as well. Pretty much every officer involved wrote their version of events- I like the additional detail in Greer's:

'the officers of the steamer made a great many irritating remarks to each other and the passengers, which were evidently intended for our benefit. Among other things said were, "Did you ever hear of such an outrage?" "Marines on board! Why, this looks devilish like mutiny." "These Yankees will have to pay well for this." "This is the best thing in the world for the South." "England will open the blockade." "We will have a good chance at them now." "Did you ever hear of such a piratical act?" "Why, this is a perfect Bull Run." "They would not have dared to have done it if an English man-of-war had been in sight."'

It's also worth looking into some of the reports of the officers of the Trent. Williams spoke at a dinner in Plymouth:

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice-Chairman, gentlemen, and brother members of this the Royal Western Yacht Club, it is not with the feelings of arrogance and presumption which Mr. Fairfax has thought proper to impute to me that I will now endeavor, as well as severe illness will permit me, to convey to your minds the deeply-seated gratitude that I feel, not only to the chairman for the complimentary language and too partial language used by him, whom I have ever found for the last four or five years my kind and considerate friend, but also from the manner in which the mention of my name has been received by you — you, many of whom are old and tried friends of mine, and many whose faces I have never met before. Therefore I take it to be not so much a personal matter, but a national matter--(hear, hear)--that you have taken this opportunity of throwing around my shoulders the mantle of your approbation. (Renewed applause.) Gentlemen, if I fail to convey to you — if I fail to convey to you from the poverty of my language the throbbings that swell up from the well of my heart, I beg you to believe that I am sincere in all that I shall say. (Bravo, and hear, hear.) This compliment was never looked for by me. ( “We believe it, Williams.” ) I will endeavor to be as little egotistical as possible, but in the present instance it may be necessary that I should speak, in some measure of myself, in consequence of what has been said about me in the New York papers, and which has been referred to by Punch. The New York papers have thought proper to allude to me in unwarranted language, and which I fear has been countenanced by Mr. Fairfax. Before I say one word about Mr. Fairfax, or the proceedings which took place on board the Trent, and which, perhaps, you would like to hear from my own lips--( “We should,” and applause)--and the manner in which the Trent was boarded, I crave your indulgence to allow me to refer to notes. I am not a practised speaker. I have never had to speak on any occasion like the present, and, therefore, I must crave your indulgence to allow me to refer to notes which I have this day made from extracts taken from different papers, in order that I might not omit any portion of such evidence as I should wish to lay before you. I throw myself on your indulgence. (Hear, hear, and cheers.) I believe, at all events, that I have on my side truth and power. To convince you of that truth — I cannot give you the chapter and verse of these extracts that I am going to read to you, because I have neither had time, nor have I had the health to put myself to the task of taking any notes of the particulars of the dates in such papers. (Hear, hear.) But I read in the press the opinions of the Americans — I mean the Northern portion of the Union, the Federal States. In alluding to the attack on the Trent it says: “If the act itself is justifiable, the manner in which it was performed is unexceptionable.” (Oh! and derisive laughter.) As to the manner in which it was performed: I was, at the time Captain Moir came to me to say that a suspicious vessel was ahead, on the main deck, with a pipe in my mouth reading the “Essays and reviews.” I did not think for one moment that such an atrocious thing would have been done as that which was enacted by the gallant officers of the San Jacinto to take as prisoners of war, contrary and in violation of international law, the so-styled Commissioners from the Confederate States. The argument that appeared or presented itself to my mind — the argument of the moment — as a flash of lightning, was that if a slave, a fugitive slave, once succeeds in putting his foot in a free State--putting aside Great Britain--that slave from that moment was free from his bondage. (Enthusiastic cheering.) The manner in which it is performed is “unexceptionable.” Shortly after the San Jacinto was seen, a very few minutes after the vessel was descried, we hoisted our ensign. It was not responded to. As we approached the San Jacinto a shot was fired across our bows. I appeal to you now — to you, officers of the army and navy — is it usual for a neutral power, when wishing to speak with another vessel, to fire a shot across her bows to order her to heave to? (No, no, certainly not.) We proceeded slowly. We put her helm a starboard and approached her. We were not half a cable's length from her; I would say she stopped — except that she had steerage way — when a shell was fired across her bows--(shame)--and that is the way which it has been thought proper to style as unexceptionable. (Ironical laughter.) I make them a present of that. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) Captain Wilkes says: “In the process of arrest he was glad to say every thing was conducted properly, and nothing occurred which did not do honor to the American navy.” (Oh! oh!) I will not dilate upon that. If they think that honor, let them hug it to their souls; but God forbid that her Britannic Majesty's navy should hug as honor such an act to their souls. (Bravo, and repeated applause.) Now, gentlemen, I approach a subject with great diffidence, for it personally affects my honor, it personally affects my character. (Hear, hear.) Before I say one word regarding the notes which I have before me, I will tell you the manner in which Mr. Fairfax and I parted. (Hear.) Mr. Fairfax came to me on the main deck, hat in hand, and said: “Sir, I have had a painful duty to perform, and if in the excitement of the moment I have said aught that by possibility” --I can't say this is word by word what he said, but it is the substance--(hear, and “that's all we want” )--“if I have said aught that by possibility can be construed into a personal offence or an insult toward you, I most humbly beg your pardon, sir, for I never meant it.” I replied: “Mr. Fairfax, I have had a painful scene to witness — a scene of degradation to my country's flag. (Hear, hear.) I do not deny that my feelings have been greatly excited, but if by any gesture I have done aught to offend you as a man, there is my hand, sir, and I crave your forgiveness.” I ask you now, gentlemen, that Mr. Fairfax--I do not say that he has said so — but I say he has countenanced it in the American papers, he has countenanced the expression, “Gasconader.” (Loud cries, “Have they dared?” and shame, shame.) He (Mr. Fairfax) says “that my manner was so violent he was compelled to request Captain Moir to remove me from the deck” --(oh! oh!)--and “that there was no union existing between Captain Moir and myself.” Gentlemen, I utterly deny that there ever occurred one single instance of a want of unity between Capt. Moir and myself--(bravo, and “that's a refutation” )--and I am proud to have this opportunity of saying that I can bear testimony to the high character of Captain Moir--(cheers)--the most gallant sailor, the most urbane gentleman, with all the courtesies of life to endear him to those with whom he is associated, it has ever been my lot to meet in this world. (Repeated cheers.) I confess that I have been advised to speak at no length on account of my health. But I cannot help it, let the consequences be what they may. (Hear, hear.) I must explain to you what has never yet appeared in the public papers. (Hear, hear.) It is said by the American papers — but I cannot put my hand on it now, though I have read it over and over again — it is said, “That Captain Wilkes could not have received instructions from his Government at Washington, for that he was on his return from the Western Coast of Africa, wending his way through the Bahama Channel to New York.” What do you think? I do not know whether it has come before your notice at all; but what do you believe? How will you put trust in the veracity of such men who will write such things, when on the 16th of October I saw the San Jacinto off St. Thomas? I cannot remember now whether it was on the night of the 16th or on the morning of the 17th. I went on my way to Mexico, going to Havana, Vera Cruz, Tampico. On my return to Havana, on the 6th of November, I found that the San Jacinto had been to Havana from St. Thomas; that she had coaled there, and that two of her officers, passing themselves off as Southerners in their hearts, had lunched with Mr. Slidell and family, and extracted from them their intended