"I confess that there are several parts of this Constitution which I do not at present approve, but I am not sure I shall never approve them. For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged by better information, or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise."
--Benjamin Franklin
The Importance of the Second Constitution from ITTS:usa.was.americanhistory.gov, 2042
Today, most Americans are familiar with the structure of our current government; the Imperial Congress of Representatives serves as the nation’s legislative body with the head of the legislature, the President of Congress, taking up the executive functions of the state as well with the Empress (or Emperor) being a figurehead. This parliamentarian type of government is a fairly recent development in American history [1] and came about during the denikification of the 1970s as separating the new Democratic government from the Nikist regime. Before then, apart from the First Republic, America’s governments were at least nominally based on the government created by the Second Constitution from 1787.
While controversial when it was passed, the Second Constitution is both the second longest lasting constitution used by the United States and the most revolutionary. The first constitution in the world to provide explicit protections for basic human rights such as the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press, the first to provide for a democratic government, and one of the first to properly attempt to separate the powers of government. [2] These revolutionary aspects would guarantee that even after James Polk overthrew the government in 1842 and established the Conductorate, countries from across the world would take inspiration from the Second Constitution in forming their own governments…
The only Niepcegraph [3] of the US Congress building used under the Second Constitution
…In contrast to what our current Eleventh Constitution has established, the legislature established by the Second Constitution was bicameral, with the lower house being the House of Representatives, headed by the Speaker of the House, and the upper house being the Senate, headed by the Speaker of the Senate. In the House of Representatives, the number of Representatives were distributed by the population of the states and elected by the people, while in the Senate, each state received two Senators who were chosen by the state governments. This system was put into place as a compromise between the large and small states, a necessary compromise as the early United States placed a far higher amount of power in the states’ hands than successor governments.
Any law which was to be passed required being passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and would then require approval of the executive branch. The executive branch consisted of three offices, the Director of the People, the Director of the State, and the Monarch, each of which held different powers. Arguably the most powerful office was the Director of the People who was elected via popular vote to serve for a six year term, although during some period of where the office wasn’t filled, the House of Representatives could appoint an officeholder until new elections were held. (This was how the first Director of the People, John Jay, would come into office.) The Director of the People’s powers included the ability to veto legislation, although the veto could be blocked by an agreement by both the Director of the State and the Monarch or overwritten by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress, as well as appoint many of the offices such as the Justices of the Supreme Court, Federal Judges or Secretaries, and the ability to issue executive orders, although the order could also be vetoed via an agreement by the Director of the State and the Monarch.
The Director of the State on the other hand was appointed by the Senate for a term set upon their appointment. The term had a maximum of six years although shorter terms were occasionally given, such as the first Director of the State, George Clinton, who was appointed for a two-year term. [4] The Director of the State was tasked with appointing ambassadors, could veto legislation which could in turn be overwritten by either agreement by the Director of the People and the Monarch, or by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress, and sign treaties with foreign states. In contrast with the Director of the People, the Director of the State could not issue executive orders, although the Director of the State could be re-elected where the Director of the People could not be, although only Director Thomas Jefferson was the only Director to ever be re-elected. [5]
The final executive position was the Monarch. In contrast to the Empresses/Emperors of today, the Monarch was an elected, not an inherited position under the Second Constitution, with the Monarch serving for life or until abdication. For the first few years under the Second Constitution, the official title of the Monarch was simply “Monarch of the United States,” being changed in 1794 to “Princeps” before finally becoming Emperor after the annexation of Louisiana…
…While the Second Constitution was a radical change, it should be noted that the change from a republic to a monarchy was in many ways the least radical change. It was a large point of contention during the adoption of the Second Constitution, but following the adoption, it actually changed surprisingly little as the Second Constitution guaranteed the states the right to choose their government structure as long as it was a “representative” form of government, as well as affording them considerable autonomy. This meant that, immediately after the Second Constitution was adopted, the same republican governments remained in place in the states, and far more change was noted by the new Congress and the Directorships by even the most ardent republicans from the time… [6]
The Ratification of the Second Constitution and the Provisional Congress of 1788-1789 from ITTS:usa.was.americanhistory.gov, 2042
When the Congress of the Confederation ratified the Second Constitution on October 3rd, it allowed for the new House of Representatives and Senate to assemble on a provisional basis with members coming from each state regardless of that states’ ratification status. May 1st,1788, was set for the date of the first meeting of the provisional Congress.
