Is this TL being written from the perspective of it being a current event in 1944 or from a future perspective looking back?
Torqumada
The attack would have to be very heavy on incendiaries to destroy rather than release the bioweapons - not sure how WW2 incendiaries would have dealt with that. I know for fact that there are explosive additives now (don't ask) that release a massive amount of fluorine radicals and other extremely short lived, extremely aggressive chemical species - so that, if such a charge explodes in a room, ANYTHING small within the room including pretty much any microbial and viral material will be dead within few seconds (and anything larger than a rodent may still be alive but will die soon due to massive lung oedema). However, nothing remotely similar was available back then, and fire alone is a hit or miss.
This is going to get ugly, and uncontrollable. How much of an epidemic would it take to paralyze the American war effort?
This is going to get ugly, and uncontrollable. How much of an epidemic would it take to paralyze the American war effort?
This is still within living memory of the Spanish Influenza outbreak of 1918. This is also during a time when Americans were fighting hard to curtail tuberculosis.(That's where the American Lung Association came from) America knows how to deal with a deadly airborne infection. Despite killing over 600,000 Americans in 1918, output for the year is estimated to have only dropped a fraction of a percent. I wouldn't expect this to be that much different.
IIRC, wouldn't the various sulfa drugs they have in 1944 be a semi-efficient treatment for plague?
In fact, if the wiki is to be believed, Streptomycin was invented in 1943 and has been used as a first-line treatment for plague for many years afterwards, so the big question is whether they can ramp up production of the drug.
Ah. Thank you. I am glad to see theres something that can work. I imagine theyll try every thing theyve got, and if sulfa drugs work, great.It's not production that you have to worry about, it's the testing phase that takes such a long time. As the story states, they had barely started testing animals, let alone human beings in November 1944. The plague would burn itself out, more than likely, before adequate testing could be done and then drug production ramped up to meet the demand.
Now, depending upon which sulf drug you are talking about, they could be 90% effective. That is the same study that noted the effectiveness of streptomycin against bubonic plague. It's from 1953, a decade after it was discovered.
Torqumada
This isn't going to end well for Japan.
Iwo and Okinawa are going to be gassed. Period.
If you drag Germany into this insanity, it's a step too far. The Germans are already quite aware they are fucked by this point, even if Hitler doesn't. He's going down the junta highway if word gets out he's planning on giving such an order.
Unless, of course, the villain you mentioned who plays hero here is Goering, who, when he hears about plans to use bio/chem weapons- ON EITHER FRONT- is broken out of a drug induced stupor, has a moment of lucidity and shoots Hittler in the face...with a Panzerfaust.
You can use gas on Okinawa & Iwo without too much danger to the troops, gas in caves, or used on the defense lines in the south of Okinawa for example, will be very effective and US troops really won't need to be going through a lot of the territory that has been gassed. In addition, many of the available gasses are NOT persistent, and can be used easily. Remember that the US had experience using these weapons during WWI. These are not the persistent nerve agents available now.
This was not surprising as the bombs were made of porcelain and designed to shatter upon impact.