movements. (Sensation; “Hear, hear;” and “That never came out before;” “Bravo.” ) I again say that I am going to approach a subject with great diffidence. I am going to speak of Mrs. Slidell and her daughters. (Hear, hear, and “Cheers for them.” ) I tell you, sir, that Miss Slidell branded one of the officers to his face with his infamy, having been her father's guest not ten days before. ( “Disgraceful,” and “Bravo for Miss Slidell.” ) No words of mine shall pass my lips on a political point I have no political feelings. I do as I am ordered. Mr. Fairfax denied that the marines made a rush toward Miss Slidell at the charge, with fixed bayonets. I believe when I lay my hand on my heart (suiting the action to the word) and say, as I hope for mercy in the day of judgment, it is true that they did so. (Hear, hear.) Miss Slidell — and no girl in this world has been pained more at the mention of her name in the public papers than she has been by the manner in which some persons have alluded to it, not pained by then having stated the manner in which she acted--(cheers)--but some of the public papers described her as having slapped Mr. Fairfax's face. (Cries of “Serve him right if she did,” and “Bravo.” ) She did strike Mr. Fairfax. ( “Loud cheers for her then.” ) She did strike Mr. Fairfax--(cheers)--but she did not do it with the vulgarity of gesture which has been attributed to her. Miss Slidell was with her father in the cabin, with her arm encircling his neck, and she wished to be taken to prison with her father. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Fairfax attempted to get into the cabin — I do not say forcibly, for I do not say a word against Mr. Fairfax, so far as his manner is concerned — he attempted to get her away by inducements. ln her agony, then, she did strike him in the face three times. I wish that Miss Slidell's little knuckles had struck me in the face. I should like to have the mark forever. (Oh! and laughter.) It has been argued in the public papers that if Captain Moir and I — I am not finding fault with the papers, I am finding fault with the letters which have appeared in the local papers; I am not finding fault with the feelings of the country, for the general voice of the country has thrown over me what you have done this night, as I said before, the mantle of your approbation which is dear to me. (Applause.) It has been argued whether we should not have done our duty more clearly if we had refused a passage to these so-styled Commissioners from the Southern States. Now on this point I have a very strong opinion I know that there are at this table members of the legal profession, but I am not going to offer any opinion of my own. I am going to offer to your notice a fact of which I am perfectly cognizant, and which occurred in the year 1833-either at the latter end of the year 1833 or the beginning of the year 1834. At that time Donna Maria was on the throne of Portugal. In 1833, Dom Miguel was expelled from that country, and yet a noted agent of Dom Miguel applied to the Peninsular and Oriental Company for a passage to Lisbon in the Tagus steamer. The passage was refused. That agent prosecuted the company. I do not mean to say that this is decidedly a point in support, but a fortiori it strengthens my argument. He prosecuted the company for having refused him a passage, and after a long hearing the political agent was cast, but the only plea on which he was cast was the plea of the company that if they had not refused him they would have been refused admittance to the Tagus, and, consequently, have been subjected to a prosecution, collectively and individually, by passengers who had paid their money to be taken to Lisbon. A fortiori I say that it is a case in point. (Hear, hear.) It shows that Captain Moir had no right or power whatever to refuse these so-styled Confederate Commissioners passage to England. (Cheers.) Moreover, so far from any disunion between Captain Moir and myself, I should have had nothing to do officially with either accepting or refusing them as passengers. (Hear, hear.) But I should have offered my advice most strenuously to Captain Moir that he would have been subjected to a prosecution if he should refuse to take them. But I hold myself personally responsible for every thing that was done. (Cheers.) If what was done was wrong I am willing to bear it. (Cheers.) If what was done was right, he and I acted together. (Loud applause.) The Hampshire Advertiser says, “That I stepped out of my proper position, and presumed to make myself a diplomatic character” --that I was merely a deliverer of her Majesty's letters. (Oh.) Well, I am not ashamed to be a deliverer of her Majesty's letters. (Much applause, and cries of “Well done.” ) I have not shirked my duty to my country. I have served twenty-eight years under the pennant in my own service, and I am too old to undergo the expense of commanding a ship, even if I had the interest to get the appointment to one. I accepted my present appointment in order to educate my orphan boy--[his nephew. The young gentleman was sitting by his side, and the remark occasioned a continued outburst of applause of an enthusiastic character.] I thank you for allowing him to be present and sit by my side. Although some may blame me for it, I tender you my most humble thanks. (Cheers.) Well, I must speak of Mrs. Slidell. You may be aware that those ladies were under my charge for three weeks--three weeks of close intercourse on board ship with ladies under your charge give you a greater insight into their character and their feelings than casual intimacy on shore. (Hear, hear.) Whatever other people may say of Mrs. Slidell and her daughters, I assure you that so far as my humble judgment goes they were thoroughly well-bred ladies. (Applause.) Now, what will you think of this? When I landed I was sent up to London in a special train. I had previously recommended Mrs. Slidell and her daughters to a hotel in London, believing it to be a quiet hotel, and where they might get apartments en suite. (Hear.) Well, I was sent in a special train to report the circumstances to the Government. On the day after I had arrived in London, I dined with Mrs. Slidell; for on the day on which I did arrive in London I was engaged at the foreign office with Lord Palmerston and the Lords of the Admiralty until a late hour. I say then that on the day after I dined with Mrs. Slidell. I am somewhat diffident in telling you what took place. You will hardly believe that a gentleman of the Northern States, aye, a so-called gentleman, had called upon Mrs. Slidell that afternoon, and, as if their feelings were not harrowed enough by being separated from their father and protector, some demon must come to make the rankling in their hearts more bitter by telling them the decision of the law-officers of the crown. He said he came to offer his condolence (!) and to inform them that the law-officers of the crown had decided “that the seizure of her husband was not contrary to international law.” (Cries of disgraceful and shameful.) Gentlemen, I was enabled to tell Mrs. Slidell--and perhaps you will pardon me if I repeat the expression here--(yes)--that it was a d----d infernal lie!--( “Oh,” and a laugh)--for I had just come from the foreign office, where I had learnt the decision of the law-officers of the crown--(hear)--and which was diametrically opposite to what the man dared to say. (Cheers.) Now, gentlemen, I have only one more subject that I know of on which to speak — the circumstances attending the gallant Federal marines rushing with the points of their bayonets at Miss Slidell. (Hear, hear.) It was at this point that she screamed, for her father snatched himself away from her — I do not mean snatched himself rudely ; but he snatched himself away from her to break the window of his cabin, through which he thrust his body out. But the hole was so small that I hardly thought it would admit the circumference of his waist. It was then the lady screamed. I am charged by Mr. Fairfax, “that my manner was so violent that he was compelled to request Captain Moir to remove me.” (Nonsense.) But when the marines rushed on at the point of their bayonets — and I believe it is not necessary that I should make a solemn asseveration that it is true--(no, no)--when they rushed on at the point of the bayonet, I had just time to put my body between their bayonets and Miss Slidell--(oh!)--and I said to them, and if Henry of Exeter were here I would ask him for his absolution for it--(laughter)--I said to them, “Back, you d----d cowardly poltroons.” ( “Bravo,” and “Capital.” ) I need not ask you, gentlemen, if I am acquitted of bullying. I bullied no one. (Hear, hear.) I need not ask you whether you acquit me now. I beg once more to express my thanks to you for the mantle of your approbation which you have thrown over my shoulders. Captain Williams then resumed his seat, amidst repeated applause, but immediately rose again and said: Allow me one moment. It is sufficient for me that I have received such approbation, but it may be satisfactory to you to know that I have received the approbation of my Government. (Hear, hear, and cheers.)

