Issue 11: Lone Star Rising
(a big thank you to black mage for the following part)
Excerpts from The Lamar Party: The Knights of Liberty by George Bush, 1999 (C)
'After Texas won its independence in the Texan War for Liberty, the nation became divided over the future for the fledgling nation. Some, of whom President Hubbard was a major supporter, favoured the expansion of Texan territory through annexation of parts of the Confederate States of America and Mexico; this, they argued, was the only way to ensure Texan sovereignty in the face of enemies on all sides. Others, including many former Ku Klux Klan members, favoured peaceful relations with neighbouring nations; their most prominent activist, Elisha M. Pease, favoured reintegration with the United States. Pease ran for President in 1876 against Hubbard, but lost heavily, gaining only 27% of the vote due to Hubbard's large-scale popularity. Taking this as validation of his hawkish foreign policy, Hubbard sent a geographic expedition into New Mexico to assert Texan territorial claims to the land, causing an increase in tensions between the CSA and Teaxs.
In a speech to the Texan legislature about the growing war clouds, Hubbard declared, 'Texan sovereignty will not be guaranteed through talk and diplomacy, but by the bayonet and by force of arms. This government will not back down on measures needed to ensure the safety of the Texan people. If that required New Mexico, if that requires Arizona, if that requires the entire continent fly under the Lone Star, then rest assured that we will fight for the protection and preservation of our country'. This speech was later included as part of the Lamar Party charter.
The final straw came on May 19, 1876. A Texan scouting party encountered a Confederate border patrol; after a tense standoff, the Confederates took the Texan party into custody in Santa Fe. The next day, Texan forces crossed the border into New Mexico, ostensibly to rescue the scouting party but in reality to annex the territory.
The war was, in retrospect, somewhat misguided; the Confederacy was undergoing a period of rapid industrialisation under Judah P. Benjamin, whereas Texas suffered in diplomatic and economic isolation. The Texan invasion force were routed in the Battle of Santa Fe, while Confederate troops took Dallas on July 2 and Houston on July 24. Austin was left defenceless; the Texan government was moved to San Antonio in anticipation of the rapid collapse of the capital. However, it was not to be; a rapid program of conscription raised a militia to defend Austin, while the United States, anxious to prevent Confederate expansion, supplied Texas with arms and logistics. The unprepared Texan army met the Confederates on September 3 at Waco.
Little more needs be said about the battle than has been said already; dubbed 'Texas' baptism of fire', the underequipped, untrained militia managed to halt the advance of the superior Confederate force. At the same time, attacks by new recruits managed to cut Confederate supply lines to Dallas and Houston, forcing a hasty withdrawal. The Treaty of Austin was signed on the 8th of November, ending the war; Texas was forced to pay a heavy indemnity to the CSA, but compared to the impending collapse of the nation just a few months earlier, this seemed a small price to pay.
While the war ended in the return of the status quo in geographic terms, politically it was devastating. The Texan Legislature split over the issue of the war; those in favour called themselves Lamarites, those against called themselves Houstonists, echoing the names of famous Texan leaders of times past. In the 1880 election, Hubbard, running on the Lamarite ticket, was roundly defeated by the more moderate John Ireland. Yet even in defeat he secured a lasting legacy for his successors. The Lamar Party was born.'
-
Campaign advertisement for the 1884 Texan election, mailed to homes around the Greater Houston Area.
'Men and women of Texas! Your country needs you!
For too long, we have been humilated by our enemies, who surround us on every front. For too long, we have allowed our past defeats to go unpunished, and for other nations to push us around? 'Who do they think they are?', they think? Well, it's time we tell them!
Texas has a proud history, and a great destiny. Don't let Confederate lies fool you; during the First Texan Republic, we controlled an empire stretching across North America, including Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Wyoming. [1]. We had a proud future ahead of us, as a power to make the world tremble!
But this was taken from us! The traitor Sam Houston, who even now his namesake party honours (when in truth he should be burnt in effigy in front of every house in the country!), sold us to the United States. Like we were Rhode Island or Wyoming! Well, it's time to tell them they're wrong. We're Texas, and we kneel to no one!
A vote for John Ireland is a vote for servitude! A vote for Lawrence Ross is a vote for Texas!
Lawrence Ross: Rebuilding Texas
[1]: Well, sorta. They CLAIMED parts of those states, which isn't quite the same thing. But it's an anonymous campaign ad, so truth isn't quite necessary.
