How long could Yugoslavia survive after Tito's death?

Yugoslavia's demise was a done deal after Tito's death, but could it be delayed, and if so how long?
 
If someone tries to invade Yugoslavia you might be able to unite the peoples of the Federation against the invading power, but that kind of conventional conflict could just turn into a nuclear war.

If there was an especially far-sighted or conciliatory leader, Yugoslavia might've lasted up to today. I don't put much faith in the "ancient hatreds" thesis that Yugoslavia's social fragmentation made the implosion of the country inevitable, but it certainly provided the gunpowder for the spark. If the elite had dealt with the looming financial crisis in a more productive fashion they might have pulled back from the brink and saved the country.

Yugoslavia's economic system wasn't viable, it ran up a massive un-payable debt that eventually led to hyperinflation and a financial collapse. Saving the economy is a pre-condition of a surviving Yugoslavia, I'll quote a previous post below about the Yugoslav economy.

Yugoslavia's ethnic tensions only happened as a result of its financial problems. The economy was dependent on IMF loans, Yugoslavia wouldn't even be able to pay the principal amount, let alone the interest by the '80s.
Hyperinflation and unemployment above 10% during the '80s, even with 1/5 of the workforce living in other countries as foreign workers, discredited the political system and radicalized the populace towards nationalists on both sides. The central government lost fiscal control over the republics, and politics devolved into national arguments about who "stole" from who. The Economy of Tito's Yugoslavia: Delaying the Inevitable Collapse addresses Yugoslavia's postwar economic history very well.

Yugoslavia would've needed a capitalist market economy to survive. Pre-war the King was about to give the Croats and Slovenes autonomous Banovinas, a similar framework could've worked postwar.

Yugoslavia is probably the only nation that would have benefited from being in the axis during WW2. Without the 1941 coup, Yugoslavia been an axis minor to provide natural resources for the German war machine, or minor troop contributions as with Hungary and Slovakia. German influence on Italy and the axis minors would prevent a total partition of an alt-Axis Yugoslavia as in OTL, and the Kingdom would suffer at most at third Vienna award that leaves the Serbo-Croatian core intact (preventing Jasenovac, the NDH, and the bulk of the civil war).

Yugoslavia may even have been neutral on the eastern front as Bulgaria was, or pulled an Italy and switched sides once the writing was on the wall.
View attachment 424595

View attachment 424596
 
If someone tries to invade Yugoslavia you might be able to unite the peoples of the Federation against the invading power, but that kind of conventional conflict could just turn into a nuclear war.

If there was an especially far-sighted or conciliatory leader, Yugoslavia might've lasted up to today. I don't put much faith in the "ancient hatreds" thesis that Yugoslavia's social fragmentation made the implosion of the country inevitable, but it certainly provided the gunpowder for the spark. If the elite had dealt with the looming financial crisis in a more productive fashion they might have pulled back from the brink and saved the country.

Yugoslavia's economic system wasn't viable, it ran up a massive un-payable debt that eventually led to hyperinflation and a financial collapse. Saving the economy is a pre-condition of a surviving Yugoslavia, I'll quote a previous post below about the Yugoslav economy.
With that economic factor in mind, you think they would try to develope a more democractic Titoism similar to current day Vietnam?
 
Top