(Western Morning News, 13 December 1861 p.3)

While looking for this particular speech, I also found what purports to be a letter from another officer of the Trent. I couldn't trace it back to the Belfast Newsletter, so take it with a grain of salt. However, it seemed accurate enough to be real, and all of the reports have some form of agenda.

"An officer of the Trent,” understood to be Mr. C. P. Savage, of Belfast, has forwarded to the Belfast News Letter a narrative of the boarding of that ship by the sailors and marines of the San Jacinto. Several passages will be read with interest, and these we extract:-

"The conversation that ensued was exciting in the extreme. The lieutenant was asked if he was aware that her Majesty’s mails were on board, that he was violating the law of neutrality, that his commander had done what might entail the most serious consequences. He knew it all perfectly, and so did his commander; but have the bodies, dead or alive, of Messrs. Mason, Slidell, Eustis, and M’Farland, he would, and he demanded the passenger list, which he was refused. The lieutenant, stepping suddenly one side, laid his hand on the arm of a fine, noble-looking, white-headed gentleman, and said, 'Mr. Mason, I know you perfectly; we have met before; and you also, Mr. Slidell,’ he added, pointing to the latter gentleman, who advanced forward, disdaining to conceal himself. 'I am sorry for you, but you must accompany me board the San Jacinto.’ The answer was, ‘We will not; we appeal to the British captain, to whom we entrusted ourselves, to save us from this outrage in Spanish waters, and on virtually British soil.’ Vain appeal! Five more boats had in the meantime arrived, and marines with fixed bayonets had taken possession of the main deck. Tears of rage, shame, and mortification stood in the captain's eyes. One of the ladies, a most charming person, threw herself before the captain and implored him with clasped hands not to allow her husband to be dragged from under the British flag. At last the final question was put, 'If we refuse to give these men up, what course will you adopt?’ Take possession of the ship, and, if you steam ahead, sink you; will have these men all risks.’ 'Then,’ said Captain Williams of the Royal Navy, our naval agent, 'then, sir, in the name of her Britannic Majesty’s Government, whom— although a humble individual —I have the honour to represent, I protest, in the most solemn manner, against this cowardly and piratical act, and call on all here to witness my protestation, foreigners and English.’ In all this trying scene both of the gentlemen principally concerned behaved in a manner that was worthy of the mission with which they were entrusted. With folded arms they calmly listened to the angry discussion; there was none of the blustering braggadocio so often imputed to American citizens, and when the lieutenant— Fairfax by name—said he felt for them, for that he was a Southern himself, Mr. Mason’s answer, as he turned on his heel, was, 'Then, sir, I am sorry for you.’ In the mean time the foreigners, of whom, of course, we had numbers of all ranks and denominations, were clustered about in knots, aghast at the insolence of the Americans, and having the most implicit faith in the efficacy of the ensign that floated from our peak. Of course there was a great deal of nonsense talked, and some ridiculous ideas proposed, which would have only suited a third-rate play in a minor theatre, such as covering these men over with the Union Jack, or throwing the ensign in the gangway to see if they dared cross it. I assure you, sir, in the midst of the confusion that reigned, I could not help being struck, and feeling a glow of pride, that these men, of all countries, should so openly show their dependence on the fact of that flag floating from aloft. Twice in the confusion the marines came on the quarter deck and were ordered back again to wait for orders. The orders from the mam deck were that the delegates were to be taken dead or alive. They severally and emphatically declared that they must be removed by force, for as to going voluntarily from a British ship that was out the question. Moderate force was accordingly used. I do not mean for moment to say that the unfortunate victims were dragged, kicking and striking, out of the entry port. They simply resisted, having to be dragged a few steps by marines, and then gave in to superior numbers and the force of circumstances. As Mr. Mason left the gangway, as calm and unmoved as had been throughout, he turned to the captain of the Trent and said, Captain Moir. I hold you responsible that this outrage on passengers in British vessel be represented in a proper quarter;’ and the answer was, 'I shall not forget it.' The scene, however, at the separation of Mr. Slidell from his family was intensely moving. Mr. Slidell had been in his cabin, I believe, writing. When the moment came for him to surrender himself to the lieutenant of the San Jacinto, his daughter threw herself into her father’s arms, and held him as though her single strength would have sufficed to save him. The naval agent sent out the men of the American vessel, trusting that in a little time the young lady would be calmed. Of course this could not last long, and so at last with the gentlest violence we could use, we held her pretty little wrists. embued with five times their natural strength, while her father, breaking the glass of his window, escaped out of the cabin in that manner. Then the poor girl gave way, and, sobbing and crying, was carried to her cabin, imploring to be allowed to see her father 'just once more.’ ...

