We don't try people in the court of public opinion for precisely this reason.Considering the vast consensus outside of the twelve jurors is that Simpson was guilty-and given the result of the civil trial-claiming that Simpson was innocent in the sense that another man committed the murders is a large claim. Correct me if I'm misrepresenting your position-but you seem to be saying that not only was there reasonable doubt in the Simpson case but that we can be fairly certain someone else was the murderer.
So I have to ask-what are your sources and how can you be so confident Simpson was not the man responsible?
One of our board members, Fenwick, is not only a practising attorney but has also reviewed the trial record, is pretty strongly in the innocent camp. OJ's acquittal is what happens when you have access to competent attorneys who are able to decisively cut through the practices of a corrupt prosecution and police system.
Any similarly situated defendant would have been acquitted with access to competent counsel, celebrity or not.