If Germany wins WWI, can a Fascist France and Russia gang up on Germny and win during

It's meant to be bad, because Monarchies will rule Europe, nothing pleasant about it.

Monarchies ruling Europe isn't necessarily bad.

I meant bad as in "this isn't supposed to be plausible."

There's a reason I referred to that oversized Germany as a cum stain. Its total CP+Italy wank to the point none of it can stand scrutiny.
 
Monarchies ruling Europe isn't necessarily bad.

I meant bad as in "this isn't supposed to be plausible."

There's a reason I referred to that oversized Germany as a cum stain. Its total CP+Italy wank to the point none of it can stand scrutiny.

It is plausible, my friend.

The axis forces won on the eastern front, so it made a decent fighting position from germanys position.

Plus, the use of zeppelins would still be concluded, and everyone was afraid of zeppelins because of there potential to kill everything if possible.

Fun fact: Light Artilley was placed on zeppelins for use in destroying enemy fortifications ahead of friendly forces.
 
It is plausible, my friend.

The axis forces won on the eastern front, so it made a decent fighting position from germanys position.

Um...what do Axis forces winning on the eastern front have to do with TTL Germany growing impossibly larger?

Plus, the use of zeppelins would still be concluded, and everyone was afraid of zeppelins because of there potential to kill everything if possible.

Fun fact: Light Artilley was placed on zeppelins for use in destroying enemy fortifications ahead of friendly forces.

Fun fact: Zeppelins are easily shot down (incendiary bullets, yay). And mounting artillery on them doesn't make them that much more effective.

Not to mention that light artillery versus fortifications is not going to be very effective.
 
Um...what do Axis forces winning on the eastern front have to do with TTL Germany growing impossibly larger?



Fun fact: Zeppelins are easily shot down (incendiary bullets, yay). And mounting artillery on them doesn't make them that much more effective.

Not to mention that light artillery versus fortifications is not going to be very effective.

To answer your question, it's because they won in WW1, and Russia accepted a peace-treaty that let them have baltic states, and Ukraine and those countries.

Is that clear or do I have to make it more clearer?
 
To answer your question, it's because they won in WW1, and Russia accepted a peace-treaty that let them have baltic states, and Ukraine and those countries.

Is that clear or do I have to make it more clearer?

This: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Armisticebrestlitovsk.jpg

is not grounds for that. And Germany being able to get an even harsher treaty (unlikely to put it mildly)...is going to have even more trouble getting that area to cooperate and submit.
 
This: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Armisticebrestlitovsk.jpg

is not grounds for that. And Germany being able to get an even harsher treaty (unlikely to put it mildly)...is going to have even more trouble getting that area to cooperate and submit.

That's why there is Military Prisons, Germany is powerful enough to atleast make a few military prisons here and there.

Are you saying rigid airships would be used militarily in World War 2?

Most likely, It depends if theres enough time to research efficient aircraft, etc.

But most certainly, we would see a earlier copy of STG-44 due to the need for a intermediate cartridge rifle with the firing power of a sub-machine gun out on the battlefield.
 
Thanks for not answering me. I asked for your reasoning as to why you think the STG-44 would be made sooner than it did, would you care to explain to me? I am just honestly curious.
No, I won't explain. I just gave you a wikipedia article that basically explains why, the Russians made an assault rifle, Germans noticed and make there own, using captured Fedorov Avtomats.
 
That was using your logic. Supposedly the Germans for three decades didn't care about a gun, but bam! They suddenly did, but you won't explain why they would care in ITTL since a Wikipedia link to the Russian gun in question is enough of an answer. ;)
 

yourworstnightmare

Banned
Donor
The question: Can a Fascist France and Russia form if Germany wins WW1. I would say plausible, although you'd have to work on it. Things could go in a different direction too.
The questions: Would they gang up on Germany? Perhaps, it's certainly not implausible. Here it doesn't have much to do with whether they are Fascist or not. It could happen if Germany showed weakness and France and Russia were growing strong again regardless of their ideology.
The question: Would they win? Perhaps. It's not impossible, depend on in which shape Germany is, who are allied with Germany, who are allied with France and Russia, will the war be a long conflict or will one side collapse early? So the winner of such a conflict depend on several factors.
 
Top