And now the last boat shoved off, the San Jacinto forged slowly ahead, and the Trent turned astern, as to allow the ladies the quarter deck to take a parting glance, and wave a parting farewell to their unfortunate relatives. There stood the four gentlemen on the quarterdeck. I saw Captain Wilkes take off his cap, and present his glass to Mr. Slidell — a hurried glance with eyes blinded by tears, a hurried wave of white handkerchiefs—up went the San Jacinto's jib, she payed slowly round her heel, let fall her topsails, and steamed off a head for New York. As she ‘payed off,’ she dipped her ensign, which we simply acknowledged by hoisting our answering pennant. Off she went, having completed her piratical act, no doubt to be received in New York with the wildest ovations; and we turned a-head for St. Thomas, our hearts black with rage and shame at the insult offered to the British flag, which we were powerless to resent, but still fondly thinking the day of retribution could not be far distant. Captain Wilkes had written a few lines in pencil on the back of one of the letters that had passed between husband and wife, the purport which was that he assured the ladies the gentlemen should treated with every consideration, and made as comfortable as possible. The lady, without reading the whole, as soon as she saw from whom the letter proceeded, tore it off from her husband’s letter, and threw it on the deck. As regards the officers who came from the San Jacinto, I must say that they behaved with feeling and in a gentlemanly manner, constantly repeating that they were very sorry, but they must obey orders. One officer was asked what he thought they would say at Washington. He said, 'He guessed they had put their foot in it.’ The first lieutenant said he was very sorry, and had tried at Havanna to get quit of so mean a job. The marine officer was asked what he thought the British Government would say. His reply was more characteristic. He said, 'Well, I calculate the lion will roar a bit, but he won’t bite.’ But, however, throughout these officers behaved with gentlemanly forbearance, in spite of some bitter and taunting remarks from foreigners regarding the recent Southern successes. While all the confusion and excitement was at its full height, I was struck by a thick-set elderly gentleman, sitting the rail of an arm-chair, attentively listening to all that was going forward on the quarter-deck, but never altering his position; coolly puffing his cigar, he seemed perfectly indifferent to everything and everybody around him. He went to the companion once, and (unseen as he thought) quietly loosened a cutlass. That, sir, was a man who, in a practical way, has done the Northern cause more harm than any one else. Had they only known who they left behind, they would have bitten their nails through vexation. I firmly believe they would have dispensed with the presence of at least two of the delegates to have known that man was on board. I did not know who he was at the time, but I have since learned. [Supposed to be the captain of the Sumter or Jeff. Davis.] Upon questioning him as to his motive for touching the cutlass, his answer was that intention was to cut down the lieutenant, had he been recognised. He looked a determined man, and the North knows it. He was not the only one they left behind; several others would have been, I believe, equally acceptable at Washington— one or two of whom took to their beds.”

(Western Morning News, 12 December 1861 p.3)

What actually catches my eye is the high speed of the Edgar, which seems to have moved a lot faster than most others tabulated here.
I suspect it's a combination of more horsepower, a cleaner hull, better weather, and the talent of the captain. That said, these are all winter speeds- I might have to do some spring and summer ones to improve the sample. And these are also all British, so the Union may be faster or slower than these indicative figures. Still, I don't think it'd hurt to slow everybody down a little.

That sounds like a fun one!
I wonder if you might get a few months of stand-off between the two, like the Essex and Phoebe in Valparaiso (assuming, of course, that both have guns). I would have thought there'd have been a problem with keeping storeships in neutral ports. However, it doesn't seem to have been an issue during either the Crimean War or the Civil War, so in theory neither should have been obliged to move. Eventually, I imagine, honour would dictate that the Fredonia would make a run for it rather than keep valuable stores bottled up unused. A very lucrative capture- if the British can make it, of course.

He might well bet on making it to San Francisco (as he doesn't know the British dispositions) but end up engaged along the coast.
If he wants to make it back to San Francisco, he'd be wiser to shift his flag to Narragansett. However, I think that most officers would see it as too cowardly to trade ships just because the original was at risk of capture. You can't leave Narragansett at Acapulco, though, because it's not even a match for Mutine- let alone the combined force of Clio, Tartar and Termagant. So I guess the two sail in company up the coast, and get overhauled somewhere along the way.

I wonder if the Calypso will be that reinforcement, or whether they'd add another ship or two
Do you mean Geyser (plus, possibly, Stromboli)? Calypso is the sail sloop that comes back from the Pacific and arrives in Spithead on 7 January. Its crew will probably go into another ship, but I think that ship probably goes to North America or onto convoy duty. However, I'm also fairly certain that they'd add another ship to the Pacific- most likely a battleship, as they seem to be working up more battleships than can be justified by the needs of the North America squadron. An 80-gun two-decker like Meeanee would take a long time to get to the Pacific (my estimate is 190 days), but it would completely change the calculus of attacking San Francisco.

We've focused on the lower west coast, but do you want to chat through the Northwest as well?