While opposition to the Second Constitution did see some violence in New Jersey and led to the Regulator revolt spreading to New York, most of the opposition was done peacefully through pamphlettering and letter-writing than revolt. The greatest concerns amongst the “Anti-Federalists,” or those opposed to the Second Constitution, was the abandonment of republicanism and the establishment of a monarchy, although other concerns such as the fear that the federal government would be too unresponsive to local communities or seize power from the states were also expressed frequently.
The Anti-Federalist movement was extremely unorganized, hindering efforts by the Anti-Federalists to block the ratification of the Second Constitution despite the fact that it is believed that somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of Americans at the time supported Anti-Federalist causes. Furthermore, popular Anti-Federalist fears were able to be at least somewhat dealt with by pro-Second Constitution Federalists who were more organized although split between the “Princely” pro-monarchy Federalists, and “Caton” pro-republic Federalists. These two factions both argued for the Second Constitution in different ways, the Princely faction arguing that the new monarchy was actually more republican (at the time, republican did not necessarily mean the same as it does today, some argued that a republican government is representing its population, not that it isn’t a monarchy) [7] than the First Constitution thanks to the existence of the House of Representatives. The Caton Federalists on the other hand argued that the Second Constitution could be reverted back into a republican form relatively easy, and that with its distribution of power and the built-in Bill of Rights, it allowed for the benefits of a strong government without an easy potential for abuse.
Articles such as these were the main method of public argument
For both Federalist factions, the greatest boon was the ongoing Regulator Revolt which cast serious doubt on the practicality of a weak republican government and soured the prospects of a republic in general for many Americans. This souring drove many who would have otherwise been Anti-Federalists into being Caton Federalists, leading to a more rapid adoption of the Second Constitution by the states than likely would have happened had there been no ongoing revolt. The Bill of Rights too was almost certainly another deciding factor in the ratification, perhaps more so than the ongoing revolt with many accounts from several states’ ratification conventions critically noted that many who voted for ratification in those conventions referenced the Bill of Rights explicitly.
The first six states to ratify the Second Constitution did so before the Provisional Congress assembled, starting with Pennsylvania on November 25th, 1787, followed by Delaware, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia and finally Maryland on March 6th, 1788. South Carolina would begin to ratify the Second Constitution in 1787, but ongoing disruption from a Regulator-backed slave rebellion led to the South Carolinian convention agreeing to postponing until July 1788 when it would ratify in a virtually unanimous vote, allowing New Jersey to ratify the Second Constitution before South Carolina on June 22nd. With South Carolina’s ratification, only one more state’s ratification was required for the Second Constitution to become official, however that ratification would only come a year later in 1789 as the Regulator Revolt was crushed…
[1] Not the truest statement, at least depending on how strictly one defines the term Parliamentarian as arguably the Second Constitution is at least quasi-parliamentarian.
[2] Once more, not a 100% true statement.
[3] OTL's daguerreotype.
[4] Technically a flawed statement as well, the Second Constitution is imperfectly worded on the definition of the Director of the State's term. Depending on the interpretation it might set
no term definitions.
[5] Whether a Director of the People could be elected a Director of the State, or vice-versa, is undefined in the Second Constitution.
[6] Since the Second Constitution empowered the Monarch so little the "Republican" elements of government (Congress, the Directors, etc.) are dominant and the changes these elements bring are far more visible.
[7] IOTL James Madison argued the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a republic, and that the House of Commons of Great Britain was a republican body so the argument that the Second Constitution just creates a "crowned republic" or something similar wouldn't be too out there.