Campaign advertisement for the 1884 Texan election, mailed in response to the previous advertisement anonymously around the Greater Houston area.
September 3, 1876. A great day in our nation's history. Waco Day, instituted last year by the Ireland administration, ensures that Texas shall forever remember the sacrifice of the 3rd Texan Militia.
But just think, gentle citizen. What if that battle never happened at all? What if 7 000 Texan soldiers hadn't been forced to spill their blood that day? What if 7 000 husbands, fathers, brothers and sons were still with us?
It's not so farfetched. It only requires a single leap of thought; that the corrupt, bloodthirsty Hubbard government of the Lamar Party was thrust into the dustbin of history. Without the mad doctrine of endless war and bloodshed that they thrust on this country, the 15 000 Texans who died in the mad War of 1876 would still be with us today.
You may have received some mail from an anonymous source for the Lamar Party, who we have strong evidence to suggest is linked with the United States government [2]. Needless to say, its claims are utterly false. There never was a Texas greater or more prosperous than it is today under John Ireland, and any attempt to create a so-called Texan Empire would only cause untold human suffering. The lies of the Lamar Party would only plunge us into a war which would destroy our great nation, and cause untold human suffering. Look at your father, your son, your brother, your friend. The Lamar Party would erase them from your life through pointless war and bloodshed, as thoroughly as if they had never existed.
The Houston Party cares for Texas. We wish to prevent this immense tragedy, and to protect Texas from a war which it could never win. But there's only one way to do that: throw the Lamar Party back in the dustbin of history, where it belongs.
A vote for Ross is a vote for bloodshed. A vote for Ireland is a vote for salvation.
John Ireland: Believing In Texas
[2]: The USA is widely distrusted in Texas, equalled only by the CSA. Since no one would ever believe that the Lamar Party was funded by the Confederacy, this'll have to do.
Excerpt from fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texan_presidential_election, 1884
The Texan presidential election, 1884 pitted incumbent John Ireland of the Houston Party against Lawrence Ross of the Lamar Party. The campaign was marked by attempts by the Lamar Party to propagate the belief in a 'Texan Empire', based on historical claims. Although the claim was widely ridiculed at the time, it later gained greater credence in Texas.
The Ireland administration had suffered a series of scandals relating to their close relations with the United States. Although their most prominent reintegration activist, Elisha M. Pease, had died in 1883, his influence was still felt strongly within the party. Capitalising on this discontent, the Lamar Party won the election with 52% of the vote, with the Houston Party on 44%, with prominent re-integration activist Albert Jennings Fountain gaining 4% of the vote as an independent. He would later run for the Houston Party in 1888.
-
Excerpts from an editorial by the Houston Post, 27 July, 1888
'For the safety of Texas, it is imperative that Albert Fountain not gain the nomination of the Houston Party. The ideal of integrationism is an idle fantasy, discredited by history; Texas is an independent nation and Texas will remain an independent nation. A Fountain presidency would lead to the death of our republic in its infancy. Recent economic troubles are no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater'
Excerpts from an article by the San Antonio Express, 4 August
'The Houston Party presidential primary has become a tight race between prominent integrationist activist Albert Jennings Fountain and Attorney-General Jim Hogg. At present, the 37-year-old Hogg appears to command the support of more than half the delegates, largely thanks to the support of former President John Ireland; however, his controversial views on race relations and his extreme youth may count against him. If he gains the nomination and wins the election, he will be the youngest President in the history of the nations of North America. Albert Jennings Fountain enjoys support from amongst the more radical wings of the Houston Party, but is still a controversial figure; it remains to be seen whether his views on reintegration into the United States will prove platable to moderates disillusioned with Jim Hogg's views on race. Voting will be held tomorrow, and the result is expected to be close.'
Excerpts from a speech by Albert Jennings Fountain to the Houston Party National Convention, 6 August
'Members of the Houston Party and fellow Texans, I am proud to accept this party's nomination to President.
...
There has been much controversy of late about my views on the independence issue; to resolve any confusion on the matter, let me speak frankly. I am not in favour of subjugation. I am not in favour of isolation. I am in favour of Texas, whatever that means or implies. If independence is more profitable to our state, then so be it. But if reintegration will bring greater happiness and benefits to the people of Texas, then as their representative I would be sworn to pursue that option.