ED: Missed one of the Pacific reinforcements. They were:

HMS Devastation (sailed for the Pacific from Plymouth on 6 January, carrying Armstrong guns for Bacchante and Clio)
HMS Geyser (completing coal in Portsmouth Harbour, due to leave on the 15th January for the Pacific)
Possibly HMS Stromboli (taking in powder and shell at Spithead on 2 January 1862, expected to sail for the Pacific; however, listed as going to South America on 8 January with the gunboat HMS Spider; subsequently actually went to South America)
 
Last edited:

Saphroneth

Banned
Do you mean Geyser (plus, possibly, Stromboli)? Calypso is the sail sloop that comes back from the Pacific and arrives in Spithead on 7 January. Its crew will probably go into another ship, but I think that ship probably goes to North America or onto convoy duty. However, I'm also fairly certain that they'd add another ship to the Pacific- most likely a battleship, as they seem to be working up more battleships than can be justified by the needs of the North America squadron. An 80-gun two-decker like Meeanee would take a long time to get to the Pacific (my estimate is 190 days), but it would completely change the calculus of attacking San Francisco.
I probably did get mixed up, yes. There was one I think was due to leave for the Pacific, and it was probably Geyser.

We've focused on the lower west coast, but do you want to chat through the Northwest as well?
I understand the way it works out is a lot more simple - the US has very little and the British have two gunboats with a pair of howitzers each (and possibly a single 32 pounder) plus the Topaze and Hecate - though the gunboats are listed as four gun ships in letters of the time so may have had their other guns in store nearby. On land there's very roughly equal forces, with the British planning to attack and use their superior mobility to take the line of the Columbia River before using that as their line of defense.

There's some pretty good information in the US navy reports of the events as well. Pretty much every officer involved wrote their version of events- I like the additional detail in Greer's:

'the officers of the steamer made a great many irritating remarks to each other and the passengers, which were evidently intended for our benefit. Among other things said were, "Did you ever hear of such an outrage?" "Marines on board! Why, this looks devilish like mutiny." "These Yankees will have to pay well for this." "This is the best thing in the world for the South." "England will open the blockade." "We will have a good chance at them now." "Did you ever hear of such a piratical act?" "Why, this is a perfect Bull Run." "They would not have dared to have done it if an English man-of-war had been in sight."'

It's also worth looking into some of the reports of the officers of the Trent. Williams spoke at a dinner in Plymouth:

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice-Chairman, gentlemen, and brother members of this the Royal Western Yacht Club, it is not with the feelings of arrogance and presumption which Mr. Fairfax has thought proper to impute to me that I will now endeavor, as well as severe illness will permit me, to convey to your minds the deeply-seated gratitude that I feel, not only to the chairman for the complimentary language and too partial language used by him, whom I have ever found for the last four or five years my kind and considerate friend, but also from the manner in which the mention of my name has been received by you — you, many of whom are old and tried friends of mine, and many whose faces I have never met before. Therefore I take it to be not so much a personal matter, but a national matter--(hear, hear)--that you have taken this opportunity of throwing around my shoulders the mantle of your approbation. (Renewed applause.) Gentlemen, if I fail to convey to you — if I fail to convey to you from the poverty of my language the throbbings that swell up from the well of my heart, I beg you to believe that I am sincere in all that I shall say. (Bravo, and hear, hear.) This compliment was never looked for by me. ( “We believe it, Williams.” ) I will endeavor to be as little egotistical as possible, but in the present instance it may be necessary that I should speak, in some measure of myself, in consequence of what has been said about me in the New York papers, and which has been referred to by Punch. The New York papers have thought proper to allude to me in unwarranted language, and which I fear has been countenanced by Mr. Fairfax. Before I say one word about Mr. Fairfax, or the proceedings which took place on board the Trent, and which, perhaps, you would like to hear from my own lips--( “We should,” and applause)--and the manner in which the Trent was boarded, I crave your indulgence to allow me to refer to notes. I am not a practised speaker. I have never had to speak on any occasion like the present, and, therefore, I must crave your indulgence to allow me to refer to notes which I have this day made from extracts taken from different papers, in order that I might not omit any portion of such evidence as I should wish to lay before you. I throw myself on your indulgence. (Hear, hear, and cheers.) I believe, at all events, that I have on my side truth and power. To convince you of that truth — I cannot give you the chapter and verse of these extracts that I am going to read to you, because I have neither had time, nor have I had the health to put myself to the task of taking any notes of the particulars of the dates in such papers. (Hear, hear.) But I read in the press the opinions of the Americans — I mean the Northern portion of the Union, the Federal States. In alluding to the attack on the Trent it says: “If the act itself is justifiable, the manner in which it was performed is unexceptionable.” (Oh! and derisive laughter.) As to the manner in which it was performed: I was, at the time Captain Moir came to me to say that a suspicious vessel was ahead, on the main deck, with a pipe in my mouth reading the “Essays and reviews.” I did not think for one moment that such an atrocious thing would have been done as that which was enacted by the gallant officers of the San Jacinto to take as prisoners of war, contrary and in violation of international law, the so-styled Commissioners from the Confederate States. The argument that appeared or presented itself to my mind — the argument of the moment — as a flash of lightning, was that if a slave, a fugitive slave, once succeeds in putting his foot in a free State--putting aside Great Britain--that slave from that moment was free from his bondage. (Enthusiastic cheering.) The manner in which it is performed is “unexceptionable.” Shortly after the San Jacinto was seen, a very few minutes after the vessel was descried, we hoisted our ensign. It was not responded to. As we approached the San Jacinto a shot was fired across our bows. I appeal to you now — to you, officers of the army and navy — is it usual for a neutral power, when wishing to speak with another vessel, to fire a shot across her bows to order her to heave to? (No, no, certainly not.) We proceeded slowly. We put her helm a starboard and approached her. We were not half a cable's length from her; I would say she stopped — except that she had steerage way — when a shell was fired across her bows--(shame)--and that is the way which it has been thought proper to style as unexceptionable. (Ironical laughter.) I make them a present of that. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) Captain Wilkes says: “In the process of arrest he was glad to say every thing was conducted properly, and nothing occurred which did not do honor to the American navy.” (Oh! oh!) I will not dilate upon that. If they think that honor, let them hug it to their souls; but God forbid that her Britannic Majesty's navy should hug as honor such an act to their souls. (Bravo, and repeated applause.) Now, gentlemen, I approach a subject with great diffidence, for it personally affects my honor, it personally affects my character. (Hear, hear.) Before I say one word regarding the notes which I have before me, I will tell you the manner in which Mr. Fairfax and I parted. (Hear.) Mr. Fairfax came to me on the main deck, hat in hand, and said: “Sir, I have had a painful duty to perform, and if in the excitement of the moment I have said aught that by possibility” --I can't say this is word by word what he said, but it is the substance--(hear, and “that's all we want” )--“if I have said aught that by possibility can be construed into a personal offence or an insult toward you, I most humbly beg your pardon, sir, for I never meant it.” I replied: “Mr. Fairfax, I have had a painful scene to witness — a scene of degradation to my country's flag. (Hear, hear.) I do not deny that my feelings have been greatly excited, but if by any gesture I have done aught to offend you as a man, there is my hand, sir, and I crave your forgiveness.” I ask you now, gentlemen, that Mr. Fairfax--I do not say that he has said so — but I say he has countenanced it in the American papers, he has countenanced the expression, “Gasconader.” (Loud cries, “Have they dared?” and shame, shame.) He (Mr. Fairfax) says “that my manner was so violent he was compelled to request Captain Moir to remove me from the deck” --(oh! oh!)--and “that there was no union existing between Captain Moir and myself.” Gentlemen, I utterly deny that there ever occurred one single instance of a want of unity between Capt. Moir and myself--(bravo, and “that's a refutation” )--and I am proud to have this opportunity of saying that I can bear testimony to the high character of Captain Moir--(cheers)--the most gallant sailor, the most urbane gentleman, with all the courtesies of life to endear him to those with whom he is associated, it has ever been my lot to meet in this world. (Repeated cheers.) I confess that I have been advised to speak at no length on account of my health. But I cannot help it, let the consequences be what they may. (Hear, hear.) I must explain to you what has never yet appeared in the public papers. (Hear, hear.) It is said by the American papers — but I cannot put my hand on it now, though I have read it over and over again — it is said, “That Captain Wilkes could not have received instructions from his Government at Washington, for that he was on his return from the Western Coast of Africa, wending his way through the Bahama Channel to New York.” What do you think? I do not know whether it has come before your notice at all; but what do you believe? How will you put trust in the veracity of such men who will write such things, when on the 16th of October I saw the San Jacinto off St. Thomas? I cannot remember now whether it was on the night of the 16th or on the morning of the 17th. I went on my way to Mexico, going to Havana, Vera Cruz, Tampico. On my return to Havana, on the 6th of November, I found that the San Jacinto had been to Havana from St. Thomas; that she had coaled there, and that two of her officers, passing themselves off as Southerners in their hearts, had lunched with Mr. Slidell and family, and extracted from them their intended movements. (Sensation; “Hear, hear;” and “That never came out before;” “Bravo.” ) I again say that I am going to approach a subject with great diffidence. I am going to speak of Mrs. Slidell and her daughters. (Hear, hear, and “Cheers for them.” ) I tell you, sir, that Miss Slidell branded one of the officers to his face with his infamy, having been her father's guest not ten days before. ( “Disgraceful,” and “Bravo for Miss Slidell.” ) No words of mine shall pass my lips on a political point I have no political feelings. I do as I am ordered. Mr. Fairfax denied that the marines made a rush toward Miss Slidell at the charge, with fixed bayonets. I believe when I lay my hand on my heart (suiting the action to the word) and say, as I hope for mercy in the day of judgment, it is true that they did so. (Hear, hear.) Miss Slidell — and no girl in this world has been pained more at the mention of her name in the public papers than she has been by the manner in which some persons have alluded to it, not pained by then having stated the manner in which she acted--(cheers)--but some of the public papers described her as having slapped Mr. Fairfax's face. (Cries of “Serve him right if she did,” and “Bravo.” ) She did strike Mr. Fairfax. ( “Loud cheers for her then.” ) She did strike Mr. Fairfax--(cheers)--but she did not do it with the vulgarity of gesture which has been attributed to her. Miss Slidell was with her father in the cabin, with her arm encircling his neck, and she wished to be taken to prison with her father. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Fairfax attempted to get into the cabin — I do not say forcibly, for I do not say a word against Mr. Fairfax, so far as his manner is concerned — he attempted to get her away by inducements. ln her agony, then, she did strike him in the face three times. I wish that Miss Slidell's little knuckles had struck me in the face. I should like to have the mark forever. (Oh! and laughter.) It has been argued in the public papers that if Captain Moir and I — I am not finding fault with the papers, I am finding fault with the letters which have appeared in the local papers; I am not finding fault with the feelings of the country, for the general voice of the country has thrown over me what you have done this night, as I said before, the mantle of your approbation which is dear to me. (Applause.) It has been argued whether we should not have done our duty more clearly if we had refused a passage to these so-styled Commissioners from the Southern States. Now on this point I have a very strong opinion I know that there are at this table members of the legal profession, but I am not going to offer any opinion of my own. I am going to offer to your notice a fact of which I am perfectly cognizant, and which occurred in the year 1833-either at the latter end of the year 1833 or the beginning of the year 1834. At that time Donna Maria was on the throne of Portugal. In 1833, Dom Miguel was expelled from that country, and yet a noted agent of Dom Miguel applied to the Peninsular and Oriental Company for a passage to Lisbon in the Tagus steamer. The passage was refused. That agent prosecuted the company. I do not mean to say that this is decidedly a point in support, but a fortiori it strengthens my argument. He prosecuted the company for having refused him a passage, and after a long hearing the political agent was cast, but the only plea on which he was cast was the plea of the company that if they had not refused him they would have been refused admittance to the Tagus, and, consequently, have been subjected to a prosecution, collectively and individually, by passengers who had paid their money to be taken to Lisbon. A fortiori I say that it is a case in point. (Hear, hear.) It shows that Captain Moir had no right or power whatever to refuse these so-styled Confederate Commissioners passage to England. (Cheers.) Moreover, so far from any disunion between Captain Moir and myself, I should have had nothing to do officially with either accepting or refusing them as passengers. (Hear, hear.) But I should have offered my advice most strenuously to Captain Moir that he would have been subjected to a prosecution if he should refuse to take them. But I hold myself personally responsible for every thing that was done. (Cheers.) If what was done was wrong I am willing to bear it. (Cheers.) If what was done was right, he and I acted together. (Loud applause.) The Hampshire Advertiser says, “That I stepped out of my proper position, and presumed to make myself a diplomatic character” --that I was merely a deliverer of her Majesty's letters. (Oh.) Well, I am not ashamed to be a deliverer of her Majesty's letters. (Much applause, and cries of “Well done.” ) I have not shirked my duty to my country. I have served twenty-eight years under the pennant in my own service, and I am too old to undergo the expense of commanding a ship, even if I had the interest to get the appointment to one. I accepted my present appointment in order to educate my orphan boy--[his nephew. The young gentleman was sitting by his side, and the remark occasioned a continued outburst of applause of an enthusiastic character.] I thank you for allowing him to be present and sit by my side. Although some may blame me for it, I tender you my most humble thanks. (Cheers.) Well, I must speak of Mrs. Slidell. You may be aware that those ladies were under my charge for three weeks--three weeks of close intercourse on board ship with ladies under your charge give you a greater insight into their character and their feelings than casual intimacy on shore. (Hear, hear.) Whatever other people may say of Mrs. Slidell and her daughters, I assure you that so far as my humble judgment goes they were thoroughly well-bred ladies. (Applause.) Now, what will you think of this? When I landed I was sent up to London in a special train. I had previously recommended Mrs. Slidell and her daughters to a hotel in London, believing it to be a quiet hotel, and where they might get apartments en suite. (Hear.) Well, I was sent in a special train to report the circumstances to the Government. On the day after I had arrived in London, I dined with Mrs. Slidell; for on the day on which I did arrive in London I was engaged at the foreign office with Lord Palmerston and the Lords of the Admiralty until a late hour. I say then that on the day after I dined with Mrs. Slidell. I am somewhat diffident in telling you what took place. You will hardly believe that a gentleman of the Northern States, aye, a so-called gentleman, had called upon Mrs. Slidell that afternoon, and, as if their feelings were not harrowed enough by being separated from their father and protector, some demon must come to make the rankling in their hearts more bitter by telling them the decision of the law-officers of the crown. He said he came to offer his condolence (!) and to inform them that the law-officers of the crown had decided “that the seizure of her husband was not contrary to international law.” (Cries of disgraceful and shameful.) Gentlemen, I was enabled to tell Mrs. Slidell--and perhaps you will pardon me if I repeat the expression here--(yes)--that it was a d----d infernal lie!--( “Oh,” and a laugh)--for I had just come from the foreign office, where I had learnt the decision of the law-officers of the crown--(hear)--and which was diametrically opposite to what the man dared to say. (Cheers.) Now, gentlemen, I have only one more subject that I know of on which to speak — the circumstances attending the gallant Federal marines rushing with the points of their bayonets at Miss Slidell. (Hear, hear.) It was at this point that she screamed, for her father snatched himself away from her — I do not mean snatched himself rudely ; but he snatched himself away from her to break the window of his cabin, through which he thrust his body out. But the hole was so small that I hardly thought it would admit the circumference of his waist. It was then the lady screamed. I am charged by Mr. Fairfax, “that my manner was so violent that he was compelled to request Captain Moir to remove me.” (Nonsense.) But when the marines rushed on at the point of their bayonets — and I believe it is not necessary that I should make a solemn asseveration that it is true--(no, no)--when they rushed on at the point of the bayonet, I had just time to put my body between their bayonets and Miss Slidell--(oh!)--and I said to them, and if Henry of Exeter were here I would ask him for his absolution for it--(laughter)--I said to them, “Back, you d----d cowardly poltroons.” ( “Bravo,” and “Capital.” ) I need not ask you, gentlemen, if I am acquitted of bullying. I bullied no one. (Hear, hear.) I need not ask you whether you acquit me now. I beg once more to express my thanks to you for the mantle of your approbation which you have thrown over my shoulders. Captain Williams then resumed his seat, amidst repeated applause, but immediately rose again and said: Allow me one moment. It is sufficient for me that I have received such approbation, but it may be satisfactory to you to know that I have received the approbation of my Government. (Hear, hear, and cheers.)

