Napoleonrules and DValdron,
I may have committed a grave sin by referencing the sources I did. But you by not commenting on the implied question in the first part of my post regarding the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the duty of the police have choose to ignore something for which you may have no answer. If the police have no duty to protect you, who's duty is it? By what means is that duty accomplished?
Does this count as a reference to original sources by academics https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013 (I know the FBI is not a academic institution but they are were academics go to get their data).
I may have committed a grave sin by referencing the sources I did. But you by not commenting on the implied question in the first part of my post regarding the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the duty of the police have choose to ignore something for which you may have no answer. If the police have no duty to protect you, who's duty is it? By what means is that duty accomplished?
Does this count as a reference to original sources by academics https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013 (I know the FBI is not a academic institution but they are were academics go to get their data).