How can you get this map in Europe be real?

ATT.png

how is this possible to happen?
 
Last edited:
LOL, not got a clue. I can only think that Occitania is going to have grow out of Aquitaine, or at the latest an English Gascony spun off on its own that absorbs its dream-quest of fiefs and then has an Aragonese adventure

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
Aragon leads several successful wars againt France and conquers a large part of the south. To counteract this threat, a Spanish monarch leaves his title to France.
 
It's more-or-less impossible. "Belarus" and "Ukraine" in borders that nobody defined unil the 30s (to say nothing of Kaliningrad) and the fairly recent concept of "Azerbaijan", but that Greece requires a PoD ages and ages ago. And there are no Estonians in Latvia. If that state was called "Livonia" or suchlike it would work, but as its stands it's like calling Britain "Scotland".
 
Is there any relevance with the colours, ie. all the shades of blue belong to one alliance and all the shades of grey belong to another? Also is rump Hungary meant to be part of Czechoslovakia, its just the colours seem a little different?

Iranian Anatolia looks the weirdest to me, maybe something to do with more successful Timur and/or less successful Ottomans?
 
Do I need to wear my glasses when using the computer or is Iceland under Irish rule? That seems a bit interesting. Add to that a near-Balkanization of Spain ...
 
I see someone got bored going east :rolleyes:

Do I need to wear my glasses when using the computer or is Iceland under Irish rule? That seems a bit interesting. Add to that a near-Balkanization of Spain ...

Is there any relevance with the colours, ie. all the shades of blue belong to one alliance and all the shades of grey belong to another? Also is rump Hungary meant to be part of Czechoslovakia, its just the colours seem a little different?

Iranian Anatolia looks the weirdest to me, maybe something to do with more successful Timur and/or less successful Ottomans?

It's more-or-less impossible. "Belarus" and "Ukraine" in borders that nobody defined unil the 30s (to say nothing of Kaliningrad) and the fairly recent concept of "Azerbaijan", but that Greece requires a PoD ages and ages ago. And there are no Estonians in Latvia. If that state was called "Livonia" or suchlike it would work, but as its stands it's like calling Britain "Scotland".


fixed the map
Added Hungary,Castilla and Iceland

freedom-3.jpg

Here are the Linguistic stats of these countries in this TL
-Italy(Italia)
Official Language:Italian(Napulitano based)
-Veneto-Milan
Official Language:Veneto
-Occitania
Official Language:Occitan(Provençal based)
-SanMarino
Official Language:Emilia-Romagnolo/Sanmarinesi
-Sardinia
Official Language:Sardinian
-YugoSlavia
Official Language:Serbo-Croato-Slovene
-Andalusia(UK)
Official Language:Andalusian Spanish
 
-Andalusia(UK)
Official Language:Andalusian Spanish

Andalusia UK? Andalusia is British?

Also I have my doubts about the plausibility of the Middle East having RL borders yet with Iran stretching all the way into Anatolia. No way that the Middle East is going to turn out the same with that.
 
The Revolutionary Period French ideas of small logical sub divisions gets perverted to a horrifying degree?
 
Personal Union or as a colony/territory? And is it still Muslim, because that would effectively remove the Personal Union option...
 
Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia? And pretty much every state in eastern europe, scandinavia, and the middle east being recognizable from OTL? With a very far back POD, what with a surviving Andalusia, Ocitania, and a linguistic division of Italy?

I got nothing.
 
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the "Iran" in eastern Anatolia.

And yet Iran's border with Azerbaijan, which cuts clean through Azeri-speaking country and exists because Russian generals in 1828 thought the Aras would make a nice neat little fortification, is exactly the same...
 
While we're on border anachronisms...

-Estonia is basically modern Latvia and Estonia
-Latvia is modern Lithuania
-Scandinavia is borders, post-WWII
-Ukraine and Belorus appear to have their current borders, which were determined by Soviet Administration
-Georgia and Azerbaijan appear to have their modern shapes, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Nakchivan notwithstanding
-Poland has post-WWII borders
-Iran aside, the middle east reflects the current world

Now, there could be justifications for this. Some of these borders could crop up in alternate timelines. But I don't see how they can exist when europe west of the oder is so different

-Politically, Linguistically divided Italy
-An occitan State from Valencia to provence
-A Spain where Castille predominates, but never finished the conquest; independent portugal and andalucia
-United Kingdom in Britain, sans Ireland but with Andalucia
-Venice and Milan united
-Strong Savoy; independent Sardinia
-Germany seems to be post-Anschluss, plus Sudetenland and half of the low countries

Again, these are in most cases doable, some of them in the same timeline. but I'm clueless as to how to get them all, especially with eastern europe following OTL.
 
i like it how latvia has everything south of what actually is latvia.

fixed.
freedom-4.jpg

Here are the Linguistic stats of these countries in this TL
-Italy(Italia)
Official Language:Italian(Napulitano based)
-Veneto-Milan
Official Language:Veneto
-Occitania
Official Language:Occitan(Provençal based)
-SanMarino
Official Language:Emilia-Romagnolo/Sanmarinesi
-Sardinia
Official Language:Sardinian
-YugoSlavia
Official Language:Serbo-Croato-Slovene
-Andalusia(UK)
Official Language:Andalusian Spanish
-Castillia
Official Language:Spanish(Madrid based)
 
Top