Many have accused me of hypocricy, running for an office in a nation they claim I do not believe in. I did not support secession 14 years ago, and the independence of our nation is still a serious issue now. But whether our nation be a republic or a state or an empire, I would still wish to serve the people of Texas to the best of my ability. If that means that I would run for President to better serve their needs, then the name of the office hardly matters.
...
Once again, thank you for your support, fellow delegates. Now let's kick out Hubbard, and restore Texas!
Excerpts from the Purity Manifesto, mailed by Texan Unity to letterboxes around Texas, 12 August
'The dirty traitor Albert Fountain wants to sell our nation to the nigger-loving USA. He wants to drag down Texas, God's chosen nation, to be down there with the Satan-worshiping [sic] Yankees when Tribulation sends them all to hell! Well, we're going to stand up for Texas. We fought off the USA and we fought off the CSA. And we're going to fight off AJF.
Tomorrow, when Fountain appears in Houston to preach to his addled Yankee supporters, we call on all true Texans to take the fight for our nation to the streets. We will fight in every city and every street to wipe out the Houstonites and keep Texas pure!
We don't want war. But if they insist, they'll get one!!! [sic]'
Excerpts from a police interview with Lachlan Parker, security guard, from 14 August, 1888
Interviewer: What time did Fountain arrive?
Parker: About 9:30.
Interviewer: OK. And when did the crowds start gathering?
Parker: When he started giving his speech, at 10.
Interviewer: And what was their response?
Parker: Oh, they were crazy for him. They were his guys, at first. We had to get more guys for the barricades to hold them back, they were that crazy about him.
Interviewer: When did people negative to Fountain start appearing?
Parker: What?
Interviewer: People who didn't like him.
Parker: Oh. They started marching up at about quarter past.
Interviewer: Quarter past ten, that is?
Parker: Yep.
Interviewer: And by marching, do you mean in a military formation?
Parker: Yeah. They had banners and uniforms and everything. Real organised. They started pushing into Fountain's people, knocking people around.
Interviewer: And did your men do anything to stop it?
Parker: [Laughter] What, and get beaten to death? We just kept to the line.
Interviewer: How did Fountain react?
Parker: He just kept giving his speech. Didn't react much at all.
Interviewer: When did the shooting start?
Parker: About five minutes after they arrived, but I can't give you an exact figure. I wasn't exactly watching the clock.
Interviewer: 'They' being the group identifying themselves as Texan Unity?
Parker: Who?
Interviewer: The men opposed to Fountain.
Parker: Ah. Yeah, them.
Interviewer: And who shot first?
Parker: No idea. People started screaming, fighting each other.
Interviewer: What happened next?
Parker: Well, this Texan Unity group, as you say, started to push through the crowd. They were better organised, so they beat the Jennings guys into a pulp. We managed to hold the line against them, but there was hundreds of them and only a few dozen of us.
Interviewer: How did Fountain react?
Parker: He tried to get out. Started shouting at me to get him out of there. He practically (inaudible)
Interviewer: I'm sorry, could you repeat that?
Parker: Never mind. He was damn scared.
Interviewer: And what did you do?
Parker: Well, we started trying to push through the mob. I was at the front of the line, trying to push away some of the nutty ones, when we heard a shot. I turned around and Fountain was dead.
Interviewer: How do you know he was dead?
Parker: Well, it's damned hard to live without half your face, isn't it?
Excerpts from an article by the Houston Post, 14 August, 1888
'Fountain Killed In Riot
Controversial Houston Party candidate for the presidency, Howard Jennings Fountain, was assassinated in a riot in the streets of Houston yesterday. Houston was addressing a crowd of his supporters when a group identifying themselves as Texan Unity attacked the rally, which escalated into the use of firearms. Fountain was killed by an unidentified assailant as he attempted to escape the besieged podium. In addition, 7 people were killed and scores wounded in the fighting.
The Houston Party immediately released a statement accusing the Lamar Party of complicity in the assassination. President Ross strongly denied this; while expressing his condolences for Fountain' family, he stated that the Lamar Party had no links with the assassination or with Texan Unity.
In a prepared statement given anonymously to the police, Texan Unity identified themselves as the perpetrators of the assassination, and warned of 'cleansing still to come'.'
Excerpts from a speech by Jim Hogg, Houston Party vice-presidential candidate, upon receiving the Houston Party nomination to the presidency.
