Wolf of Badenoch
Donor
I've previously posited a couple of scenarios where I suggested that a more effective League (i.e. one with strong US support) might have prevented WWII and Japanese intervention in China. These have been, if not shot down in flames, at least limped back to base with one engine out, no rear gunner and damaged vertical stabilisers. The primary critics appear to have superior knowledge of US politics of the period after WW1 (I had naively assumed that Woodrow Wilson was the prime opponent to the League).
I've recently marked an essay entitled: 'The real watershed in British politics was not the Spanish Civil War of 1936 as is generally believed, but the invasion of Abyssinia in the previous autumn." This prompts me to try again.
Is there really no way, short of an early WWII, for the international community to stop aggression by Italy - and also Japan?
I've recently marked an essay entitled: 'The real watershed in British politics was not the Spanish Civil War of 1936 as is generally believed, but the invasion of Abyssinia in the previous autumn." This prompts me to try again.
Is there really no way, short of an early WWII, for the international community to stop aggression by Italy - and also Japan?