How to convict OJ of the two murders

Considering the vast consensus outside of the twelve jurors is that Simpson was guilty-and given the result of the civil trial-claiming that Simpson was innocent in the sense that another man committed the murders is a large claim. Correct me if I'm misrepresenting your position-but you seem to be saying that not only was there reasonable doubt in the Simpson case but that we can be fairly certain someone else was the murderer.

So I have to ask-what are your sources and how can you be so confident Simpson was not the man responsible?
We don't try people in the court of public opinion for precisely this reason.

One of our board members, Fenwick, is not only a practising attorney but has also reviewed the trial record, is pretty strongly in the innocent camp. OJ's acquittal is what happens when you have access to competent attorneys who are able to decisively cut through the practices of a corrupt prosecution and police system.

Any similarly situated defendant would have been acquitted with access to competent counsel, celebrity or not.
 

fred1451

Banned
We don't try people in the court of public opinion for precisely this reason.

One of our board members, Fenwick, is not only a practising attorney but has also reviewed the trial record, is pretty strongly in the innocent camp. OJ's acquittal is what happens when you have access to competent attorneys who are able to decisively cut through the practices of a corrupt prosecution and police system.

Any similarly situated defendant would have been acquitted with access to competent counsel, celebrity or not.
If you mean acquitted because the prosecution didn't proved their case, and given the complexity that they set out to prove, then I more or less agree with you and you need to read no farther.

If on the other hand, you mean that Orenthal James Simpson did not kill these two people could you please explain to me why the LA legal system decided to try and convict OJ? This would not have been one of those typical police frame ups where a cop 'finds' a bag of drugs in someone's car. This would require a concerted effort where just solving the crime at hand would have been orders of magnitude easier, to the point of I don't think the level of detail that was achieved in their evidence would have been possible even if the initial responders had arrived at the scene, knew Nicole Brown was OJ's ex and instantly decided they were going to frame the dude for what ever reason and then managed to talk everyone else into going along with it. Almost literally, if the LAPD were framing OJ, then for some reason they wanted Nicole dead, and decided that the best way to arrange it was to try to blame OJ for the deed. Even there, how they chose to kill Nicole, Ron was collateral damage, beggars the idea that it was some kind of pro hit.

'Not Guilty' does not equal 'Innocent'.
 
Was Al "AC" Cowlings, who drove the white Ford Bronco, ever charged or investigated? It is my opinion that, if OJ had not done the murders, then it was AC! A shame he was never questioned seriously.
 

fred1451

Banned
Was Al "AC" Cowlings, who drove the white Ford Bronco, ever charged or investigated? It is my opinion that, if OJ had not done the murders, then it was AC! A shame he was never questioned seriously.
Except his blood was not found at the Bundy Crime Scene, and OJ's was.
 
Top