'In 133 BC, a great man, Tiberius Gracchus, attempted to help the poor of the Roman Republic. This noble cause was selfishly put to an end by the interests of a corrupt and entrenched autocratic oligarchy, and he was slaughtered. His death marked the beginning of a deluge of civil wars, which eventually plunged the Republic into dictatorship. Delegates, Texas has found its Tiberius Gracchus in Albert Jennings Fountain; now, the only question is how to deal with the extreme danger his death raises for our nation.
Because what kind of nation is this when the primary instrument of politics is not the vote, but militias? Where it is not left up to the people to decide government, but up to those who can afford for armies to enforce their will?
I have no doubt the Lamar Party administration were behind this henious act. For the safety of Texan democracy, we must demand that President Ross be removed from office immediately, for murdering a great man. We will not rest until Albert Fountain is avenged.'
Excerpt from an article by the Houston Post, 21 August, 1888
'On the streets of Houston, the overwhelming consensus is that Albert Jennings Fountain's death was a positive step for Texas. Lance Morgan, 63, applauded the slaying, saying 'It's people like Fountain who have kept our nation from achieving the glory it deserves. Yankee-lovers like him have no place in Texas.
There is generally little support for the idea, proposed by Jim Hogg, that the death of Fountain was a premediated act; Theresa Moore spoke for many when she said, 'President Ross wouldn't do a thing like that. He's a great man, and he keeps our country safe'.
Overall, support for the Lamar Party remains high. Ross is expected to win the next election, despite economic turbulence due to sanctions from the CSA over his stance on New Mexico.
Excerpts from The Scoop, autobiography of Reinzi Johnston, former political correspondant for the Houston Post, published posthumously
'I first met Yankee Doodle in circumstances so hackneyed they sounded like they came straight from a dimestore novel. It was the 3rd of September; Hogg wasn't making any traction with the voters, who'd hated Fountain, anyway, and Ross was well on his way to winning the election. I returned to my office after a long lunch only to find a telegram, waiting for me. It was blunt; he said he had information implicating Ross in a major scandal, but he'd only tell me if I met him that night in his house in Houston. For reasons of confidentiality, I still can't say where. Well, no one could refuse a scoop like that, so I headed out there.
Once I got there, he met me at the front door. I'd brought a bodyguard with me; from the darkness he shoved a gun in my face and told me that if I didn't get the bodyguard to clear off there was no deal. That pretty much settled it; you can't write much without much of a head, although some journalists I've met would differ.
Anyway, once we got inside, he told me his story. He was a former Lamar Party highup, who'd gotten wind of a plan to kill Fountain. The whole idea seemed stupid, seeing as not even his own party could stand Fountain, but apparently Ross was worried Fountain was getting CSA support, and Ross had spent the last 4 years irritating them. Of course, this was all a story I'd heard before in pubs and the like, but without proof, it was just a story. Yankee Doodle had something different: a telegram, indisputably from Ross, implicating him in setting up Texas Unity.
Well, once I saw THAT, I knew Ross was dead. Literally.
Excerpt from an article by the Houston Post, from the 4th of September
Ross Implicated In Fountain Assassination
Evidence has come to light that President Lawrence Ross may have been involved in the assassination of Albert Fountain Jennings on the 13th of August. A source from within the Lamar Party, identifying himself only as 'Yankee Doodle', has given exclusive telegram transcripts to the Houston Post identifying Ross as the founder and chief mover of Texan Unity, the organisation which has claimed responsibility for the murder of Fountain'
Excerpt from an article by the San Antonio Express, 12th of October
Ross Impeached
Lawrence Ross was today impeached and removed from office by the Texan Congress on a charge of conspiracy to commit murder. The motion passed with the support of nearly half the Lamar Party, which has been shattered and divided by the allegations, published in the Houston Post, that Ross was responsible for the murder of Houston Party candidate Albert Fountain Jennings. Ross was taken into custoday shortly after leaving Congress.
Vice-president Barnett Gibbs was today sworn in as President, but pledged not to run for re-election; the Lamar Party has not yet announced who their candidate for the upcoming election will be. Gibbs talked up the chances of a Lamar Party victory, despite the scandal, saying, 'We are sure that Texas will know that the Lamar Party looks out for their interests, and will re-elect us in a landslide over the discredited Houston Party opposition.'
Excerpt from an article by the Houston Post, 6th of November, 1888
It's A Landslide
Excerpts from The Scoop, autobiography of Reinzi Johnston, former political correspondant for the Houston Post, published posthumously
'Of course, until now you haven't known who Yankee Doodle REALLY was. Well, here's the scoop: he was a Confederate. A spy in Ross' office, who faked the telegram and everything associated. Because it wasn't Fountain who was the agent, it was Hogg. I don't know if the CSA were behind Texan Unity, but I wouldn't bet against it.