(Western Morning News, 13 December 1861 p.3)
While looking for this particular speech, I also found what purports to be a letter from another officer of the Trent. I couldn't trace it back to the Belfast Newsletter, so take it with a grain of salt. However, it seemed accurate enough to be real, and all of the reports have some form of agenda.
"An officer of the Trent,” understood to be Mr. C. P. Savage, of Belfast, has forwarded to the Belfast News Letter a narrative of the boarding of that ship by the sailors and marines of the San Jacinto. Several passages will be read with interest, and these we extract:-

"The conversation that ensued was exciting in the extreme. The lieutenant was asked if he was aware that her Majesty’s mails were on board, that he was violating the law of neutrality, that his commander had done what might entail the most serious consequences. He knew it all perfectly, and so did his commander; but have the bodies, dead or alive, of Messrs. Mason, Slidell, Eustis, and M’Farland, he would, and he demanded the passenger list, which he was refused. The lieutenant, stepping suddenly one side, laid his hand on the arm of a fine, noble-looking, white-headed gentleman, and said, 'Mr. Mason, I know you perfectly; we have met before; and you also, Mr. Slidell,’ he added, pointing to the latter gentleman, who advanced forward, disdaining to conceal himself. 'I am sorry for you, but you must accompany me board the San Jacinto.’ The answer was, ‘We will not; we appeal to the British captain, to whom we entrusted ourselves, to save us from this outrage in Spanish waters, and on virtually British soil.’ Vain appeal! Five more boats had in the meantime arrived, and marines with fixed bayonets had taken possession of the main deck. Tears of rage, shame, and mortification stood in the captain's eyes. One of the ladies, a most charming person, threw herself before the captain and implored him with clasped hands not to allow her husband to be dragged from under the British flag. At last the final question was put, 'If we refuse to give these men up, what course will you adopt?’ Take possession of the ship, and, if you steam ahead, sink you; will have these men all risks.’ 'Then,’ said Captain Williams of the Royal Navy, our naval agent, 'then, sir, in the name of her Britannic Majesty’s Government, whom— although a humble individual —I have the honour to represent, I protest, in the most solemn manner, against this cowardly and piratical act, and call on all here to witness my protestation, foreigners and English.’ In all this trying scene both of the gentlemen principally concerned behaved in a manner that was worthy of the mission with which they were entrusted. With folded arms they calmly listened to the angry discussion; there was none of the blustering braggadocio so often imputed to American citizens, and when the lieutenant— Fairfax by name—said he felt for them, for that he was a Southern himself, Mr. Mason’s answer, as he turned on his heel, was, 'Then, sir, I am sorry for you.’ In the mean time the foreigners, of whom, of course, we had numbers of all ranks and denominations, were clustered about in knots, aghast at the insolence of the Americans, and having the most implicit faith in the efficacy of the ensign that floated from our peak. Of course there was a great deal of nonsense talked, and some ridiculous ideas proposed, which would have only suited a third-rate play in a minor theatre, such as covering these men over with the Union Jack, or throwing the ensign in the gangway to see if they dared cross it. I assure you, sir, in the midst of the confusion that reigned, I could not help being struck, and feeling a glow of pride, that these men, of all countries, should so openly show their dependence on the fact of that flag floating from aloft. Twice in the confusion the marines came on the quarter deck and were ordered back again to wait for orders. The orders from the mam deck were that the delegates were to be taken dead or alive. They severally and emphatically declared that they must be removed by force, for as to going voluntarily from a British ship that was out the question. Moderate force was accordingly used. I do not mean for moment to say that the unfortunate victims were dragged, kicking and striking, out of the entry port. They simply resisted, having to be dragged a few steps by marines, and then gave in to superior numbers and the force of circumstances. As Mr. Mason left the gangway, as calm and unmoved as had been throughout, he turned to the captain of the Trent and said, Captain Moir. I hold you responsible that this outrage on passengers in British vessel be represented in a proper quarter;’ and the answer was, 'I shall not forget it.' The scene, however, at the separation of Mr. Slidell from his family was intensely moving. Mr. Slidell had been in his cabin, I believe, writing. When the moment came for him to surrender himself to the lieutenant of the San Jacinto, his daughter threw herself into her father’s arms, and held him as though her single strength would have sufficed to save him. The naval agent sent out the men of the American vessel, trusting that in a little time the young lady would be calmed. Of course this could not last long, and so at last with the gentlest violence we could use, we held her pretty little wrists. embued with five times their natural strength, while her father, breaking the glass of his window, escaped out of the cabin in that manner. Then the poor girl gave way, and, sobbing and crying, was carried to her cabin, imploring to be allowed to see her father 'just once more.’ ...

And now the last boat shoved off, the San Jacinto forged slowly ahead, and the Trent turned astern, as to allow the ladies the quarter deck to take a parting glance, and wave a parting farewell to their unfortunate relatives. There stood the four gentlemen on the quarterdeck. I saw Captain Wilkes take off his cap, and present his glass to Mr. Slidell — a hurried glance with eyes blinded by tears, a hurried wave of white handkerchiefs—up went the San Jacinto's jib, she payed slowly round her heel, let fall her topsails, and steamed off a head for New York. As she ‘payed off,’ she dipped her ensign, which we simply acknowledged by hoisting our answering pennant. Off she went, having completed her piratical act, no doubt to be received in New York with the wildest ovations; and we turned a-head for St. Thomas, our hearts black with rage and shame at the insult offered to the British flag, which we were powerless to resent, but still fondly thinking the day of retribution could not be far distant. Captain Wilkes had written a few lines in pencil on the back of one of the letters that had passed between husband and wife, the purport which was that he assured the ladies the gentlemen should treated with every consideration, and made as comfortable as possible. The lady, without reading the whole, as soon as she saw from whom the letter proceeded, tore it off from her husband’s letter, and threw it on the deck. As regards the officers who came from the San Jacinto, I must say that they behaved with feeling and in a gentlemanly manner, constantly repeating that they were very sorry, but they must obey orders. One officer was asked what he thought they would say at Washington. He said, 'He guessed they had put their foot in it.’ The first lieutenant said he was very sorry, and had tried at Havanna to get quit of so mean a job. The marine officer was asked what he thought the British Government would say. His reply was more characteristic. He said, 'Well, I calculate the lion will roar a bit, but he won’t bite.’ But, however, throughout these officers behaved with gentlemanly forbearance, in spite of some bitter and taunting remarks from foreigners regarding the recent Southern successes. While all the confusion and excitement was at its full height, I was struck by a thick-set elderly gentleman, sitting the rail of an arm-chair, attentively listening to all that was going forward on the quarter-deck, but never altering his position; coolly puffing his cigar, he seemed perfectly indifferent to everything and everybody around him. He went to the companion once, and (unseen as he thought) quietly loosened a cutlass. That, sir, was a man who, in a practical way, has done the Northern cause more harm than any one else. Had they only known who they left behind, they would have bitten their nails through vexation. I firmly believe they would have dispensed with the presence of at least two of the delegates to have known that man was on board. I did not know who he was at the time, but I have since learned. [Supposed to be the captain of the Sumter or Jeff. Davis.] Upon questioning him as to his motive for touching the cutlass, his answer was that intention was to cut down the lieutenant, had he been recognised. He looked a determined man, and the North knows it. He was not the only one they left behind; several others would have been, I believe, equally acceptable at Washington— one or two of whom took to their beds.”

(Western Morning News, 12 December 1861 p.3)


...good lord, there's no way I can account for all that lot - by the sounds of it you could write a one-act play on the seizure alone.
 
...good lord, there's no way I can account for all that lot
I thought I should flag them up because Greer, Houston and Hall (for the Union) and Williams and Savage (for the British) all concur on Slidell jumping through the window of his stateroom, which doesn't really come up in your version of events. I know there's only so much that you can fit in, but the interplay with Slidell, the marines, and his daughter seems to be one of the bigger aspects of the whole seizure, at least in British public opinion.

by the sounds of it you could write a one-act play on the seizure alone.
It's nice to have too much primary source material than too little, though. If I were attempting it, I'd start with the Americans leaving the Trent, move through the angry responses of the passengers (who actually was the guy they thought was a Confederate privateer captain?), and then bring the main issues into focus via a discussion in the captain's cabin between Moir and Williams. There might be an interesting interplay between Moir, who seems to have been relatively calm about the whole thing, and Williams, who was extremely bellicose in Plymouth, and who in the heat of the moment breached neutrality rules by securing the Confederate correspondence. You might even juxtapose it with Wilkes' reception in Boston, for which I'm pretty sure I could get the report of the meeting. Or maybe even James Gordon Bennett writing up the New York Herald's editorial...
 
Top