Yes.If the rebellion had occurred some 15+ years earlier while Britain was engaged in the ARW would it have gone better for the Irish in their quest for independence?
Would have GB have fought more to keep Ireland at the expense of their American colonies?
Plus,there were often fears of Ireland being used by foreign powers(e.g France and Spain) to stage an invasion of Britain.Ireland had more people than the United States at the time, and was exploited heavily by the Empire producing significant food exports, so the British would fight harder to keep Ireland than the American colonies.
If the rebellion had occurred some 15+ years earlier while Britain was engaged in the ARW would it have gone better for the Irish in their quest for independence?
Would have GB have fought more to keep Ireland at the expense of their American colonies?
If the French and Spanish can land a significant number of troops in Ireland (which should be possible IIRC the French Navy was weakened by the revolution but still almost managed to land in Ireland in 1796) there's a good chance of success, if not then it will likely end like OTL's 1798 rebellion.If the rebellion had occurred some 15+ years earlier while Britain was engaged in the ARW would it have gone better for the Irish in their quest for independence?
Would have GB have fought more to keep Ireland at the expense of their American colonies?
If the Irish rebellion happens early enough, might the British fold early enough to keep America in the Empire?
Do the French and Spanish land in Ireland as a way too force England to capitulate?