So now you know the real truth, or at least what very reputable sources tell me to be the real truth. The story of the century, which got Ross imprisoned for life, the Lamar Party kicked out of office for 16 years, and Texan politics turned upside down, was all a plot by the CSA. And I went along with it. I guess it wasn't such a great scoop after all.'
-
(here are my humble additions)
20 october 1903
Santa Fe, Republic of Aztlan
The only thing standing proundly in Santa Fe was the newly made purple flag made to represent the republic of Aztlan, the rest was either destroyed or feeling depress and even there it was that glorious, Daphne didn’t even knew what that meant but she didn’t felt like thinking too much. Her husband had died in the war as he had the very bad idea to fight for the Confederacy. She was now left alone with her daughter Victoria and with no job, the bombardment of city. She wondered if anyone she knew was dead, she felt like she was the only alive that wasn’t Texans or Mexican in the city. It was weird to see them side by side not killing each other.
Her daughter asks
“Why did they change the flag?”
“We are no longer Confederate”
“Why?”
“We got beaten”
“and now we are what?”
“Azlanite I guess”
“What does that mean?”
“That we are good enough to be Texan according to them”
“What will we do mom”
“No idea, but I’ll figure out, it can’t go more bad than now”
They both walked out toward whatever they left of the street, unknowing of the recent counter offensive from the Mexican army (the city not entirely under Texans control) and they would be right in the middle of a counter offensive.
-
Excerpts taken from Micheal C. Jester’s “The First American War of the Century: The Second-Texan-Confederate War ”. (C) 1986: Washington University Press, used with permission of the Author.
Like a most war, the second Texan-Confederate war can find its origin in the First one. While having gain independence in the first one, it’s secondary objective of conquest had failed. The “Greater Texas” idea (Who appeared in small propaganda leaflet during the First war whether or not Coke was really following that ideology still remain bit of mystery) that who take all the neighboring CSA states to become a Major power in North America was not dead in the head of most right-wingers in Texas. After 2 decades of industrialization and with a CSA trying to adapt it is way to the new century the opportunity, seemed well timed.
The Lamar Party Election was quick to degrade relationship with the Confederacy, as the political ancestor of the Lamar had been the one who fought remake their republic. The Confederates was relatively unready to fight a war, but they could have sought allies in there war and they founded it in the Republic of Mexico. As Confederate/Mexican relation went better the Texas/Confederate, degrade quickly until the Invasion of New Mexico and Oklahoma by Texas in early march 1903.
Oklahoma border to Texas was much larger than the one it had with the Confederacy. It was vital for the Confederacy as it was it only connection to the New Mexico. Therefore, the Entire War effort of the CSA had been concentrate to that region.
The Mexican supported the CSA by invading both the Invaded territory and Texas, but they were I’ll equipped and there invasion of the Texas was crushed within a month after reaching San Antonio (The massacre of over 50 000 Mexican soldier at that battle is still commemorate Nowadays). But there invasion of the occupy confederates territory was much more effective as they helped strengthen by Confederates position.
By the end of the year, Texas called for peace it had a complete hold Oklahoma but a weak on New Mexico and Arizona. The Confederates forced the Texans to retired themselves from the territory, but later Texas would push a secession of the two states in order to create Aztlan and independent country that would fall under Texas sphere of influence and also Oklahoma would become an integral part of Texas.
Aztlan inner politic were purposely oriented by both Texas and Mexico in order to dilapidate the wealth amassed during the Confederate era, out of the Democrat and Whig party were made the Patriot and National party candidates carefully selected by the two nations (Patriots for Texan and National for Mexico, later that allegiance switched to the Marxist) are arms were given to each side in order further destabilize the country. Making Aztlan one of the poorest nations on Earth even nowadays.
-
28 February1903
Texas claim it’s right on Oklahoma and the New Mexico territory and declare that if the Confederacy doesn’t surrender war will happen
March 3 1903
Invasion of the Confederacy by Texas, it is quick to establish its dominance
April 21 1903
Mexico decides to invade Texas and New Mexico in Support for the Confederacy, its force get beaten badly but they manage to weaken the Republic.
December 1 1903
The war End, the republic of Aztlan recognize by all the major country, it is put under Texan influence.